Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Figure
1.
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
Systems
with
weights
applied
to
the
arm
(left),
the
pivot
in
equilibrium
(right),
and
the
chamber
filled
with
water.
Using
the
known
masses
applied
to
the
end
of
the
system
and
the
height
of
the
water
in
the
chamber,
the
center
of
pressure
and
hydrostatic
force
as
well
as
mass
can
be
determined
using
a
series
of
equations.
However,
the
relations
for
a
partially
submerged
surface
are
different
from
those
for
a
fully
submerged
surface.
The
relations
for
a
partially
submerged
vertical
rectangular
surface
are
given
in
equations
1,2,
and
3.
The
relations
for
a
fully
submerged
rectangular
surface
are
given
in
equations
4,5,
and
6.
For
further
clarification
of
the
variables
and
values
for
the
constants,
figure
2
can
be
referenced.
!"
!
= !! + ! !
(1)
where
m=
mass
applied
to
end
of
pressure
system
(kg)
=
density
of
the
fluid
in
the
chamber
(water)
(kg/m3)
b=
depth
of
surface
where
pressure
is
applied
(m)
L=
length
of
balance
bridge
arm
from
weights
to
pivot
(m)
a=
height
from
arm
to
top
of
lower
surface
(m)
d=
height
of
lower
surface
(m)
h=
height
of
fluid
(water)
in
chamber
(m)
!
! = + !
(2)
where
hp=
center
of
pressure
measured
from
top
(m)
a=
height
from
arm
to
top
of
lower
surface
(m)
d=
height
of
lower
surface
(m)
h=
height
of
fluid
(water)
in
chamber
(m)
= ! !
(3)
where
F=
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
vertical
rectangular
surface
(N)
=
density
of
the
fluid
in
the
chamber
(water)
(kg/m3)
g=
acceleration
due
to
gravity
(m/s2)
h=height
of
fluid
(water)
in
chamber
(m)
b=
depth
of
surface
where
pressure
is
applied
(m)
=
!"#
!
!!
where
m=
mass
applied
to
end
of
pressure
system
(kg)
=
density
of
the
fluid
in
the
chamber
(water)
(kg/m3)
d=
height
of
lower
surface
(m)
L=
length
of
arm
from
weights
to
pivot
(m)
a=
height
from
arm
to
top
of
lower
surface
(m)
h=
height
of
fluid
(water)
in
chamber
(m)
!
! = + ! +
!!
!
!
!"(!! )
(5)
where
hp=
center
of
pressure
measured
from
top
(m)
a=
height
from
balance
bridge
arm
to
top
of
lower
surface
(m)
d=
height
of
lower
surface
(m)
h=
height
of
fluid
(water)
in
chamber
(m)
!
= !
(6)
where
F=
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
vertical
rectangular
surface
(N)
=
density
of
the
fluid
in
the
chamber
(water)
(kg/m3)
g=
acceleration
due
to
gravity
(m/s2)
h=height
of
fluid
(water)
in
chamber
(m)
d=
height
of
lower
surface
(m)
Figure
2.
Sketch
of
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
System
including
variable
clarification
and
values.
Once
these
values
have
been
calculated,
the
relationships
between
height
and
mass,
center
of
pressure,
or
hydrostatic
force
can
be
analyzed.
Analysis
of
these
plots
is
important
in
confirming
that
equations
1
through
6
properly
represent
the
relationships
between
variables.
It
is
also
important
to
analyze
the
quality
of
the
data
collected
by
the
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
System.
Thus,
using
the
known
masses
applied
to
the
balance
bridge
arm,
the
theoretical
height
can
be
calculated
using
equations
1
and
4.
Assuming
these
equations
properly
represent
the
system,
this
theoretical
value
of
height
can
be
compared
to
the
height
measured
off
of
the
pressure
system.
This
relationship
is
representative
of
the
quality
of
the
data
collected.
OBJECTIVES.
The
objectives
of
this
study
are
(a)
to
determine
and
analyze
the
relationships
of
hydrostatic
force
and
center
of
pressure
with
respect
to
the
height
of
the
water
in
the
pressure
system
chamber,
(b)
to
confirm
that
these
relationships
are
represented
in
the
given
equations,
and
(c)
to
assess
the
accuracy
of
the
measurements
produced
by
the
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
System.
DATA
COLLECTION.
An
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
System
was
set
on
a
flat
surface.
The
chamber
was
filled
with
water
until
the
balance
bridge
arm
was
level
and
the
height
read
zero
(at
the
bottom
of
the
quadrant)
(fig.3).
Known
masses
(kg)
were
added
to
the
left
side
of
the
arm.
To
balance
the
moment
about
the
pivot,
water
was
added
into
the
chamber
until
the
balance
bridge
arm
was
level
again.
The
drain
was
also
used
to
help
level
the
arm.
The
corresponding
water
height
(mm)
was
recorded.
Figure
3.
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
System
leveled
at
a
water
height
of
0
mm.
This
process
was
repeated
for
the
partially
submerged
surface
as
mass
was
added
in
increments
of
10
kg
until
the
water
height
reached
approximately
96
mm.
At
this
point,
water
was
added
to
that
the
vertical
rectangular
plate
was
fully
submerged
at
100
mm.
The
balance
bridge
arm
was
leveled
at
a
water
height
of
100
mm
by
adding
masses
until
the
total
mass
reached
approximately
225
g.
Now
fully
submerged,
the
known
masses
were
added
in
increments
of
50
g
to
the
left
side
of
the
balance
bridge
arm.
Water
addition
and
the
drain
were
used
to
level
the
balance
bridge
arm.
The
corresponding
water
height
was
recorded.
This
process
was
continued
until
the
water
height
reached
160
mm
which
occurred
with
a
mass
of
450
g.
DATA
ANALYSIS.
The
water
heights
were
converted
into
meters,
and
the
masses
were
converted
into
kilograms
using
equations
7
and
8
respectively.
1 = 0.001
(7)
1 = 0.001
(8)
For
the
partially
submerged
surface
(water
heights
under
100
mm),
equations
1-3
were
used
to
calculate
theoretical
height,
the
center
of
pressure,
and
the
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
surface
respectively.
The
applied
masses
were
then
plotted
against
the
corresponding
theoretical
heights,
the
theoretical
heights
were
plotted
against
the
measured
heights
for
the
same
masses,
the
centers
of
pressure
was
plotted
against
the
corresponding
measured
heights,
and
the
hydrostatic
forces
were
plotted
against
the
corresponding
measured
heights.
The
standard
deviation
was
additionally
calculated
between
the
theoretical
water
heights
and
the
measured
water
heights
for
each
of
the
masses.
A
graph
of
the
standard
deviation
against
the
measured
height
was
developed
for
the
partially
submerged
surface.
For
the
fully
submerged
surface
(water
heights
greater
than
100
mm),
equations
4-6
were
used
to
calculate
theoretical
height,
the
center
of
pressure,
and
the
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
surface
respectively.
Once
again,
these
values
were
used
to
develop
plots
of
various
relationships
(the
applied
masses
versus
the
corresponding
theoretical
heights,
the
theoretical
heights
versus
the
measured
heights
for
the
same
masses,
the
centers
of
pressure
versus
the
corresponding
measured
heights,
and
the
hydrostatic
forces
versus
the
corresponding
measured
heights).
The
standard
deviations
between
the
theoretical
heights
and
the
measured
heights
of
water
for
the
fully
submerged
surface
were
calculated.
The
results
were
plotted
against
the
corresponding
measured
heights.
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSION.
Effect
on
Partially
Submerged
Surface.
In
a
plot
of
theoretical
height
versus
measured
height
of
water
for
a
given
mass
(fig.
4),
there
is
a
linear
relationship
with
a
slope
of
approximately
one
for
a
partially
submerged
surface.
This
relationship
fits
the
height
measured
from
the
Hydrostatic
Pressure
System
with
an
R2
value
of
0.99982.
Thus,
the
measured
height
is
approximately
equal
to
the
theoretical
height
corresponding
to
the
applied
mass
(the
height
measured
by
the
pressure
system
is
accurate).
As
a
result,
calibration
of
the
pressure
system
is
not
needed.
0.12
y
=
1.0458x
R
=
0.99982
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Measured
Height
(m)
Figure
4.
Theoretical
Height
versus
Measured
Height
of
water
in
chamber
for
a
corresponding
applied
mass
for
a
partially
submerged
surface.
The
results
given
in
figure
4
are
further
supported
by
the
plot
of
the
standard
deviation
between
the
theoretical
and
measured
height
of
water
versus
the
measured
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
(fig.
5).
The
standard
deviation
varies
little
with
change
in
water
height
(the
plot
is
almost
horizontal).
Also,
the
measured
height
of
the
water
is
varied
by
less
than
0.005
m
from
the
theoretical
value
for
height.
Also,
the
percent
error
in
height
measurements
remained
below
7%:
within
the
acceptable
error
of
15%.
Thus,
the
heights
measured
from
the
pressure
system
are
close
in
value
to
the
theoretical
heights.
As
a
result,
there
is
no
need
for
calibration.
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Measured
Height
(m)
Figure
5.
Standard
Deviation
between
theoretical
and
measured
height
of
water
versus
the
measured
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
for
a
partially
submerged
surface.
As
demonstrated
by
figure
6,
as
the
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
of
the
pressure
system
increases,
the
hydrostatic
force
on
the
vertical
rectangular
surface
of
the
quadrant
increases
as
well.
A
power
model
represents
this
relationship
between
hydrostatic
force
and
measured
height.
.
Due
to
the
power
relationship
between
variables,
as
height
increases,
each
resulting
change
in
height
results
in
a
larger
increase
in
the
value
of
hydrostatic
pressure.
The
power
model
fits
the
data
with
an
R2
value
of
1,
so
the
model
also
supports
the
relation
between
hydrostatic
force
and
height
given
in
equation
3.
3.5
3
y
=
343.35x2
R
=
1
Mass (kg)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Measured
Height
(m)
Figure
6.
Relationship
between
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
vertical
rectangular
surface
and
the
measured
height
of
water
for
a
partially
submerged
surface.
Since
the
measured
height
is
approximately
equal
to
the
theoretical
height
(fig.
4),
a
plot
of
the
relationship
between
mass
and
theoretical
height
can
be
used
for
analysis
as
well.
Since
the
moment
about
the
pivot
on
the
right
end
of
the
balance
bridge
arm
must
be
equal
to
zero,
the
moment
due
to
the
weight
of
the
applied
masses
is
equal
to
the
moment
due
to
the
hydrostatic
force
on
the
surface.
As
a
result,
as
height
increases,
hydrostatic
force
increases
(fig.
6),
and
mass
(and
thus
weight)
must
increase
as
well
(fig.
7).
As
a
result,
figure
7
is
supportive
of
the
results
presented
in
figure
6.
Figure
7
is
also
confirmation
of
the
relationship
between
mass
and
height
given
in
equation
1.
Similar
to
equation
1,
the
model
between
mass
and
theoretical
height
is
polynomial,
which
fits
the
collected
data
with
an
R2
value
of
0.99972.
0.25
y
=
18.715x2
+
0.194x
0.2
R
=
0.99972
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Theoretical
Height
(m)
Figure
7.
Relationship
between
applied
mass
and
theoretical
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
for
a
partially
submerged
surface.
The
data
collected
from
the
hydrostatics
pressure
system
is
also
able
to
provide
information
on
the
center
of
pressure
on
the
vertical
surface
at
various
heights
(fig.
8).
Similar
to
the
linear
relationship
between
the
center
of
pressure
and
height
given
in
equation
2,
the
plot
of
the
center
of
pressure
versus
the
measured
height
of
water
for
a
partially
submerged
surface
is
a
linear
model
supported
by
an
R2
value
of
1.
Thus,
as
water
height
increases
in
the
chamber,
the
center
of
pressure
(measured
from
the
balance
bridge
arm
down)
decreases.
In
fact,
as
the
height
of
the
water
in
the
chamber
increases,
the
center
of
pressure
approaches
the
centroid
of
the
surface
(0.15
m).
Similar
results
were
reported
by
Humpherys
(1991)
in
his
study
of
Center-of-Pressure
Gates.
0.2
0.195
0.19
0.185
0.18
0.175
y
=
-0.3333x
+
0.2
R
=
1
0.17
0.165
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Measured
Height
(m)
Figure
8.
Center
of
pressure
on
the
vertical
rectangular
quadrant
versus
the
measured
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
for
a
partially
submerged
surface.
The
procedure
used
to
determine
the
relationship
of
the
center
of
pressure
and
hydrostatic
force
with
height
or
depth
of
the
water
for
a
partially
submerged
surface
is
similar
to
a
procedure
used
during
study
of
sessile
drops
(Tadmor
and
Yadav,
2007).
Effect
on
Fully
Submerged
Surface.
Similar
to
the
results
found
under
the
study
of
a
partially
submerged
surface,
the
relationship
between
the
theoretical
and
measured
height
for
a
fully
submerged
surface
at
a
given
applied
weight
is
linear
(fig.
9).
This
relationship
fits
the
data
gathered
from
the
pressure
system
with
an
R2
value
of
0.9912.
Since
the
slope
of
the
plot
is
approximately
one,
the
measured
height
of
the
water
in
the
chamber
is
approximately
equal
to
the
theoretical
value
of
the
height
of
water
at
a
given
mass.
Thus,
no
calibration
is
needed
due
to
the
relative
accuracy
of
the
measurements
for
a
fully
submerged
surface.
0.16
0.15
0.14
y
=
0.9342x
0.13
R
=
0.9912
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
Measured
Height
(m)
Figure
9.
Theoretical
height
versus
measured
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
for
a
fully
submerged
surface.
The
accuracy
of
the
measurements
taken
by
the
hydrostatics
pressure
system
is
also
supported
by
the
plot
of
the
standard
deviation
between
theoretical
height
and
measured
height,
and
the
measured
height
of
water
in
the
chamber.
Like
figure
5,
the
plot
of
standard
deviation
and
measured
height
for
a
fully
submerged
surface
is
nearly
horizontal
(fig.
10).
Because
the
standard
deviation
is
less
than
0.01
m
at
all
heights,
the
measured
height
is
relatively
close
in
value
to
theoretical
height.
While
the
measured
heights
vary
more
from
the
theoretical
heights
for
a
fully
submerged
surface
than
the
partially
submerged
surface,
the
variation
is
still
low.
In
fact,
the
percent
error
in
height
measurements
remained
below
7%:
well
under
the
acceptable
error
of
15%.
Thus,
figure
10
is
confirmation
that
the
hydrostatics
pressure
system
does
not
need
to
be
calibrated.
Unlike
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
Unlike
the
plot
for
hydrostatic
force
versus
measured
height
of
a
partially
submerged
surface
(fig.
6),
the
hydrostatic
force
versus
measured
height
for
a
fully
submerged
vertical
rectangular
surface
fits
a
linear
model
with
an
R2
value
of
1
(fig.
11).
Thus,
this
model
is
also
consistent
with
the
relationship
between
height
and
hydrostatic
force
given
in
equation
6.
As
shown
in
the
graph,
hydrostatic
force
is
increasing
steadily
with
the
increasing
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
of
the
pressure
system.
Similar
results
were
found
in
the
study
of
slopes
under
drawdown
conditions
(Lane
and
Griffiths,
2000).
8
7
6
y
=
68.67x
-
3.4335
R
=
1
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
Measured
Height
(m)
Figure
11.
Hydrostatic
force
versus
measured
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
for
a
fully
submerged
surface.
Similar
to
figure
7,
the
plot
of
applied
mass
versus
theoretical
height
for
a
fully
submerged
surface
reaffirms
the
results
of
the
plot
for
hydrostatic
force
versus
measured
height
of
the
water
(fig.
12).
Since
the
theoretical
height
is
approximately
equal
to
the
measured
height,
the
plot
is
confirmation
that,
as
the
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
increases;
the
applied
mass
must
also
increase.
This
is
once
again
due
to
the
fact
that
the
moments
about
the
pivot
must
balance.
As
the
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
increases,
the
applied
mass
must
also
increase
to
counteract
the
moment
due
to
the
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
quadrant
(fig.
11).
However,
unlike
the
plot
for
a
partially
submerged
surface,
the
plot
of
applied
mass
versus
theoretical
height
is
linear
for
a
fully
submerged
surface
with
an
R2
value
of
0.99854.
Thus,
the
relationship
between
mass
and
height
given
in
equation
4
is
supported
by
this
plot.
Mass (kg)
0.5
y
=
3.8228x
-
0.1279
0.45
R
=
0.99854
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.08
0.09
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
Theoretical
Height
(m)
Figure
12.
Relationship
between
applied
mass
and
the
theoretical
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
for
a
fully
submerged
surface.
Unlike
the
graph
of
center
of
pressure
versus
measured
height
for
a
partially
submerged
surface
(fig.
8),
the
plot
of
the
center
of
pressure
(measured
from
the
balance
bridge
arm
down)
and
measured
height
is
a
power
model
with
an
R2
value
of
0.98633
(fig.
13).
Thus,
this
relationship
is
confirmation
of
the
relationship
between
center
of
pressure
and
height
given
in
equation
5.
Similar
to
the
partially
submerged
surface,
as
height
increases,
the
center
of
pressure
is
decreasing
towards
to
centroid
of
the
vertical
rectangular
surface.
In
other
words,
the
distance
of
the
center
of
pressure
from
the
arm
decreases
as
the
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
increases.
These
results
are
once
again
supported
by
the
study
of
Center-of-
Pressure
gates
(Humpherys,
1991).
0.165
0.164
0.163
0.162
0.161
0.16
0.159
y
=
0.1295x-0.106
0.158
R = 0.98633
0.157
0.156
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
CONCLUSIONS.
The
Edibon
Hydrostatics
Pressure
System
accurately
measures
the
height
of
the
water
in
the
chamber
needed
to
calculate
both
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
the
vertical
rectangular
quadrant
and
the
center
of
pressure
at
which
this
force
acts,
with
a
low
standard
deviation
from
the
theoretical
water
height
for
both
partially
and
fully
submerged
surfaces.
This
is
confirmed
by
the
linear
plots
of
theoretical
versus
measured
water
height
in
which
the
slope
is
approximately
one
for
both
the
partially
and
fully
submerged
surfaces.
The
data
gathered
from
the
pressure
system
also
supports
the
relationships
between
variables
as
they
are
presented
in
the
equations
given
to
calculate
hydrostatic
force,
center
of
pressure,
and
mass.
In
other
words,
the
hydrostatic
force
acting
on
both
partially
and
fully
submerged
vertical
rectangular
surface
increases
as
the
height
of
the
fluid
(water)
in
the
chamber
increases.
This
relationship
is
supported
by
the
plots
of
mass
versus
theoretical
height
when
the
balance
of
the
moments
about
the
pivot
is
considered.
For
both
partially
and
fully
submerged
surfaces,
the
center
of
pressure
(measured
from
the
balance
bridge
arm
down)
decreases
towards
the
centroid
of
the
quadrant
as
the
height
of
water
in
the
chamber
increases.
REFERENCES.
engel,
Y.
A.,
&
Cimbala,
J.
M.
(2014).
In
Fluid
mechanics:
Fundamentals
and
Applications
(3rd
ed.,
pp.
38-59).
New
York,
NY:
McGraw-Hill
Higher
Education.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
This
study
was
conducted
in
the
Department
of
Biosystems
Engineering
lab