Jonas Sjstedt (V) och Jan Bjrklund (L) diskuterar om skatten br snkas eller hjas.

Vad tycker du?

Varfr tycker du s?

Vilka resultat fr vi av att hja/snka skatten?

Jmfr med ditt frra hemland.

r skatten hgre eller lgre?
Hur fungerar det?

Svt
#Dinrst
V vnsterpartiet
L liberalerna (folkpartiet)

Jonas Sjstedt (V) vill ha en hgre skatt

Jan Bjrklund (L) vill ha en lgre skatt
Fr vem r det bra med en lg skatt fretag och miljonrer
Fr vem r det bra med en hg skatt ensamstende mammor, pensionrer och sjukskrivna
--------------------------------Analysing this discussion, in the same time I can agree and disagree with the both party
leaders. Both solutions could be considered right depending on in which category you are.
I think that for taking the best solution, first of all, we must take into consideration the today
market and economic landscape. There is a profound relation between these aspects and no
decision could be taken in the right way, if it is not analysed the economical context in which
Sweden is situated.
Of course I want low taxes for mothers, retired people and when you are sick, but in some
time I want that companies to develop and create therefore more jobs. Having jobs, we can
pay taxes and from the taxes we can pay assistance for child birth, for sickness and for elders.
We cannot low the taxes in the advantage of the reach people, but we can lower them in such
a way to allow business to grow, to invest more and to create more jobs.
Increasing the taxes I do not think is a very good idea or even so popular among all the
people also without taking into consideration economical and psychological implications.
Already people are tired to work and pay half of their salary in order to support other people.
In the same time I do not believe that people do not want to help the other in need. The

problem is how you help other and what are the mechanisms should the government to
develop in doing so.
In my homeland the taxes has grown some time ago, but in the last two years they have been
lower in some sectors (like food industry) and new economical mechanisms have been
developed in order to encourage companies to grow. Of course it is a long road to success,
but we have to have faith and to do everything necessary that everyone to live in harmony
and happy.
------------------------------------------Analysera deras diskussion, kan jag hlla med de bda partiledarna p samma
tid. Bda lsningarna kan vara rtt beroende p vilken kategori du r.
Jag tycker att fr att ta den bsta lsningen, frst mste man ta hnsyn till
dagens marknad och ekonomiska landskapet. Det finns en stor relation mellan
dessa aspekter och inget beslut kan man fattas p rtt stt om man inte
analyseras den ekonomiska sammanhang i vilket landet ligger.
Jag vill lga skatter fr mammor, pensionrer och sjukskrivna, fr alla eftersom
jag vill fretagarna att utveckla och s skapa fler jobb. Nr jobbar man, kan man
betala skatt och d kan skatt betala std till frlossningen, fr sjukdom och fr
ldre. Jag tycker att mnniskor r glada att betala skatt om de har rd med det
eftersom det r jttefin att hjlpa andra mnniskor som r i behov.
P samma tid kan man inte lg skatter i frdel av rika mnniskor. Om r man rika
d man kan betala hger skatt. Redningen mste hitta ekonomiska mekanismer
fr att beskatta folk p rtt stt.
I mitt hemland skatterna kat fr en tid sedan, men under de senaste tv ren
har de varit lgre i vissa sektorer (som livsmedelsindustrin) och nya ekonomiska
mekanismer har utvecklats fr att uppmuntra fretag att vxa. Ocks man kan
vlja en procent frn ens skatt fr att g till ngon hjlpande organisation.