Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine the acceptability of potato powder supplemented and spices added cookies based on
their sensory and physical properties. Sensory evaluation was done based on hedonic scale. Potato powder supplementation was
ranged from 10-50% (wt. of flour/wt. of potato powder). Cardamom and clove were used as flavoring agent, which ranges from
0.5% to 1% (wt. of flour/wt. of spice). Increment in potato powder supplementation was lead to substantial decrement in physical
properties and sensory evaluation (P<0.05) irrespective of spices addition. 10-30% replacement by potato powder was found to
be acceptable. 10% replacement by potato powder and in combination with cardamom: clove ratio (1.5:0.5) was found to be the
best in overall acceptability (P<0.05). Moreover, the cookie samples prepared with formulations having potato powder and wheat
flour ratio of 1:9 and 2:8 with the combination of cardamom and clove (1:1 and 1.5:0.5) had the same or higher sensory score
than the conventional wheat flour cookies. ANOVA analysis showed that Variation in spices addition have a significant effect on
flavour. Whereas, amount of replacement by potato powder has a significant effect on over all acceptability, taste, and colour
(P<0.05).
Keywords: cookies, potato powder supplementation, spices addition, sensory & physical analysis, ANOVA analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------1 INTRODUCTION
Cookies are a widely consumed bakery product and there
global consumption rate is only second to bread (according
to Dun & Bradstreet's Industry Reports, US, 2010). The U.S.
Chamber of Commerce noted that cookie and cracker
manufacturing was the fastest-growing segment of the
bakery industry with an annual average increase of 2.3 per
cent. This is because cookies come in a wide variety of
types. The principal raw material used in cookie processing
is wheat flour which is low in crude fibre content and
mineral content. In recent years the interest in high fibre
content in foods has greatly increased. High dietary fibre
supplemented cookies have been prepared by replacing
wheat flour with cereal by-products like corn bran, rice bran
or barley husk [1] [2] [3].
Potato is a rich source of starch and regarded as the most
important staple food in the world after rice. The potato
contains vitamins and minerals, as well as an assortment of
phytochemicals, such as carotenoids and natural phenols.
Chlorogenic acid constitutes up to 90% of the potato tuber
natural phenols. Others found in potatoes are 4Ocaffeoylquinic acid (crypto-chlorogenic acid), 5-Ocaffeoylquinic (neo-chlorogenic acid), 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic
and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acids. The potato is best known for
its carbohydrate content (approximately 26 grams in a
medium potato). The predominant form of this carbohydrate
is starch. A small but significant portion of this starch is
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
408
Preparation of Spices
The spices are brought from local market of South Kolkata.
Dried in tray drier at 40C for 3-4 hours, powdered and
packed in small glass bottles by covering the opening with
aluminium foil followed by HDPE lids.
2.3.
Development
of
Potato
Supplemented
Flavoured Cookies
At first different flour combinations of the wheat flour and
potato powder were tried to obtain the best acceptable
formulation. Sugar, shortening, whole egg (emulsifier),
baking powder and essence was added to these formulations
for preparation of cookies (Table 1). The best formulation
was selected by sensorial quality characteristics like colour,
flavour, taste, mouth feel, texture, spread, crispiness,
grittiness (absence) and overall acceptability and evaluation
of physical properties like spread, volume and density.
Finally the proximate analysis of the standard and three
most acceptable blends was done.
Three of the most acceptable formulations were further used
for development of flavoured cookies using different
combinations of selected spices like powdered cardamom
and powdered clove. First the best acceptable amount spices
(Table 1) that enhances the flavour and acceptability was
selected by sensory analysis of un-supplemented wheat flour
cookies (C9 C11).
Then then the percentage of the two different spices was
varied keeping the optimised amount constant and was used
in the potato supplemented formulation (Table 1). The
sensorial as well as physical quality characteristics were
analysed.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
409
Sample
Code
C
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C*
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
Wheat
Flour
(gm)
100
90
80
70
60
50
100
90
80
70
100
100
100
90
90
90
80
80
80
70
70
70
Potato
Flour
(gm)
10
20
30
40
50
10
20
30
10
10
10
20
20
20
30
30
30
Vanilla
Essence
(ml)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Spices (gm)
Cardamom
0.5
0.75
1
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
Clove
0.5
0.75
1
1.5
1
0.5
1.5
1
0.5
1.5
1
0.5
Cookies
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
410
Standardization
of
Formulation
for
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
411
C4
19 1.256
C5
19 1.198
C*
19 1.241
C6
19 1.855
C7
19 1.954
C8
19 1.742
35
1.821
30
1.911
50
1.814
50
1.712
47
1.721
43
1.915
20.33
0.442
20.51
0.817
20.19
0.512
20.82
0.336
20.37
0.348
20.41
0.547
1.84 0.722
18.280 0.171
1.094 0.458
1.57 0.944
13.430 0.215
1.489 0.213
2.63 0.516
37.306 0.261
0.536 0.117
2.63 0.218
37.306 0.518
0.536 0.221
2.47 0.897
32.963 0.742
0.606 0.242
2.26 0.415
27.591 0.911
0.725 0.714
Table -3: Nutritional Composition of Cookies with and without Partial Supplementation of Potato Powder
Composition
Amount in C*(%) Amount in C6 (%) Amount in C7 (%) Amount in C8 (%)
Moisture
2.36 0.262
2.99 0.137
3.36 0.164
3.96 0.851
Ash
0.871 0.123
1.067 0.411
1.115 0.322
1.406 0.189
Fat
31.44 0.371
29.93 0.422
30.63 0.312
30.85 0.528
Protein
3.465 0.121
3.898 0.112
3.632 0.137
3.711 0.198
Crude Fibre
0.29 0.013
0.77 0.0.23
1.02 0.031
1.29 0.024
Reducing Sugar
3.09 0.167
3.36 0.185
3.62 0.191
3.09 0.213
Total Sugar
22.17 0.521
22.17 0.313
22.68 0.179
22.43 0.184
Other Carbohydrates 36.05 0.314
35.311 0.815
33.08 0.843
33.61 0.263
Fig -1: Contour plot for combined effect of Spread ratio and variation in formulation on sensory score of spread
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
412
Fig -2: Contour plot for combined effect of volume and variation in formulation on sensory score of texture
Fig -3: Contour plot for combined effect of density and variation in formulation on sensory score of crispness
Fig 3 shows that sensory rating of crispiness (Table 2) is as a
combined effect of variation in formulation i.e. different
recipe of cookies (Table 2) and density of different cookies
(Table 2). The figure indicates that the sensory rating for
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
413
3.2
Standardization
of
Formulation
for
Flavoured Cookies
3.2.1 Effect of Species Addition and Potato Powder
Supplementation
on
Sensorial
and
Physical
Properties
1%, 1.5% and 2% of cardamom and clove mixture
containing each constituent at a ratio of 1:1 was added to
100gm wheat flour during development of cookies. The
Table 4: Effect of Spices on Sensory Attributes and Physical Properties of Cookies
Sensory Analysis of Wheat Flour and Potato Supplemented Flavoured Cookies
Sample Colour
Flavour
Taste
Mouth
Texture
Spread
Crispiness Grittiness
Code
feel
(Absence)
C9
8.82 8.84 8.86 8.85 8.77 8.85 8.86
8.6 0.365
0.651
0.291
0.321
0.313
0.894
0.325
0.449
C10
8.84 8.12 8.19 8.82 8.64 8.81 8.91
8.75 0.945
0.321
0.831
0.298
0.815
0.834
0.256
0.542
C11
8.86 8.39 8.64 8.87 8.76 8.73 8.72
8.83 0.512
0.781
0.666
0.452
0.226
0.172
0.881
0.133
C12
8.79 8.37 8.34 8.84 8.83 8.79 8.74
8.75 0.212
0.512
0.912
0.951
0.915
0.654
0.948
0.214
C13
8.69 8.67 8.33 8.73 8.69 8.56 8.72
8.53 0.957
0.543
0.524
0.271
0.441
0.415
0.944
0.743
C14
8.8
8.86 8.71 8.84 8.73 8.88 8.91 0 8.79 0.987
0.628
0.881
0.711
0.322
0.521
0.212
.642
C15
8.81 7.68 8.29 7.65 8.78 8.7
8.83
8.11 0.336
0.832
0.542
0.548
0.495
0.959
0.568
0.951
C16
8.84 8.33 8.41 8.83 8.83 8.87 8.81
8.47 0.945
0.472
0.424
0.624
0.412
0.241
0.412
0.847
C17
8.86 8.97 8.95 8.97 8.81 8.93 8.97
8.95 0.333
0.215
0.341
0.623
0.111
0.674
0.492
0.77
C18
8.05 7.42 7.32 7.74 7.01 7
7.04
7.97 0.086
0.194
0.427
0.662
0.221
0.619
0.173
0.638
C19
8.11 8.08 7.48 8.13 7.33 7.28 7.53
8.21 0.356
0.433
0.107
0.323
0.372
0.242
0.241
0.126
C20
8.31 8.54 7.81 8.55 7.77 7.64 7.99
8.68 0.324
0.573
0.177
0.121.
0.625
0.258
0.317
0.487
Physical Properties of Potato Powder Supplemented Flavoured Cookies
Sample Thickness (mm)
Diameter (mm)
Weight (gm)
Spread
Volume (cc)
Code
Ratio
C12
19 1.254
50 1.428
20.23 0.154
2.63
37.306
0.101
0.371
C13
19 1.169
50 1.414
20.77 0.457
2.63
37.306
0.744
0.562
C14
19 1.797
51 1.238
20.34 0.272
2.68
38.813
0.888
0.911
C15
19 1.232
47 1.165
20.92 0.317
2.47
32.964
0.614
0.101
C16
19 1.849
48 1.432
20.48 0.442
2.52
34.381
0.241
0.624
C17
19 1.371
48 1.333
20.11 0.817
2.52
34.381
0.717
0.444
C18
19 1.924
43 1.010
20.61 0.512
2.26
27.592
0.111
0.327
Overall
Acceptability
8.28 0.191
8.44 0.655
8.63 0.241
8.39 0.721
8.77 0.584
8.8 0.217
7.98 0.851
8.71 0.312
8.79 0.309
7.07 0.013
7.53 0.117
7.86 0.856
Density (gm/
cc)
0.542 0.651
0.556 0.786
0.524 0.297
0.634 0.567
0.596 0.253
0.585 0.233
0.747 0.181
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
414
C19
19 1.184
41 1.266
20.93 0.336
C20
19 1.256
43 1.732
20.88 0.348
2.16
0.431
2.26
0.106
25.084
0.913
27.591
0.091
0.834 0.374
0.756 0.649
Table 5: Main Effects ANOVA for Cookies Prepared With Different Combination of Potato Powder and Spices
Overall Acceptability
Effect
SS (Sum of Degrees of Freedom MS (Mean of F
Standard
Prob*>F
Square)
(DF)
Square)
Value
Value
Variation in Spices
0.7443
2
0.3721
20.25
0.008080* 6.94
% Replacement of
2.4001
2
1.2000
65.30
0.000883* 6.94
potato powder
Error
0.0735
4
0.0184
Flavour
Variation in Spices
1.4074
2
0.7037
15.58
0.012940* 6.94
% Replacement of
0.5766
2
0.2883
6.38
0.056905
6.94
potato powder
Error
0.1806
4
0.0452
Taste
Variation in Spices
0.4384
2
0.2192
31.95
0.003470* 6.94
% Replacement of
1.8875
2
0.9437
137.55 0.000205* 6.94
potato powder
Error
0.0274
4
0.0069
Colour
Variation in Spices
0.0235
2
0.0117
2.1
0.236580
6.94
% Replacement of
0.8323
2
0.4161
74.8
0.000678* 6.94
potato powder
Error
0.0222
4
0.0056
4. CONCLUSION
Among all formulations tried, the cookie samples prepared
from 10% potato powder and 90% wheat flour as well as
from 20% potato powder and 80% wheat flour with the
optimised combination of cardamom and clove (1:1,1.5:0.5)
had the same or higher sensory score than the control. More
over the cookies from blended flour had higher percentage
of crude fibre and ash (i.e. minerals) than the control
cookies.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
415
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
416