Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN MEKANIKAL

MEC554 THERMALFLUID LAB

Experiments Title:
FORCED CONVECTION
Lectures Name:
DR WAN AHMAD NAJMI BIN WAN MOHAMED
Class:
EMD5M4A

Prepared by:
Bi
l
1
2
3
4

Name
NurAyuni binti Safari
Nur Afifah binti Noor Azaman
Norfatiha binti Suhaimi
Siti Zaiton binti Ismail

Matrix No
2014884564
2014208644
2014208638
2014217896

Date Performed
: 7 November 2016
:_____________________

Approved by

Date Submitted
: 14 November 2016
:_____________________

Received by

Signature

Assessment Rubric: Technical Content. 60 marks


Scale
Criteria
1. Introduction
(10 marks)

1
Poor

2. Experimental
Procedure
(10 marks)

3. Data / result and


Sample Calculation
(20 marks)

4. Discussion and
Conclusion
(20 marks)

3
Acceptable

Unable to generate a
complete theoretical formula
i.e. only writing the final
formula.
Make many errors in
applications of engineering
principles and concepts.
Unable to produce and
appropriate procedure to run
the experiment.
Having no objective(s).
Would not allow experiment
to achieve any goals.

Unable to present
experimental result using
appropriate tables, charts,
graphs or other presentation
formats.
Unable to relate theoretical
analysis with experimental
result and their practical
implication.
Unable to come out a clear
and understandable
conclusion.

Adequately generate
theoretical formula with small
errors.
Make some but tolerable
errors in applications of
engineering principles and
concepts.
Adequately produce an
appropriate procedure to run
the experiment i.e. missing
steps in procedure.
Having objective(s). Would
allow experiment to achieve
most goals.
Adequately present
experimental result using
appropriate tables, charts,
graphs or other presentation
formats.
Adequately relate theoretical
analysis with experimental
result and their practical
implication.
Conclusion is not clear, but
yet, understandable in such
manner.

5
Excellent

Student capable to generate a


complete theoretical formula
from the beginning.
All relevant engineering
principles and concepts are
accurately and comprehensively
demonstrated and applied.
Student capable to produce a
detailed procedure to run the
experiment.
Objective clearly defined.
Would allow experiments to
achieve goals.
Students capable to articulate
experimental result using
appropriate tables, charts,
graphs or other presentation
formats.
Students capable to relate
theoretical analysis with
experimental result and their
practical implication.
Student capable to express a
clear and concise conclusion.

Assessment Rubric: Writing Performance Level. 20 marks


Scale
Criteria

1
Poor

3
Acceptable

5
Excellent

1. Structure
(5marks)

Paragraphs are poorly


organized; use of sections is
illogical and hinders
document navigation.

Paragraphs are usually well


organized; use of sections is
logical and generally allows
easy document navigation.

All paragraphs are well


organized; use of sections is
logical and allows easy
navigation through the
document.

2. Graphics, figures,
tables and equations.
(5marks)

Figures, tables and equations


are not clearly or logically
identified and fail to support
the text.

Some figures, tables and


equations are logically
identified and adequately
support the text.

All figures, tables and equations


are clearly and logically
identified and strongly support
the text.

3. Mechanics
(5marks)

Sentences are poorly written;


numerous incorrect word
choices and errors in
grammar, punctuation and
spelling.

Sentences are generally well


written; a few incorrect word
choices and errors in grammar,
punctuation and spelling.

Sentences are well written; there


are no incorrect word choices
and the text is free of errors in
grammar, punctuation and
spelling.

4. Formatting and
references
(5marks)

Report is formatted poorly


and lacks a quality cover
page and index.
Fails to correctly report any
sources or to utilize
appropriate citation forms.

Formatting of the report is


genarally consistent and
adequate,includes a quality
cover page and index.
Most sources are correctly
reported; appropriate citation
forms are genarally utilized.

Formatting of the report is


professional and includes a
professional cover page and
index.
All sources are correctly
reported; appropriate citation
forms are utilized thoughout.

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING


UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
40450 SHAH ALAM
SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN
Tel: 03-55435190 Fax: 03-55435160
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

REPORT ASSESSMENT FORM


Experiments Title:
FORCED CONVECTION

Prepared by:
Bi
l
1
2
3
4
N
o
1
2
3
4
N
o
1
2
3
4

Name

Matrix No

NurAyuni binti Safari


Nur Afifah binti Noor Azaman
Norfatiha binti Suhaimi
Siti Zaiton binti Ismail

Technical Report
Introduction
Experimental
Procedures
Data/result/sample
of calculation
Discussion and
Conclusion
Writing
Performance
Structure
Graphics/Figures/Ta
bles
Mechanics
Formatting and
references

Course
Outcome
CO2

Signature

2014884564
2014208644
2014208638
2014217896
Assessment
Full Mark
Given Mark
10

C02

10

CO2

20

CO2

20

TOTAL
Course
Outcome
CO3

60

/60
Assessment
Full Mark
Given Mark
5

C03

CO3

CO3

TOTAL
TOTAL
MARKS

20

/20

80

/80

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING


UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
40450 SHAH ALAM
SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN
Tel: 03-55435190 Fax: 03-55435160
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

DIRECT OBSERVATION AND INTERVIEW ASSESSMENT FORM


NAME

: ________________________________________________________

LAB

: _____________________________ Student ID No.: ________________

General Guidelines:

LEVEL
Scale

Lemah
(Weak)
1

Sederhana
(Marginal)
2

Memuaskan
(Satisfactory)
3

Baik
(Good)
4

Cemerlang
(Excellent)
5

Please rate the respective student according to these followings criteria (Section A & B)
(A)

DIRECT OBSERVATION (CO1)


NO

ITEM

FULL MARK

A.1

Follow the appropriate experiment procedure or not

A.2

Correct data keeping method

A.3

Level of participation in the activity

A.4

Level of commitment

5
TOTAL

(B)

GIVEN MARK

20

INTERVIEW SESSION (CO4)


NO

ITEM

FULL MARK

B.1

Demonstrate the right method to use the apparatus /


right reading methodology.

B.2

Explanation on data and result

B.3

Explanation on possible application

B.4

Additional engineering knowledge gained throughout


this experiment.

TOTAL

____________________
(Signature)
Date: _______________

20

GIVEN MARK

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen