Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257751479
CITATION
READS
68
4 authors, including:
Eshamsul Sulaiman
Basim Atiya
University of Malaya
19 PUBLICATIONS 53 CITATIONS
4 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Marhazlinda Jamaludin
University of Malaya
12 PUBLICATIONS 46 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
bs_bs_banner
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University College, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University College, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Keywords
failure mode, ferrule height, fracture
resistance, glass bre post, post length.
Correspondence
Dr Shurooq S. Abdulrazzak, Department of
Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry,
MAHSA University College, Level 4, Pusat
Bandar Damansara, Damansara Heights, 50490
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Email:
drshurooq_71@yahoo.com,
shurooq@mahsa.edu.my
doi:10.1111/aej.12042
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combined effect of ferrule height
and post length on fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically
treated teeth restored with glass fibre posts, composite resin cores and crowns.
Ninety human maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated and
divided into three groups (n = 30) according to the ferrule heights: 4, 2 and
0 mm, respectively. Post spaces in each group were prepared at 2/3, 1/2 and
1/3 of the root length (n = 10). The specimens were received fibre posts,
composite resin core build up and cast metal crowns. After thermocycling,
compressive static load was applied at an angle of 135 to the crowns. Two-way
analysis of variance showed significant differences in the failure load in the
ferrule height groups, no significant differences in post length groups and no
significant interaction between ferrule heights and post lengths. More restorable failure modes were observed.
Introduction
Endodontically treated teeth are usually more susceptible
to fracture because they have insufficient coronal tooth
structure as a result of caries, trauma or the endodontic
procedure itself (1). It has been suggested that the
dentine in endodontically treated teeth undergoes
changes in collagen cross-linking that make them dry
with time. Thus, they become more brittle with high risk
of fracture compared with non-endodontically treated
teeth (2). They are often indicated for full coverage restoration with post and core to achieve retention and
resistance form for the final restoration (3). The survival
of a pulpless tooth is directly related to the quantity and
quality of the remaining coronal dentine (4). Many in
vitro and in vivo studies (57) stated that the fracture
resistance of endodontically treated teeth increased significantly with increased amount of coronal dentine.
Sound coronal dentine must be conserved to allow the
crown margin to extend below the junction of the core
and the remaining tooth structure. This is to increase
retention and resistance of the core by allowing the use of
a ferrule preparation (8) and thus increases the mechanical resistance of a post/core/crown restoration (9). Other
study stated that the ferrule preparation has no benefit in
terms of resistance to fracture of central incisors restored
with prefabricated parapost, composite core and crown
(10). However, in viewing their results, it can be seen that
the mean failure load for the teeth with ferrule preparation was higher than that of the non-ferruled teeth but
the difference was not significant, which may be due to
the different methodology and small sample size. A
number of authors have suggested that endodontically
treated teeth must have at least 2 mm of tooth structure
coronal to the preparation finish line to ensure structural
integrity (11,12). It was recommended that surgical
crown lengthening or orthodontic extrusion for at least
one millimetre in case when the existing clinical crown
height will not permit the placement of a crown ferrule
(13). It is known that endodontically treated teeth with
posts have significantly greater longevity than teeth
without post (14). Different recommendations have been
made regarding the optimal post length. It was suggested
that the post should be equal to or greater than the length
1
S. S. Abdulrazzak et al.
S. S. Abdulrazzak et al.
Results
The means and standard deviations of the failure loads for
each post length subgroup at different ferrule heights are
presented in Figure 4.
Two-way ANOVA test was performed to test the two
main effects, ferrule height and post length. Results in
Table 1 shows that only the ferrule height had significant
effect on the failure load (P < 0.000). The 4 mm ferrule
height group had significantly higher fracture resistance
3
S. S. Abdulrazzak et al.
Ferrule height
Post length
Restorable
Freq (%)
Unrestorable
Freq (%)
4 mm
10 mm
7.5 mm
5 mm
Total
10 mm
7.5 mm
5 mm
Total
10 mm
7.5 mm
5 mm
Total
10
10
10
30
10
10
10
30
10
10
10
30
7 (70%)
7 (70%)
6 (60%)
20 (66.7%)
7 (70%)
6 (60%)
5 (50%)
18 (60%)
7 (70%)
6 (60%)
4 (40%)
17 (56.7%)
3 (30%)
3 (30%)
4 (40%)
10 (33.3)
3 (30%)
4 (40%)
5 (50%)
12 (40%)
3 (30%)
4 (40%)
6 (60%)
13 (43.3%)
2 mm
0 mm
Figure 4 The mean failure load for each post length subgroup.
Table 1 Two-way ANOVA for the effect of ferrule height and post length on
fracture load
Independent
variable
Ferrule heights
4
2
0
Post length
10
7.5
5
Mean failure
load (N) (SD)
30
30
30
30
30
30
F (d.f.)
P value
536.7 (195.4)
414.6 (133)
319.8 (54.7)
18.143 (2)
0.000*
467.1 (184.3)
412.4 (155.6)
391.4 (148.3)
2.344 (2)
0.102
Mean
difference (I-J)
*
122.1
216.9*
94.8*
Lower
bound
Upper
bound
P value
17.9
126.0
30.7
226.3
307.7
158.8
0.018
0.000
0.002
Discussion
In the present study, the fracture resistances of
endodontically treated maxillary central incisors with different ferrule heights combined with different post
lengths were stress tested and recorded. The results of this
investigation confirmed the general consensus that the
endodontically treated teeth with the presence of a
ferrule are superior to those lacking a ferrule in the prevention of tooth fracture under a static load. Regardless of
the post length, our results indicated that increasing the
ferrule height significantly increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth (P < 0.000). This is
in agreement with other studies (5,6,18,19). Moreover,
the 4 mm ferrule height group presented significantly
with the highest mean failure load (536.7 N) when compared with the 2 mm (414.6 N) and 0 mm (319.8 N)
ferrule groups regardless of post length. This may be
attributed to several mechanisms of action. The most
reasonable explanation is that when the amount of
remaining dentine increased, this allowed for redistribution and dissipation of large force. Besides, more coronal
dentine structure may have formed a more stable foundation for the post and core; accordingly, the greater
resistance to rotation would be achieved (20). It could be
concluded that the endodontically treated teeth restored
with glass fibre posts and composite cores with at least
2 mm of remaining tooth structure (ferrule) is beneficial
in increasing fracture resistance.
It is important to know that the lowest mean failure
load recorded in this study was higher than the
maximum human incisal bite force, which does not
exceed 200 N during normal physiological functioning of
anterior teeth (20). This could be as a result of the design
of our study that includes periodontal ligament simulation, which tends to act as a shock absorber leading to
higher values of failure loads.
S. S. Abdulrazzak et al.
Conclusions
Under the limitations of this study, the following conclusions were drawn:
1. Increasing the ferrule height significantly increased
the fracture resistance of the endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with a glass fibre post,
composite core and crown (P < 0.000).
2. Post length had no significant effect on the fracture
resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central
incisors for any given ferrule height (P = 0.102).
3. Almost all the subgroups had restorable failure except
the subgroup without ferrule with short post (1/3 root
length), which had more unrestorable failure.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by a grant from the University
of Malaya (project no. PS074/2009A).
References
1. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth
stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989; 15: 5126.
2. Cheung WA. Review of the management of endodontically treated teeth Post, core and the final restoration.
J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 6119.
3. Darabi F, Namazi LA. Comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using two different
restoration systems. Dent Res J 2008; 5: 659.
4. Tjan AH, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of post
channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls.
J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 496500.
S. S. Abdulrazzak et al.
20. Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with
varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet
Dent 2005; 93: 33136.
21. Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Waki T et al. Stress analysis of
endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with different types of post material. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:
14550.
22. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post
length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to
cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 7882.
23. Santos-Filho PC, Castro CG, Silva GR, Campos RE,
Soares CJ. Effects of post system and length on the
strain and fracture resistance of root filled bovine teeth.
Int Endod J 2008; 41: 493501.
24. do Valle AL, Pereira JR, Shiratori FK, Pegoraro LF,
Bonfante G. Comparison of the fracture resistance of
endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated
posts and composite resin cores with different post
lengths. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15: 2932.
25. Maccari PC, Conceio EN, Nunes MF. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three
different prefabricated esthetic posts. J Esthet Restor
Dent 2003; 15: 2530.
26. Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L,
Rodrguez-Cervantes PJ, Prez-Gnzlez A,
Snchez-Marn FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 4754.
27. Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M.
Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the
three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil
2006; 33: 6907.
28. Seefeld F, Wenz HJ, Ludwig K, Kern M. Resistance to
fracture and structural characteristics of different
fiber reinforced post systems. Dent Mater 2007; 23:
26571.
29. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJA.
Structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure
modes of fiber, metal and ceramic post-and-core
systems. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 47682.
30. Akkayan B, Glmez T. Resistance to fracture of
endodontically treated teeth restored with different post
systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 4317.
31. Giovani AR, Vansan LP, de Sousa Neto MD, Paulino SM.
In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal
posts with different lengths. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:
1838.
32. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element
analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowelrestored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 3219.
33. Fuss Z, Lusting J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of
endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth:
impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001; 27: 468.