Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/compchemeng
Instituto Tecnologico de Celaya, Departamento de Ingeniera Qumica, Celaya, Gto. 38010, Mexico
b
Uni6ersidad de Guanajuato, Facultad de Qumica, Guanajuato, Gto. 36050, Mexico
Received 23 September 1997; accepted 18 March 1999
Abstract
A strategy for the energy-efficient design of the fully thermally coupled distillation column (Petlyuk system) is presented. The
strategy is based on a dynamic model and uses two recycle streams as search variables. The optimization procedure with the
dynamic model provides the conditions under which a given design minimizes the heat duty supplied to the reboiler. Several case
studies are presented, and some trends of the optimal values of the recycle streams are identified. 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All
rights reserved.
Keywords: Distillation column; Energy efficient; Petlyuk systems
1. Introduction
Integrated distillation schemes such as thermally coupled distillation sequences with side columns and the
fully thermally coupled distillation column, or Petlyuk
system (Fig. 1), provide choices of special interest for
the separation of ternary mixtures because of their
potential energy savings. Several studies have been conducted to show the economic potential of those integrated schemes (Tedder & Rudd, 1978; Cerda &
Westerberg, 1981; Fidkowski & Krolikowski, 1986,
1987; Glinos & Malone, 1988; Fidkowski & Krolikowski, 1990; Triantafyllou & Smith, 1992; Wolff &
Skogestad, 1995; Annakou & Mizsey, 1996). In several
of these studies it has been stressed that despite the
economic incentives of integrated distillation systems,
their industrial implementation has been restricted because of the need for reliable design methods and a
proper understanding of their control properties.
We focus in this paper on the use of a rigorous
dynamic model as a convenient tool for the design of
the Petlyuk system. The approach is an extension of a
model previously developed for the design of thermally
coupled distillation sequences with side columns (Hernandez & Jimenez, 1996); the case for the Petlyuk
* Corresponding author.
distillation sequence shows further complications because of the additional degree of freedom provided by
the additional recycle stream between the columns. The
model is used to detect the operating conditions under
which a given design for the Petlyuk system can provide
the minimum energy consumption.
2. Model development
The dynamic model is based on the total mass balance, component mass balances, equilibrium relationship (ideal VLE), summation constraints, energy
balance, and stage hydraulics (Francis Weir formula).
One set of equations must be written for each column
of the Petlyuk system. The equations are coupled because of the two recycle streams between the columns;
therefore, the full set of equations must be solved
simultaneously. An important aspect for the design of
the system is the specification of the two recycle
streams, a liquid stream that leaves column C-2 from
stage NR and enters at the top of column C-1, and a
vapor stream that leaves column C-2 from stage NS2
and constitutes the feed stream at the bottom of
column C-1 (Fig. 2). We define the following dimensionless variables for these streams, which lie between 0
and 1 and are used as search variables in the optimization procedure:
0098-1354/99/$ - see front matter 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 9 8 - 1 3 5 4 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 2 5 7 - 4
1006
hV =
VB
VNS2
(1)
hL =
LT
LNR
(2)
Equations for PI controllers complement the closedloop dynamic model. The model can be solved using a
numeric technique such as Eulers method.
3. Optimization strategy
The dynamic model requires a basic structure of the
Petlyuk system. Such a preliminary design can be obtained by the shortcut method of Triantafyllou and
Smith (1992), or through the implementation of some
expected distribution of the intermediate component.
The dynamic model serves two purposes. First, it will
detect whether the proposed design can effectively
provide the desired products compositions, and secondly it will identify the operating conditions under
which a minimum energy consumption will be achieved.
The following steps are used for the optimization
procedure.
1. Specify products compositions for the Petlyuk system. These values are taken as set points for the
dynamic model.
2. Establish the control loops between each manipulated variable (R, LS and QR) and its corresponding
output variable (XD, XS and XB).
3. Set a value for hV.
4. Set a value for hL.
5. Initialize time to start the rigorous dynamic
simulation.
6. Integrate the dynamic model (for details see Hernandez & Jimenez, 1996).
7. Compare product compositions with set point values. If they do not agree, increase time by Dt and go
back to step 6. If they agree, a search point is
4. Case studies
The method was applied to optimize some given
designs for energy consumption for the nine cases that
arise from the separation of three mixtures with three
different compositions. Different mixtures were analyzed in an attempt to understand the influence of the
relative difficulty of the separation A/B with respect to
B/C on the energy consumption and design of the
system. The ease of separation index (ESI), as defined
by Tedder and Rudd (1978), can be used to characterize
each mixture:
ESI=
aAB
aBC
(3)
1007
Table 1
Mixtures analyzed
Mixture
Components (A, B, C)
ESI
F1
F2
F3
1.04
1.86
0.18
remixing of component B affects the energy requirements of the separation system. A proper operation of
the Petlyuk system should extract the intermediate component at the tray where its composition profile reaches
a maximum. Fig. 4 shows the composition profile of
component B in the main column for the optimum
conditions provided by the dynamic model. The action
of the controllers provides the desired feature that the
liquid sidestream product is taken from the stage with
the maximum concentration of component B.
For the mixture with a high concentration of the
intermediate component, M2, the optimal values for the
Table 2
Feed composition for each mixture analyzed
Feed
Composition
M1
M2
M3
0.333/0.333/0.333
0.15/0.70/0.15
0.45/0.1/0.45
1008
Fig. 5. Search for the optimal values for the mixture F1 with
composition M2.
Fig. 7. Search for the optimal values for the mixture F2 with
composition M1.
Fig. 6. Search for the optimal values for mixture F1 with composition
M3.
Fig. 8. Search for the optimal values for the mixture F2 with
composition M2.
1009
Fig. 9. Search for the optimal values for mixture F2 with composition
M3.
Fig. 10. Search for the optimal values for the mixture F3 with
composition M1.
Fig. 11. Search for optimal values for the mixture F3 with composition M2.
1010
5. Concluding remarks
The dynamic model provides a robust tool for the
design of energy-efficient Petlyuk systems. No convergence problems were observed for any of the case
studies. Some trends were observed for the optimal
values of the two recycle streams used as search variables. The results show that hV values can be correlated
to an ESI, and that there is no significant deviation in
the optimal solution with small changes in hV. There is,
however, a high dependency on the energy consumption with respect to hL once a value for hV has been
specified. Therefore, the results suggest that a proper
value for hV can be set ahead of design, but a search
over hL is still required to obtain a design with minimum energy consumption. Furthermore, we found that
in all cases the optimum value of hL was lower than
that of hV. These observations reduce significantly the
search space for the design of the Petlyuk system with
minimum energy consumption.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge financial support
from CONACyT, Mexico and from the Program
PROSAA of the Universidad de Guanajuato, for the
development of this project.
Appendix A. Nomenclature
B
D
ESI
L
LS
bottoms
distillate
ease of separation index
liquid flowrate
side product
MB
MD
QR
R
V
XD
XB
XS
Greek symbols
a
relative volatility
h
liquid or vapor fraction
Subscripts
B
vapor stream supplied to the bottom of
column C-1
L
liquid
V
vapor
T
liquid stream supplied to the top of column
C-2
References
Annakou, O., & Mizsey, P. (1996). Rigurous comparative study of
energy-integrated distillation schemes. Industrial Engineering
Chemistry Research, 35 (6), 1877 1885.
Cerda, J., & Westerberg, A. W. (1981). Shortcut methods for complex
distillation columns (1). Minimum reflux. Industrial Engineering
Chemical Process Design and De6elopment, 20, 546 557.
Fidkowski, Z., & Krolikowski, L. (1986). Thermally coupled system
of distillation columns: optimization procedure. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 32 (4), 537 546.
Fidkowski, Z., & Krolikowski, L. (1987). Minimum energy requirements of thermally coupled distillation systems. American Institute
of Chemical Engineers Journal, 33 (4), 643 653.
Fidkowski, Z., & Krolikowski, L. (1990). Energy requirements of
nonconventional distillation systems. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 36 (8), 1275 1278.
Glinos, K., & Malone, F. (1988). Optimality regions for complex
column alternatives in distillation systems. Chemical Engineering
Research and Design, 66, 229 240.
Hernandez, S., & Jimenez, A. (1996). Design of optimal thermallycoupled distillation systems using a dynamic model. Transactions
of the Institute of Chemical Engineers, 74, 357 362.
Stephanopoulos, G. (1984). Chemical process control. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tedder, D. W., & Rudd, D. F. (1978). Parametric studies in industrial
distillation (Part I). Design comparisons. American Institute of
Chemical Engineers Journal, 24 (2), 303 315.
Triantafyllou, C., & Smith, R. (1992). The design and optimisation of
fully thermally coupled distillation columns. Transactions of the
Institute of Chemical Engineers, 70, 118 132.
Wolff, E. A., & Skogestad, S. (1995). Operation of integrated threeproduct (Petlyuk) distillation columns. Industrial Engineering
Chemistry Research, 34 (6), 2094 2103.