Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Guidance Note 1
1.0
Module specification:
1.1
Description
In this module you will be required to carry out an in-depth study involving
theoretical, experimental or investigative analysis or a combination of these
methods. This work will be undertaken on an individual basis. The nature of the
dissertation is to present you with a challenge whose solution is not readily available,
and it will therefore involve original work.
Your dissertation will differ from research in that your supervisor would be aware of
or could envisage the conclusion or limits of the investigation. This should not,
however, prevent you from exploring alternative investigative methods and solutions
to the proposed study. Your work should be original but based on proven techniques
which should relate to and integrate with your previous and current academic
studies.
1.2
Learning Outcomes
The aim of the dissertation is to increase your perception of problem identification,
evaluation of solution with particular emphasis upon the development of creative and
innovative skills.
1.3
Teaching and Learning Methods
You are expected to personally manage the module which will involve the
undertaking of research and other practical work and the regular seeking of
supervisor guidance at mutually convenient intervals. You are also required to use
available private study time to facilitate reading, research, seminar attendance,
design and data analysis, dissertation project formulation and progression.
You are encouraged to make use of the e-learning materials to gain further
information and guidance in the study. A programme of tutorials will be provided to
guide you through the process of how to design and conduct the dissertation project
and progress will be regularly checked by supervisors.
1.4
Key Dates
You will be provided with a list of key dates at the start of the year. It is your
responsibility to manage your time so that you are able to meet the two key dates
provided.
The first key date is at the end of the first semester (see module information pack for
actual date details) when you will be expected to give a board presentation to your
supervisor based on the findings of your review and how you intend to move on with
your investigation.
Your supervisor will provide a mark out of 10 based on their satisfaction of you is
your board presentation and your engagement in the module at this stage.
The second key date is near the end of the second semester (see module
information pack for exact date) when you will be expected to submit your
dissertation.
1.5 Word Count
You are required to write in the region of between 8 and 15 thousand words for your
dissertation.
Word count is based on the wording of chapter 1(Introduction), chapter 2 (literature
review), chapter 3 (methodology), chapter 4 (investigation) and chapter 5
(conclusion) and does not include the acknowledgement, abstract, contents pages,
references or appendices.
An indication of the word count for each chapter is;
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Investigation
Conclusion
1500
5,200
1,100
3,100
1,100
2.0
Guidance on Structure and Content:
These notes are arranged as a general check list which may be used in the
production and assessment of the dissertation, grouped under six headings, namely:
Introduction
Literature review
Method
Investigation, analysis and synthesis of the information
Conclusions and recommendations and
Presentation
The first five headings refer directly to the content of the report. The fifth heading
refers to the whole report in general.
2.1
Introduction
The main purpose of the introduction is to define and differentiate the subject. The
following questions should be asked:
2.2
Literature Review
The objectives of the dissertation need to be established on inception and should
relate to the production of a sizeable academic exercise. You are expected to read
around the topic and build on the work of others. This material should be complied
into the literature review chapters.
The literature review chapters are likely to cover the essential features of the subject
and may amount to two or three chapters each presenting a facet of the dissertation.
This may reflect an industry slant or give an overview from a particular sector or
country. This is likely to precede a theoretical chapter when the main body of theory
and/or hypothesis can be laid out.
2.3
Method
You should explain the method chosen, giving reasons for your choice and
demonstrate the ability to use it successfully. The methodology which will be used to
establish the data must be justified, i.e. how does it relate to the theory outlined or
literature review undertaken. The following questions should be asked:
Is the methodology used properly explained?
Is it appropriate?
5
2.6
Conclusions and Recommendations
The chapters dealing with the analysis, conclusions and recommendations are
important parts of your dissertation. These parts of the submission are likely to show
your critical ability.
Your conclusion should give an assessment of the previously accumulated and
summed up evidence. It should present conclusions, generalities and evaluations
and offer suggestions for further actions. The following questions should be asked:
3.0
Submission of the Dissertation:
The written presentation of the dissertation should demonstrate your ability to convey
your own thoughts to others by textual, tabular and graphical means. The report
should conform to an appropriate standard format. The following questions should be
asked:
Title: Is the title apt?
Composition: Are the introduction, the presentation of evidence and the
conclusion properly presented?
Format: Is the format adequate in respect of titles, dates, acknowledgements,
tables of content, chapter and paragraph structure, bibliographies, appendices
and indices?
Expressions: Is textual, tabular and graphical expressions adequate?
Summary: Has a summary been included which describes the subject,
explains the method of working and states the conclusions?
Documentation: Have sources been listed and is a bibliography included?
4.0
Mark Allocations
The dissertation submission will be marked in accordance with the following
distribution of marks. The assessor will consider each of the noted aspects of the
work and mark according to the criteria set out below. A second assessor will also
mark on the basis of these criteria. The two marks are compared and agreed at the
meeting of the dissertation tutors.
Assessment Area
Mark
Introduction
Literature Review
10%
30%
7
Methodology
Investigation
Conclusion
Presentation
10%
30%
10%
10%
Assessment
5.1
Viva Voce
The viva voce is a verbal examination of the dissertation submission in the presence
of three members of staff. The basis of the assessment will be subject to the
following criteria:
The examination will last approximately 30 minutes.
The examination will be used to assess the originality of the work and to
investigate problem areas identified by the examiners.
Normally you will be informed of the general agenda for the viva at the
commencement of the examination.
Where borderline marks are awarded the viva will function so as to confirm
the grading awarded.
First class honours grading may be similarly assessed.
Where submissions have been marked as fail the viva will offer some scope
for the reasons and issues identified to be resolved.
6.0
Supervisors and You
You should be paired to supervisors with adequate experience and knowledge of the
project areas and the nature of the dissertation. This allows for the establishment of
definite terms of reference for the relatively short period of time that will be allotted to
the project. You will be expected not only to consider the selected project area but
to be introduced to the philosophy and methodology of research. This process will
come via mentoring rather than instruction or direction. This process can only be
established by meeting regularly with your supervisor. You should prepare for
meetings by producing work programmes, experiential data, graphs or plots, data or
a research synopsis which explains the progress to date and the relevance of the
direction of the work. Where progress is hampered due to any reason the meeting
should still take place. In such situations the meeting should focus on how the
problem can be overcome either by better work planning, alternative forms of
investigation or other.
Apendix 1
BN3990 DISSERTATION FINAL ASSESSMENT
Student Name:
Student Number
Title:
Course:
Assessment
Component
Introduction
(10 marks)
Indicative Areas to be
Assessed
Background introduction;
clarity of aims & objectives;
description of methods.
Literature Review
(30 marks)
Adequacy of review;
identification of relevant
issues; depth of
understanding; determination
of relevant questions for
discussion/investigation.
Methodology
(10 marks)
Awareness of available
methodologies; reasoned
choice of appropriate
methods; justification,
awareness of limitations.
Investigation /
Analysis &
Synthesis of
information
(30 marks)
Evidence of planned
approach; lack of bias in
implementation, description of
primary data; analysis of
data.
Conclusion and
Recommendations
(10 marks)
Logicality of findings;
sensible & considered
recommendations for further
work. General quality of
presentation; syntax,
grammar & spelling;
conformity with School
Guidelines on layout,
pagination, referencing, etc;
use of graphics.
Board Presentation
(Marked at end of first
semester)
(10 marks)
Specific Comments
Mark
10