1. Litigations should, as much as possible, be decided on their
merits and not-on technicality. De las Alas et al. vs. Court of Appeals et al., p. 218. 2. The rules of procedure ought not to be applied in a rigid, technical sense; rules of procedure are used only to help secure, not override, substantial justice. If a technical and rigid enforcement of the rules is made, their aim would be defeated.id. 3. No vested right in technicalities. Id. 4. The Rules of Court should not be interpreted to sacrifice substantial rights of a litigant at the altar of technicalities to the consequent impairment of the sacred principle of justice. The Rules of Court frown upon hair-splitting technicalities that do not square with their liberal tendency and with the ends of justice. Gapoy vs. Adil et al., p. 259.