Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Professor and Head, Department of Civil Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College,
Puducherry - 605107
2,3
IV Year Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College,
Puducherry- 605 107
Abstract
The construction industry has gained very fast growth in recent decades due to the increase in population, increase in
industrialization and also introduction of new infrastructure projects. These resulted in the growth of construction industry
drastically, which leads to a huge demand for construction materials and also in generation of huge amount of construction
waste. The present work aims at finding the optimum concrete mixture encompassing of cement mortar and brick bat debris as a
substitute for fine aggregate. Also the basic properties of cement mortar debris and brick bat debris as fine aggregate was
studied and it is compared with the traditional fine aggregate. The effect of cement mortar debris and brickbat debris as fine
aggregate in concrete for different proportions on strength was recorded at the curing age of 7, 14 and 28 days. All the data are
tabulated andcompared. It was observed that particular proportions of cement mortar debris and brickbat debris displayed
enhancing effect onthe compressive strength.
--------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PROJECT DEVELPOMENT
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 05 Issue: 03 | Mar-2016, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
124
Materials:
Sl. No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sl. No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sieve size
(mm)
4.75
1.60
0.60
0.425
0.30
0.15
0.09
Pan
Sieve size
(mm)
4.75
1.60
0.60
0.425
0.30
0.15
0.09
Pan
Percentage passing
(%)
100
65
15
9
6
5.8
5.5
5.5
Percentage passing
100
54
25
15
10
6
3
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 05 Issue: 03 | Mar-2016, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
125
Sieve
size
(mm)
Weight
of
retained (kg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4.75
1.60
0.60
0.425
0.30
0.15
0.09
Pan
0
0.130
0.075
0.040
0.065
0.150
0.025
0.015
a. Design Stipulations:
For decrease in
W/C
(0.6-0.5=0.1)
For increase in
Compaction
factor (0.90.8=0.1)
-1.5
-2
+3
+3
-3.5
0
26
41
49
62
92
97
100
of
Percentage passing
0
74
59
51
38
8
3
0
c. Design
g.
Determination
AggregateContent:
of
Coarse
and
Fine
h. Mix Proportion:
Water:Cement:FA: CA [9][10]
191.6
0.5
383.16
1
546
1.5
1187
3
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 05 Issue: 03 | Mar-2016, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
126
6. TESTING ON CONCRETE
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.375
0.450
0.600
0.150
0.300
0
0.375
0.300
0.150
0.600
0.450
0
0.750
0.750
0.750
0.750
0.750
1.500
Cement mortar
debris(kg)
1
1
1
1
1
1
Coarse
aggregate(kg)
25
20
10
40
30
0
River sand(kg)
25
30
40
10
20
0
100
100
100
100
100
100
Cement(kg)
Coarse
aggregate(%)
River sand(%)
50
50
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Cement mortar
debris(%)
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
Cement(%)
Mix
5. MIX PROPORTION
DISCUSSION
8. CONCLUSION
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 05 Issue: 03 | Mar-2016, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
127
9. REFERENCE
BIOGRAPHIES
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 05 Issue: 03 | Mar-2016, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
128