Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174 USA
of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Polytechnic Institute, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
The use of a horizontal arrangement of wall shunts is proposed in this paper as a cost-effective way to reduce stray losses in
power transformers. The paper compares the performance of horizontal wall shunts with the available alternative (vertical shunts).
3D finite element analysis (FEA) is used for the calculation of stray losses in tank walls, and other structural parts. A novel hybrid
numerical/analytical method is proposed for the calculation of stray losses inside the magnetic shunts. The proposed method is based
on double Fourier series expansions of the magnetic field distribution at the surface of the shunts which is determined using 3D
FEA. A 200 MVA power transformer is investigated as a case study where the stray losses are calculated with and without vertical
and horizontal shunts. A Parametric FEA is carried out to find the optimal placement of the horizontal shunts on the tank walls.
Results show that the proposed horizontal magnetic shunts arrangement are as effective as conventional vertical shunts in reducing
the stray losses while reducing the weight of the shields, therefore providing a cost-effective method for magnetic shielding of the
transformer tank walls.
Index Termsfinite element method, magnetic shielding, power transformer, stray loss, wall shunts.
N OMENCLATURE
A
H
B
J
Manuscript received January 20, 2016; revised April 28, 2016; accepted
September 9, 2016. Corresponding author: A. I. Sarwat (e-mail: asarwat@fiu.edu).
This work was funded by the National Science Foundation under grant
number CRISP-1541108.
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Core clamps
(yoke beams)
LV TC side
shunts
LV side mid
shunts
LV End side
shunts
Laminated
Core
HV TC side
shunts
HV mid
shunts
HV End side
shunts
End side
shunts
(a)
Laminated
Core
HV side top
shunts
HV side
bottom shunts
LV side top
shunts
LV side
Bottom shunts
End side
shunts
Core clamps
(yoke beams)
(b)
1(b) depicts the 200 MVA sample transformer with the new
proposed horizontal wall shunts.
A
+ cA = 0
(3)
n
where c is a constant determined by the permeability and
conductivity of the boundary material. Since in power transformers tank walls and yoke-beams are made of iron and the
penetration depth at 60 Hz for iron is less than 1 mm, in 3D
FEM model of the transformer IBC is applied to the interior
boundaries of the tank walls and the exterior boundaries of
the yoke-beams.
(1)
Three phase full load current excitation is applied to windings. Since the distance between the tank walls and the outer
windings are not equal in all directions, no symmetry boundary
condition is applied to the 3D model of the transformer to
maximize the accuracy of the analysis.
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
d
2L
Pmn
(4)
m=1 n=1
(5)
(6)
(7)
X
ny
mx
X
sin
(8)
Hmn cos
Hz0 (x, y) =
W
L
m=1 n=1
where Hmn are the double Fourier series coefficients, which
can be calculated as follows:
Z WZ L
mx
ny
2
Hmn =
Hz0 (x, y) cos
sin
WL 0
W
L
L
(9)
For calculation eddy-current loss of the magnetic shunt, first
the loss corresponding to each spatial harmonic is calculated
and then the superposition is applied in order to calculate the
total shunt loss. The spatial harmonic component of (8) could
be written as:
mx
ny
sin
(10)
Hz0 (x, y) = Hmn cos
W
L
This equation can be used as a boundary condition for (5),
(6) and (7) in order to calculate magnetic field inside the
shunt. By expanding (5) in the direction of z-axis the following
equation is derived:
2 Hz
2 Hz
2 Hz
+
+
= jHz
2
2
x
y
z 2
(11)
Hy
Hz
Hx
+
+
=0
x
y
z
ny (13)
mx
Hy
Hx
z
sin
+
= Hmn e cos
x
y
W
L
Since the magnetic shunts are laminated, current cannot flow
in the direction of z-axis, based on (7) it can be expressed as
the following equation:
Jz =
Hy
Hx
=0
x
y
(14)
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
10
TABLE I
C OMPARISON OF STRAY LOSSES IN DIFFERENT WALL SHUNT
ARRANGEMENTS
Parameter
10
-1
10
-2
Tank Loss (W )
Yoke-Beam Loss (W )
Shunt Loss (W )
Total Loss (W )
Total Loss Reduction (%)
Total Shunt Weight (kg)
Error (%)
10
10
Without
Shunts
58993
17893
76886
Vertical
Shunts
5981
5439
1740
13160
82.88
2671
Horizontal
Shunts
5458
5368
2236
13062
83.01
2009
15
Harmonic order
Pv =
2
Hmn
L2 W 2 2 2 2Real()
J.J
=
2e
2
2 2 (L2 m2 + n2 W 2 )
mx
ny
n2 W 2 cos2
cos2
W
L
mx
2
2 ny
2 2
+ m L sin
sin
(19)
W
L
Fig. 5. The mesh of the case study transformer model without wall shunts
consisting of 817,155 elements.
W/2
2
L3 W 3 2 2
Hmn
8 2 (L2 m2 + n2 W 2 ) Real()
(20)
2
2 2 X X
L3 W 3 Hmn
2
2
2
2
2
8 m=1 n=1 (L m + n W )Real()
(21)
Equation (21) presents the series expansion of the eddycurrent losses of a magnetic shunt based on the Fourier series
expansion of magnetic field on its surface.
For the calculation of magnetic shunts losses based on the
presented analytical method, magnetic field distribution on the
shunts surface is calculated with 3D finite element analysis
(FEA) using COMSOL Multiphysics. The calculated magnetic
field distribution is exported into MATLAB and the doubleFourier series coefficients of (8) are calculated and using (21)
and thus the total loss of the magnetic shunt can be obtained.
Fig. 4 shows the convergence of (21) for a sample vertical
magnetic shunt. This figure shows that by expanding this
equation up to the 15th component in both x and y axes,
the convergence error would be less than 0.1%.
IV. R ESULTS AND D ISCUSSIONS
In this section the 200 MVA transformer shown in Figs.
1(a) and 1(b) is considered as a case study to compute the
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Fig. 11. Magnetic flux distribution (Tesla) in horizontal and vertical magnetic
shunts.
Fig. 9. Induced current density streamlines on vertical shunt packets surfaces.
10
Tank Loss
Yokebeam Loss
Magnetic Shunt Loss
9
8
Loss (kW)
7
6
5
4
3
2
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Vertical displacement of horizontal shunts (mm)
400
(a)
18
Total Loss
Fig. 10. Magnetic leakage flux lines diverted by horizontal magnetic shunts.
Loss (kW)
17
16
15
14
13
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Vertical displacement of horizontal shunts (mm)
400
(b)
Fig. 12. Parametric FEA results on vertical position of horizontal shunts: (a)
The losses in tank walls, yokebeams and magnetic shunts, (b) Total losses.
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2611479, IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
0018-9464 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.