Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
Abstract
The subject of religion in schools is often a touch subject. It is true that not one religion can be
held at a greater value than another. At the same time, care must be given to not disrespect the
customs, values and beliefs of other individuals. The best way to do this is often hard to decide.
The following scenario is an example of one of the many issues surrounding religion in the
school system.
RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
3
Religion in Schools: Karen White
Introduction
RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
(Underwood, p.216, 2006). It is the duty of the school and Mr. Ward to insure the rights of all
students. The Establishment Clause/ Free Exercise clause states that the government cannot
sponsor just one religion (Underwood, p.216, 2006). In this case Mrs. White would be forcing
her students to follow the guidelines brought forth by her religion alone. In the case of Lemon v.
Kurtzman (1971), we are able to learn of the three prong test that can be used to justify
government involvement in religion. One must ask: 1. Does the action or policy have a secular
legislative purpose? 2. Does its primary effect neither advance nor inhibit religion? 3. Does the
policy or action foster an excessive government entanglement with religion (Underwood, p.210,
2006)? It is easy to see that Mrs. Whites new policy does not pass the test.
Con Support
It is Mrs. Whites belief that by forcing her to participate in activities that are against her
religion, she is being discriminated against. There is much literature about the protections of
religious freedoms of students. A student can even be excused from proticipating in a given
activity (Underwood, p.217, 2006) However, there is not much to say about that of educators.
Should they not be entitled to the same rights and freedoms? This case is very similar to a
currently active case, Yvonne Lemmons v. Southfield Public Schools (2016). It is being argued
in this case that it is discrimination to force a teacher to take part in a religious or holiday activity
of which is against their beliefs. Moreover, it is a direct violation of ones civil rights.
In another very similar case, Bein v. Warrenburg Central School District (1976), a
decision was made that the educator was not a fault under similar circumstances (Jehovah's
Witness Employees Holiday Celebrations Court Cases, n.d.). Even though Mrs. White would not
lead holiday projects and activities, it was never said that parents could not step in and do so
themselves. Secondly, Mrs, White did say she would not say the pledge. Yet, she is more than
RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
willing to teach her students the words and meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance. As in Bein v.
Warrenburg Central School District (1976), Mrs. White would insure that her actions did not
leave a negative impact on her students, while still she maintained her own freedom of religion.
Final Thoughts
It is my belief in this case that Mrs. White should be required to maintain holiday projects
and activities. She should insure that the Pledge of Allegiance is said and sing Happy Birthday
on students birthdays as per the requirements of the Establishment Clause within the First
Amendment. As a teacher it is Mrs. Whites job to teach students respect of not just ones own
beliefs, but everyone elses as well. She should insure that all displays properly reflect the
heritage, customs, and values of all. Moreover, students should not be taught that one religion is
to be held at a higher value that another. This is something I feel strongly will happen if Mrs.
Whites behavior is allowed to continue. If Mrs. White is non-compliant with these orders her
termination should be upheld.
RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
References
Jehovah's Witness Employees Holiday Celebrations Court Cases. (n.d.). Retrieved October 13,
2016, from http://jwemployees.bravehost.com/NewsReports/2001.html
Lemon v. Kurtzman, No. 89, 310 (June 28, 1971).
Lemmons v. Southfield Public Schools, 2:16-cv-10008 (Michigan Eastern District Court January
04, 2016).
Skoros v. City of New York, 04-1229-CV. (United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
February 02, 2006).
Underwood, J., & Webb, L. D. (2006). School law for teachers: Concepts and applications.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.