Sie sind auf Seite 1von 37

CHAPTER - IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Analysis of data is a process of inspecting, cleaning, transforming, and


modeling data with the goal of highlighting useful information, suggesting
conclusions, and supporting decision making. Data analysis has multiple facts
and approaches, encompassing diverse techniques under a variety of names, in
different business, science and social science domains.

Data mining is a particular data analysis technique that focuses on


modeling and knowledge discovery for predictive rather than purely descriptive
purposes. Business intelligence covers data analysis that relies heavily on
aggregation, focusing on business information. In statistical applications, some
people divide data analysis into descriptive statistics, Exploratory Data
Analysis (EDA) and Confirmatory Data Analysis (CDA). EDA focuses on
discovering new features in the data and CDA on confirming or falsifying
existing hypotheses. Predictive analytics focuses on application of statistical or
structural models for predictive forecasting or classification, while text
analytics applies statistical, linguistic, and structural techniques to extract and
classify information from textual sources, a species of unstructured data. All
are varieties of data analysis.

In this chapter the researcher has arranged the primary data gathered
through questionnaire in the form of tables and diagrams. The collected data
are classified into
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)

Socio-demographic variables.
Respondents perception on service quality.
Level of Opinions of the Respondents and
Testing of research hypotheses.

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
This section attempts to analyze the socio-economic background of the
service quality rented by Solar Systems. The socio demographic variables like
Gender, Age, Occupation, Education, Income, Family Size and so on were
discussed extensively. The relationship or associations between the socio
demographic backgrounds of the respondents with their economic life are
discussed by using percentage analysis.
ANALYSIS
Analysis is classifying and rearranging the raw data to arrive at
meaningful interpretation.
INTERPRETATION
Interpretation is essential because it brings the outcome of the analysis
into forefront.
It is through interpretation that the researcher can understand the
abstract principles that work beneath his founds. Through this he can
linkup the same abstract with those of other studies having the same
abstract principle.
Interpretation leads the establishment of explanatory concepts that can
serve as a guide for tutor research studies.
Research can appreciate only through interpretation which can make
other to understand of researcher finding a per project study. The data
collect are analyzed sing simple percentage tool as the against the total
number of the respondents.
The content analysis presented in the form of tables and charts.

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS


TABLE 4.1
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

Gender

No. of Respondents

Percentage

Male

95

79

Female

25

21

Total
Source: Primary Data

120

100

It is inferred from the above table that, 79 percent of the respondents


were male and remaining 21 percent of the respondents were female.
TABLE 4.2
AGE GROUP OF THE RESPONDENTS

Age

No. of Respondents

Percentage

18 - 25 years

58

48

26 - 35 years

37

31

36 - 45 years

18

15

Above 45 years

120

100

Total
Source: Primary Data

The above table infers that, out of the total respondents of the study, 48
percent of the respondents were between the age group of 18 - 25 years, 31
percent of the respondents were between the age group 26 - 35 years of age, 15
percent of the respondents were between the age group og 36 - 45 years of age
and remaining 6 percent of the respondents were above 45 years of age.

TABLE 4.3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
Educational Qualification

No. of Respondents

Percentage

ITI

18

15

Below 10th

24

20

SSLC

35

29

Diploma

31

26

Graduate

12

10

120

100

Others
Total
Source: Primary Data

The above table shows the educational qualification the respondents.


Among the total respondents, 29 percent of the respondents were SSLC in their
educational qualification, 26 percent of the respondents have completed
Diploma, 20 percent of the respondents were below 10 th, 15 percent of the
respondents were ITI in their educational qualification, 10 percent of
respondents were graduates and none of the respondents have other educational
qualification.
TABLE 4.4
DESIGNATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

Designation

No. of Respondents

Percentage

Manager

Supervisor

10

Operator

30

25

Workmen

78

65

Total
Source: Primary Data

120

100

It is clear from the above table that, 65 percent of the respondents were
workmen, 25 percent of the respondents were operators, 8 percent of the
respondents were supervisors and remaining 2 percent of the respondents were
managers.
TABLE 4.5
EXPERIENCE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Years of Experience

No. of Respondents

Percentage

Less than 3 years

50

42

3 to 6 years

40

33

7 to 10 years

18

15

10 to 15 years

Above 15 years

120

100

Total
Source: Primary Data

It is clear from the above table that, 42 percent of the respondents have
less than 3 years experience, 33 percent of the respondents were having 3 to 6
years of experience, 15 percent of the respondents were having 7 to 10 years of
experience, 6 percent of the respondents were having 10 to 15 years of
experience and only 4 percent of the respondents were having above 15 years
experience.

t-test
1.Exciting work challenge

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

Mean

120

2.22

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

1.156

.105

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 1.15
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

10.190

2. Individual recognition

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.075

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.87

1.28

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

120

Mean
2.51

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.594

.054

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .59
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
4

35.376

3.Good pay scale

df
119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.918

of the Difference
Lower
1.81

Upper
2.03

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

120

Mean
3.39

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.539

.049

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .53
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
5

58.143

df
119

4. Issues you have raised

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

2.862

of the Difference
Lower
2.76

Upper
2.96

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

120

Mean
2.29

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

1.305

.119

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 1.30
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
6

8.322

df
119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

5. Ease of staying in current organization

.992

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.76

1.23

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

120

Mean
3.42

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.616

.056

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0.61
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
7

49.905

df
119

6.Share options in the company

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

2.807

of the Difference
Lower
2.70

Upper
2.92

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

120

Mean
1.03

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.222

.020

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .22
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
8

40.127

7.Exposure to latest

df
119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.813

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.77

.85

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

120

Mean
3.08

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.862

.079

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .86
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
9

28.164

8.Company strategy

df
119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

2.215

of the Difference
Lower
2.06

Upper
2.37

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000

Mean

120

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

2.71

.715

.065

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2.7
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
1

df

.128

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.899

.008

9.Company reputation
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
2

120

Mean
3.10

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.556

.051

of the Difference
Lower
-.12

Upper
.14

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .55
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

50.232

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

2.550

10.Upsetting organizational
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
3

120

Mean
2.59

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.739

.067

of the Difference
Lower
2.45

Upper
2.65

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .73
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
3

df

27.595

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.862

11. The performance


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
4

120

Mean
1.82

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.866

.079

of the Difference
Lower
1.73

Upper
2.00

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .86
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
4

df

12.201

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.965

12. Immediate top level


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
5

120

Mean
2.21

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

1.236

.113

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.81

1.12

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 1.23
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
5

df

8.671

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.978

13.Peer Relations
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
1

120

Mean
3.51

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.710

.065

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.75

1.20

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .71
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
1

df

43.174

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

2.798

14. Flexible Work


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
2

120

Mean
3.30

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.495

.045

of the Difference
Lower
2.67

Upper
2.93

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .49
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

62.141

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

2.810

15. Promotion Opportunities


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
3

120

Mean
2.70

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.740

.068

of the Difference
Lower
2.72

Upper
2.90

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .74
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
3

df

29.007

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.960

16.Receiving an upsetting
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
4

120

Mean
1.78

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.852

.078

of the Difference
Lower
1.83

Upper
2.09

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .85
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
4

df

12.001

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.933

17.Distance between work

One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
1

120

Mean
4.14

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.455

.041

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.78

1.09

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .45
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
1

df

88.960

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

3.692

18.Ongoing stress at work


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
2

120

Mean
3.73

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.604

.055

of the Difference
Lower
3.61

Upper
3.77

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .60
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

56.793

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

3.133

19.Job security at present


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
3

120

Mean
2.76

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.799

.073

of the Difference
Lower
3.02

Upper
3.24

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .79
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
3

df

26.982

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.968

20.Medical aid benefits


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
4

120

Mean
2.44

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.658

.060

of the Difference
Lower
1.82

Upper
2.11

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .65
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
4

df

29.808

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.792

21.Canteen facilities
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
5

120

Mean
3.99

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.587

.054

of the Difference
Lower
1.67

Upper
1.91

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .58
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
5

df

63.677

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

3.412

22.Job not being designed


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
1

120

Mean
1.76

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.830

.076

of the Difference
Lower
3.31

Upper
3.52

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .83
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
1

df

12.251

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.928

23.Consideration of your ideas


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
2

120

Mean
2.66

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.704

.064

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.78

1.08

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .70
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

30.469

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.958

24.Skill n Motivate
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
3

120

Mean
2.23

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

1.242

.113

of the Difference
Lower
1.83

Upper
2.09

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 1.24
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
3

df

8.764

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.993

25.Your level of commitment


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
4

120

Mean
2.87

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.925

.084

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.77

1.22

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .92
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
4

df

23.048

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.947

26.Communication problems
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
5

120

Mean
3.30

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.478

.044

of the Difference
Lower
1.78

Upper
2.11

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .47
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
5

df

64.843

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

119

.000

2.830

27.Freedom to work independently


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
1

120

Mean
2.67

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.813

.074

of the Difference
Lower
2.74

Upper
2.92

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .81
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
1

df

25.015

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.857

28.Fitting into the culture


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
2

120

Mean
3.92

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.512

.047

of the Difference
Lower
1.71

Upper
2.00

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .51
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

72.920

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

3.407

29.Career planning
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
1

120

Mean
1.63

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.819

.075

of the Difference
Lower
3.31

Upper
3.50

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .81
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
1

df

11.009

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.823

30.Career development
One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
2

120

Mean
1.71

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.873

.080

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.68

.97

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .87
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
2

df

10.514

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.838

31. Your level of trust


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
3

120

Mean
2.71

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.864

.079

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.68

1.00

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .86
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
3

df

23.440

119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

1.848

32.Training Programs provided


One-Sample Statistics
N
VAR0000
4

120

Mean
1.65

Std.

Std. Error

Deviation

Mean

.857

.078

of the Difference
Lower
1.69

Upper
2.00

One-Sample Test
Test Value = .85
95% Confidence Interval
t
VAR0000
4

10.232

df
119

Sig. (2-

Mean

tailed)

Difference

.000

.800

of the Difference
Lower

Upper
.65

.95

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen