Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Structure of Samsung's research and development department The structure of SE's R & D department (Samsung Advanced
Institution Technology - SAIT)
The global R & D network of Samsung electronics consists of six centers in
Korea and 18 centers in 9 different countries (for example in US, UK, Israel,
China, India, Russia, Japan) SE established, besides the SAIT as the corporate
R & D center at The headquarter, also an effective R & D system for the
product division base. As over mentioned the SAIT works on long-term
projects which benefit multiple divisions. The other laboratories are
responsible for medium to short-term projects. Transfers of engineers from
medium / Short-term projects to the SAIT and vice versa, is a very common
strategy in order to profit from the various knowledge, different point of
views and ideas. At the SAIT the employees belong either to a technology
group or a project group. Separated both groups as well as the other
business units cooperation and communicate very close with each other
through the established matrix organization. By this SE is able to respond to
rapid technology changes and new discoveries. Out it can share business
strategies, different knowledge and viewpoints In order to minimize the time
to the market and increase the success rate of the new launched
technologies.
FROM PAPER:
Despite a successful strategy, a few points could be discussed to find an alternative
strategy. The strategy that implemented SE is working well as we can see
performance in its last annual reports (see appendix 3). Yet, when SE decided to sell
directly to end customers market, it faced more and more attacks as a patents and
copyrights breaker. It spends billions per year in fees and its brand image of
follower and copycat does not improve in a good way. To conclude, SE does not
have to change its basic strategy but maybe adapt its strategy in certain markets
for end customers. For instance marketing communication and advertising should
not be the same everywhere. In Europe, the brand is seen as a medium range
quality. SE must absolutely be considered as a high quality product brand if it does
not want to remain always as the follower. It could solve some problems using tools
that offer other basic strategies such as transnational strategy for marketing
division (Raisch, 2014). As we can read on a Bloombergs report (2013), from 2014
Samsung no longer wants to be seen as a fast follower. It is one of the challenges
SE set in its last strategy planning.