Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Alpha
Beta
Analyze
y p
prospect
p elements
Source, Migration, Reservoir, Trap, Seal
Consider the most-likely scenario
Consider other cases - the range of possibilities
Outline
1. Define prospect elements
2. Estimating trap volume
3. HC Type
4. Assessment
5. Risk
Outline
1. Defineprospectelements
2. Estimatingtrapvolume
3. HCType
HC Type
4. Assessment
5. Risk
Plumbing To Connect
the Container to the Kitchen
A Kitchen
Where Organic
Material Is
C k d
Cooked
Correctly
Placed
Wells
A Container
From Which
Oil & Gas
Can Be
Produced
A Real HC System
Draupne Shale
organic rich
serves as a source rock
Heather Shale
Sognefjord Shale
both organic poor
Oil
Spill
Point
Facies
Change
g
Fault
Leak
Point
Brent Sandstone
acts as a reservoir
oil & gas from the Draupne, gas from coals in the Brent
HC Migration
Most-Likely
y Scenario
Alpha
Beta
Sea Water
Oil
Overburden
Seal
Reservoir
Oil
Migration
Source
Basement
Oil
Generation
18 Ma
Most-Likely
Most
Likely Scenario
Alpha
Beta
Sea Water
Overburden
Oil
Migration
Seal
Reservoir
Oil
Migration
Source
Basement
10 Ma
Oil
Generation
Most-Likely
y Scenario
Alpha
Beta
Sea Water
Overburden
Oil
Migration
Seal
Reservoir
Source
Basement
Oil
Generation
Gas
Generation
Present
Most-Likely
y Scenario
Beta
Alpha
Oil
Oil
18 Ma
Most-Likely
Most
Likely Scenario
Beta
Alpha
Oil
Oil
10 Ma
Most-Likely
Most
Likely Scenario
Beta
Alpha
Gas
Oil
Oil
Present
Explorations
p
Task
Identify
O
Opportunities
t iti
Acquire
Seismic Data
Interpret
Seismic Data
Capture
Prime Areas
Drill
Wildcats
Process
Seismic Data
Failure
Assess
Prospects
1.
2.
3.
4.
Volume
HC Type
Assessment
Risk
Success
Confirmation
Well
Uneconomic Success
Drop
Area
To EMDC
or EMPC
Outline
1. Define p
prospect
p
elements
2. Estimating trap volumes
3. HC Type
4. Assessment
5. Risk
Lets
Let
s start an exercise
Exercise
We will do some quick estimates using a
series of simplifying assumptions
Outline
1 Define
1.
D fi
prospect elements
l
2. Estimating
g trap
p volumes
3. HC Type
4. Assessment
5. Risk
DHI Analysis
AVO Analysis
HC Systems Analysis
Oil or Gas???
Modelresponsewithdifferentrock&fluidproperties
Ifthereshouldbeadifference,whichfluidtypedoes
theseismicdatasupport?
Quantittative
Shouldtherebeadifferenceinseismicresponse
(AVO) between an oil filled reservoir and a gas filled
(AVO)betweenanoilfilledreservoirandagasfilled
reservoir?
Extractamplitudesfromnear andfaranglestacks
FFromourbasinmodeling&HCsystems
b i
d li & HC t
analysis,whichfluidtypeshouldweexpect
Qu
ualitativ
ve
Whatdidthesourcegenerate
g
Whatdidthetrapleakorspill
Gas
Oil
Brine
20%
Porosity
y
30%
Porosity
y
20% Porosity
Off t
Offset
30% Porosity
Off t
Offset
04
0.4
10%
Slo
ope
02
0.2
20%
00
0.0
30%
-0.2
02
-0.4
04
-0.3 -0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
Intercept
0.2
0.3
Questions???
To what level are the traps filled with oil & gas?
Fluid Contact?
Gas over Oil?
Fluid Contact?
Oil over Water?
Outline
1 Define prospect elements
1.
2. Estimating trap volumes
3. HC Type
4 Assessment
4.
5. Risk
Types of Assessments
Once a lead has been high-graded into a
prospect, we have to assess its potential value
Deterministic
D t
i i ti Assessment
A
t
One value for each parameter
One final number, e.g., 200 MBO
Probabilistic Assessment
A range of values for each parameter
A range of outcomes, e.g. 200 50 MBO
Alpha
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Alpha
Gas Only
20% Chance of Occurrence
Scenario 4
Alpha
Oil Only
30% Chance of Occurrence
Alpha
Scenario 1
112 MBO
Gas
Billion Cubic Ft Gas
95 GCF
Scenario 2
121 MOEB
6 GCF = 1 MBO
0 MBO
314 GCF
Gas Only
Scenario 3
Oil-Equivalent
52 MOEB
Uneconomic
192 MBO
0 GCF
192 MOEB
0 MBO
0 GCF
0 MOEB
Oil Only
Scenario 4
Low Gas Saturation
Uneconomic
Probabilistic Assessment
The Goal is to Get A Number and a Range of
Possible Outcomes
p a Range
g of Values for Each
We Input
Assessment Parameter
usually minimum, most-likely, maximum
Area
Min
ML
Max
12
20
27
Thickness
Net:Gross
Porosity
HC Sat.
FVF
Recovery
Unrisked Results
100%
100
80%
Ec
conomic Minimum
Excedan
nce Prob
bability
60%
40%
20%
0%
0
100
200
300
Milli B
Million
Barrels
l off Oil
50% Chance of finding 200 MBO or more
75% Chance of finding the economic minimum
400
Outline
1. Define p
prospect
p
elements
2. Estimating trap volumes
3. HC Type
4. Assessment
5. Risk
25% Risk
75% Chance
Ch
off S
Success
Source
Maturation
HC
Migration
Reservoir
Presence
Trap
Quality
Reservoir
Quality
Seal
Adequacy
Biodegradation
- - - - 1.0
Trap Quality
- - - - 1.0
10
chance of success
Seal Adequacy
- - - - 0.8
(COS)
Source Quality
- - - - 1.0
10
Source Maturation
- - - - 1.0
HC Migration
- - - - 1.0
10
0.72
Highest Risk
10
- - - - 1.0
Some Risk
100
Gas Only
Ec
conomic Minimum
0.8
0.6
04
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
100
72 % COS
58 % Chance of
Finding More
Than the
Economic
Minimum
Oil Only
200
300
400
500
Exercise
In the exercise we will use
A COS of 60%
An economic minimum of 100 MBOE
Summaryy
Weve Gone from Identifying an Opportunity
i the Bonanza Basin
in
i to Drilling
i i a Wildcat
i
at
the Alpha Prospect