Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Radiochemistry, South African Nuclear Energy Corporation ( Ltd.), P.O. Box 582, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa
b
Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
Received 26 April 2000; received in revised form 27 June 2000; accepted 3 July 2000
Abstract
In a quest for more effective radiopharmaceuticals for pain palliation of metastatic bone cancer, this paper relates results obtained with
Ho and 153 Sm complexed to the bone seeking phosphonate, N,N-dimethylenephosphonate-1-hydroxy-4-aminopropylidenediphosphonate (APDDMP). APDDMP is synthesised from the known bone cancer pain palliation agent 1-hydroxy-3-aminopropylidenediphosphonate (APD) and was complexed to lanthanide trivalent metal ions. This work is performed to utilise the idea that the energetic b-particle
emitter, 166 Ho, coupled with phosphonate ligands such as APD and APDDMP could afford a highly effective radiopharmaceutical in the
treatment of bone cancer. Complex-formation constants of APDDMP with the important blood plasma metal-ions, Ca 21 , Mg 21 , and Zn 21
and the trivalent lanthanides Ho 31 and Sm 31 were measured by glass electrode potentiometry at 378C and I5150 mM. Blood plasma
models were constructed using the computer code ECCLES and the results compared with those gathered from animal tests. The
166
Ho-APDDMP complex was found to have little liver or bone uptake while 153 Sm-APDDMP had a moderate bone uptake. This was
primarily due to the high affinity of APDDMP for Ca(II). Clinical observations could be explained by the blood plasma modelling.
2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
166
1. Introduction
In previous studies, 153 Sm-EDTMP (QuadrametE) has
been shown to be effective in the palliation of pain
associated with metastatic bone cancer [1,2]. The high
affinity of EDTMP for bone, coupled with the nuclear
properties of 153 Sm (t 1 / 2 546.75 h; maximum b-particle
energy51.3310 213 J) enabled the radiopharmaceutical to
alleviate the pain associated with metastatic bone cancer.
In order to improve the efficacy of the radiopharmaceutical, we have replaced the 153 Sm by 166 Ho which has a
higher energy b-particle (t 1 / 2 526.9 h; maximum b-particle energy53.0310 213 J). Despite the chemical similarity between these two metal ions, however, these studies
were unsuccessful, the Ho-EDTMP complex having a
different biodistribution to Sm-EDTMP. Computer modelling studies showed that this was due to subtle changes in
*Corresponding author. Fax: 127-12-305-5944.
E-mail address: radchem@aec.co.za (J.R. Zeevaart).
166
Ho;
153
Sm
0162-0134 / 01 / $ see front matter 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0162-0134( 00 )00125-2
58
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents
The ligand APDDMP was synthesised from APD by a
Mannich type reaction based on the method reported by
Shcherbakov et al. [7]. 4.7 g (0.02 mol) APD and 4 g
(0.048 mol) H 3 PO 3 were dissolved in 10 ml H 2 O and 10
ml HCl(c). The APD only dissolves after heating the
mixture in a three-necked flask. The solution was brought
to boiling point under reflux conditions. Over a period of
30 min, 7 ml of a 37% CH 2 O (formaldehyde) solution was
added dropwise. The solution was refluxed for a further 2.5
h after which it was allowed to cool. Excess HCl and
formaldehyde were removed by evaporation at 1008C and
2.2. Potentiometry
Potentiometric titrations were performed using a Metrohm Titroprocessor 670 with a Metrohm 665 dosimat and
a combination glass electrode (Ag /AgCl reference). The
electrode was calibrated regularly using strong acidbase
titration data [8]. To correct the deviation of the electrode
at high pH, the Nernst equation was adjusted to the
following:
E 5 E 0 1 60.4 3 log[H 1 ] 1 Ej
where Ej (51.354310 211 / [H 1 ]) is the liquid junction
potential.
All titrations were performed under inert atmosphere
and solutions were held at a constant ionic strength of 0.15
M NaCl and a temperature of 37.060.18C. The titrations
were performed beginning at low and ending at high pH,
adding 0.10 ml aliquots of 0.050 M NaOH (carbonate-free)
in 0.10 M NaCl. Protonation constants were calculated
from data obtained from titrations of the ligand alone. The
concentration of the ligand was refined together with the
protonation constants in an iterative process. MetalAPDDMP formation constants were calculated from titration data at three different metal:ligand ratios varying from
1:1 to 1:3. Data were analysed using the ESTA [8] library
of programs. During the analysis, the previously determined protonation constants, were held constant. Metal
hydrolysis constants and pK w were taken from the literature [9] and held constant during optimisation procedures.
The models were tested for plausibility by comparing
experimental and calculated formation and deprotonation
curves.
59
153
Sm-
2.5. Preparation of
99 m
3.1. Potentiometry
APDDMP has nine potential sites for protonation, one
tertiary amine and four phosphonato groups. The pH range
used in this study precluded the determination of the amine
protonation constant. However, Shcherbakov et al. [7]
have determined this to be 10 11.87 at 258C and I5
1.0 M KNO 3 . The basicity of this group is very high but
not unusual when one considers that the corresponding pKa
of APD is 10.95 [5]. Although a phosphonate is electron
withdrawing, deprotonation of the amine group of
APDDMP relative to APD is more difficult because in the
former a proton is removed from LH 72 while in the latter
it is removed from LH 32 . The charge on the ligand is
likely to affect both the entropy and enthalpy of deprotonation. The same reasoning explains the increase in pKa in
the sequence: NH 3 (pKa 59.24); H 2 NCH 2 PO 22
(pKa 5
3
42
10.05); [HN(CH 2 PO 3 ) 2 ]
(pKa 510.79). Increasing the
alkyl chain separating the amine and phosphonate also
60
Table 1
Protonation and formation constants for APDDMP determined in this study at 378C and I5150 mM NaCl. All constants calculated using potentiometry
Equilibrium a
log K
[this work]
H1L;HL
H1HL;H 2 L
H 1H 2 L;H 3 L
H 1H 3 L;H 4 L
H 1H 4 L;H 5 L
H 1H 5 L;H 6 L
Ca1L1H;Ca(HL)
2Ca1L;Ca 2 L
Ca 2 L1H;Ca 2 (HL)
Ca 2 (HL)1H;Ca 2 (H 2 L)
Ca1L1OH;CaL(OH)
Ca1L12OH;CaL(OH) 2
2Mg1L;Mg 2 L
Mg 2 L1H;Mg 2 (HL)
Mg 2 (HL)1H;Mg 2 (H 2 L)
Mg 2 L1OH;Mg 2 L(OH)
Mg1L12OH;MgL(OH) 2
2Sr1L;Sr 2 L
Sr 2 L1H;Sr 2 (HL)
Sr 2 (HL)1H;Sr 2 (H 2 L)
Sr 2 L1OH;Sr 2 L(OH)
Zn1L;ZnL
ZnL1H;Zn(HL)
Zn(HL)1H;Zn(H 2 L)
Zn(H 2 L)1H;Zn(H 3 L)
Zn1L1OH;ZnL(OH)
Zn1L12OH;ZnL(OH) 2
Ho1L;HoL
HoL1H;Ho(HL)
2Ho1L12H;Ho 2 (H 2 L)
Ho1L1OH;HoL(OH)
Ho1L12OH;HoL(OH) 2
Sm1L;SmL
SmL1H;Sm(HL)
2Sm1L12H;Sm 2 (H 2 L)
Sm1L1OH;SmL(OH)
Sm1L12OH;SmL(OH) 2
Not Found c
9.82(,1)
7.21(,1)
6.09(1)
4.89(1)
2.04(2)
13.87(3)
10.99(3)
7.30(4)
5.91(4)
8.60(3)
11.61(2)
11.10(3)
7.34(4)
5.72(4)
4.47(4)
12.19(2)
10.17(2)
7.32(3)
5.71(4)
3.25(4)
9.53(2)
7.19(3)
6.03(3)
4.26(4)
13.46(3)
15.49(7)
12.01
7.81(3)
32.32(4)
19.14(4)
22.72(5)
13.10(3)
6.80(3)
31.50(4)
18.93(4)
22.96(4)
Number of
data points
Hamilton
R factor
643
0.00509
298
0.0128
290
0.0122
600
0.0104
267
0.0134
364
0.0262
342
0.0232
log K b
Shcherbakov [7]
11.87
10.30
6.82
5.70
4.57
,2
12.83
a
Charges on metal-ions, APDDMP and complexes have been omitted for simplicity. L represents H-APDDMP except for the protonation constants
where L represents APDDMP for comparison.
b
I51 M KNO 3 and 258C. The metal to ligand ratio studied is 1:1.
c
The value is probably to high to be determined by the experimental setup used in this work.
61
62
Table 2
Speciation of APDDMP in normal blood plasma as calculated by
ECCLES. L5APDDMP 27
Species
Fig. 5. Experimental (points) and modelled (lines) formation curves for
Ca(II) complexation by APDDMP. pA is the negative logarithm of the
free ligand concentration. The three separate titrations are represented by
(s) 0.00105 M Ca(II), 0.00122 M APDDMP and 0.00583 M HCl; (h)
0.00100 M Ca(II), 0.00162 M APDDMP and 0.00562 M HCl and (n)
0.00096 M Ca(II), 0.00310 M APDDMP and 0.01063 M HCl vs. 0.0500
M NaOH in 0.010 M NaCl. All solutions were at 378C and 0.15 M NaCl
or 0.15 M total ionic strength.
Mol%
32
[Ca 2 (L)]
[Ca 2 (HL)] 22
[Mg 2 (L)] 32
[Mg 2 (HL)] 22
[Ca(HL)] 42
[Ca 2 (H 2 L)] 2
[Mg 2 (LOH)] 42
42.4
33.0
11.6
10.1
1.1
1.1
0.3
63
166
Ho-APDDMP, (middle)
153
99m
Tc-APDDMP.
64
Table 3
Distribution of the various nuclides in different organs of baboons
Area
Bone
Liver
Kidneys
a
Ho-APD b
58.1
68.3
58.4
166
55.4
57.1 c
60 c
Corrections were made for 166 Ho, 153 Sm and 99m Tc decay.
Values for 3 h.
c
Values extrapolated from recordings after 2 h.
b
Ho-APDDMP
153
Sm-APDDMP
66.7
58.8
72
99m
Tc-APDDMP
82.2
52.4
62
4. Conclusion
It was once again gratifying to find that ECCLES is able
to give much insight into the in vivo behaviour of
radiopharmaceuticals. The ECCLES output enabled the
authors to accurately predict that 166 Ho-APDDMP would
have little liver and bone uptake. It furthermore predicted
that 153 Sm-APDDMP would have a moderate bone uptake,
65
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the South African Nuclear Energy
Corporation for permission to publish this work. We also
thank Prof. Irene Dormehl for the baboon tests, Dr. A.V.
Kolesnikov and Dr. D Tomasevic for the translation of the
Russian article.
References
[1] A.S. Alberts, B.J. Smit, W.K.A. Louw, A.J. van Rensburg, A. van
Beek, V. Kritzinger, J.S. Nel, Radiother. Oncol. 43 (1997) 175179.
[2] USA Food and Drug Administration, Approval for 153 Sm-EDTMP
(EQuadramet), Granted during March 1997.
[3] N.V. Jarvis, J.M. Wagener, G.E. Jackson, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton
Trans. ((1995)) 14111415.
[4] J.R. Zeevaart, N.V. Jarvis, I. Cukrowski, G.E. Jackson, S. Afr. J.
Chem. 50 (1997) 189194.
[5] J.R. Zeevaart, N.V. Jarvis, W.K.A. Louw, G.E. Jackson, I. Cukrowski, C.J. Mouton, J. Inorg. Biochem. 73 (1999) 265272.
[6] J. Simon, D.A. Wilson, J.R. Garlich, D.E. Troutner, Patent 899734,
Dow Chemical Company, 1989.
[7] B.K. Shcherbakov, F.I. Belskii, M.P. Komarova, Y.M. Polikarpov,
T. Y Medved, M.I. Kabachnik, Izv. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser.
Khim. 3 (1982) 560564.
[8] P.M. May, K. Murray, Talanta 35 (1988) 927941, and references
therein.
[9] A.E. Martell, R.M. Smith, Critical Stability Constants, Vols. 3 and 6,
Plenum, New York, 1977 and 1989, and references therein.
[10] P.A. May, D.R. Williams, P.W. Linder, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.
((1977)) 588595.
[11] W.F. Goeckeler, B. Edwards, W.A. Volkert, R.A. Holmes, J. Simon,
D. Wilson, J. Nucl. Med. 28 (1987) 495504.
[12] B. Kurzak, A. Kamecka, K. Kurzak, J. Jezierska, P. Kafarski,
Polyhedron 17 (1998) 44034413.
[13] N.V. Jarvis, J.M. Wagener, Talanta 41 (1994) 747754.
[14] G.L. Smith, S.B. Rees, D.R. Williams, Polyhedron 4 (1985) 713
716.
[15] M. Neves, M. Reis, F. Waerenborgh, E. Martinho, L. Patricio, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 140 (1987) 359360.
[16] W.K.A. Louw, I.C. Dormehl, A.J. van Rensburg et al., Nucl. Med.
Biol. 23 (1996) 935941.
[17] J.S. Arnold, Kinetic analysis of bone imaging agents, in: Principles
of Radiopharmacology, CRC Press, Chicago, 1979, pp. 205233.
[18] I. Fogelman, D.L. Citrin, J.H. McKillop, J.G. Turner, R.G. Bessent,
W.R. Greig, J. Nucl. Med. 20 (1979) 98101.
[19] W.-Y. Lin, C. Lin, S. Yen et al., Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24 (1997)
590595.
[20] H. Fleisch, Endocrine Rev. 19 (1998) 80100.
[21] R.A.M.J. Claessens, Z.I. Kolar, Langmuir 16 (2000) 13601367.