Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
HOUSTON DIVISION
CAROL ANN DAVIS,
Plaintiff
1
2. Texas Municipal League- Intergovernmental Risk Pool
Southern District barring the June 18, 2008 illegal search and seizure of
Plaintiff in Austin, Texas under the color of law. At all times relevant
the entity defendant, the city defendant, attorney defendant and the
revenge against Plaintiff Carol Ann Davis that includes among other
of money for copies (for public records) and then attempting to arrest
acts under the color of law and should have prevented the commission
of overt acts and other violations under the color of law and therefore
actionable under the law for the continuous activity to destroy Plaintiff
TMLRiskPool@tmlirp.orgi
Risk Pool, located at 1821 Rutherford Lane, Austin TX 78754 (512) 491-
provisions of the ‘policy’ and prevent the filing of yet another federal
civil rights lawsuit but attorney defendant Gillespie clearly has acted,
client and the 1997 (Travis County Judge Elizabeth Earle) CAPIAS
and tampering with government data bases. The matter of the CAPIAS;
data bases is under criminal investigation with John Keel Texas State
rights claim and that the Plaintiff was disadvantage because of lack of
funds and the illegal custom practice of the illegal insurance scheme of
February 18, 2001 in the City of Jersey Village and moreover protect
the sham of the FAKE client ‘Mr. Davis’ and the waste fraud and abuse
held back what she knew and her pay check is derived by criminal
activity and the evidence and this situation it is patently clear this is
one of those situations and the time for the games to end without the
with her life but defendant attorney Lori Gillespie has decided
otherwise for the membership where she earns money derived from
and file a false police report and use total police power to illegal seize
and search Plaintiff on June 18, 2008. Now included in the purpose of
defendants ( Johnson, Doe and Casey) have all assisted and facilitated
the wrongful illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff, and did not care
League and the City of Austin attorneys has been noticed of this
lawsuit June 17, 2010 by facsimile to Attorney Robin Sanders, City of Austin,
City of Austin, P.O. Box 1546 Austin, TX 78767, 512-974-2161, Fax: 512-974-
1311,Email:christopher.coppola@ci.austin.tx.us.
5
5. The City of Austin Police Department is a Defendant, the City of
5088 . The City of Austin Police Department, have all assisted and
facilitated the wrongful illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff, and did
conduct that has seriously harmed and may result in the wrongful
and damage her witnesses under the color of law. The City of Austin
of Austin and the City of Austin Police Department, 715 E 8th St,
Plaintiff, and did not care about controlling case law, have engaged in
a course of conduct that has seriously harmed and may result in the
6
Police Dept. and David Douglas was notified of conference and
wrongful illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff, and did not care about
seriously harmed and may result in the wrongful death of plaintiff, and
damage her witnesses. The City of Austin Police Dept. and David
lawsuit and requested to furnish the name of the unknown male officer
and facilitated the wrongful illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff, and
she spoke freely that she did not care about controlling case law, have
7
engaged in a course of conduct that has seriously harmed and may
The City of Austin Police Dept. and David Douglas was notified of
Jurisdiction
8. This court has jurisdiction over all civil actions arising under the
28 U.S C., § 1331 & 1343 (a) (1),(a) (2) (amended 1981, 1983 ,
1985(3) and 1986 and therefore present a federal question. The court
has jurisdiction because the defendants are public figures and on the
fact issue of actual malice the all civil actions arising under the
Venue
is injury in fact, the injury caused by the defendant, and the court can
8
redress the injury. Center for Individuals Freedom v Carmoucahe , 409
F 3d 655, 659 ( 5th Circuit 2006). An action arising under federal law
Due to the previous federal civil rights lawsuit filed against ‘member’
City of Jersey Village for excessive force and that the events which give
rise to the instant lawsuit are based on the actual words spoken by
who used a letter to summon Carol Ann Davis from Spring, Texas to
“submit “monies for public records but attorney Lori Gillespie had
visions of Plaintiff Davis wielding guns on June 18, 2008 much like City
criminal conduct of an injured party i.e. not wielding guns June 18,
2008 to cover up the crimes against the injured party of not wielding
accountability and when that falls short file more false charges against
Carol Ann Davis brings this cause of action against each of the parties
9
and alleges the defendant parties concerted, coordinated act by these
parties , and all of Plaintiff, Carol Ann Davis causes of action arise from
Davis’ and her claims against the TML Risk Pool ETAL and the City of
concerted misconduct by both the TML Risk Pool and the City of Austin
and its police officers where the causes of action against the defendant
parties and are inherently inseparable from the cause of action in the
Southern District of Texas where Carol Ann Davis, Plaintiff filed against
the City of Jersey Village ETAL in February 18, 2003. Judge Ewing
Werlein Jr. has extensive knowledge of the facts and the parties. (See
Brown v Anderson, 102 S.W. 3d 245, 250 Tex- app Beaumont 2003)
and moreover the self- dealing attorneys who use law enforcement to
D. Conditions Precedent
Preliminary Statement
10
Ron Stern. During the course of Ron Stern’s criminal investigation and
probe into the Harris County Courts, agent Stern solicited Plaintiff to
provided her a government tape recorder. Over the course of time the
parties have changed as well as the claims against the parties for the
events where discovery should come to an end and Plaintiff get on with
operations where the Texas Municipal League (TML) and its member
obstructing of justice.
the right to travel to collect document for a life saving emergency legal
civil rights violations from 1995 to the present and behind the scenes
its city ‘members’ and its officers defendant ‘members’ have engaged
11
Travis ( the Capitol Station of Texas) to destroy the business enterprise
that Plaintiff has a vested interest in; the collection of damages based
her rights of due process, property and has resulted in physical injury
and the imminent risk of death for failure to obtain emergency redress
of Texas where the entity Defendant and the attorney Defendant have
E. Facts
a federal civil rights lawsuit that had been filed by Plaintiff in February
18, 2003 and went to trial September 12, 13, 14, and 15, 2005.
Plaintiff lost that trial and Plaintiff had good cause to continue to seek
12
Palmer, Ray Viada, Stefani Orr, Karen Matlock, Ben Plaut, Larry Mayo,
Leona Filis, James Supkis, Tom Christian Sanders and L.H. “Mike”
Decker, Tom Fillion, Jerry Graves among others lawyers linked to the
conferences had advised that she [the City of Jersey Village ETAL)
would pay Carol Ann Davis damages if Carol Ann Davis “was
13
Viada, Stefani Orr and Ben Plaut had aided and abetted in the
court. Plaintiff alleges that at all times material attorney Lori Gillespie
had a duty to investigate and to take steps when she became aware of
investigative interviews and file a final report with the controlling legal
Title 18 violations was not a mere rumor; Carol Ann Davis complaints,
as the employer of the legal service complained about must take the
reports, calendars, e‐mails, phone records, etc. and file a final report to
filed by the city dispatcher ( Tracy Martin also a fact witness disclosed
decided for Plaintiff the absolute necessity to involve more people than
necessary including the federal court again with regards to Plaintiff the
due process repeatedly for meritorious claims for the illegal insurance
be sanctioned for harassing litigation and filing false police reports June
the filing of false police reports and lying to the FBI investigation 282-
A- HO- 59712.
June 18, 2008 Plaintiff suffered illegal search and seizure when
illegal search and seizure. Carol Ann Davis and her vehicle was
16
wrongfully seized and searched by the Defendants and documented in
Officer Johnson, Officer John Doe, and Sgt Joanne Casey with a tow
defendant’s and the ‘insuring’ entity defendants) was acting within the
course and scope of his and her employment as described herein and
for Austin Police Department; are sued for illegal search and seizure
and for the blatant excessive force violations of law is the Texas
from another location in Austin and driven to the offices of the Texas
the custom pattern and practice of the TML and its ‘members’ who
initial and file false police reports. Kidnapping and the excessive
the peace and dignity of the State of Texas and ‘harassed’ opposing
VILLAGE ET AL & LONNIE RAY DAVIS. The Jersey Village federal civil
the state and federal crimes documented in those Carol Ann Davis
the (now convicted JVPD officer Robert “Body armor” LaRouax of ‘Do
15. At the time of the arrest, the officer defendant was acting under
color of the laws and regulations of the State of Texas and the Austin
custom in place that enabled its agents and employees to act with
18
deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of individuals. The
and custom of the agency, not only, tolerating misconduct by its police
discipline, or train but moreover where the police officer have TML and
other inside attorneys who assist in writing one report with what
happened and a second report altering the facts in the first report and
of what not happened is the core problem. Lying to the FBI just adds to
the confusion and state and federal violations of law. The defendant
to the events and players are set out in several lawsuits since 1996
and these events of June 18, 2008 are part of a chain conspiracy to
deny due process. Moreover Plaintiff directs this court to Travis County
the super county of Travis linked to the Dec 2, 2009 email Karen
Matlock spent public money on a personal agenda and yet still earns
her money derived from illegal activity and her ability to corrupt
20
17. Defendants willfully detained Plaintiff. Plaintiff did not consent
lawsuit and her intent to hold state officials accountable for interfering
herein sues.
which were not legitimated public concerns. This publicity was highly
sues.
21
20. Defendants initiated or have attempted a criminal prosecution
against Plaintiff and the ‘case’ is still under investigation in Travis and
June 18, 2008 but the false arrest of Carol Ann Davis by the State
Police on January 14, 2010 will be filed under a separate cover where
Carol Ann Davis for ‘harassment’ pursuant to Texas Penal Code 42.07.
The ‘PC’ appears to be a cooperative effort with others who are paid
initiating the illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff and Plaintiff were
22
NEGLIGENCE BY ALL DEFENDANTS
22. Defendants owed a legal duty. Specifically the TML and Lori
Gillespie owed a legal duty connected the City of Jersey Village lawsuit
Defendant’s negligence.
Village and Lonnie Ray Davis, filing criminal charges with the Texas
State Auditor John Keel, including and publishing the state and federal
permission was sought from the FBI Houston Office. Evidence is the
24. The June 18, 2008 Defendants orally made a false statement of
Constitution.
force.
24
27. Defendants are also charged herein and claims against
officer and the other Defendants, s under state law, for illegal search
filing criminal charges against Plaintiff December 04, 2010 after Karen
Matlock made the initial contact to Carol Ann Davis and was directed to
J. Damages
Stowers violation in the initial lawsuit filed against the City of Jersey
25
a. All reasonable and necessary Attorney fees incurred by or on
of this cause to the court of appeals and the Supreme Court of the
the Texas Labor Code Section. 21. 259. All conditions precedent has
future.
lawsuit;
c. Emotional pain.
e. Inconvenience;
26
and were usual and customary charges for such services in Harris
County, Texas;
n. Loss of benefits.
o. Humiliation.
p. Lost of credit. .
q. Loss of time.
s. Physical injury;
27
v. Physical impairment in the future and in all reasonable
w. Injury to reputation;
entitled.
EXEMPLARY DAMAGES
30. Plaintiff would further show that the acts and omissions of
K. Attorney Fees
28
legal expert. Upon judgment, plaintiff is entitled to an award of
L. Jury Fee
32. Plaintiff is not prepared to tender the jury fee today but
perhaps after the cost incurred next week linked to the false criminal
thereof when the plaintiff lacks funds especially due to the oppression
M. Prayer
33. For these reasons, plaintiff asks for judgment against defendant
absolute legal limits by law and based on the recent 8 million dollar
figure assigned by a Harris County Jury for 1 night in jail including the
29
d. All other relief the court deems appropriate including the
herein and that upon final trial hereof, they have and recover judgment
of the defendants jointly and severally for an accounting and for their
actual damages, punitive damage and attorney fees all as set out forth
above. Plaintiff prays for pre- and post judgment interest, as allowed
by law and for cost of court expended. Plaintiffs pray for general relief
and that these damages fall with the jurisdictional limits of the court.
Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 S. Ct. 285, 292, 50 L.Ed. 2d 251 (1976) (quoting
Hanes v Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed 2d 652
been secured under the Constitution and law of the United States. See
U.S. v. Farrar, 414 f 2d 936-938 (5th Circuit) (citing Bell v. Hood, 327
U>S. 678, 66 S.Ct. 773, 90 L. Ed. 939 (1946). Also see controlling
Texas case Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W. 2d 833, 839-40 (1992). The
(the fake one) to both the previous federal lawsuit and the
30
events linked to the cover up of the FAKE client, prima facia
attorney and officer defendants; and only one (1) of the many
reasons the State Bar and Texas DPS’s Special Crimes agreed
grand juries in Texas- and thus the ‘secrecy’ of the Grand Jury
"Mr. Davis' and the evidence is plenty sufficient. Facts are 'Mr.
Davis' is the link between attorney Joe Jamail and several members of
Jonathan Stoger and all of causes of action arise from the same
the reason TML attorney defendant Lori Gillespie spent $ 234, 587. 34
in ‘legal fees’ i.e. ‘billable hours’ instead of paying damages where the
claim is meritorious and justified. The many other Harris County RICO
Thompson as Client 3071, Plaintiff vs. the O’QUINN’S & the JAMAIL’S
numbered 99-219 Rusk County 4th Judicial District Court) and the TML
attorneys ( Viada, Orr and Plaut ETAL ) parties and are inherently
inseparable from the cause of action against the TML who abused
in the City of Jersey Village ETAL lawsuit case and Karen Matlock
County court RICO victims attached to CAROL ANN DAVIS federal court
case and as the “Top cop” and acting for ‘law enforcement’ adopted a
posture behind the scenes where she acted under the color of law and
where the question turns on the FAKE client documented in the illegal
Ewing Werlein Jr. has extensive knowledge of the facts and the parties
(See Brown v Anderson, 102 S.W. 3d 245, 250 Tex- app Beaumont
32
2003). Facts are 'Mr. Davis' is the link between the entity defendants
(TML) the attorney defendant Lori Gillespie, and the Austin Police
Never has it been said or published in any venue or forum where the
CAROL ANN DAVIS, PUBLIC INTEREST CASE(s) has played that the
contract lawyers attorneys Viada, Orr and Ben Plaut who made
Plaintiff lied to the FBI, and engaged in combat litigation i.e. harassing
litigation and thus the illegal search and seizure June 18, 2008 in
citizens to advance ‘Mr. Davis’ legal objective and since “Mr. Davis’ is a
33
This is a public interest case, and the evidence shows the false
arrest of June 18, 2008 was to protect the illegal activity and money
Respectfully submitted,
Copied to:
Jerry S. Payne
11505 Memorial Drive
Piney Point, Texas 77024
713-785-0677
713-785-4874
jspayne1776@gmail.com
TBN 15658000
34
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
CAROL ANN DAVIS, Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
_________________________
Carol Ann Davis
35
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
Plaintiff
Department, Officer Johnson – Officer John Doe and Sgt. Joanne Casey.
36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
under oath pursuant to the penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and
correct and filed in good faith and that; on June 18, 2008 I appeared at
documents. I did not have guns and the guns were not found in the
illegal search and seizure June 18, 2008. All of the above is submitted
in good faith.
______________________________ SEAL
37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
CAROL ANN DAVIS,
Plaintiff
COSTS
I am a plaintiff in this case and declare that I am unable to pay the costs of these
proceedings and that I am entitled to the relief requested. In support of this application, I answer
the following questions under penalty of perjury: I am not employed and I reside with a friend,
my address is 25311 Sugar Valley Lane, Spring, Texas 77373. My telephone number is 281-350-
2943. I do not have any gross pay or wages and I do not have any other income. In the past 12
months, I have received a gift (loan) for attorney fees paid to Carolyn M. Barnes and Mike
McDougal related to opposing counsels false charges pending in Travis County and Montgomery
Counties in the past six months. I have not a business, or profession, or other self-employment
except for the legitimate business of law and meritorious litigation connected to the illegal
dissemination of ‘Mr. Davis’ and the federal civil rights claim to damages calculations based
on case law explaining the business of law to collect damages regardless of the discriminatory
and deceptive trade practices of opposing counsels and or the TML ETAL and other defendants
named and unnamed. I have not rent payments, interest, or dividends, Pension, annuity, or life
38
insurance payments, disability, or worker’s compensation payments, gifts, or inheritances or
income from any other source. The amount of money that I have in cash or in a checking
account is less than $ 150.00. I do not own a automobile, real estate, stock, bond, security,
trust, significant jewelry, art work, or other financial instrument or thing of value, including any
item of value held in someone else’s name. Any housing, transportation, utilities, or loan
payments, or other regular monthly expenses are paid by the friend where I reside until I am
restored by the collection and payment of my damages linked to the illegal dissemination and
relationship with the friend is private. I do not contribute to the friends support. I have debts or
financial obligations which are past due and owing including medical bills still owed to doctor
James M. Rogers adopted improperly by Karen Matlock of the Texas Attorney General Office in
the previous lawsuit where she derived money and still derives money from illegal activity. I
declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and understand that a false
____________________________________
39
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
CAROL ANN DAVIS,
Plaintiff
IT IS ORDERED:
The plaintiff’s application under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed without prepaying fees or
The clerk is ordered to file the complaint and issue a summons. The United States
marshal is ordered to serve the summons with a copy of the complaint and this order on the
defendant(s). The United States will advance the costs of service. Prisoner plaintiffs are
’ Granted Conditionally:
40
The clerk is ordered to file the complaint. Upon receipt of the completed summons and USM-285
form for each defendant, the clerk will issue a summons. If the completed summons and USM-
285 forms are not submitted as directed, the complaint may be dismissed. The United States
marshal is ordered to serve the completed summons with a copy of the complaint and this order
on the defendant(s). The United States will advance the costs of service. Prisoner plaintiffs are
Denied
Date:
___________________________________
Judge’s signature
41
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
CAROL ANN DAVIS, Plaintiff
lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not
counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States
agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3)
— you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in
the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:
42
i
This year the Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool celebrates its 34’Th year of service to the
local communities of Texas. The Pool has grown from 130 members in February 1974 to 2,617 by September
30, 2007. It has expanded coverage’s from its original Workers' Compensation program to include a wide range
of comprehensive Liability and Property coverage.
The Pool's mission is to provide Texas municipalities and other units of local government with a stable
source of risk financing and loss prevention services at the lowest cost consistent with sound business
practices. By spreading the risk of losses across the state of Texas and across a variety of local governments,
and by employing pro-active loss prevention measures, the Pool is able to provide a stable and long-term
risk financing system for its members.
The Pool has made a significant commitment to provide resources for its Loss Prevention program. It is the
Pool's belief that proper training and a commitment by the members to manage their work environments will
lower losses, and, as a result, the cost of coverage will be lower.
Loss Prevention works. In almost every area where the Pool has focused its Loss Prevention efforts, losses
have come down. More importantly, work environments and activities have become safer for local
government employees and their citizens. During 2006-2007, the Loss Prevention program provided more
than 605 classes, which provided training to 14,470 individuals representing 662 members. Loss Prevention
provides training in all areas of local government exposed to risk. Some of the more significant programs include
Police Emergency Driving, Excavation and Trenching Safety, Recognizing and Preventing Sexual Harassment,
Law Enforcement Liability, Back Injury Prevention, Public Works and Utility Safety, Confined Space Entry, and
Hands-on Fire Emergency Vehicle Response.
At September 30, 2007 the Pool provided workers' compensation for 127,000 employees and coverage for over
$17 billion worth of property.
One important means of member communications is on-site field service visits. In the year ending September
30, 2007 the Pool made 4,300 visits to its members. The purpose of these visits was to provide assistance,
answer questions, pass on information, and work with the member in filing or resolving claims.
ii
For the second year in a row, the Liability Fund has satisfied all criteria
receive some portion of the $9.2 million equity return and 1,524 Members will
receive a distribution of at least 24% plus a credit for longevity and this is the
iii
Officer Lawrenz wife and daughter have died since he played a role to
City of Jersey Village ETAL would pay damages because he has stated that he
does not want to visit with Judge Werlein Jr. ever again and he barely made it
through that court case and his health his suffering. What is disturbing here is
Officer David Lawrenz does not have any remorse for the loss of life of the
witnesses ( Honerkamp) and feels justified to save his career, and the retirement
benefits, and other money derived from illegal activity at the expense of the
actually innocent plaintiff who sustained damages due to his violations under the
color of law. Put way zero accountability is responsible for Officer Lawrenz perjury
protect Chief Wedemeyer who was covering up for Chief Mike Lindsey.
Lindsey ‘s (officers D.R. Smith and Mike Connors) are linked to the Panola County
County with the FAKE ‘Mr. Davis” in 480-735 ETAL after the 1997 Harris County
Grand Jury found “all the troopers and attorneys for the private security violations
and a client with a billionaire law firm to back it up and moreover a Travis County
Prosecutor linked to Karen Matlock that would act in the agreement to cover it up
or he did not act in agreement to cover it up and that is why the Travis County DA
letter from Ronnie Earle’s office disseminated the unsigned David Luna letter
about the state and federal crimes where they did not SEE a violation of law if it
disturbed the flow of money derived from illegal activity in addition to the letter is
attendance but her name is omitted from the letter. Joseph Stell is in attendance
but his name is also omitted from the unsigned letter that David Luna did not
sign.
iv
Footnote: U.S. District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
(Houston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:10-cv-02070
v
Political Disputes- As attorneys, the TML will answer your general
questions regarding municipal law. Often TML get calls for "legal
differences. These calls are awkward, and they cannot give you an
answer about who is right and who is wrong. Every town has
statute and or a plan to violate the law with TML contract lawyers
such as in the case of Carol Ann Davis. Legal ethics will prevent us
across the bar side taking due to a TML political dispute to control
assistance as the TML can to their member officials and in this case
Investigation for Chief Mike Lindsey, D.R. Smith and Mike Connors.
Chief Wedemeyer ETAL, Lindsey, Smith and Connors have all made
profits and gained government benefits paid from public money all
derived from illegal activit and the case with Defendant attorney
Lori Gillepie when she dialed 911 and filed a false police report. The
give the members the best assistance available even lying and
not available from us, we try to find the best person to whom to
refer you even to decorate the sidewalk in the middle of the night
vi
Attorneys Soechting, Walker, and Stoger are the attorneys
O’QUINN LAW FIRM
who opposed the Ibarra Bros in Harris County representing Harris County; and at
all times material to the Carol Ann case those lawyers have touched the many
Carol Ann Davis cases at one time or another from the time of illegal
dissemination of ‘Mr. Davis’ to the present. Client 3071 and plaintiff, Carol Ann
Davis has a legal basis in fact and law to say that after Lindy Honerkamp
identified the pre - trial evidence about the frauds related to Carla Roberson
Cummings ( Joe Jamail and George “Buck” Cire) delivered to State Bar of Texas
no doubt led to 'Mr. Davis' and the Travis Co 480-735 case against Carol Ann
Davis for “Unlicensed Investigations” and all the other court cases connected to
‘Mr. Davis’ including Carol Ann Davis v. City of Jersey Village ETAL 4:03-CV-HO-02395
and not ‘Mr. Davis ‘but the genuine Lonnie Ray Davis born 2-06-1951.
Carol Ann Davis did not sue Texas DPS however ‘Mr. Davis' was instrumental
in other 'extra jobs' not just 'unlicensed investigations’. In fact, 'Mr. Davis'
contributed actually cutting not only client 3071 and Carol Ann Davis access to
the courts but also cut of the access to Maurquita Forrester, Al Johnson, Leo West
and other actually innocent citizens are also a victims of ‘Mr. Davis’, and the
illegitimate operations of the O’QUINN’S and the JAMAIL’s and moreover the State
of Texas and its bar of lawyers including the Commission for Lawyers Grievance
Committee, a division of the State Bar of Texas. These facts cannot be argued
out of existence where merely reciting history accompanied with government
documents clearly provide evidence and give the required proof of a series of
events where reached is the end of the racketeering of ‘Mr. Davis’; "Impervious to
the truth" is a finding of fact according to SDTX Houston Division Judge Kenneth
Hoyt regarding Harris County in Ibarra Bros case which includes the O’Quinn Law
Firm, Hayne and Boone i.e. attorneys Lynn Liberato and former United States
attorney Larry Finder. (See Houston Post Archives re Larry Finder and the Dept of
Justice probe into the Harris County Courts). Judge Ewing Werlein Jr, has
extensive knowledge of the parties, witnesses and the claims which have changed
over the course of time.