Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
However, if you wish to skip to the next speaker, use the scroll
bar at left to locate the speakers first slide (indicated by the
icon in the bottom right corner of slides 10 and 34). Click on
the thumbnail for the slide to begin the audio for that portion
of the presentation.
Note: If the slides begin to lag behind the audio, back up one
slide to re-sync.
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI Conventions
ACI conventions provide a forum for networking, learning the
latest in concrete technology and practices, renewing old
friendships, and making new ones. At each of ACIs two
annual conventions, technical and educational committees
meet to develop the standards, reports, and other documents
necessary to keep abreast of the ever-changing world of
concrete technology.
With over 1,300 delegates attending each convention, there is
ample opportunity to meet and talk individually with some of
the most prominent persons in the field of concrete
technology. For more information about ACI conventions,
visit www.aciconvention.org.
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
10/14/2011
These seminars, cosponsored by ACI and the Portland Cement Association (PCA),
will cover all the major changes in the new edition of the 318-11 Building Code.
DATE
LOCATION
DATE
LOCATION
September 13
September 27
September 29
October 4
October 6
October 11
October 13
October 20
October 25
October 27
November 1
Chicago, IL
Philadelphia, PA
Houston, TX
Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
Minneapolis, MN
Cincinnati, OH
New Brunswick, NJ
St. Louis, MO
Orlando, FL
November 3
November 8
November 10
November 15
November 17
November 29
December 1
December 6
December 8
December 13
December 15
Charlotte, NC
Boston, MA
Detroit, MI
Des Moines, IA
Portland, OR
Denver, CO
Phoenix, AZ
Atlanta, GA
Washington, DC
Dallas, TX
San Francisco, CA
ACI
For more information, visit ACI seminars.
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
Table of Contents
Influencing Parameters
Proposed Model
Conclusions
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
DRSR
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
10/14/2011
Influencing Parameters
Bond Model
Effective Strain
Crack Pattern
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
Research Significance
Bond Model:
for
the
strengthened
shear
beams
resistance
which
Holzenkmpfer (1994)
fail
of
FRP-
by
FRP
debonding.
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
Advantage
of
origin of
of
most
current
HB
305
origin
current
The modified
Modified
version
Holzenkmpfer
(1994)
current
NLFM
models
code 440.2R
(previously
known
ACI
to
Maeda
et
al.model
(1997)
forVfrpFRP
bonded
that
calculate
bond
as CIDAR)
model
to
calculate
,the
model
and
current
calculate
Vbetween
,
to
concrete,
strength
FRP
ACI
440.2R
model
to
frp
calculated
Vfrp,
and
concrete,
Introduced
the
The
bond
model
uses
Considers
allconcept
the
effective
length
correct
concept
The
uses
variables
in and
the
for model
FRP
bonded
to
Considers
all correct
concrete,
Le ,variables.
variables.
concept
and
bond
model,
correct
variables
in the
bond model,
Calculates Pfrp P
Lfrp
and
Le are
is
Calculated
e
Calculated
Pfrp
is
relatively
rather accurate.
accurate.
accurate
for
relatively accurate.
limited
concrete
strengths.
Effective Strain:
Le (mm)
150
Vf
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
100
Maedaet
al.(1997)
Modified
NLFM
50
disadvantage
Produces
conservative
is not
effect
of
f'designed
The
model
is have
model
Fails
to
c predict
results
in Lepredicting
to
calculate
bond
considered,
been
originally
accurately
and
eff
the bondbetween
strength,
PRC
strength
steel
developed
for these
when
frp.
plates
and
concrete,
beams
strengthened
in
Fails
to
predict
parameters
are
accurately
Le and eff
shear
with FRP.
considered
separately.
The
when model produces
these
conservative
in
parameters resultsare
predicting
effective
consideredthe
separately.
bond length, Le.
is
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
100 E .t
200
f f (GPa.mm)
10/14/2011
wfe= df - Le
df
k p 1.125
Le
Le
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
2
1
wf
wf
bp
Holzenkmpfer
(1994)
and
Neubauer
and
Rostsy (1997)
bc
bp
400
sf
s
Transverse Steel:
Cracking Pattern:
No transverse reinforcement
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
Transverse
Reinforcement
Ratio
(Steel + FRP)
Crack Pattern
Distribution
FRP Anchorage
Length
Trapezoidal
bonding area
Le
Le
Le
(a)
(c)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
Bond Strength
between FRP
and Concrete
Amount of FRP
fibers longer
than (or equal
to) effective
anchorage length
wfe
wfe
Le
EB FRP
contribution to
the shear
resistance
Equivalent rectangular
bond area
Equivalent rectangular
bond area
ACI
(b)
WEB SESSIONS
Le
Le
(d)
10/14/2011
kc= we / df
2.00
1.80
U-Jacket FRP-debonded
1.60
Side-bonded FRP-debonded
1.40
U-Jacket-concrete crushing
1.20
0.6
w fe
1.00
f E f s E s
d f
for U-Jacket
df
0.80
0.40
y=
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.43x-0.5
1.00
1.50
y=
2.00
0.6x-0.5
2.50
3.00
kc
3.50
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
f E f s E s
f E f + s E s
0.43
w fe
0.60
kc
w fe
df
w fe
df
0.6
f E f s E s
0.43
f E f s E s
for U-Jackets
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
140.0
R2 = 0.61
120.0
fe
kc k L kw eff Le
t f .E f
0.31kc k L kw
f c
tf Ef
fu
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
sf
U-Jacket-Proposed model
0.0
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
0.0
WEB SESSIONS
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
28
140.0
Vf exp (kN)
Applying kc to Vf calculated using the ACI 440.2R 2008, fib TG 9.3 2001, CAN/CSA-S806 2002, HB 305 2008 (CIDAR
2006), and CNR-DT200 2004 guidelines resulted in a
significant improvement on the accuracy of the calculated
results for all the mentioned guidelines .
Vf cal (kN)
140.0
R2 = 0.37
120.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
Vf exp (kN)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
10/14/2011
Conclusions
Acknowledgement
The
The Ministre
guidelines.
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
1
2
1a, J.A.O.
Barros
2b
Loss of bond
(debonding)
b)
Strip
Rupture
SCHEMATIZATION OF R.C.
BEAM WEB AND NSM FRP
STRIPS
Post Doc:
vincenzo.bianco@uniroma1.it
b Associate Prof.: barros@civil.uminho.pt
c Full Prof.:
giorgio.monti@uniroma1.it
x f 1,k ; N f ,k ;tn
beam flange
X
hw
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
bw
d)
strips
University of Minho
at Guimares, Portugal
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
c)
X fi
sf
Oil
tn
Li
Lf
O o
st
hw
Lfi
Xi l
xf1,k
sf
x f 1,k
a)
beam web
b)
FRP-RCS10 - Tampa - Florida
2-4 Aprile 2011
10/14/2011
V ficf ; f ctm ; X il
V fip ,cf
90
f ctm
X il
X fi
C fi ; X il
45 s f 0.0
section
Lf
u k N f , k 1 with ui ,k 0 i 1,.., N f ,k
xf1,k
sf
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
web top
bw surface
Oo
X il
C fi ; X il
b)
a)
i; tn ; q2 qe
The first strip is placed at a distance equal to the spacing sf from the
assumed crack origin O;
of the crack;
V fibd
Vc
tr
Li t n ; LRfi t n ; q1 ; xi
X il
Lcfi tn ;qe
l
Oi
Li tn
Li tn
C fi ;
Ld
bw
e2 j 1
3
o j bj
X fj
X oj
v1 j
aj
v2 j
e1 j
tn ; i; qm ; nn
Ld
lin
A lin
fi A f 2
strip
b)
C fi L fi ; fi
E fi L fi ; fi
dE fi A nlin
A lin
fi
fi
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
dE fi
Softening Friction
Softening
Free Slipping
2
0
Elastic
strip-adhesive adhesion
q
X 22
Ld
A finlin A nlin
f2
c)
bw
2
2
b)
fctm . sin fi . dC fi
E fi X il ;
1
q
X 21
C fi ; X il
V fip ,cf
bw
2
intersection with
the CDC plane
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
a)
e1Pj
d)
c)
hw
xitr
oitr
Vc
tr
i
Lcfi tn ;q1
An odd number of strips are placed so that the central one gets the
LRfi tn ;qe
xitr
o
An even number of strips are placed symmetrically with respect to the axis
e2Pj
k 3
V f , k with k 1, 2, 3 and
V ficf X il
bw
2
tn t s
y
k k 1
Oil
sf
web bottom
surface
In order to single out the range [VminPM-VmaxPM] of analytical values, the following
i N f ,k
y
t n tn1
fctm
i; tn ; q1
intersection with
the semi-cone of
the adjacent strip
fctm sin
LRfi tn ;q1
X il
i i 1
90
hw
x f 1,k
bw 2
V ficf X il
45; 90; s f 0; bw hw 0
i 1
V fi ,k t n ; LRfi ,k t n1 ; Lcfi ,k tn 1 ; ui ,k tn1 Strip Function
45; 45; s f ; bw hw
Yy
beam web
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
2nd
3.
tn t1
L ,k tn N f ,k 1 with Li ,k tn i 1,., N f , k
assumed
CDC plane
strips
2.
L R ,k N f ,k 1 LRfi ,k L fi ,k i 1,., N f ,k
1.
hw
Lfi
Xil
3rd
t n
Li
f ctm
f ctm sin
1st
Oil
Input Parameters
hw ; bw ; ; s f ; ; ; f cm ; f fu ; E f ; a f ; b f ; 0 ; 1 ; 2 ; 1; 2 ; 3 ; ; max ; nd
st
section plane
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
beam flange
C fi L fi ; fi
f ctm sin
fctm . sin fi . dC fi
3
q
X 22
p
X 23
d f x
Equilibrium:
O
q
X 21
Constitutive laws:
dx
Af
Kinematic compatibility:
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
Lp
f x A f c x Ac 0
Ef
du f
dx
d 2
dx 2
du
c Ec c
dx
x u f x u c x
with:
x J1 0
J1
Lp 1
Af
A f E f Ac Ec
10/14/2011
oe x e
By imposing the boundary conditions and solving the differential equation for the several phases of the bond
constitutive law, we obtain: slip distribution; distribution of tangential stresses; distribution of the strip axial
stress and of the progressive force transferred to the surrounding concrete.
1) Elastic
Phase
2)
Softening
Phase
e
o x o
o x
sf
oe x e
o sf x sf
e xe s x s
e xe
e xe
s xs
e xe
fs x fs
sf x sf
s xs
sf x sf
fs x fs
e xe s x s
sf x sf
e xe
sf
fs
x fs
fs x fs
x s xs
e
sf x sf
xitr oitr
LRfi
sf
0
sf x sf
s xs
e xe s x s
e xe s x s sf x sf
e xe
x x
e
3
1
Ltr 3
o fs x fs
os x s
sf
o fs x fs
Ltr 2
3) Softening Friction
Phase
o sf x sf
os x s
Ltr1
2
Li ti2 1Li t2m Li3t j 3 2 Li tn 3 2 Li tm 3 Li t p 3
e xe
e xe s x s
e x e s x s sf x sf
fs x fs
i>j>n>m>p
2
a)
V bd ,e xe
V bd ,e xe V bd ,s x s
V bd ,e xe V bd ,s x s V bd ,sf x sf
Ltr1
a)
Ltr1
V bd ,e x e
Ltr 2
b)
c)
V bd ,s x s
V bd ,sf x sf
Ltr 2
Ltr1
Ltr 3
b)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
c)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
k1
30
10
0
0
k 3
10
70
0
0
Exp.
20
60
50
k2
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
k3
k1
Exp.
20
10
0
0
k2
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
CDC opening angle []
Exp.
40
30
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
20
10
70
40
30
50
0
0
k3
60
k2
20
10
0
0
40
Exp.
30 k 1
20
k2
10
Exp.
k1
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
CDC opening angle []
60
Exp.
50
k3
40
k2
30
20
k1
Beam 4S-4LI45-II
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
60
50
40
k3
30
20
k2
k1
Exp.
10
0
0
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
10
0
0
70
k3
40
50
0
0
50
30
k2
70
Exp.
k1
k2
k3 k3
60
20
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
k2
k1
40
Beam 2S-7LI45-II
Beam 2S-4LI45-II
70
k1
60
70
NSM shear contrib. Vf,k [kN]
40
50
k3
k3
70
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
Exp.
50
60
70
60
30
Beam 2S-8LV-I
Beam 2S-5LV-I
k 2
k 1
70
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
60
50
40 k 2
k1
Exp.
30
20
k3
10
0
0
The developed mechanical model allows the maximum contribution to the shear strength provided by a
system of NSM FRP strips to be predicted with a satisfactory level of accuracy and ragardless of: amount of
existing steel stirrups, concrete mechanical properties, number and inclination of the strips.
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
125
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
100
75
k3
50
k1
k2
25
0
5
10
15 20 25 30
Spacing sf [cm]
75
k2
75
50
Real
Max. Ideal
10
L2
15 20 25 30
Spacing sf [cm]
15 20 25 30
Spacing sf [cm]
c)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
35
L5
L4
k1
35
Lf 1
L1 L f 2
L3
a)
Lf 3
0.5 s f ,real
s f ,real
b)
100
0
5
10
Lf 5
L 5 t n
Lf 4
100
L 3 tn
75
Ideal
50
Lf 5
Lf 4
k3
25
b)
125
25
tn 2
50
0
5
35
Exp.
k1
k2
k3
100
a)
L 2 t n
L1 tn
25
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Spacing in the ideal configuration sf [cm]
L 4 t n
Lf 3
Lf 2
Lf 1
s f ,ideal
c)
d)
Parametric studies of the NSM FRP strips shear strength
contribution to a RC beam
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
10/14/2011
300
100
k1
k2
k3
0
0
25
50
75
100
Concrete compressive strength fcm [MPa]
k1
k2
k3
0
0
15
30
45
Concrete angle []
100
b)
max
Vfk [kN]
max
k1
k2
k3
0
0
2
4
6
Strip cross section thickness af [mm]
60
30
60
Strip spacing sf [cm]
200
100
k1
k2
k3
55
70
85
100
Strip inclination angle []
b)
300
k1
k2
k3
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
Strip Youngs Modulus Ef [GPa]
0
0
10
20
30
40
Strip cross section width bf [mm]
a)
0
40
90
300
300
200
100
a)
b)
max
100
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cross section width bw [cm]
max
200
a)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
0
0
20
40
60
80
Cross section depth hw [cm]
300
max
max
Vfk [kN]
200
100
100
a)
Vfk [kN]
300
Vfk [kN]
0
0
60
b)
k1
k2
k3
200
k1
k2
k3
200
max
15
30
45
CDC Angle []
100
200
Vfk [kN]
0
0
0.1
a)
max
max
k1
k2
k3
k1
k2
k3
max
0.05
Load step
100
200
Vfk [kN]
0
0
200
k1
k2
k3
Vfk [kN]
100
300
300
k1
k2
k3
Vfk [kN]
Vfk [kN]
200
max
Vfk [kN]
200
300
Vfk [kN]
300
k1
k2
k3
max
Vfk [kN]
300
c)
100
0
0
2
4
Strip Strength ffu [GPa]
d)
b)
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
300
100
k1
k2
k3
200
max
200
Vfk [kN]
k1
k2
k3
max
200
Vfk [kN]
k1
k2
k3
max
Vfk [kN]
300
100
100
2
4
Bond parameter 0 [MPa]
0
5
a)
c)
300
300
100
d)
k1
k2
k3
200
max
200
Vfk [kN]
k1
k2
k3
max
max
Vfk [kN]
k1
k2
k3
200
0
0
0
0
5
10
15
20
Local bond parameter 2 [MPa]
35
b)
300
Vfk [kN]
15
25
Bond parameter 1 [MPa]
100
0
0
3
6
9
Bond parameter 2 [mm]
12
100
0
0
e)
5
15
20
Bond parameter 3 [mm]
25
f)
Due to both the high-performance of the currently available structural adhesives and the premature
occurrence of other failure modes such as either concrete tensile fracture or strip rupture, a variation of
each of the bond parameters does affect the peak NSM shear strength contribution.
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
10/14/2011
Seminar Schedule
Bookstore
ACI eLearning
Conventions
Concrete Knowledge
ACI
WEB SESSIONS
10