Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Background: A previous study indicated that 31% of the elderly in
Taiwan have a vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D adequacy has been
associated with physical performance in the elderly.
Objectives: The first aim of the current study was to identify the
determinants for vitamin D deficiency. The second aim was to evaluate
the association between vitamin D status and physical performance.
Design: A total of 5664 community-dwelling participants aged $55 y
were recruited since 2008. Plasma total 25-hydroxyvitamin D
concentrations were originally determined by ELISA and calibrated to
a chemiluminescence measurement. Physical performance was
assessed by handgrip strength, the Short Physical Performance
Battery, timed up and go, a 6-min walk test, and single-leg stands.
Multiple linear regression and logistic regression were used to
estimate the cross-sectional associations.
Results: Vitamin D inadequacy (,50 nmol/L) was related to higher
education (P-trend , 0.01), body mass index [(BMI; in kg/m2) ORs
(95% CIs) for $30 compared with 18.5 to ,25 were 1.78 (1.14, 2.78)
for men and 1.53 (1.11, 2.11) for women], and vegetable intake [fourth
compared with first quartile, 1.58 (1.15, 2.18) for men and 2.38 (1.82,
3.12) for women]. Higher intakes of fish [fourth compared with first
quartile, 0.44 (0.33, 0.59) for men and 0.27 (0.21, 0.36) for women]
and milk [fourth compared with first quartile, 0.46 (0.31, 0.69) for men
and 0.69 (0.49, 0.95) for women] were associated with lower risk of
vitamin D inadequacy. Few subjects had 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations ,30 nmol/L. Above that concentration, there was no doseeffect relation with physical performance except for single-leg stands.
Conclusions: The factors associated with vitamin D inadequacy in
Taiwan were higher education, higher BMI, and lower fish and milk
intakes. No dose-effect relation existed between vitamin D concentration
and physical performance except for single-leg stands. This study
was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02677831.
Am J
Clin Nutr 2016;104:133444.
Keywords: epidemiology, HALST, physical performance, vitamin D,
lifestyle factors
INTRODUCTION
1334
and impaired skin and renal synthesis (1). It has been estimated that
40100% of community-living elderly adults have vitamin D deficiency in the United States and Europe (24). Traditionally, the
focus on vitamin D has been for its role in maintaining bone health,
for example, in improving bone mineral density and preventing
osteoporosis and fractures. In the past decade, however, associations have been found between vitamin D deficiency and cancer,
cardiovascular disease, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, symptoms
of depression, cognitive deficits, frailty, and total or chronic diseasespecific mortality (5). It was estimated that increasing the plasma
25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]8 concentrations of all Europeans
to 40 ng/mL (w100 nmol/L) would reduce the total of economic
burden of disease by 16.7%, or V187,000 million/y (6).
Vitamin D deficiency is a major problem even in subtropical
countries where sun exposure is sufficient to prevent vitamin D deficiency (7). The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy (,50 nmol/L)
in the elderly has been reported to be 1273% in Malaysia, 91%
in India, 36% in China, 518% in Japan, and 6980% in Korea
(7). Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in Southeast Asian
countries were identified as younger age, being female, living in
an urban area, and being less physically active (8). In Taiwan,
the dietary reference intake of vitamin D for the elderly ($65 y
old) is 10 mg/d, but the actual intake from food and supplements
was found to be 67 mg/d (9); however, the vitamin D status in
this population was usually adequate (3040 ng/mL) (1012). A
1
Am J Clin Nutr 2016;104:133444. Printed in USA. 2016 American Society for Nutrition
Supplemental Material can be found at:
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/suppl/2016/10/12/ajcn.115.1
22804.DCSupplemental.html
4
Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Miaoli, Taiwan; 5Institute for Translational Genomics and Biomedical
Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA; 6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and 7Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University
Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
METHODS
Food-frequency questionnaire
The participants were asked to report the consumption frequency and the portion size of 72 food items over the past year. The
original food-frequency questionnaire was developed for Chinese
Americans (19) and then adapted for a validation study in the
Taiwanese population (20). Average consumption for each food
item (in grams per day) was calculated from frequency and portion
size. Food groups (i.e., fruits, vegetables, meat, fish, milk, and eggs)
were created by summing the consumption of the relevant food items.
Assessment of physical performance
Physical performance was measured through handgrip strength
and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), which included
gait speed, 5-times chair stands, and standing balance during the
home visit, and timed up and go (TUG), the 6-min walk test, and
single-leg stands during the clinical examination at the hospital.
Handgrip strength was measured with a North Coast hand
dynamometer (North Coast Medical Inc.) (21). The best performance (in kilograms) in 3 trials was used for the analysis.
Success in single-leg stands was defined as being able to stand
on one leg for 30 s with eyes open (22). For the 6-min walk test,
participants were encouraged to walk as far as possible in 6 min.
Total distance walked (in meters) was recorded by trained examiners (23). For the TUG test, the participants were asked to stand
up from a chair, walk 3 m at their usual pace, turn around, and walk
back to sit in the chair (24, 25). Time (in hundredths of a second)
was measured by trained examiners using a handheld stopwatch.
The SPPB scores were determined by using the following
criteria (15): For tests of gait speed, the faster of 2 walks was used
to define the scores. Participants received a score of 0 if they were
not able to perform the test, 1 if their speed was #0.43 m/s, 2 if
0.440.60 m/s, 3 if 0.610.77 m/s, and 4 if .0.77 m/s. For
5-times chair stands, participants received a score of 0 if they
were not able to perform the test, 1 if they completed the test in
.16.7 s, 2 if 16.613.7 s, 3 if 13.611.2 s, and 4 if #11.1 s. For
standing balance, the participants were asked to maintain their
balance in 3 different standing positions for $10 s. Participants
received a score of 0 if they were not able to perform the test,
1 if they could hold a side-by-side stand for 10 s but were unable
to hold a semitandem stand for 10 s, 2 if they could hold
a semitandem stand for 10 s but were unable to hold a fulltandem stand for .2 s, 3 if they could hold a full-tandem stand
for 39 s, and 4 if they could hold a full-tandem stand for 10 s. A
summary performance score was the sum of scores calculated
across the 3 tests, with 0 representing the worst and 12 the best.
Vitamin D measurements and calibration
Biological samples were collected according to a standard
protocol. Briefly, fasting blood and morning urine were collected
and analyzed at a certified clinical laboratory, the Union Clinical
Laboratory. After routine standardization and calibration tests, all
the blood samples were centrifuged at 2500 3 g for 15 min at
48C. The plasma was separated into aliquots and stored at
2808C in a freezer at National Health Research Institutes.
The original total 25(OH)D in plasma was measured with an
OCTEIA 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D EIA kit (Immunodiagnostic
Systems Inc.). The inter- and intra-assay CVs of the measurement
were 710% and 412%, respectively.
1335
1336
CHUANG ET AL.
TABLE 1
Plasma 25(OH)D concentrations by center1
25(OH)D concentration, nmol/L
30 to ,50
50 to ,75
75 to ,125
Men
Taipei
Yangmei
Miaoli
Changhua
Hualien
Chiayi
Kaohsiung
Total
Women
Taipei
Yangmei
Miaoli
Changhua
Hualien
Chiayi
Kaohsiung
Total
1
$125
25806#
24854#
24841#
24804#
23859#
23828#
22862#
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
4
(0.3)
(0.0)
(0.3)
(0.0)
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.0)
(0.2)
107
121
120
46
63
13
72
542
(27.0)
(32.1)
(35.4)
(13.6)
(15.3)
(3.9)
(20.9)
(21.4)
251
211
167
196
280
103
204
1412
(63.4)
(56.0)
(49.3)
(57.8)
(68.1)
(31.0)
(59.3)
(55.6)
33
44
44
87
64
150
65
487
(8.3)
(11.7)
(13.0)
(25.7)
(15.6)
(45.2)
(18.9)
(19.2)
4
1
7
10
3
65
3
93
(1.0)
(0.3)
(2.1)
(2.9)
(0.7)
(19.6)
(0.9)
(3.7)
25806#
24854#
24841#
24804#
23859#
23828#
22862#
9
6
9
4
2
1
3
34
(1.9)
(1.6)
(2.5)
(1.0)
(0.5)
(0.3)
(0.8)
(1.2)
194
205
167
107
126
35
109
943
(40.2)
(56.3)
(45.9)
(27.2)
(32.7)
(8.9)
(28.5)
(34.1)
252
145
164
242
229
191
227
1450
(52.3)
(39.8)
(45.1)
(61.6)
(59.5)
(48.7)
(59.4)
(52.5)
26
8
21
40
25
151
42
313
(5.4)
(2.2)
(5.8)
(10.2)
(6.5)
(38.5)
(11.0)
(11.3)
1
0
3
0
3
14
1
22
(0.2)
(0.0)
(0.8)
(0.0)
(0.8)
(3.6)
(0.3)
(0.8)
To quantify the measurement error of the original measurements, the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme
(DEQAS) standards (5 samples at different concentrations) and
a set of randomly selected samples (n = 62) were sent to the Union
Clinical Laboratory, where the vitamin D was measured by
Chemiluminescence, Diasorin, LIAISON. The bias from the
DEQAS method means ranged from 22.6% to 9.2%.
We randomly split the samples into 2 parts and obtained an
equation between the original and the new measurements (y =
0.0089x2 + 0.3401x + 21.742, R2 = 0.7411, where x = original
measurements by ELISA and y = new measurements by
chemiluminescence). We then applied the equation to the other
part. To validate this equation, we sent another set of samples to
the Union Clinical Laboratory (n = 106). We then applied the
equation to this set of samples. Supplemental Figure 1 presents
the Bland-Altman plots of the average and the differences between the measured and the calibrated results.
Statistical analysis
The plasma 25(OH)D concentrations (in nmol/L) were divided
into ,30 (at risk of vitamin D deficiency), 30 to ,50 (at risk of
inadequacy), 50 to ,75 (sufficient), 75 to ,125 (sufficient, but
not consistently associated with increased benefit), and $125
(may be harmful) (26). We used multiple linear regression models
to determine the variables associated with vitamin D concentrations: age at recruitment (,65, 65 to ,75, or $75 y old);
education; season of blood draw (MarchMay, JuneAugust,
SeptemberNovember, or DecemberFebruary); smoking status
(never, former, or current); drinking status (never, former, or
current); physical activity at leisure time (sex-specific quartile);
physical activity at work (sex-specific quartile); BMI (in kg/m2:
,18.5, 18.5 to ,25, 25 to ,30, or $30); number of chronic
diseases (02, 35, or $6); fruit, vegetable, meat, fish, milk, and
egg intakes (in sex-specific quartiles); and multivitamin use (yes
RESULTS
,30
North latitude
1337
759
1058
681
832
1278
622
455
1327
301
484
165
68.19
62.51
60.29
59.55
60.26
(63.69,
(58.17,
(55.53,
(54.88,
(54.99,
72.70)
66.85)
65.05)
64.23)
65.52)
855
816
549
512
59.92
64.44
66.66
57.63
(55.47,
(59.90,
(62.04,
(53.06,
64.36)
68.97)
71.28)
62.20)
,0.001
0.003
,0.001
75
990
303
769
361
95.84
75.24
73.98
69.94
66.53
(88.99,
(71.93,
(69.81,
(66.28,
(62.25,
102.69)
78.56)
78.15)
73.61)
70.80)
895
721
435
447
70.61
81.58
83.87
69.17
(67.04,
(77.83,
(79.83,
(65.12,
74.18)
85.33)
87.90)
73.22)
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
0.05
1024
846
628
971
455
1072
1898
464
136
1850
214
216
218
70.38
75.81
79.42
79.61
(67.24,
(71.18,
(74.71,
(74.93,
73.52)
80.45)
84.13)
84.28)
70
1369
927
132
83.14
79.30
73.26
69.53
(76.20,
(76.27,
(70.13,
(64.22,
90.07)
82.32)
76.38)
74.85)
1116
1048
334
0.35
2666
24
42
2190
86
456
2686
19
27
2029
238
235
230
60.93
61.82
61.80
64.09
(56.61,
(56.99,
(56.96,
(59.22,
65.24)
66.65)
66.64)
68.96)
76
1524
923
209
68.23
61.65
60.03
58.74
(62.49,
(57.31,
(55.60,
(53.90,
73.96)
65.98)
64.46)
63.58)
1030
1273
429
1119
837
674
784
537
76.14
76.55
75.19
76.69
74.86
(72.59,
(72.89,
(71.45,
(73.10,
(71.00,
79.69)
80.22)
78.92)
80.28)
78.71)
1208
1195
1018
797
586
61.77
62.90
60.51
62.48
60.87
(57.33,
(58.44,
(56.01,
(57.98,
(56.38,
66.21)
67.36)
65.00)
66.99)
65.36)
605
620
634
639
77.33
75.26
75.57
77.06
(73.45,
(71.46,
(71.77,
(73.16,
81.21)
79.07)
79.37)
80.97)
682
681
683
686
63.76
61.47
61.01
62.40
(59.20,
(56.90,
(56.46,
(57.90,
68.32)
66.04)
65.56)
66.91)
611
621
632
634
78.11
76.95
76.53
73.64
(74.24,
(73.14,
(72.67,
(69.80,
81.99)
80.76)
80.38)
77.47)
669
681
693
689
65.05
61.82
61.28
60.50
(60.52,
(57.29,
(56.72,
(55.95,
69.57)
66.35)
65.84)
65.05)
0.16
0.27
0.02
0.60
,0.001
0.09
,0.001
0.00
0.52
0.79
0.43
0.03
,0.001
0.05
(Continued)
Age, y
55 to ,65
65 to ,75
$75
Education
Illiterate
Primary school
Middle school
High school
.High school
Season
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Winter
Smoking
Never
Former
Current
Drinking
Never
Former
Current
Betel chewing
Never
Former
Current
Work-related physical activity, sex-specific quartile
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
BMI, kg/m2
,18.5
18.5 to ,25
25 to ,30
$30
No. of chronic diseases2
02
35
$6
The 5 most prevalent diseases3
Hypertension
Cataract
Hyperlipidemia
Gastric ulcer or gastric diseases
Heart diseases
Fruit intake, g/d
Q1 (M: ,94.4; F: ,90.5)
Q2 (M: 94.4 to ,192.0; F: 90.5 to ,176.3)
Q3 (M: 192.0 to ,343.7; F: 176.3 to ,319.0)
Q4 (M: $343.7; F: $319.0)
Vegetables, g/d
Q1 (M: ,317.3; F: ,325.4)
Q2 (M: 317.3 to ,524.0; F: 325.4 to ,526.6)
Q3 (M: 524.0 to ,835.9; F: 526.6 to ,836.4)
Q4 (M: $835.9; F: $836.4)
Women
1338
CHUANG ET AL.
TABLE 2 (Continued )
Men
n
0.23
866
602
597
433
77.60
77.09
76.25
74.29
(73.95,
(73.21,
(72.39,
(70.28,
81.25)
80.97)
80.11)
78.29)
714
599
605
580
69.99
74.72
77.34
83.17
(66.22,
(70.82,
(73.52,
(79.36,
73.76)
78.62)
81.17)
86.99)
1415
369
474
240
74.73
75.20
79.12
76.17
(71.41,
(71.02,
(75.16,
(71.59,
78.06)
79.38)
83.08)
80.74)
509
814
749
426
78.43
76.29
75.72
74.78
(74.46,
(72.57,
(71.99,
(70.79,
82.41)
80.01)
79.46)
78.77)
0.61
677
788
638
629
62.12
62.91
61.76
61.86
(57.52,
(58.36,
(57.26,
(57.33,
66.72)
67.46)
66.25)
66.39)
730
836
704
462
55.82
61.05
65.53
66.24
(51.33,
(56.55,
(60.96,
(61.61,
60.32)
65.56)
70.10)
70.86)
1376
469
663
224
61.01
62.51
63.00
62.13
(56.64,
(57.87,
(58.44,
(57.27,
65.37)
67.15)
67.55)
66.99)
808
958
692
274
63.78
62.01
61.49
61.35
(59.23,
(57.53,
(56.96,
(56.62,
68.33)
66.50)
66.02)
66.09)
,0.001
,0.001
0.03
0.09
0.21
0.06
,0.001
0.26
1738
760
1839
893
The means were adjusted for the other variables in the table. Q, quartile; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
The chronic diseases included self-reported hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, hyperlipidemia, asthma, chronic respiratory tract disease,
cancer, gastric disease, liver and gallbladder diseases, cataract, gout, anemia, kidney disease, arthritis, spurs, osteoporosis, fracture, and mental disease.
3
The means and 95% CIs were adjusted for age at recruitment (,65, 6575, or $75 y old); education (illiterate, primary school, middle school, high
school, or more than high school); season (spring, summer, autumn, or winter); smoking, drinking, and betel nut chewing status (never, former, or current);
physical activity at work (sex-specific quartile), BMI (in kg/m2: ,18.5, 18.5 to ,25, 25 to ,30, or $30); fruit, vegetable, meat, fish, milk, and egg intakes (in
sex-specific quartiles); and multivitamin use (yes or no).
2
Women
1339
,50
OR (95% CI)
589
849
526
170
209
155
1.00
0.94 (0.73, 1.21)
1.15 (0.86, 1.53)
65
809
237
591
262
10
181
66
178
99
0.60 (0.29,
1.00
1.15 (0.82,
1.35 (1.03,
1.72 (1.24,
665
621
364
314
230
100
71
133
799
672
493
225
174
135
1.00
0.95 (0.74, 1.22)
1.10 (0.83, 1.46)
772
347
845
199
108
227
1.00
1.18 (0.88, 1.59)
1.00 (0.79, 1.27)
1467
383
114
431
81
22
1.00
0.68 (0.50, 0.92)
0.55 (0.33, 0.93)
1421
178
179
186
429
36
37
32
1.00
0.61 (0.41, 0.91)
0.66 (0.44, 0.97)
0.58 (0.38, 0.88)
57
1119
691
97
13
250
236
35
882
824
258
234
224
76
1.00
0.95 (0.76, 1.19)
0.93 (0.67, 1.29)
476
472
512
504
129
148
122
135
1.00
1.11 (0.82, 1.49)
0.78 (0.57, 1.07)
0.90 (0.65, 1.24)
490
504
485
485
121
117
147
149
1.00
1.03 (0.75, 1.39)
1.47 (1.08, 1.99)
1.54 (1.12, 2.12)
686
464
484
330
180
138
113
103
1.00
1.15 (0.88, 1.50)
0.89 (0.67, 1.18)
1.11 (0.82, 1.51)
$50
,50
OR (95% CI)
523
852
389
309
426
233
1.00
0.97 (0.79, 1.20)
1.39 (1.06, 1.81)
344
818
193
305
104
111
509
108
179
61
0.52 (0.40,
1.00
0.92 (0.70,
1.07 (0.83,
1.02 (0.69,
490
587
418
269
365
229
131
243
1718
16
30
948
8
12
1.00
0.77 (0.30, 1.99)
0.79 (0.38, 1.64)
1423
52
289
767
34
167
1.00
1.09 (0.66, 1.78)
1.02 (0.81, 1.30)
1732
11
21
954
8
6
1.00
1.29 (0.46, 3.66)
0.31 (0.12, 0.82)
1306
155
147
156
723
83
88
74
1.00
1.02 (0.75, 1.38)
0.96 (0.71, 1.30)
0.84 (0.61, 1.16)
51
1013
578
122
25
511
345
87
652
839
273
378
434
156
1.00
0.92 (0.76, 1.11)
1.00 (0.77, 1.30)
458
436
423
447
224
245
260
239
1.00
1.08 (0.85, 1.39)
1.17 (0.91, 1.51)
0.98 (0.75, 1.28)
494
445
422
403
175
236
271
286
1.00
1.68 (1.30, 2.16)
2.06 (1.59, 2.66)
2.35 (1.80, 3.07)
410
543
414
397
267
245
224
232
1.00
0.77 (0.60, 0.98)
0.91 (0.70, 1.18)
0.93 (0.71, 1.21)
0.32
0.01
,0.001
0.01
1.23)
1.62)
1.76)
2.38)
0.68)
1.22)
1.36)
1.49)
,0.001
,0.001
0.58
0.72
0.46
0.94
0.01
0.05
0.003
0.76
,0.001
0.01
0.88
0.62
0.11
0.45
,0.001
0.01
0.35
0.17
(Continued)
Age, y
55 to ,65
65 to ,75
$75
Education
Illiterate
Primary school
Middle school
High school
.High school
Season
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Winter
Smoking
Never
Former
Current
Drinking
Never
Former
Current
Betel chewing
Never
Former
Current
Work-related physical activity, sex-specific quartile
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
BMI, kg/m2
,18.5
18.5 to ,25
25 to ,30
$30
No. of chronic diseases2
02
35
$6
Fruit intake, g/d
Q1 (M: ,94.4; F: ,90.5)
Q2 (M: 94.4 to ,192.0; F: 90.5 to ,176.3)
Q3 (M: 192.0 to ,343.7; F: 176.3 to ,319.0)
Q4 (M: $343.7; F: $319.0)
Vegetables, g/d
Q1 (M: ,317.3; F: ,325.4)
Q2 (M: 317.3 to ,524.0; F: 325.4 to ,526.6)
Q3 (M: 524.0 to ,835.9; F: 526.6 to ,836.4)
Q4 (M: $835.9; F: $836.4)
Meat intake, g/d
Q1 (M: ,25.7; F: 0 or rarely)
Q2 (M: 25.7 to #60.0; F: .0 to #34.3)
Q3 (M: .60.0 to #120.0; F: .34.3 to #68.6)
Q4 (M: .120; F: .68.6)
Women
1340
CHUANG ET AL.
TABLE 3 (Continued )
Men
,50
OR (95% CI)
504
484
495
481
210
115
110
99
1.00
0.56 (0.42, 0.73)
0.49 (0.37, 0.65)
0.44 (0.33, 0.59)
1061
295
401
207
354
74
73
33
1.00
0.80 (0.59, 1.08)
0.51 (0.38, 0.69)
0.45 (0.30, 0.68)
412
635
590
327
97
179
159
99
1.00
1.14 (0.84, 1.53)
1.15 (0.85, 1.55)
1.30 (0.92, 1.83)
1346
618
392
142
1.00
0.71 (0.56, 0.90)
$50
,50
OR (95% CI)
362
562
495
345
368
274
209
117
1.00
0.47 (0.38, 0.59)
0.36 (0.29, 0.46)
0.27 (0.21, 0.36)
853
307
448
156
523
162
215
68
1.00
0.87 (0.68, 1.10)
0.81 (0.65, 1.00)
0.68 (0.49, 0.95)
533
617
441
173
275
341
251
101
1.00
1.16 (0.93, 1.44)
1.07 (0.84, 1.36)
0.99 (0.72, 1.36)
1144
620
695
273
1.00
0.65 (0.54, 0.79)
,0.001
P
,0.001
,0.001
0.05
0.53
0.55
,0.001
0.005
The ORs were adjusted for the other variables in the table. An OR .1 indicates greater odds of vitamin D inadequacy (,50 nmol/L). Q, quartile.
The chronic diseases included self-reported hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, hyperlipidemia, asthma, chronic respiratory tract disease,
cancer, gastric disease, liver and gallbladder diseases, cataract, gout, anemia, kidney disease, arthritis, spurs, osteoporosis, fracture, and mental disease.
1
2
country, sun exposure should be sufficient for vitamin D synthesis. However, the culture favors fair skin, and both men and
women with higher educational levels may have adapted lifestyles to limit sun exposure (e.g., sunscreen use).
Dietary vitamin D information is not available in the current
National Taiwan Food Composition Database. Nevertheless,
a previous study showed that the major food sources of vitamin D
in Taiwan are fish and its products along with milk and mushrooms (9). Our study confirms that fish and milk intakes were
associated with higher plasma 25(OH)D concentrations. Although vitamin D fortification of milk is not mandatory in
Taiwan, imported dried milk powder may be fortified, and the
level of fortification depends on the brand of the dairy product.
The inverse association found between vegetable intake and
vitamin D status was unexpected. Vegetable intake was positively
associated with higher education and recreational physical activity (data not shown) in our study. The inverse association
between vegetable intake and vitamin D status could be a result of
residual confounding by education or a chance finding. However,
its false discovery rates were low in both men (q = 0.01) and
women (q = 0.04). The European Prospective Investigation into
Cancer and NutritionOxford study reported that vegetarians
and vegans have lower plasma 25(OH)D concentrations than meat
and fish eaters do (46), suggesting that the differences between
vegan and meat and fish eaters could be caused by the intake of
animal food. However, sun exposure still had a greater influence on
plasma 25(OH)D concentrations than did vitamin D intake (46).
Betel nut chewing was associated with a lower frequency of
vitamin D inadequacy in men in this study. Prior studies from
Western countries have been inconsistent in showing that
smoking and drinking can be risk factors for vitamin D deficiency
(31, 34, 36, 47, 48). The association between vitamin D status and
smoking and drinking could arise from smokers and drinkers
having different levels of vitamin D intake compared with
$50
Women
0.03 529
0.74 912
0.74 495
0.21 844
4
31
4
34
3
29
4
33
4
33
3
30
4
34
0.29 534
0.07 937
0.89 512
0.32 871
0.52 534
0.49 939
0.53 530
0.42 924
0.48 496
0.43 887
P2
4
32
Value
Value
30 to ,50 nmol/L
n
1332
1325
1348
1372
1405
1440
,0.001 1402
0.01 1437
0.16
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.01 1391
0.002 1423
0.80
0.12
0.002 1375
0.23 1418
0.02 1331
,0.001 1349
,0.001 1389
,0.001 1419
P2
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Value
50 to ,75 nmol/L
n
487
310
Ref 475
Ref 292
Ref 484
Ref 311
Ref 486
Ref 305
462
293
Ref 480
Ref 310
Ref 459
Ref 291
Ref 480
Ref 306
P2
0.67
0.81
0.10
0.32
0.79
0.61
0.52
0.36
93
22
91
20
93
22
91
22
88
21
,0.001 90
,0.001 20
0.84
0.31
0.59
0.27
93
22
Value
0.34
1.00
$125 nmol/L
89
20
P2
Value
75 to ,125 nmol/L
0.93
0.10
0.38
0.12
0.24
0.72
0.84
0.53
,0.001
0.02
0.03
0.74
0.61
0.36
0.41
0.73
P2
The means and ORs were adjusted for age at recruitment (,65, 65 to ,75, or $75 y old); education (illiterate, primary school, middle school, high school, or more than high school); physical activity at
leisure time and at work (sex-specific quartile); BMI (in kg/m2; ,18.5, 18.5 to ,25, 25 to ,30, or $30); number of chronic diseases (02, 35, or $6); and fruit, vegetable, meat, fish, milk, and egg intakes (in
sex-specific quartiles). Most of the dependent variables were normally distributed except for the timed up and go test and the 5-times chair stands. The 2 variables were log-transformed before fitting a multiple
linear regression. The adjusted (least square) means were estimated by fitting a linear regression model. The adjusted means for timed up and go and 5-times chair stands were then calculated by exponentiating
the adjusted means. Ref, reference; SPPB, Short Physical Performance Battery.
2
The P values compare the adjusted (least squares) means or ORs to the ref group (50 to ,75 noml/L) with Students t test.
3
Mean; 95% CI in parentheses (all such values).
4
OR; 95% CI in brackets (all such values).
,30 nmol/L
TABLE 4
The adjusted means or ORs and 95% CIs of the participants physical performance by 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations1
1341
1342
CHUANG ET AL.
REFERENCES
1. Kinyamu HK, Gallagher JC, Rafferty KA, Balhorn KE. Dietary calcium
and vitamin D intake in elderly women: effect on serum parathyroid
hormone and vitamin D metabolites. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:3428.
2. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007;357:26681.
3. Barnard K, Colon-Emeric C. Extraskeletal effects of vitamin D in older
adults: cardiovascular disease, mortality, mood, and cognition. Am J
Geriatr Pharmacother 2010;8:433.
4. Holick MF. High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications
for health. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:35373.
5. Theodoratou E, Tzoulaki I, Zgaga L, Ioannidis JP. Vitamin D and multiple
health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
of observational studies and randomised trials. BMJ 2014;348:g2035.
6. Grant WB, Cross HS, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Moan J, Peterlik M,
Porojnicu AC, Reichrath J, Zittermann A. Estimated benefit of increased vitamin D status in reducing the economic burden of disease in
western Europe. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2009;99:10413.
1343
1344
CHUANG ET AL.
49. Fawehinmi TO, Ilomaki J, Voutilainen S, Kauhanen J. Alcohol consumption and dietary patterns: the FinDrink study. PLoS One 2012;7:
e38607.
50. Mathe C, Van PG, Vaes B, Adriaensen W, Gruson D, Degryse JM. No
relation between vitamin D status and physical performance in
the oldest old: results from the Belfrail study. Age Ageing 2013;42:
18690.
51. Pramyothin P, Techasurungkul S, Lin J, Wang H, Shah A, Ross PD,
Puapong R, Wasnich RD. Vitamin D status and falls, frailty, and
fractures among postmenopausal Japanese women living in Hawaii.
Osteoporos Int 2009;20:195562.
52. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dietrich T, Orav EJ, Hu FB, Zhang Y, Karlson
EW, Dawson-Hughes B. Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations
are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and
inactive persons aged . or =60 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:7528.
53. Boxer RS, Dauser DA, Walsh SJ, Hager WD, Kenny AM. The association between vitamin D and inflammation with the 6-minute walk
and frailty in patients with heart failure. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:
45461.
54. Sohl E, de Jongh RT, Heijboer AC, Swart KM, Brouwer-Brolsma EM,
Enneman AW, de Groot CP, van der Velde N, Dhonukshe-Rutten RA,
Lips P, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with physical performance:
the results of three independent cohorts. Osteoporos Int 2013;24:
18796.
55. Annweiler C, Bridenbaugh S, Schott AM, Berrut G, Kressig RW,
Beauchet O. Vitamin D and muscle function: new prospects?
Biofactors 2009;35:34.
56. Peiris AN, Bailey BA, Guha BN, Copeland R, Manning T. Can a model
predictive of vitamin D status be developed from common laboratory
tests and demographic parameters? South Med J 2011;104:6369.