Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Nikhill Joshi
Class/per. AP English 12/ Period 2
Date
8/26/16
After finishing this article, I gained a new perspective on the types and characteristics of
good literature. I had always thought of literature as a sophisticated craft in which the writer
adopts a formulaic method for developing and advancing the plot and characters, but I now
realize that there are many different types of theses that convey different feelings in a work of
literature. While I completely agree with the majority of theses that the author described
(especially the subjectivity thesis), I was confused on the description for the cultural code
thesis. The author explains how our entire experience as the human race is coded, and we
only perceive meaning because it conforms to codes. While I understand the intent behind this
statement in trying to describe clichs, I believe that the things within our environment possess
meaning due to being outside of societal norms rather than conforming to them. Although meanings
help the reader observe certain perceptions about a character or scenario due to societal standards,
the authors word choice suggested that things that do not conform are considered meaningless; a
statement that is certainly false.
Name
Nikhill Joshi
Class/per. AP English 12/ Period 2
Date
8/26/16
Name
Nikhill Joshi
Class/per. AP English 12/ Period 2
Date
8/26/16
Self assess. Fill out the chart prior to submitting your work for feedback:
Comments: Student
Concerns
(Evidence criteria/standards (Improve or
met)
Remediate)
1-2
Criteria
(Proficient)
CCSS standard &
Description of mastery
Advanced
Exceeded
Standard
3-4
Comments: Teacher
Standard/Criteria 1
I believe that I went over the
expectations for
analyzing/citing different
portions of the articles. I can
effectively use citations to
support my claims.
Standard/Criteria 2
Although I feel that I can
assess the quality and
validity of claims, I am not
completely perfect in
determining the hidden
meaning behind the words.
I need to work on
understanding the
intentional meaning of texts.
RL8:Delineate and
evaluate the argument
and specific claims in a
text, including the validity
of the reasoning as well
as the relevance and
sufficiency of the
evidence.
Standard/Criteria 3
Although I can write
arguments to support
certain claims, I need to
work on using relevant
quotes/sources for the
specific claims
Standard/Criteria 4
A student who earns a 4 goes beyond what was taught. A student who earns a 3 demonstrates a strong knowledge
of what is explicitly taught. A student who earns a 2 shows a grasp of the simpler concepts and may have errors or
omissions when it comes to the more complex concepts taught. A student who earns a 1 only demonstrates a partial
understanding of simpler concepts taught (Marzano 2006).