Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the world needs to look at the different
available natural energy sources. So it is necessary to look
into more environmentally friendly energy sources as wind
energy. But there are a range of advantages and
disadvantages of wind energy to look at, for examples wind
energy is friendly to the surrounding environment. Also
wind turbines take up less space than the average power
station and are considered as great resources to generate
energy in remote locations. But the main disadvantage
regarding wind power is down to the winds unreliability
factor. Also wind turbine construction can be very
expensive and the noise pollution from commercial wind
turbines should be considered [1]. Moreover, all wind
farms connected to grid shall endeavor to maintain the
voltage wave form quality at the grid connection point, also
to keep voltage and frequency deviation in their permissible
value otherwise, the grid operator is authorized to
disconnect the wind farm from the grid [2].
A flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) has
higher controllability in power systems by means of power
electronic devices. The basic applications of FACTS
devices are power flow control, increase of transmission
capability, voltage control, reactive power compensation,
stability improvement and power quality improvement [3,
4]. However, because of the considerable cost of FACTS
devices, it is important to minimize their number and obtain
their optimal locations in the system.
1
978-1-4799-6415-4/14/$31.00 2014 IEEE
Case study 1
Simulation Results:
Results show that:
(pu)
0.8647
V with
FACTS
C range
(pu)
0.9839
V with
FACTS LC range
(pu)
0.9963
0.883
0.9444
0.946
0.8745
0.9421
0.9436
bus
number
V without
FACTS
Line
number
From
bus
To
bus
Lines
reactance
p.u.
0.0411
FACTS capacitive
range
reactance value %
of line reactance
-70
39
0.025
-30
0.0128
-70
13
0.0046
-70
14
0.0363
-70
15
39
0.025
-70
17
10
13
0.0043
-70
0.8172
0.939
0.9361
Line
number
39
0.7937
0.9368
0.932
0.0411
0.0128
-80
13
0.0046
-57.23
14
0.0363
-80
15
39
0.025
-80
16
10
11
0.0043
-53.08
bus number
1
Power
angle with
FACTS C
range
-32.2858
Power angle
with FACTS
L-C range
-30.0138
-35.3893
-29.8945
-28.8129
-35.5177
-30.3834
-29.6625
-46.1495
-33.8841
-33.2112
27
-35.1527
-29.9831
-29.2817
37
-28.9861
-23.4317
-22.4069
39
-56.2736
-36.4061
-35.0903
To
bus
Lines
reactance
p.u.
From
bus
1.4
1.064
0.794
0
-56.27
With
FACTS
C
range
1.177
1.064
0.937
0
-36.41
With
FACTS
L-C
range
1.1795
1.063
0.932
0
-35.09
1.157
1.092
1.089
Power
angel with
FACTS C
range
-24.8264
Power angel
with FACTS
L-C range
-24.8529
-35.3638
-27.5765
-28.7164
37
-7.9869
-3.9295
-3.785
39
-43.6912
-30.3794
-30.5393
bus
number
1
Case study 2
Line number
From
bus
To
bus
Lines
reactance
p.u.
14
0.0129
FACTS capacitive
Range
reactance value %
of line reactance
-70
0.0026
-70
Simulation Results:
11
0.0092
-34
12
11
0.0082
-70
13
0.0046
-30
14
0.0363
-63.13
15
39
0.025
-70
V
without
FACTS (p.u.)
0.8775
V with FACTS
C range (p.u.)
0.9559
V with FACTS
L-C range
(p.u.)
0.9565
0.852
0.9247
0.9245
0.0151
39
0.8203
0.9138
0.9154
0.0213
-5. 28
18
0.0133
-80
0.0128
-80
14
0.0129
-80
0.0026
20
12
11
0.0082
-80
14
0.0363
-64.92
15
39
0.025
-80
Line
number
From
bus
To bus
Lines
reactance
p.u.
1.516
With
FACTS
C range
1.39
With
FACTS LC range
1.38
1.064
1.063
1.064
0.82
0.914
0.915
-43.69
-30.38
-30.54
3.836
3.771
3.775
REFERENCES
[1]www.clean-energyideas.com/articles/advantages_and_disadvantages_of_
wind_energy.html
[2] Wind Farm Grid Connection Code, In Addition To The
Egyptian Transmission Grid Code (ETGC), Revised Draft, June
2013.
[3] A. Y. Abdelaziz, M. A. El-Sharkawy and M. A. Attia,
Optimal Location of TCSC in Power Systems for Increasing
Loadability by Genetic Algorithm', Electric Power Components
and Systems Journal, Vol. 39, No. 13, 2011, pp. 1373-1387.
[4] Zhang, X.-P., Rehtanz, C., and Pal, B., Flexible AC
Transmission Systems: Modeling and
Control, Germany:
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1, 2, 1518,22,2006.
[5] Meikandasivam, S., Nema, R. K., and Jain, S. K., Behavioral
study of TCSC devicea Matlab/Simulink implementation,
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Issue
45, pp. 694699,September2008.
[6] Gerbex, S., Cherkaoui, R., and Germond, A. J., Optimal
location of multi-type FACTS devices in a power system by
means of genetic algorithms, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 16,
No.3,pp.539544,August2001.
[7] Saravanan, M., Slochanal, S. M. R., Venkatesh, P., and
Abraham, J. P. S., Application of particle swarm optimization
technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost
of installation and system loadability, Elect. Power Syst. Res.,
Vol. 77, No. 3/4, pp.276283,2007.
[8] A.Adamczyk, R. Teodorescu, R.N Mukerjee, P. Rodriguez,
Overview of FACTS devices for wind power plants directly
connected to the transmission network , Industrial Electronics
(ISIE), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on 4-7 July 2010,
pp. 3742-3748.
[9] A. Y. Abdelaziz, M. A. El-Sharkawy, M. A. Attia, and B. K.
Panigrahi, 'Genetic Algorithm Based Approach for Optimal
Allocation of TCSC for Power System loadability Enhancement',
Proceedings of Swarm, Evolutionary and Memetic Computing
Conference (SEMCCO 2012), December 20 22, 2012, Institute
of Technical Education and Research, SOA University,
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, pp. 548-557.
[10] Zimmerman, R.D., Murillo-Sanchez, E.C.: Matpower A
MatlabTM Power System Simulation Package Version 3.2, Users
Manual (September 21, 2007).
[11]
http://sys.elec.kitami-it.ac.jp/ueda/demo/WebPF/39-NewEngland.
[12] Abdel-Rahman Amin Khatib , Internet-based Wide Area
Measurement Applications in Deregulated Power Systems ,
Ph. D. Thesis , Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic and State
University , Blacksburg, Virginia, July 2002.