Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Transport and technology of Projects and Processes, University of Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Biocantaber S.L., Santa Cruz de Bezana, Cantabria, Spain
Teican Medioambiental S.L., Boo de Pilagos, Cantabria, Spain
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 2 August 2012
Received in revised form 17 October 2012
Accepted 24 November 2012
Keywords:
Thermal conductivity
Concrete
Lightweight aggregate
Recycled aggregate
a b s t r a c t
The following study consists of the thermal evaluation of the enclosure of a reinforced concrete biodigester, through the theoretical analysis of the inuence of each component of the materials in the whole
mixture, depending on the distinct values of thermal conductivity of the concrete.
To determine this variable in each specic case, a review of the theoretical models developed over the
years by experts in the eld has been made to nd the most suitable model for the case under study.
The effect on the thermal conductivity of the variation in type and proportion of the basic elements
making up the concrete is studied: the aggregate, the cement, the water/cement ratio, the porosity and
the humidity among others, with the aim of providing a tool for estimating the thermal conductivity of
a concrete created with the desired proportions.
This tool is designed in the form of a nomogram for each specic case, in which conventional concrete, concrete with recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste (CDW) and lightweight
structural concrete are differentiated.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Within the increasingly important setting of energy efciency
and renewable energy, the following study is focused on energy
savings in the generation of biogas, a technology which according
to the Spanish Renewable Energy Plan 20112020, will increase by
more than 50% over the period of the plan [1,2].
To take advantage of energy from biogas generated in anaerobic digesters using cogeneration, the use of internal combustion
engines is currently the most widespread mode for the production
of electricity. These engines provide a moderate electric performance, about 3540% efciency, while the remainder of the energy
is lost, up to 9095% in heat production and 510% in noise generation.
This heat is consumed in the biogas generation process, for heating the digesters. The efcient design of thermal insulation of these
digesters can enable much of this heat to be assigned to processes
other than the generation of biogas, such as drying digestates, or
district heating within the area where heat is supplied to farms,
greenhouses, pools, urban areas, etc.
This study originates from previous research carried out by the
research group entitled Thermal evaluation and optimization for
biogas-producing biodigesters. The possibilities provided by concrete, enable this research line to be continued with the aim of
studying the degree to which the material of the biodigester can
reduce the thermal conductivity of the walls. This lower thermal
conductivity makes the biogas production more energy efcient
and, owing to the lower consumption of the digester, reduces the
amount of CO2 emitted.
2. Determination of the thermal conductivity of concrete
2.1. Initial analysis
Thermal transmittance U (W/m2 K) is dened as the amount of
energy passing through a specic surface area in a time unit. It is
given by the following expression [3]:
U=
0378-7788/$ see front matter 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.036
(1)
where RT is the total thermal resistance of the construction component (m2 K/W).
In the same way, the thermal resistance of a homogeneous thermal layer is dened by the expression [3]:
R=
Corresponding author.
1
RT
e
(2)
where e is the thickness of the layer (m), is the thermal conductivity of the material of the layer (W/m K).
311
Fig. 2. Comparison between the results obtained through the application of Valores
Cubic Model [1012] and the experimental results obtained by Kim et al. dry conditions [13]. Polynomial extrapolations in both cases.
H = P [Va
(2/3)
+ 1 Va
(2/3)
/(Va
(2/3)
Va + (Va /((a Va
/P )
)))]
Fig. 3. Comparison between the results obtained using the correction applied by
Valore to his Cubic Model [1012] and the experimental results obtained by Kim et
al. wet conditions [13]. Polynomial extrapolations in both cases.
(3)
312
Table 1
Thermal conductivity values obtained by Kim et al. [13] for given conditions of w/c ratio, ne aggregate/total aggregate proportion and aggregate volume.
w/c (%)
Aggregate volume
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
0.70
0.63
0.56
0.49
0.35
0.21
0.00
Concrete (dry)
2.46
2.33
2.24
1.96
1.71
1.39
1.16
1.96
1.94
1.77
1.53
1.28
1.00
0.77
Table 2
Thermal conductivity values obtained by applying the Cubic Model proposed by Valore [1012]. Values from the study of Kim et al. [13] have been taken account.
Aggregate volume
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
Cement paste
Concrete (dry)
Concrete (wet)
2.91
0.77
2.23
2.10
1.97
1.86
1.75
1.65
1.56
1.47
1.38
1.30
1.22
1.15
1.08
2.79
2.63
2.46
2.32
2.19
2.06
1.95
1.84
1.72
1.63
1.53
1.44
1.35
313
Fig. 8. Nomogram for conventional concrete, based on the recommendations of the ACI Norm 211.1-91 [19].
1
(2 /0.063)
(4)
Table 3
Thermal conductivity values of different aggregate type CTE [14].
Type of aggregate
Thermal conductivity
(W/m K)
Limestone
Siliceous
Granite
Sandstone
Basalt
Quartzite
2.0
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.5
4.0
314
Table 4
Effects of the w/c ratio on the thermal conductivity of cement pastes, Kim et al. [13].
Extrapolation from 0.4 to 0.6 w/c ratio has been made.
w/c (%)
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
1.26
1.22
1.20
1.16
1.13
1.10
1.07
1.03
0.98
0.96
0.86
0.77
0.71
0.64
0.56
0.49
Table 5
Dosage per m3 for different percentages of recycled aggregate in a H25 concrete
[18].
Components
0%
20%
50%
100%
Cement (kg)
Water (kg)
Sand (kg)
Gravel coarse (kg)
Gravel medium size (kg)
Recycled gravel (kg)
w/c
Paste/aggregate
275
178.75
843.01
751.96
225.91
0
0.65
0.36
275
178.75
877.77
564.69
169.65
183.58
0.65
0.36
275
178.75
848.6
349.67
105.05
454.72
0.65
0.36
275
178.75
868.15
0
0
830.11
0.65
0.36
0%
20%
50%
100%
Cement (kg)
Water (kg)
Sand (kg)
Gravel coarse (kg)
Gravel medium size (kg)
Recycled gravel (kg)
w/c
Paste/aggregate
380
190
713.9
882.2
121.59
0
0.50
0.45
380
190
744.45
665.28
91.69
189.24
0.50
0.45
380
190
709.54
414.06
57.07
471.12
0.50
0.45
380
190
714.56
0
0
874.04
0.50
0.45
315
This separation is essential to establish how each component affects the total composition, and elucidate a mean
thermal conductivity, which is valid to be assigned in the
study.
In this study, dosages are established for two types of concrete
(H25 and H40), according to the CEDEX indications, varying the
proportion of coarse aggregate and recycled aggregate from 0 to
100%, as shown in Table 5 and Table 6.
Table 7
Main characteristics of recycled aggregate [18].
Material
Density (kg/m3 )
Percentage (weight)
Percentage (volume)
Mortar
Gravel
Brick
Asphalt
Gypsum
1900
2450
2300
2100
750
1.4
2.00
0.85
0.70
0.30
52
44
1.50
1.50
0.70
57.45
37.70
1.37
1.50
1.97
316
(1 V1 + 2 V2 + + n Vn )
(V1 + V2 + + Vn )
thermal conductivity, which in turn is more inuenced by the percentage of recycled aggregate present.
(5)
4. Results
As a result of the investigation, a set of nomograms have been
developed to facilitate the choice of components and their proportions in the concrete, in order to obtain the best use of energy. As
was mentioned, the variation of a single component within the
material, not only affects the complete mixture, but also directly
alters the other components, making it difcult to assess the effect
of variation of each element independently.
These nomograms provide a complete picture of each individual
case, enabling the engineer in a simple way to observe the effect
of changes in the proportions and type of each component on the
concretes thermal conductivity (Figs. 811).
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
2050% recycled
aggregate
100% recycled
aggregate
59.00
50.00
43.00
37.50
33.00
29.25
26.00
23.25
54.88
46.51
40.00
34.88
30.70
27.21
24.19
21.63
51.30
43.48
37.39
32.61
28.70
25.43
22.61
20.22
317
consistency and specic air content, instead of the use of the w/c
ratio [23].
Ranges of values are determined that reect the results found in
dozens of tests, rstly, for a concrete in which the thick aggregate
is substituted (sand lightweight), and secondly for a complete
substitution of the aggregate (all lightweight).
For the case dealt with in the guides, a conductivity of cement
paste of 0.7 W/m K is assumed, with a coarse aggregate/ne aggregate ratio of 1.5/1. Natural limestone aggregate was used, with a
thermal conductivity of 2 W/m K, and expanded clay as a structural
lightweight aggregate, with a thermal conductivity of 0.12 W/m K,
obtained as the mean of the range of values contained in the Catalogue of construction components of the CTE [14].
5. Discussion
The guide consists in the graphic interpretation of the recommendations of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in its
document Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal,
Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete (ACI 211.1-91) [19].
The cement content for each water/cement ratio is determined
and then, assuming a constant thermal conductivity in the cement
paste of 0.7 W/m K, and depending on the type of aggregate considered [20], the thermal conductivity of the dry concrete is obtained.
The damp state, according to Valore [1012], would require multiplying the latter value by 1.25.
4.2. Recycled concrete with aggregate from construction and
demolition waste
To plot the strength versus w/c ratio curves, the recommendations followed in Ref. [21] are taken into account. The study assumes
a concrete made with CEM-I-42.5 R cement, silica sand, crushedlimestone coarse aggregate, the same maximum size of 20 mm and
recycled aggregate with 31% presence of adhered mortar with a
density of 1.74 kg/dm3 .
The De La Pena formulation, related to the percentage of w/c
and the characteristic strength of concrete control was chosen. For
the different proportions, reduction coefcients listed in Ref. [21]
are assumed (Table 8).
Due to the many variables which affect the thermal conductivity
of concrete, it is necessary to x some of them, while taking into
account that their ideal proportions vary as ratios are varied. In this
way, the thermal conductivity of the cement paste is assumed to
be constant with a value of 0.7 W/m K, and the cement content is
given in Table 9:
Thermal conductivity of recycled aggregate and limestone
aggregate is assumed to be 1.58 W/m K and 2 W/m K respectively.
Thermal conductivity of the mixture is reduced as the recycled
aggregate is more important within the amount of aggregate. The
proportion coarse aggregate/ne aggregate has been always constant with a value of 1.50.
4.3. Lightweight structural concrete
Both graphs are based on the study developed to compile the
Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for lightweight concrete (ACI 211.2-98) [20,22]. The strength of lightweight structural
concrete is generally related to the content of cement for a specic
Table 9
Content of cement for each percentage of recycled aggregate.
6. Conclusions
20%
350
50%
375
100%
400
318
[8] T.Z. Harmanthy, Thermal properties of concrete at elevated temperatures, Journal of Materials 5 (1970) 4774.
[9] R.W. Zimmerman, Thermal conductivity of uid-saturated rocks, Journal of
Petroleum Science and Engineering 3 (1989) 219227.
[10] R.C. Valore Jr., Calculation of U-values of hollow concrete masonry, Concrete
International 2 (February (2)) (1980) 4063.
[11] R.C. Valore Jr., The Thermophysical Properties of Masonry and its Constituents,
International Masonry Institute, Washington, DC, 1988.
[12] ACI Committee 122, Guide to Thermal Properties of Concrete and Masonry
Systems (ACI 122R-02).
[13] K.-H. Kim, S.-E. Jeon, J.-K. Kim, S. Yang, An experimental study on thermal
conductivity of concrete (Cement and Concrete Research 33, 2003).
[14] Catlogo de Elementos Constructivos del CTE, Redaccin: Instituto Eduardo
Torroja de ciencias de la construccin con la colaboracin de CEPCO y AICIA,
Archivo: CAT-EC-v5.0(MAYO08).doc, Mayo 2008.
[15] P. Matiasovsky, O. Koronthalyova, Analysis and modelling of effective thermal
conductivity of dry porous building materials, Institute of Construction and
Architecture, Slovak Academy of Sciences.
[16] P. Matiasovsky, O. Koronthalyova, Pore structure and thermal conductivity of
porous inorganic building materiales, Institute of Construction and Architecture, Solvak Academy of Sciences.
[17] Ministerio de Fomento Instruccin de Hormign Estructural, EHE-08, Centro
de Publicaciones de la Secretara General Tcnica, cuarta edicin, 2010.
[18] F. Ballester, J.A.Polanco, M..Calzada, Plan Integral para el control de residuos en obras de construccin, Grupo Sadisa Universidad de Cantabria,
20072010.
[19] ACI Committee 211, Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal,
Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete (ACI 211. 1-91, reapproved 2002).
[20] ACI Committee 213, Guide for Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete (ACI
213R-87).
[21] M.S. de Juan, M.P.A. Gutirrez, Tesis Doctoral, Estudio sobre la utilizacin de
rido reciclado para la fabricacin de Hormign Estructural, 2004.
[22] ACI Committee 211, Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Structural
lightweight Concrete (ACI 211.2-98).
[23] S.H. Kosmatka, B. Kerkhoff, W.C. Panarese. Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, EB001.14, 14th ed., Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2002, ISBN
0-89312r-r217-3.
[24] H.Y. Wang, K.C. Tsai, Engineering properties of lightweight aggregate concrete made from dredged silt, Cement & Concrete Composites 28 (2006)
481485.
[25] O. Sengul, S. Azizi, F. Karaosmanoglu, M.A. Tasdemir, Effect of expanded perlite
on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of lightweight concrete,
Energy and Buildings 43 (2011) 671676.
[26] H. Mohammad Al-Baijat, The use of basalt aggregates in concrete mixes in
Jordan, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering 2 (1) (2008) 6370.