Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a,*
Abstract
Separability curves (mineral recovery versus yield) have been used to characterize the copper otation process both at batch
laboratory scale and industrial plant scale (rougher banks). Then, to approach the scale-up problem the rougher bank operation and
the batch were compared using the corresponding separability curves. Comparison was made at the maximum separation eciency
point in both operations. Thus, a time factor was established for optimal technical separation. The time factor can then be used for
kinetic scale-up models, together with the ratio between minerals recovery in both operating scales. Experience from several tests
recorded over a period of 10 months in an industrial concentrator showed a good consistency for scaling-up the rougher otation
recovery from batch tests within a 1% absolute error range.
The eect of particle size and air owrate in laboratory batch tests was evaluated in the space of separability curves, regarding
their eect on recovery at the optimum separability point. Also, the eect of pulp level and particle size on the bank otation kinetics
was evaluated in an industrial otation circuit. Thus, estimation of recovery changes due to variations in mineral characteristics and
operating conditions was explored.
2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Flotation; Scale-up; Particle size; Optimal separability
1. Introduction
The otation scale-up problem is complex because
the mineral characteristics (grade, size, mineralogy), cell
characteristics (geometry, power consumption, energy
dissipation, bubble and particle size distribution), reagent conditioning and operating conditions (air owrate, pulp level, froth transport and discharge facilities)
are dierent and variable in batch and plant operation.
Time scale up factors for otation kinetics prediction
are generally derived by comparison of industrial otation banks and laboratory batch cell recovery. However,
in plant practice it is common to nd very low mineral
recoveries in the last cells of the rougher banks. Thus, a
direct time comparison between the overall bank performance and the batch operation, at the same recovery,
can introduce large errors. A better approach was to
simulate the bank performance in order to estimate the
q
Presented at Minerals Engineering 02, Perth, Australia, September
2002.
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: juan.yianatos@pqui.utfsm.cl, jyianato@pqui.utfsm.cl (J.B. Yianatos).
0892-6875/03/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(03)00024-4
Thus, the following Eq. (5) can be derived from Eqs. (1),
(2) and (4) for mineral recovery,
s 1N
1 1 1 kmax
N
Rs R1
5
kmax s
N
1
N
3. Experimental
Experimental work was developed at laboratory and
plant scale at Divisi
on Salvador, Codelco-Chile. Batch
otation was developed at the Metallurgical Laboratory, using two standard Wemco cells of 2.7 (L) and 5.3
(L). Two kinds of tests were considered: (a) predictive
monthly tests using ore samples, and (b) special tests to
study the eect of dierent variables, such as particle size
and air rate on batch performance. Plant testing was
developed in the rougher otation circuit, consisting of
ve parallel otation banks. Each bank provided with
nine self-aerated Wemco cells of 42.5 m3 (1500 ft3 ) in
arrangement 333. Rougher otation performance was
evaluated on the basis of daily overall sampling (three
shifts), and also special tests for kinetic characterization
of the rougher bank were developed.
3.1. Batch otation characterization
Fig. 1 shows an example of the data over a monthly
predictive batch test using Eq. (3).
100
80
Cu Recovery, %
348
60
40
Data
20
Model
0
0
10
15
20
Time, min
25
30
349
16
Cumul. Grade
14
Increm. Grade
12
Cu Grade, %
Feed Grade
10
8
6
4
2
0
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Cu Recovery, %
100
100
90
80
80
Recovery of Cu, %
Cu Recovery, %
90
70
60
Batch
50
Feed
70
5% +212 um
60
15% +212 um
50
20% +212 um
25% +212 um
40
30% +212 um
30
Min. Grade
20
Feed Grade
10
40
10
15
20
10
15
20
100
Recovery of copper, %
90
80
90
80
70
60
50
Size: + 212 um
40
Size: +75-212 um
30
Size: +45-75 um
20
Size: -45 um
10
Feed grades
0
0
10
15
20
70
60
50
High level
Low level
40
30
0
12
Cell number
100
90
Recovery of copper, %
100
Recovery of copper
350
80
70
60
Feed Grade
Low level
50
4. Scale-up factors
High level
40
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
R1 Plant
r1 Lab
6
7
t Kmax
Rs R1
rt
r1
8
9
351
11
Recovery of Cu, %
90
80
70
Batch Lab.
60
Rougher Plant
50
Feed Grade
40
10
15
20
10
11
Month
Table 1
Rougher operating conditions, monthly average
Month
Feed %Cu
Soluble Cu (%)
% 212 lm
Throughput TPD
Cu recovery (%)
Solid (%)
November
December
January
0.715
0.033
0.697
0.028
0.722
0.005
9.16
1.68
7.52
0.86
8.03
1.94
24.46
1.56
22.92
1.61
22.35
0.27
34,590
2368
32,680
4015
31,567
486
81.38
1.31
83.71
1.35
83.79
0.39
35.96
0.57
35.24
0.61
35.05
0.31
352
data
model
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
0.9
0.88
4
10
12
14
16
Soluble copper, %
Fig. 11. Eect of soluble copper on the ratio between plant and batch
recovery at optimum separation.
88
Acknowledgements
86
84
82
80
78
76
References
74
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
5. Conclusions
A standard comparison between laboratory batch
otation tests and industrial rougher otation perfor-