Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PROBLEM SET 3
Instructions
Students are expected to work with the same group as for the previous problem
sets, using the same group name as is published on STATS301_PS2_grades.pdf.
Each group is expected to send their solutions to elipetit@ulb.ac.be (subject:
PS3 STATS301) with two attachments: your group report in pdf format with
the title PS3_group name and your STATA do-le with the same name.
it legally operated to increase the price of grain above what would have been
the competitive price. From time to time, cheating by members of the cartel
brought about a temporary collapse of the collusive pricesetting agreement.
Let's use variations in supply associated with the cartel's collapses to estimate
the elasticity of demand for rail transport of grain.
Data description
Dataset_PS3_Cartel contains weekly observations on prices and other factors
from 1880-1886, for a total of 326 weeks. These data were provided by Professor
Rob Porter of Northwestern University and were used in his paper A Study of
Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880-1886 The Bell Journal
of Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, Autumn 1983, 301-314.
Variable
Description
week
price
ice
cartel
quantity
seas1
seas2
.
.
.
seas13
Note: the thirteen month binary variables. To match the weekly data, the
calendar has been divided into 13 periods, each approximately 4 weeks long.
Questions
Suppose that the demand curve for rail transport of grain is specied as
12
X
2+m Seasm,i + ui
m=1
where
Qi
Icei
Pi
is the price of
1
2
3
ln(P ).
cartel
c1 .
cartel
4 BONUS
Is
a weak instrument ?
Does the evidence suggest that the cartel was charging the prot-
maximizing monopoly price ? Explain. (Hint : What should the monopolist do if the
c1 < 1
?)
Now suppose that the demand curve for rail transport of grain can also be
modelled as an AR(1) process
ln(Qi ) = 0 + 1 ln(Qi1 ) + i
Comment on whether
or not the series seems stationnary and conrm your intuition using a
statistical test.
6
7
8
9
b1
p-value?
Plot the weekly evolution of
di ).
ln(Qi ) against its in-the-sample prediction ln(Q
ln(Qi ).
Which model
do you prefer?
Based on the information you have from 1880 week 1 to 1886 week 16, what
is your forecast for the total tonnage of grain shipped the 17th week of
1886?