Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/ssi
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6400, USA
b
Argonne National Laboratory, Energy Technology Division, Argonne, IL 60439, USA
Received 20 May 2003; received in revised form 8 December 2003; accepted 9 December 2003
Abstract
The hydrogen permeability of SrCe0.95Eu0.05O3 d and SrCe0.95Sm0.05O3 d was studied as a function of temperature, hydrogen partial
pressure ( PH2) gradient, and water vapor partial pressure ( PH2O) gradient. Under a 100% dry hydrogen condition at 1123 K, the hydrogen
permeation rates of dense membranes (1.72 mm thick) are c 3.19 10 9 mol/cm2 s for SrCe0.95Eu0.05O3 d and 2.33 10 9 mol/cm2 s for
SrCe0.95Sm0.05O3 d. Under wet hydrogen conditions at 1123 K, the hydrogen permeation rates are c 2.89 10 9 and 1.21 10 9 mol/cm2
s, respectively, for the same materials. The dopant dependence of hydrogen permeability is explained in terms of the ionization potential of the
dopant. Electronic conductivity was calculated from hydrogen permeation fluxes; activation energies for electron conduction under both dry
and wet conditions were also calculated. The PH2O dependence of electronic conductivity and hydrogen permeability is discussed.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Hydrogen permeation; Electronic conductivity; SrCe0.95Eu0.05O3d; SrCe0.95Sm0.05O3d
1. Introduction
In recent years, the development of dense ceramic
membranes with mixed protonic and electronic conductivity
has received considerable attention due to their possible
application in hydrogen-based energy, petrochemical processes, fuel cells, separation membranes, and other technologies [1 4]. In particular, proton transport properties in
multivalent cation-substituted barium cerate and strontium
cerate (BaCe1 xMxO3 d, SrCe1 xMxO3 d, M = Yb, Tm,
Sm, Eu) have been widely studied in connection with hightemperature hydrogen separation [5 9]. Among these membranes, SrCe1 xEuxO3 d is a promising candidate material
because of the high proton selectivity of strontium cerate
and the electronic conductivity provided by the multivalent
europium dopant [6]. For these reasons, our previous work
aimed not only to elucidate the effect of Eu on the hydrogen
permeation but also to theoretically model the behavior of
SrCe1 xEuxO3 d [10 13].
The overall hydrogen permeation process consists of
three consecutive kinetic steps: gas/solid interfacial reaction,
solid-state diffusion, and solid/gas interfacial reaction. The
relative control of the overall kinetics is often determined by
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-352-846-2991; fax: +1-352-8460326.
E-mail address: ewach@mse.ufl.edu (E.D. Wachsman).
0167-2738/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2003.12.010
100
2. Experimental
Fig. 1. Hydrogen flux as a function of temperature for Eu- and Sm-doped SrCeO3 d: closed symbols = 100% H2; dry and open symbols: PH2 = 0.972 atm,
PH2O = 0.028 atm.
101
Fig. 2. Hydrogen flux as a function of applied hydrogen chemical potential gradients under various conditions of PH2O at 850 jC.
dence than did the hydrogen permeation flux of the Smdoped specimen.
The dependence of hydrogen permeability on the
dopant can be explained by an electronic conduction
mechanism in reducing atmospheres and/or by a proton
transport mechanism. Kreuer et al. [17] suggest that an
observed increase in activation energy for the diffusivity
of protonic defects with dopants may be related to the
general increase in the oxygen basicity and to the proton
transfer barrier. Muon spin relaxation measurements [18]
on Sr-doped SrZrO3 also suggest the existence of trapping
centers adjacent to the dopant ions. Furthermore, several
simulations have been performed [19 21] to predict the
effect of dopant ions on proton conduction. However, the
effect of dopant ions on hydrogen permeation is most
likely due to the effect of the dopant on electronic
conductivity.
Our previous work on electronic conduction [12]
describes it as a small polaron model because the electron
transport in dopants was understood in terms of a charge
transfer reaction, wherein an electron is transferred from a
dopant ion in a low-oxidation state to a neighboring ion in a
high-oxidation state. In addition, our earlier work [11]
showed that the ionized dopant concentration depends on
the ionization potential of each dopant under given thermodynamic conditions. The third ionization potential of Eu is
24.8 eV, which is larger than that of Sm (23.3 eV) [22].
Therefore, the reaction Eu2 + ! Eu3 + requires more energy
than Sm2 + ! Sm3 +, and Eu2 + is more thermodynamically
stable than Sm2 +. This greater thermodynamic stability of
Eu2 + means that there is a greater concentration of EuCe
U in
SrCe1 xEuxO3 d than SmCe
U in SrCe1 xSmxO3 d. Therefore, the n-type electronic conduction due to Eu Ce
U !
EuCe
V + eVis greater than the n-type conduction in Sm-doped
SrCeO3 d.
102
S.-J. Song et al. / Solid State Ionics 167 (2004) 99105
Fig. 3. Hydrogen flux of SrCe0.95Eu0.05O3d as a function of temperature: (a) dry; (b) PH2O = 0.028 atm; (c) PH2O = 0.051 atm; and (d) PH2O = 0.086 atm.
103
Fig. 4. Ambipolar conductivity of SrCe0.95Eu0.05O3 d as a function of temperature: (a) dry; and (b) wet (solid symbols: PH2O = 0.028 atm; open symbols:
PH2O = 0.051 atm; open symbols with bar, PH2O = 0.086 atm).
JOHO
RT
2F 2 L
PHW
PHV2
ramb
rOHO reV
4F 2 L BJH2
:
RT BPHW2 Pref
rOHO reV
H2
104
n~AVPH2
and by
KH2 O
PH2 O
1=2
PO2 PH2
1=4 1=2
n~APO2 PH2 O ;
H2 Og VO OxO X 2OHO
OxO
1
X V
O 2e O2 g:
2
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US Department of
Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratorys Gasification Technologies Program, under
contract W-31-109-Eng-38 and NASA NAG3-2750.
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
6
7
8
105
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
4. Conclusions
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]