Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
KHAIRPUR
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ASSIGNMENT
NAME
FAHMEEDA BANO
ROLL NO. 114
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
Implementation Arrangements
A detailed matrix of responsibility for program implementation has been incorporated into the
text of this sector plan, as well as accountability mechanisms. Implementation of this SESP will
be the responsibility of the Education Department, with technical support provided by (RSU) the
Reform Support Unit.
The components of SESP are: (i) Increasing Equitable Access to Early Childhood Education,
Primary, Middle/Elementary and Secondary education; (ii) Improving the Curriculum and
Learning Outcomes; (iii) Improving Teacher Quality; (iv) Strengthening Governance and Service
Delivery; (v) Improving Resource Allocation; (vi) Adult Literacy and Non-formal Basic
Education; and (vii) Cross-cutting areas (ICT, Education in Emergencies, Gender Equity, Social
Cohesion and Public-Private Partnerships for Education). The SESP contains detailed activities
for each sub-sector, including but not limited to the net requirements for teachers, infrastructure,
equipment and facilities, together with the envisaged role of institutional donors and private
sector partners. The Plan focuses on improving Educational Governance through a number of
key actions (training and professional development, establishing a cadre for Education
professionals, office space and equipment / logistics oversight and monitoring, research and
development), since more effective governance is a critical precursor to improved service
delivery.
To increase equitable access to schooling and reduce dropout rates, SESP proposes that primary
schools be expanded to include middle /elementary schools. This will reduce the distances that
students have to travel to get to school and strengthen student retention in an equitable fashion,
whilst reducing unit costs. Early Childhood Education will be expanded substantially,
particularly among vulnerable populations. This is expected to increase the initial access of all
groups to primary schooling and increase the likelihood that children will persist in schooling for
a longer period of time, and with greater achievement. Cost savings will be identified to help
finance this expansion of services, for example consolidating small schools and clustering
existing schools for more efficient management and teacher deployment.
To improve learning outcomes, SESP proposes several major policy initiatives. Regular
evaluations of learning outcomes will become a feature of the sector to inform policy-making
and drive budgetary decisions. Teachers will also be provided with tools to conduct ongoing
classroom-level assessments of learning in core subjects such as reading and mathematics, in
order to provide real-time feedback regarding the impact of targeted revisions to the curriculum
and to teaching and learning practices. Quality assurance standards will increasingly focus on
learning outcomes rather than inputs. The proportion of funding made available for non-salary,
quality-enhancing inputs such as reading materials, science equipment and textbooks will be
significantly increased. Careful attention will be given to language of instruction, early grades
reading and mathematics competency, and time-on-task issues. Every effort will be made to
communicate and follow management through on greatly increased expectations for student
learning at all stages of the school system.
To improve teaching quality, all new teacher recruitment and advancement will be merit-based.
Teachers will be expected to have a Bachelors Degree in Education as a minimum and a
program of continuous professional development (CPD) will become part of long-term teacher
accreditation. The Provincial Institute for Teacher Education (PITE) will be transformed into an
autonomous institution to enhance professional development in Education Leadership.
A number of new measures will be introduced to strengthen governance and management
accountability. The general focus of these efforts will be to increase responsibility and resource
availability at district and sub-district levels. School Management Committees (SMCs) will be
revitalized and a professional
Reform Support Unit (RSU) is responsible for the technical support for the accomplishment and
implementation of this comprehensive and wide range purpose programs under SESP.
The Reform Support Unit (RSU) - Sindh was conceptualized as a means to build the institutional
capability of the Department of Education. The very rationale of this program is to streamline
existing edifice of education delivery and provide policy inputs for advancement of education
growth in terms of governance, access and quality education.
Mission
To create a capacity that would strengthen the Education Department's ability to adopt
and implement the education policy and strategy.
The Unit's areas of expertise are data collection, data analysis and its institutionalized
impact on policy and strategy.
Coordination of Policy and its implementation.
To ensure education of equitable quality for all to fully harness the nation's human
potential
Vision
Improve quality and standards of school education and literacy towards building a society
committed to Constitutional values.
Provide free and compulsory quality education to all children at elementary level as
envisaged under the Sindh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2013
(Sindh Act No. XIV of 2013)
POLICIES
Program Design
The most notable program proposed under the SESP are as follows: (i) an initiative to
progressively
transform daycare-style Katchi classes into dynamic, child-centered ECE classes promoting
school readiness and equity; (ii) the introduction of double shifting across districts to increase
enrolment capacity; (iii) school consolidation, i.e. reduce the number of small schools; (iv) an
induction plan for new teachers and CPD for all teachers focused on learning outcomes in
general and reading in particular; (v) the creation of a new management cadre to enhance
governance; (vi) re-grouping of middle schools with primary schools and higher secondary
classes with secondary classes to achieve cost savings and improve transition rates and equity;
(vii) re-designing literacy and non-formal basic education to be taken to scale through reduced
reliance on traditional classroom contexts and greater use of mass media and social media
opportunities; (viii) design and implementation of an Human Resources Management System
(HRMS); (ix) improved monitoring system through hiring of monitors; and (x) establishment
of an effective Information and Communications Technology (ICT) system.
All of these programs have been designed to take into account existing capacity within the
system. Many will require close monitoring to guard against unintended side effects, for
instance school consolidation must ensure that schools remain within easy walking distance for
children, and double shifting must not result in loss of time available for teaching and learning. A
series of supporting programs under the title of STEDA, PITE, BOC and RSU are the programs
working to achieve the objectives of SESP.
Textbook Board (STBB) and Provincial Institute of Teacher Education (PITE) are also working
to ensure the effective implementation of this program. SESSP supports in policy initiatives on
curriculum, textbook development, teacher training and assessment based on new curriculum.
EFFORTS
All the programs commenced by SESP to achieve the prescribed goals are monitored by (RSU).
2.
To create awareness among parents and communities to keep check & ensure student
performance.
SAT has greatly helped the Education Department in getting rid of the traditional rote learning
method of teaching, creating sense of shared accountability & awareness in parents, in reviewing
the curriculum, and linking the reforms with output rather than input, and shift to the result based
accountability.
trainings and the newly hired teachers have been provided with Orientation and Induction
sessions.
The Teacher performance is being assessed/ evaluated every three months on average. This has
helped in implementing new teaching methodology, creating competence among the teachers and
administrators developing materials, and looking at the education developments globally
Physical Infrastructure
2.
Enrollment
3.
FMIS is established under SERP-I and is continuing under SERP- II. This helps in budgeting,
accounting and reporting for all initiatives under SERP. The budgeting includes cash plans and
releases made in accordance with the applicable laws.
RECOMMENDATION
The effectiveness of professional development depends on how carefully educators conceive,
plan, and implement it. There is no substitute for rigorous thinking and execution. Unfortunately,
many educators responsible for organizing professional development have had no formal
education in how to do so. The learning experiences they create for others are similar to their
own experiences, many of which were neither positive nor effective.
Education in Pakistan is overseen by the Federal Ministry of Education and the provincial
governments, whereas the federal government mostly assists in curriculum development,
accreditation and in the financing of research and development. Article 25-A of Constitution of
Pakistan obligates the state to provide free and compulsory quality education to children of the
age group 3 to 16 years. "The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children
of the age of five to sixteen years in such a manner as may be determined by law".
The education system in Pakistan is generally divided into six levels: Preschool (for the age from
3 to 5 years); primary (grades one through five); middle (grades six through eight); high (grades
nine and ten, leading to the Secondary School Certificate or SSC); intermediate (grades eleven
and twelve, leading to a Higher Secondary (School) Certificate or HSC); and university
programs leading to undergraduate and graduate degrees.
The literacy rate ranges from 96% in Islamabad to 28% in the Kohlu District. Between 2000 and
2004, Pakistanis in the age group 5564 had a literacy rate of almost 38%, those ages 4554 had
a literacy rate of nearly 46%, those 2534 had a literacy rate of 57%, and those ages 1524 had a
literacy rate of 72%. Literacy rates vary regionally, particularly by sex. In tribal areas female
literacy is 9.5%. Moreover, English is fast spreading in Pakistan, with more than 92 million
Pakistanis (49% of the population) having a command over the English language, which makes it
one of the top English-speaking nations in the world. On top of that, Pakistan produces about
445,000 university graduates and 10,000 computer science graduates per year. Despite these
statistics, Pakistan still has one of the highest illiteracy rates in the world. Within the context of
educational policies in Pakistan, the management of education has been reflected as a serious
concern in most of the education policies (e.g. 1970; 1972; 1992, 19982001). The National
Education Policy 2009, a current policy document for Sindh, particularly, focuses on educational
governance and considers failure in the commitment and implementation gaps as key reasons of
poor performance of the education system. This lack of commitment has been a major reason of
persistent failure in achieving goals in educational policies in Pakistan. No doubt, the current
Educational policy of Sindh government comprises all the qualities of modern educational
system in all respects. But continuous commitment and stickiness to the purpose are necessary to
achieve the desired results.
REFERENCES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Pakistan
http://itacec.org/document/learning_resources/Sindh%20Sector%20Plan%20201316%20%20SESP%20-%20Sub-sectors,%20revised%20version,%2023-0613%20(2)%20sindh.pdf
http://www.sindheducation.gov.pk/Contents/Menu/Final%20SESP.pdf
References Annual Development Programmes, Sindh. (2013-14). Planning and Development
Department, Government of Sindh.
Annual Development Programmes, Sindh. (2010-11 and 2011-12). Planning and Development
Department, Government of Sindh.
Annual Status of Education Report ASER Pakistan 2012. South Asian Forum for Education
Development (SAFED).
Bengali, Kaiser (1999). History of Educational Policy Making and Planning in Pakistan.
Working Paper Series #40. Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
First Five Year Plan: 1955-60. (1957). National Planning Board, Government of Pakistan.
National Educational Policy. (2009). Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan.
National Education Policy and Implementation Programme. (1979). Ministry of Education,
Government of Pakistan.
National Education Policy. (1992). Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan.
National Education Policy. (1998). Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan.
http://www.sindheducation.gov.pk/Contents/Menu/Final%20SESP.pdf
http://www.rsu-sindh.gov.pk/units/FMIS.php