Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
now in production
walker art center
minneapolis
cooper-hewitt
national design museum
new york
graphic design:
now in production
edited by
andrew blauvelt
ellen lupton
texts by
bke
lan albinson
peter bilak
andrew blauvelt
rob giampietro
james goggin
peter hall
steven heller
jeremy leslie
ellen lupton
ben radatz
michael rock
dmitri siegel
daniel van der velden
armin vit and bryony gomez-palacio
lorraine wild
table of contents
directors foreword
acknowledgments
introduction
andrew blauvelt and ellen lupton
fuck content
michael rock
design in motion
ben radatz
Unraveling
lorraine wild
brand matrix
armin vit and bryony gomez-palacio
brand new worlds
andrew blauvelt
designing our own graves
dmitri siegel
school days
rob giampietro
directors
foreword
The Smithsonian's Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum and
the Walker Art Center are proud to present Graphic Design: Now in
Production, an ambitious look at the broad-ranging field of graphic
design. Both institutions have established themselves as major voices
in the contemporary design discourse. The Walker has a long history
of organizing design exhibitions, presented in the context of a larger
program devoted to visual arts, film, and performance. Cooper-Hewitt
is the only institution in the United States dedicated solely to historical and contemporary design and decorative arts.
Both museums have long sought to bring public recognition to the
field of graphic design. In 1989, the Walker Art Center organized the
first major museum survey in the United States on this subject. Called
Graphic Design in America: A Visual Language History, this landmark
show was organized by Mildred Friedman, creator of a prominent
series of exhibitions and publications at the Walker devoted to design
and architecture. In 1996, Cooper-Hewitt presented Mixing Messages:
Graphic Design in Contemporary Culture, organized by Ellen Lupton.
With courage and good humor, these two projects confronted a
daunting task: to survey a sprawling field of expression that is more at
home in supermarkets and bookstores than on the walls of a gallery.
In 1986, just two years after the Macintosh computer was introduced,
legendary graphic designer April Greiman created a special foldout
poster for the Walker's influential journal Design Quarterly. Greiman
produced the piecea life-size, pixelated nude self-portraiton
a Mac, then an exotic tool for graphic design. Her production notes
chronicle the travails of making an image of this scale and complexity;
Greiman dutifully noted that her files consumed 289K of computer
memory, a size that nearly crippled her laser printer. Today, that much
memory is a mere speck, smaller than a cell phone snapshot.
The field has changed dramatically in the fifteen years since Mixing
Messageslet alone in the twenty-three years since Graphic Design
in America. Design practice has broadened its reach, expanding from
a specialized profession to a widely deployed tool. Social media and
numerous technologies for manipulating image, text, and data have
changed the way people produce and consume information. As
design tools have become more widely accessible, more designers
are becoming producersauthors, publishers, instigators, and
entrepreneurs.
and his wife, Deborah; trustee James Dayton and his wife, Megan;
trustee Rebecca Pohlad and her husband, Robert; and honorary
trustee Harriet Spencer and her husband, Edson. We would also like
to thank the Mondriaan Foundation for its support of projects undertaken by several of the Dutch designers represented in the exhibition.
A leading cultural force in contemporary design, the Netherlands is
indeed a special place for the support of design and visual culture.
For this exhibition we have developed not only a new model of shared
curatorial development with our outside experts, but at the Walker
we have also created a new educational project called Night School,
with support from the Margaret and Angus Wurtele Family Foundation. Meeting during Target Free Thursday Nights, this project brings
together more than thirty graphic design students from the College
of Visual Arts (CVA) in St. Paul, the Minneapolis College of Art and
Design (MCAD), and the University of Minnesota College of Design
to take part in a semester-long course that uses the exhibition as
its textbook to explore important issues and themes for the field. In
order to create this endeavor, we are thankful for the support shown
by the leadership at these institutions: Ann Ledy, president of CVA;
Jay Coogan, president of MCAD; and Tom Fisher, dean of the College
of Design at the University of Minnesota.
Producing this exhibition collaboratively required intensive cooperation and planning from the staffs of both museums. We are grateful
to everyone for their efforts to marry the diverse cultures, locales,
andrequirements of our two institutions in order to generate a meaningful outcome for the public. Twenty-three years from now, visual
communication will look vastly different once again. This book, and
the exhibition it documents, serves as a record of one way of viewing
present conditions, which are already changing faster than we can
observe them.
Bill Moggridge, Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum
Olga Viso, Walker Art Center
acknowledgments
We would like to extend our utmost appreciation to all the people who
helped us realize this ambitious exhibition and complex publication.
First and foremost, we would like to thank the more than two hundred
designers, artists, and publishers for their participation and contributions to the show and book. Without their assistance and generosity
in sharing their work, none of this would have been possible.
We are deeply grateful to all of our curatorial colleagues who helped
us conceive and organize the title design, magazine, and branding
sections of the exhibition: Jan Albinson of Art of the Title (artofthetitle.com); Jeremy Leslie of magCulture (magCulture.com); Armin
Vit and Bryony Gomez-Palacio of Under Consideration, LLC. We
salute their passion, commitment, and deep knowledge.
We are grateful to our respective directors, Olga Visa at the Walker
and Bill Moggridge at Cooper-Hewitt, for their unwavering support
and enthusiasm to realize this first joint venture between the
museums.
Thanks to the many lenders to the exhibition for allowing both
permission to show the works, particularly the film and television
directors and the entertainment studios, and for the generous loan
of materials.
A special thank you to our tour partners for this exhibition-the
Hammer Museum in Los Angeles and the Southeastern Center for
Contemporary Art (SECCA) in Winston-Salem, who helped bring the
work of so many designers to audiences across the United States.
Many colleagues at Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum helped
originate the exhibition and oversee its transformation at Governors Island in New York City. Our thanks go to: Caroline Baumann
(museum administration); Cara McCarty, Jackie Killian, and Amanda
Kesner (curatorial); Jocelyn Groom, Matthew O'Connor, and Mathew
Weaver (exhibitions); Greg Krum and Jocelyn Crapo (shop); Debbie
Ahn, Julie Barnes, Elyse Buxbaum, and Kelly Mullaney (development
and membership); Caroline Payson, Mei Mah, and Shamus Adams
(education); Wendy Rogers (registrar); Perry Choe (conservation);
Chul R. Kim (publications); Jimpson Pell (IT); and Jennifer Northrop,
Laurie Olivieri, and Micah Walter (communications and marketing).
We are also grateful to the design team that created the installation
at Governors Island. Our thanks go to: Prem Krishnamurthy, Adam
Michaels, Rob Giampietro, Chris Wu, and Jeffrey Waldman (Project
Projects); and Dan Wood, Amale Andraos, Sam Dufaux, and Marcel
Sonntag (WORKac).
At Governors Island, we thank Leslie Koch, Jonathan Meyers, and
Claire Kelly for hosting our exhibition at one of New York City's most
spectacular locations.
At the Walker, we are profoundly grateful for patrons' generous
support of this exhibition and their commitment to presenting
the most engaging arts of our time: Walker honorary trustee Judy
Dayton; honorary trustee Angus Wurtel and his wife, Margaret;
honorary trustee Harriet Spencer and her husband, Edson; trustee
John Christakos and his wife, Deborah; trustee James Dayton and his
wife, Megan; trustee Rebecca Pohlad and her husband, Robert; the
Bush Foundation; and the Mondriaan Foundation, Amsterdam.
Our sincere appreciation goes to the following Walker staff: Darsie
Alexander (chief curator); Mary Polta (finance); Lynn Dierks, DeAnn
Thyse, and Camille Washington (visual arts); Christopher Stevens,
Marla Stack, and Annie Schmidt (development); Kerstin Beyer, Masami
Kawazato, and Kate Tucker (membership); Cameron Zebrun, David
Dick, Peter Murphy, Scott Lewis, Kirk McCall, and Jeffrey Sherman
(program services); Robin Dowden, Eric Price, Tyler Stefanich, and
Nate Salas (new media); Joe King and Pamela Caserta (registration);
Kathleen Mclean and Pamela Johnson (editorial); Emmet Byrne, Lisa
Middag, Dylan Cole, Greg Beckel, Michael Aberman, Dante Carlos,
Andrea Hyde, Anton Pearson, and Brian Walbergh (design); Cameron
Wittig and Gene Pittman (photography); Andy Underwood (video);
Ryan French, Christopher James, and Adrienne Wiseman (marketing
and public relations); Michele Tobin and Paul Schumacher (shop); and
Sarah Schultz, Susy Bielak, and Ashley Duffalo (education).
Special thanks to Matthew Rezac, and to the faculty, students, and
leadership of the College of Visual Arts, the Minneapolis College of
Art and Design, and the College of Design at the University of Minnesota for being enthusiastic partners in our pedagogical experiment
called Night School.
Andrew Blauvelt and Ellen Lupton
the designer as
producer
ellen lupton
1998
14
1998
ellen lupton
15
Benjamin was a Marxist, committed to the notion that the technologies of manufacture should be owned by the workers who operate
them. In Marxist terminology, the "means of production" are the
heart of human culture and should be collectively owned. Benjamin
claimed that writing (and other arts) are grounded in the material
structures of society, from the educational institutions that foster
literacy to the publishing networks that manufacture and distribute
texts. In detailing an agenda for a politically engaged literary practice, Benjamin demanded that artists must not merely adopt political
"content," but must revolutionize the means through which their work
is produced and distributed.
ellen lupton
15
16
1998
ellen lupton
17
Muriel Cooper
A pioneer of design for digital media, Muriel Cooper founded the
Visible Language Workshop (VLW) at MIT in 1975. In 1985, the VLW
moved to the MIT Media Lab as one of its founding research groups.
Cooper worked with her students to create an electronic language for
building "typographic landscapes"complex, malleable documents
that function in real time and three-dimensional space. Cooper brought
typography to life, imparting dynamic interactivity to such principles as
layered information, simultaneous texts, and typographic texture. She
aimed to restructure the language of design in four dimensions. In an
interview with the author shortly before her unexpected death in 1994,
Cooper said, "In the traditional model, the designer tries to interpret
what given elements are 'supposed to do' together. So what happens
with computers (beyond the primitive desktop publishing model)? On
the 'information highway,' all sorts of things are up for grabsauthorship, how people read, how people gather and generate material for
their own purposes." EL
Muriel Cooper at work in the Visible Language Workshop at MIT. Photo: L Barry Hetherington
Anthony Velonis
Artist/producer Anthony Velonis helped transform creenprinting into
a viable fine arts medium. In the 1930s, the WPA's Federal Art Project
was created to employ artists during America's Great Depression and
to bring art into the lives of ordinary citizens. Velonis saw screenprinting as an affordable medium with great aesthetic potential. His
pamphlet Technical Problems of the Artist: Technique of the Silkscreen
Process helped to popularize screen printing in the postwar period.
After leaving the WPA, he founded the Creative Printmakers Group,
which produced fine arts prints as well as commercial posters. -EL
Anthony Velonis working on a poster matrix in the photography and reproduction department, Lowry Field, Denver, circa 1943. Courtesy Library of
Congress Prints and Photographs Division
16
1998
ellen lupton
17
the persistence
of posters
andrew blauvelt
2011
It cannot be seen whether, or for how long, the
poster will have a future. Doubts regarding its future
chances are justified when we consider the possible
way of life of a post-industrial society with new
technological resources in an environment planned
according to human requirements. 1
Josef and Shizuko MIIer-Brockmann, 1971
persistence of posters
andrew blauvelt
21
It is remarkable that the poster endures today, thirty years after Josef
and Shizuko MIler-Brockmann speculated about its future demise.
This prediction was the coda of their pioneering book, History of
the Poster. By all rights, the poster should be dead. Its ancient role
as a public proclamation, or posting, giving fair notice to citizens
or passersby, was eventually supplanted by the newspaper, which
became the official or unofficial mouthpiece of the state once the
printing press was democratized. The poster was reborn in the emergent commercial contexts of the nineteenth century, advertising the
multitude of new goods of the industrial age. While ancient forms of
posting may have been unique messages tethered to a particular
location, the modern poster was a product of the age of mechanical
reproduction. The poster multiplied and spread throughout the city,
with large and colorful sheets of paper posted on the sides of buildings and on street kiosksthe natural result of the advances made
in largescale reproductive technologies such as silkscreen, chromolithography, and photography connected to presses that can print
thousands of copies per hour. Because of this capacity, we think of
the poster today only as a multiple.
The role of the poster to sell the latest goods was eventually overtaken by printed advertisements in newspapers and magazines,
which had a more intimate scale and personal form of address that
befitted its audience as a collection of individuals rather than an
undifferentiated massthe culture of the street. The poster also lost
ground to formats inspired by it, such as the billboard, which provided
an even larger canvas to capture the attention of passersby, not on
foot but in automobiles. The poster transformed the twentieth-century cityscape with a sea of messages, each competing with the other
for attention. This cacophony eventually spawned public concern
about visual pollution, and with it restrictions such as no-posting
ordinances and zoning regulations. The official regulation of posting
started by legal decree that restricted where one could post, but later
tightened through the consolidation of media companies and the
outlets they owned, which denied access to those Andrew Blauvelt
coveted locations. The culture of posting remains on the street in a
more limited, ad hoc, and spontaneous fashion: the lost cat notice,
rubbish sale signs, realty placards on bus benches, or the bus shelter
ad. There is still a posting culture in pedestrian heavy zones such as
college campuses, where the notices about social and cultural offerings abound: a meeting here, a concert there. This is the culture of
the flyer: a pintsized poster, constrained by standardized paper sizes
and the machines that handle it: duplicators, photocopiers, laser and
inkjet printers. Desktop publishing software enabled people to design
their own flyers, and coupled with the convenience of printing centers
such as Kinkos, ensured a design culture for the zine and flyer that
proliferated in the 1990s.
Alison and Peter Smithson et al. , Parallel of Life and Art, installation at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, London, 1952 2011 Tate, London
20
2011
persistence of poster
andrew blauvelt
21
22
2011
persistence of posters
andrew blauvelt
23
persistence of poster
andrew blauvelt
23
22
2011
24
2011
Fanette Mellier
Created for the annual international poster festival in Chaumont, Fanette
Melliers Specimen uses the iconography of the printer-color bars used
to measure ink density, registration marks for trimming and aligning ink
layersas a substitute for a photograph or illustration of the typical
poster. A reference to its own production, Specimen provides a patterned
surface on one side and information about the exhibition on the reverse.
These two surfacespure text and pure imageare brought together
when the corner of the poster is folded back to the reveal the text
beneath. While a gesture for functional reasons, the dog-earring of
the paper cleverly relates the poster to the book page. In many ways,
the contemporary poster exhibits traits more closely identified with the
scale of the book, such as smaller-size type meant to be read at close
range and more complex compositions and multiple images rather than
an easily graspable main image. Mellier, who is comfortable designing at
a variety of scalesposters, identities, typefaces, and booksis perhaps
best known for her inventive use of color and shape to transform words
and letterforms into imagistic compositions. AB
24
2011
persistence of poster
andrew blauvelt
25
26
2011
persistence of posters
andrew blauvelt
27
Ed Fella
Self-proclaimed exit-level (as opposed to entry-level) design veteran
Ed Fell a has co-opted the form of the poster in the guise of the flyer,
albeit in the larger 11-by-17-inch size. Folded and printed on a paper
in the office-culture color palette of tans, peaches, and grays, they are
adorned with a sticker or a hand-applied marking. Hundreds of these
flyers have been produced, each in multiple quantities, not to promote
a lecture he is giving, but rather to commemorate it. Distributed to
attendees at the event, these flyers function as keepsakes, which as
writer Susan Sontag once noted, fulfill an important cultural function:
A poster is like a miniature of an event: a quotationfrom life, or from
high art. Modern poster collecting is related to the modern phenomenon of mass tourism. As collected now, the poster becomes a souveni,
of the event. Here, we find another inversion by Fella, namely that
the important gesture isnt one of collecting by the consumer, but of
producing and distributing these flyers on the part of the designer. This
seizing control of the means of production and distribution, becoming in
effect both message and messenger, presages other important developments that constitute the afterlife of the contemporary poster, one that
explains the persistence of this most iconic form of graphic design. AB
26
2011
persistence of poster
andrew blauvelt
27