Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page: 2
COPYRIGHT
The computer program CLOCKWORK and all associated documentation are proprietary and copyrighted
products. Worldwide rights of ownership rest with NEWTONIAN MACHINES. Unlicensed use of the
program or reproduction of the documentation in any form, without prior written authorization from
NEWTONIAN MACHINES is explicitly prohibited.
NEWTONIAN MACHINES
ANDRS DE FUENZALIDA 147
PROVIDENCIA, SANTIAGO, CHILE
Tel: (+56 2) 2 23553800
Email: contact@newtonianmachines.com
Web: http://www.newtonianmachines.com
Page: 3
CONTENT
I.
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 4
1.
2.
3.
IMPEDANCES......................................................................................................................8
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................... 19
Page: 4
INTRODUCTION
The fundamental problem of Machine Foundation analysis can be posed as illustrated in Fig. I.1
Fig I.1. a) Machine foundation harmonically excited over two layers and half-space medium. b)
Machine foundation embedded over half-space upon an arbitrary excitation. c) Piled Machine
foundation harmonically excited over half-space medium.
A rigid foundation bears on an elastic soft soil which extends to infinity. Time varying forces,
produced from the operation of a machine, acts on different points of the foundation.
If we isolate the foundation (free body diagram) for dynamic equilibrium we will need reaction
forces at the foundation soil interface.
The dynamic response of the foundation interacting with the soil shall be determined and compared
with threshold values that are acceptable for a proper operation of the machine. If the response
results higher than the threshold limits, the foundation dimensions shall be revised. It is an iterative
procedure that is typical in the engineering design process.
As a first approach for modeling the problem we can assume that the soil is elastic. In this case seems
natural to model the soil by linear springs. Such a model, masses supported on elastic springs,
exhibits natural modes of vibration. It is well known that these systems when excited at certain
frequencies vibrates with very large displacements .In fact, with infinite displacements according to
the mathematical model (Resonance phenomena)
This phenomenon is not observed in the practice because the soil extents are infinite and we are in
presence of an open system, instead of a closed one. In open systems the kinetic energy of the
Page: 5
particles in the vicinity of the foundation escapes in the form of travelling waves propagating in the
soil.
In a closed system the energy cannot escape as waves, because these are reflected in the boundaries
of the closed system. The kinetic interaction of the out-coming waves with the reflected (or
refracted) waves determines the so called vibration modes. We can say that vibration modes are
trapped waves inside the limits of the closed model.
The fundamental problem, for the Machine Foundation Problem, is to define simple models that can
represent the dissipation of energy from the travelling waves.
Being a dissipation of energy process it is natural to associate this behavior to damping mechanisms.
Radiation (or Geometric) Damping thus stands for the dissipation of elastic energy in the forms of
waves.
To model the Radiation Damping coming from an unbounded soil has been the object of rigorous
studies of continuum mechanics. The history of all these efforts is well summarized for example in
[15].
Now it is known that simplified procedures are available to solve these problems accepting
engineering simplifications.
These solutions are based in representing the soil by means of equivalent lumped parameter models.
The equivalent models are constituted of discrete springs, dashpots and eventually masses. The
parameters that defines the models are, in general, dependent of the exciting frequency,
Note that for static loads the equivalent model can consist uniquely of springs. For dynamic loads the
existence of travelling waves that drains the energy of the system needs special modeling.
Page: 6
The design procedure of a typical machine foundation requires to follows the following steps. In each
of them CW will help the task of the designer:
-
Estimate-the magnitude and characteristics of the dynamical loads. Typically the equipment
provider will help in this task. CW presents many options to evaluate the dynamical loads
when detailed information is missing. These are taken from well-known literature such as
[19]
Mass density
CW facilitates the inputting of such information and provides typical parameters for soil
types.
-
Define the Design Criteria. In cooperation with the vendor, and/or the client and considering
relevant codes. CW provides charts with well-known Acceptance Criteria for different
machines and condition.
Define the trial dimensions and type of yours foundation. With CW this is easy using the
advanced graphics interface of the software.
Calculate the dynamic response of the machine foundation system; CW accepts to define, for
some parameters, ranges of values allowing to evaluate the variation of results.
Page: 7
For bearing foundations the geometric center of gravity of the Soil Contact Area (SCA).
For piled foundation the geometric center of gravity of piles section areas.
Using the reference point as a coordinate origin X and Y axis are traced as indicated in the User
Graphic Interface. The vertical Z axis results directed upward. See Fig. 2.1
Page: 8
2.2. IMPEDANCES
The interaction between the foundation and the supporting soil can be investigated using either a
steady state analysis in the frequency domain or a direct time domain approach. In CW the frequency
domain analysis is utilized.
CW is an implementation of the Impedance Method
The dynamic impedance is defined as the ratio between the steady-state force (or moment) and the
resulting displacement (or rotation) at the base of the massless foundation. For each DOF (vertical,
horizontal, rocking, torsional) a discrete model that in most cases are independent of the others, and
acting in the corresponding direction is introduced.
The evaluation of the complex valued impedances functions at the interface points of the soilfoundation system becomes relevant in this method.
Collecting the six DOF the Foundation Impedance Matrix is a complex matrix S ,where the real and
imaginary parts represent respectively the stiffness and radiation damping of the soil foundation
system. Generally the matrix terms are frequency dependent.
Normal for shallow foundations, and if the DOF are related to a baricentric coordinate system, S is a
diagonal matrix without coupling of the different directions.
Impedance terms are conventionally given in relation to a dimensionless frequency factor
where:
-
( (
))(
Page: 9
Note that the Soil Internal Damping is incorporated using the damping ratio and that the Radiation
Damping is represented by (
).
The real parts of the impedance term represents force components that are in phase of the
displacements, and in this sense can be considered as a standard stiffness parameter. The imaginary
term are force components in phase with the velocities and are interpreted as energy dissipation by
radiation (Radiation Damping).
For a harmonically varying load {P}, statically transported to the origin (0, 0, 0) with frequency w
applied to the massless foundation.
{ }
{ }
The response, after the transient phase at the beginning will be:
{ }
Where { }
{ }
For dynamic equilibrium of a mass less foundation the equation of motion is:
{ }
[ ]{ }
([ ]
[ ])(
){ }
[ ] { }
To incorporate the foundation and machine mass, a mass matrix { } is generated and concentrated
at the coordinate origin. This matrix is usually sparse because the origin does not coincide with the
center of gravity of the foundation-machine system.
Incorporating this contribution to the equations of motion we obtain:
{ }
Where
[ ] { }
{[ ]
[ ]}{ }
Page: 10
Once obtained { },, that represents the displacements of the origin of the coordinate system, it is
easy to calculate the displacement in any other point of the rigid foundation. These points, where
results are needed, are user defined and called Control Points in CW.
3.
Clockwork 12.0 modeling capabilities are shown in Table I. Follows a brief description of each type
of model; for complete formulations see the indicated references.
Standard
Fundamental
Cones
Piles
Soil Type
Half-Space Soil
Multiple Layers over
Half-Space
Layers over Rock
Foundation Shape
Disk
Rectangle
Arbitrary
Embedded Foundation
In One Layer (Half-Space)
In Multiple Layers
Pile Theory
Winkler
Gazetas
Natural Frequency
Coupled Modes
Uncoupled Modes
Dynamic Loads
Harmonic
Periodic
Transient
Page: 11
a) Standard Model
The static-stiffness coefficients of the half-space, for each of the different DOF, are taken as
the direct springs K. These are given in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2.
The model consists of spring, dashpot and masses. These last shall be added to the
Foundation-machine masses. See Table 3.4. See Figure 3.1
Table 3.2 - Static stiffness on Homogeneous Half-Space for disk and rectangle shapes.
Page: 12
Table 3.3 - Static stiffness on Homogeneous Half-Space for an arbitrary foundation shape.
Table 3.4 Dimensionless Coefficients of standard lumped parameter model with mass on
homogeneous half-space.
Page: 13
b) Fundamental Model
The same Tables 3.2 and 3.3 are used for static values K.
The model can be visualized as shown in the Figure 3.2. See Table 3.5. For complete
formulation see [13].
Table 3.5 Dimensionless Coefficients for Dashpots and Masses used in Fundamental Model.
Page: 14
Cone Models
Theory developed by Wolf and Deek [10], [11], [12] allows to numerically simulate the
reflection, refraction of waves phenomena of a foundation above a stratified soil. Also
embedding can be simulated. See fig jjj for typical results of impedances parameters b k(a0)
and c(a0) of disk on one layer above a half space.
Table 3.6 Cone and spring-dashpot-mass model for foundation on surface of homogeneous
half-space
Fig 3.3 Vertical dynamic-stiffness coefficient of disk on layer fixed at base numerically
obtained.
Page: 15
4. PILED FOUNDATIONS
impedance is determined for two conditions that shall be selected: floating pile and pile
Table 4.2 Stiffness and Damping for Horizontal and Rocking DOF
Page: 16
Page: 17
Page: 18
Page: 19
REFERENCES
-
[1] J.P. Wolf and J.W. Deeks, Foundation Vibration Analysis a Strength of Materials Approach,
Elsevier, 2007
[2] R. Dobry and G. Gazetas, Simple Method for Dynamic Stiffness and Damping of Floating Pile
Groups, Gotechnique, 38 (1988): 557-554.
[3] G. Gazetas, Foundation Vibrations, in Foundation Engineering Handbook, 2nd Edition, edited by H.Y. Fang, Chapter 15, pp. 553-593 (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991)
[4] R. Flores and Manuel Silva, Engineering Approach to modeling of Piled Systems, Seventh World
Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1980
[5] H.G. Poulos and E.H. Davis, Pile Foundation Analysis and Design. New York: Wiley, 1980.
[6] F.E. Richart, R.D. Woods and J.R. Hall, Vibrations of Soils and Foundations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall, 1970.
[7] J.P. Wolf, Soil-Structure-Interaction Analysis in Time Domain. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
1988.
[8] J.P. Wolf, Consistent Lumped-Parameter Models for Unbounded Soil: Physical Representation,
earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 20 (1991): 11-32.
[9] J.P. Wolf, Consistent Lumped- Parameter Models for Unbounded Soil: Frequency-Independent
Stiffness, Damping and Mass Matrices, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 20 (1991):
33-41.
[10] J.P Wolf and J.W. Meek, Cone Models for a Soil Layer on Flexible Rock Half-space, Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22 (1993): 185-193.
[11] J.P. Wolf and J.W. Meek, Rotational Cone Models for a Soil Layer on Flexible Rock Half-space,
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23 (1994), in press.
[12] J.P. Wolf and J.W. Meek, Dynamic Stiffness of Foundation on or Embedded on Layered Soil
Halfspace, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Using Cone Frustrums, 23 (1994), in
press.
Page: 20
[13] J.P. Wolf, Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models, PTR Prentice-Hall,
1994.
[14] R. Flores and F. Costa Reis, Interao Solo-Estrutura para fundacoes estaqueadas V Seminario
Nacional de Produo Energia Electrica, Recife 1979
[15] G. Gazetas, Analysis of Machine Foundations: State of the Art, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, 2 (1983), 2-42.
[16] J. Lysmer and R.L. Kuhlemeyer, Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media, Journal of the
Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 95 (1969), 859-877.
[18] J.P. Wolf, Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction (Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall, 1985).