Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 INTRODUCTION
The quarter Two (Q2) Quality of Service report shows the performance of MTL against the
required Key Performance Indicator (KPI) targets in the months of April, May, and June
2016.
All the graphs in this report were plotted using already analysed data which was
submitted by Malawi Telecommunications Limited. It must be noted that MACRA
currently does not have proper tools to independently verify what has been submitted
by an operator.
Connection Rate
Page 1
Graph 1: Achieved Call Failure Rate vs. Target Call Failure Rate
NOTE: In this Q2 2016 MTL did not meet certain targets as required. Noticing from graph 1
above: MTL met all targets for Local calls, Long distance and Network to Network Calls in
April, May, and June. However for International Calls, MTL only managed to meet the
target in the month of June but failed in the months of April and May. The targets were
extremely below the required standards set by MACRA as shown from the graph above.
2.2 DIAL TONE RATE
Graph 2: Achieved Dial Tone Rate vs. Target Dial Tone Rate
NOTE: For modern day digital switches, the delay factor in the dial tone rate is almost
negligible as evidenced by the fact that MTL beat the target of 99% in all the months under
review as shown in the graph above.
Quarter Two 2016 MTL Report
Page 2
Graph 3: Achieved Fault Clearance Rate vs. Target Fault Clearance Rate within 48 hours and
within 7 days of fault reporting
NOTE: As seen in the graph above, in the within 48 hours fault clearance Rate target MTL
performed very well in all the months (April, May and June). However MTL did not
managed to meet the target for within 7 days in all the months (April, May and June).
Graph 4: Achieved Connection Rate vs. Target Connection Rate within 28 days and 120 days
after application for service
Quarter Two 2016 MTL Report
Page 3
NOTES:MTL failed to meet the target for connection rate for Within 28 days in the month
of April while in the month of May and June MTL manged to meet MACRAs target.
For the connections Within 120 days MTL did not manage to meet all the targets in the
months of April as well, and only managed to do so in the months of May and June. This is
clearly shown in the graph above.
3 CONCLUSION
MTL must be commended for those key performance indicator targets it met within the
quarter under review. As seen from the above graphs, MTL managed to meet the targets in
most significant KPIs.
MTL must improve perfomance in the Call Failure Rate KPI for International calls, Fault
Clearance Rate within 48 hours and within 7 days KPIs and Connection Rate within 28
Days as its performance in these Key Performance Indicators was below acceptable levels.
Page 4