introduction Workshop Dec. 7, 2016 UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Natural Resources: no longer the curse?
Natural Resources was considered as the curse because: Volatility in the price and demand creating unstable macroeconomy (Gylfason, 2012); Appreciation of exchange rate that discourage the growth of other sectors with export potential (Dutch disease) (Corden & Neary, 1982); Over-reliance on commodities , inferior goods, contributes to long term trade imbalances(Prebisch, 1950; Sachs & Warner,2001; Singer, 1949); No forward or back ward productive linkages that do not generate effective employment and economic impact(Hirschman, 1958); Generating little technological and scientific knowledge because innovation is driven by the input suppliers (Pavitt, 1984); Causing political conflicts and corruption that hampers stable development (Auty, 1990, 1993). 2
Counter arguments to the curse:
Data/methodology Historical evidence and cases (Nordic countries, Canada, Australia) Role of Knowledge/STI capability, Human capital Mechanisms to counter-balance macro economic volatility (i.e. Stabilization funds etc); Technological change/ organizational change/emergence of knowledge intensive service sector Linkages, cluster and global value chain Local specificity of innovative solutions 3
In this workshop, propositions are:
Natural Resource based industry has potentials to increase knowledge intensity and support economic diversification via:
Sustaining investment for transition towards knowledge economy;
Building technological capabilities based on NR activities; Strengthen local linkages with Natural resource based activities; Creating demand for local knowledge intensive activities.
How to strengthen and coordinate Knowledge, Policies,
Institutions and Programs to enable above? 4
Speakers and Topics
Prof. David Kaplan, University of Cape Town
Prof. Carlo Pietrobelli, University of Rome Tre, UNU-MERIT and Georgetown University Dr. Michiko Iizuka, UNU-MERIT Mr. Fernando Vargas, UNU-MERIT