Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Royal Family of the said King, as frontlined by the United States in the Treaty of
Paris on December 10, 1898.
In Oct. 3, 1904, the United States in turn incorporated the said Titulo with the
Torrens System making the said Titulo as Original Certificate of Title or OCT 01-4
in the name of the said Royal Family.
Evidence of hereditary succession and of ownership in page 7 and 8 of the 1966
Revised Edition of the "Registration of Land Titles and Deeds" by Narciso Pea.
PAGE 7, Except the term fee simple, all the rest of the above terminologies are rarely in use in the
Philippines.
PAGE 8 - By fee simple, is meant an absolute title; it is an absolute estate in perpetuity. It is where
title to the land is conferred upon a man and his heirs absolutely and without any limitation imposed
upon the estate.
Inside the LRC/C.C. 3957-P, we will find evidences that the government is
exercising its' right to acquire the OCT No. T-01-4, which is the Fee Simple Title
for the whole Philippine Archipelago.
While the Republic of the Philippines failed in asserting its' right of eminent
domain in the LRC/CC 3957-P, CA-G.R. SP No. 70014 has decided that the
reconstitution proceeding in LRC/CC 3957-P and annulled all decisions, writs,
orders, etc. that emanated from the case.
The claim of the Republic of the Philippines to the Philippine Territory is
therefore void to begin with. The Article 1, the National Territory described in the
1987 Constitution is also void, making the Republic of the Philippines a
government operating without territorial rights, and therefore DE FACTO. This
is the reason why the Republic of the Philippines cannot defend its
claim on the Spratly islands and North Borneo- Sabah, even though
these parcels of lands are integral part of the Philippine Archipelago.
If
the Plaintiff, the Republic of the Philippines and all other defendants was not
awarded the entitlement to the OCT T-01-4 being expropriated, who then is the
owner? We can find the clue in Rule 68 of the Revised Rules of Court in the
Philippines.
The one awarded with the Judgment of the expropriation case is then the owner.
On this particular expropriation, the Judgment was not awarded to the plaintiff,
it was awarded to a third person. Take note, not anyone can secure a copy of
the Entry of Judgment of case if there is no order from the Court.
Rule 136 Court Record and General Duties of Clerks and Stenographers
So now we know who the third person is, but what is a third person actually?
We will get the answer in Pages 34 and 35 of the 1966 Revised Edition of the
"Registration of Land Titles and Deeds" by Narciso Pea.
Page 34
His Highness Prince Julian Morden Tallano in the 2007 agreement with the GPH
is bound to silence the Title in his possession agreeing only that Luzon and
Visayas be under the GPH with the exception of Minandao and Sulu as having
been ceded in inheritance last 1752 and that Mindanao and Sulu belongs to
Muslim Kinships of His Royal Majesty, Sayyid Paduka Shah Ahmad Carpenter
Arpa-V, His Highness' right to ownership over Mindanao and Sulu doing acts of
sovereignty to what limits as the said third person and as by provided in the
Indigenous Peoples Right Act of 1997, RA 8371.
ASSERTING THE RIGHT OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE TO SELFGOVERN THROUGH THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHT ACT OF
1997 (RA 8371) AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF 1991.
Organic Law - The fundamental law or constitution of a particular state or
nation, either written or unwritten, that defines and establishes the manner in
which its government will be organized.
The Indigenous People are those people who are born within an specific area or
territory and it has been that way throughout the history of their ancestry. So the
Indigenous People of the Philippines are the Filipino People
themselves. The notion that the Indigenous People are the indigents or
The Indigenous People have the right to establish their own barangay in
accordance with the Local Government Code of 1991.
Article 18 Section 12 of the 1987 Constitution states that: The Supreme Court
shall, within one year after the ratification of this Constitution, adopt a systematic
plan to expedite the decision or resolution of cases or matters pending in the
Supreme Court or the lower courts prior to the effectivity of this Constitution. A
similar plan shall be adopted for all special courts and quasi-judicial bodies.
This provision asserts the governments right of eminent domain for all the cases
pending in courts. The pending case, the expropriation of the OCT T-01-4 is
included in this Transitory Provision of the Constitution. The courts are
mandated by the Constitution to resolve it and the NCIP, as a quasi-judicial body,
also has a provision for such mandate. It can be found in Section 64 of the RA
8371:
In the exercise of the right of the NCIP as Quasi-Judicial body, is there any other
Courts that can alter or question the decision or interpretation of the NCIP with
regards to its interpretation of the Indigenous Peoples Right Act?
The Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources is for the Private Rights of
the successor in interest of the Fee Simple Title, Original Certificate of Title No.
T-01-4, and considering the 2007 agreement, and revealed by the Supreme Court
through the awarding of the Entry of Judgment of the expropriation; His Royal
Highness' deem the empowerment and declaration of a new government,
Maharlika Philippines whereby His Highness may seat in Malacanang upon the
charter change to Federal Internal Self-Determination as the National
Government of Maharlika Philippines.
Thus, the privilege of Maharlika Philippines shall no longer be political
sovereignty, however, shall be People's Sovereignty.
Former President Corazon Aquino committed a grave crime against the people
for issuing of Executive Order/s that converted the government into a
CORPORATION / CORPORATE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY. The following
provisions of the 1935 and 1987 Constitution was violated yet the legislators
allowed such Anomalous Administrative Code to have converted the government
into a private Corporation to this day. none in the Judiciary and Legislative
branch has done corrective action regarding this.
Article 13 Section 7 of the 1935 Constitution - The National Assembly shall not,
except by general law, provide for the formation, organization, or regulation of
private corporations, unless such corporations are owned or controlled by the
Government or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof.
Article 7 Section 16 of the 1935 Constitution- The Congress shall not, except by
general law, provide for the formation, organization, or regulation of private
corporations. Government-owned or controlled corporations may be created or
established by special charters in the interest of the common good and subject to
the test of economic viability.
This is the reason why the Corporation disguised as a Government, the
Republic of the Philippines Corporation, sold all the properties considered
to be for the common good of the people, to private Corporations. The leaders in
the government sold us to the oligarchs.
BY NOW, WE SHOULD HAVE ALREADY KNOWN THAT THE REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES IS A CORPORATION.
Based on the 1898 Treaty of Paris, the Philippines was only temporarily received
by the United States. Not to mention the "Titulo De Compra" that Spain issued
the Royal Family in Exchanged for 20 Million Dollars provided by the Royal
Family whereby the United States Paid to Spain. How could the Victorious USA
pay the Loser-Spain in the 1898 Treaty of Paris of December 10? Since the
Philippines was ceded to the US, the US Congress was given authority to pass
relevant legislation to establish a government operation within the Philippine
territory, and it is still subject to be replaced legally. The US is only a TRUSTEE
and was mandated to help and develop the territory in favor of the indigenous
population. This is later reiterated in Article 22 of the treaty ending world war I,
the Treaty of Versailles.
The continuing obligation of the United States in the Treaty of Peace between US
and Spain was assumed by the Republic of the Philippines. This can be found in
Article XVII Section 1.4 of the 1935 Constitution. Analyzing, one should see the
irony in this part of the 1935 Constitution. We are not really free and independent
since the government we have is only an extension of the United States Military
Government.
The Republic of the Philippines assumed the responsibility of the United States in
the Treaty of Paris but to whom the Republic of the Philippines relinquishes the
territory ceded by Spain to the USA, which is temporarily? The Republic of the
Philippines simply became the new TRUSTEE, and we the people thought we
already became independent upon the turnover in 1946.
If we remain blinded and mesmerized to that illusion of truly independent, we
will remain a puppet nation under foreign sovereign powers administering under
its dictates. The preamble of the Constitution states that we are yet to establish a
government. The keywords; "in order to build" and "shall establish", refers to
future event paramount to our NATIONAL INTEREST.
Our Constitution is a puzzle for our real freedom and independence and if we
solve it, we then can finally reach our final political status. Solving this puzzle
will be the guiding light in our pursuit for our right to SELFDETERMINATION.
Philippines was secured through TRUSTEESHIP and the USA is the TRUSTEE. .
The problem now is we were made to believe that we are already independent
upon the turnover of governance to the Republic in 1946, where in reality, there
was only a transfer of TRUSTEESHIP. Our leaders did not see that coming, but
now, we should have already seen it through this article. Truth shall prevail if the
truth is accepted.
Let us respect people's sovereignty of His Highness' royal majesty and of the
Constitution, which we are ordained to promulgate, and so let it be affectively
enforced, as it has been written and said.
The laws to establish a new government is already there. Its the owner of the land
who shall and can establish the new government through these laws. Now the
oligarchs are pushing for a Federal Government but they are not discussing nor
expounding the truth regarding the territory of the Philippines. They cannot do
that because the Constitution needs to be promulgated first. That is why
FEDERALISM may not be it. A Charter Change to Maharlika may be it.
Our people undermined in the 1987 Constitution, the non-Recognition of
Nobilities and by converting the government into a Corporation, Federalism is
just another means, moreover, in undermining the peoples' sovereignty and
should no longer be allowed since its inception during the colonial years. Do not
let this happen again.
The Republic of the Philippines is a Corporation that needs to be replace in
accordance with the provisions of the Constitution for the Fulfillment of the
Treaty of Paris, whereby we should have revived to Maharlika in the modernation
of our country.
The 2007 Agreement between Prince Julian Morden Talllano Title holder of OCT
01-4 and the GRP/GPH, whereby t5he formers lands and territories were tacitly
expropriated in the Silencing of Title, Compensated and stands as Judicial
Administrator on said territories of OCT 01-4, It is stipulated the exception of
Mindanao (and Sulu) as having been reverted to 1752 ceding in inheritance to the
three sultans of Mindanao (and Sulu). Its progeny in 1825 was Sulu Sultan
Jamalul Kiram-I (Muwalil Wasit) whose son was the 1839 Sulu Sultan Pulalun
(the childless Moh. Faud Abdulla or Fadlun-Pullong).
Sultan Kiram-I, his sister Sitti Mahandun married to Sayyid Nakhoda Perkasa
Angging, the latter and brother Nakhoda Sangkalang who had led Sulu Warriors
in suppressing the 1613 North Borneo rebellion by the self proclaimed Sultan
Mobin against the Brunei Sultan. Reason why North Borneo-Sabah was given as
a Tribute to the Sulu Sultanate. Nakhoda Agging was the grandson of Brunei 2 nd
Sultan Ahmad.
In 1704, Nakhoda Angging was sent as Brunei Maharaja in the Sulus with his
official Brunei Nakhoda flag and the twin-headed Alligator/Crocodile Flag as
twin authority of the Brunei Sultan. Seated in Siasi Sulu, known as Maharaja
Anddin to guard against the possible ceding of North Borneo-Sabah to the
Spanish Government in Manila by then Sulu Sultan Shahabuddin. North
Palawan was instead ceded in 1705. Maharaja Anddin (Nakhoda Angging), his
community resident in Siasi was named Subah Buaya.
Sitti Mahandun and Nakhoda Anggings son was Moh. Taup, the latter
proclaimed as Prince Heir-Apparent as Maharaja Adinda Taup by his first cousin,
Sulu Sultan Pulalun in 1859.
In 1861, Sultan Pulalun granted visiting rights or pretensions of sovereignty to
the Spanish in Sulu. Only in Jolo, Tawi-tawi, Basilan and Zamboanga, the latter
place known as Jambangan, whereby Maguindanao and Sulu Sultanates brought
in flowers planted from reaching from Malasia and Brunei Sultanates.
Jambangan was a central point of trade and was part of Maguindanao Sultanate
and latter known as simply Mindanao. While Maguindanao deduced into a
Municipality only. While Sta. Cruz Island to Sitangkay was part of the Sulu
Sultanate.
Sultan Pulalun transferred his seat at the hinterlands prior to Spanish arrival in
Jolo, Sulu. While in the hinterlands, Prince Mcleod Victoria, the brother of
Englands Queen Alexandria Victoria, sent two British subjects; Baron Von
Overbeck and Alfred Dent, Esq. to the Sulu Sultanate to lease North BorneoSabah in establishing the British North Borneo Company Chaired by Prince
Mcleod.
When a Commoner, Jamlul Agdam/Azam presented himself as
Sulu Sultan, signing the 1878 Lease Treaty Agreement of North
Borneo-Sabah for perpetuity. Agdam signed the said Treaty
presenting himself as the son of Sultan Pulalun in the name as
Sultan Jamalul Alam, after the Brunei Sultan Jamalul Alam-II in
order to show his kinship with the latter who had referred the
two British subjects to the new owner (Sultan Pulalun) of North
Borneo-Sabah that was ceded as a Tribute to the Sulu
Sultanate.
After Sultan Pulalun, the Sulu sultanate was reigned by Usurper-Sultans to the
present, whereby should have been succeeded by Maharaja Adinda Taup down to
his present lineage, the Undersigned.
Maharaja Adinda Taups son was Sayyid Imam Ul-Alam Arpa (Arafa), the latter
given back Sulus sovereignty standing as the 1916-1934 Highest Spiritual Leader
of Sulu replacing the Sulu Usurper Sultan Jamalul Kiram-II (a commoner,
Amirul Kiram Awal-II) , who in 1915 had surrendered his temporal powers to the
American military administration, deduced as Highest Spiritual Leader in the
1915 Carpenter Memorandum Agreement in exchanged for a lifetime pension and
enjoying the amenities provided by the Americans.
Sayyid Imam Ul-Alam Arpa was given back Sulus sovereignty by the American
Governor of Mindanao and Sulu-Gov. Frank W. Carpenter, the latter who
supported the said Spiritual Leaders acts of sovereignty in promulgating the
Literacy Campaign, building of schools, roads, water system and Jambatanswharfs. The said Spiritual Leader was paraded on a Palakaya vinta throughout
the Sulus as attested by Imam Apdal in an Affidavit and also concurred by the
late Ibrahim Rasul, the latter being the son of the 1915 Sulu Sultanate Chief
Minister-Buto Abdulbaki.
A Sultan has both Temporal and Ecclesiastical-religious powers that is
inseparable in Islamic Jurisprudence referred as Tawhid. And this always goes
hand-in-hand in Islamic Jurisprudence. So, Sayyid Imam Ul-Alam Arpa did
reigned as Sulu Sultan from 1916 to 1934 even within the purview of foreign
administering powers.
1426, the very first Sultan of Sulu was Sultan Sharif Ul-Hashim (Zein UlAbidin /AbuBkr) the Undersigneds 5th grandfather. While his brother
established the very first Sultanate of Maguindanao reigning as Sultan Aliwya
(Sharif Kabungsuwan/Karim Ul-Makdum/AbuBaik).
And as in Nobility and Islamic Jurisprudence, I am His Highness Royal Majesty
as by the conference of Kings and Heads of Governments, and the two Prime
Ministers conference in Rabat promulgating the establishment of the
Organization of Islamic Conference (now Organization of Islamic Cooperation),
the counterpart of the United Nations Organization, in recognizing Nobilities
and Sultanate Governments. Wassalam.
Incidentally, five usurping sultans of Sulu established the Royal Council for Sulu
Sultanate and appointed Gov. Sakur Tan as their Datu Minister in promoting the
said five to be the one accepted Sulu Sultan by the GRP/GPH. However, all five
walked away when the said Governor declared himself in a self proclamation as
the one Sultan of Sulu. Representing Sulu for economic development, Sakur Tan
was instrumental in getting the support of the three major investors who
committed to the development in Sulu.
Footnote; Truer Sultan in nag parinta is never as coming from a political stand.
Moreover, is not even recognized by the Sultanate adherents.
Wa Billahi Tawfiq Wal-Hidaya, Wassalmu Alaikum Warahmatullah.
Cordially so,
HRH. Sayyid Paduka Shah Ahmad Carpenter Yu Tiamco Arpa-V, ibni _ __ _ _ _
MAHARLIKA RELIGIOUS MONARCHICAL SOVEREIGN HEAD OF ROYAL
HOUSES.