Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Journal of NUCLEAR SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, 24 [ 11], pp. 951 - 959(November 1987).
951
TECHNICAL REPORT
In this paper the method of balancing centrifuge rotors for initial three modes based
on practical experience is presented though, depending on the size of the centrifuge, more
than one flexural modes have to be encountered. The object is to provide useful and
practical information, as technical information on balancing of centrifuge rotors is
hardly available because most of the work is shrouded in the clouds of the so-called
secrecy.
The rotor is balanced in three stages. Firstly, individual components and sub-assemblies are balanced in traditionally low speed rigid rotor balancing machines. Secondly,
the complete rotor is balanced by using modal balancing. Thirdly, the rotor is run in
a high speed testing facility and rotor balance quality is checked at the operating speed.
During the second and the third stages the rotor is run in its own bearings under vacuum
and the data is acquired with the aid of a computer.
KEYWORDS: balancing, critical speed, flexural modes, flexible rotor balancing, influence
coefficient method, modal balancing, N plane balancing, N+2 plane balancing, rigid rotor balancing, rotors, ultracentrifuges, unbalance
I. INTRODUCTION
To obtain enriched uranium, there are, at
present, two commercially viable methods, ultracentrifuge and gaseous diffusion process. The
ultra-centrifuge method is more advanced, and
has specific attraction because it consumes
comparatively less electric power. The ultracentrifuges are high speed machines and their
safe operational speed and the economy of the
process are closely related to each other.
The high rotational speed demands a high
balance quality of the rotating parts, specially
the centrifuge rotor which has to pass through
multiple critical speeds while going up to or
coming down from the operational speed.
It is a well known fact that rotor whose
operating speed is well below its first critical
speed does not exhibit any significant bending
and may, therefore, be treated as rigid. In such
a rotor, unbalance (a discard between the in-
-87-
952
Khan eta/.)
- 88-
ponents are manufactured and assembled according to strict tolerances. Even then, the distribution of unbalance along the axis of rotor is
likely to be random. The distribution may be
significantly influenced by the presence of
local unbalance arising from tolerances and
fits of components and variations in wall thickness of the rotor tube. This can also come from
un-straightness of complete rotor, and also from
non-perpendicularity of the end discs.
In order to avoid the occurrance of large
internal bending moments in a centrifuge rotor,
the individual components are balanced. These
are then assembled keeping in view that at
the assembling plane the unbalance weights
are nullified. After assembly, the balancing
process is repeated for each individual sub-assembly.
The sub-assemblies are balanced in two
planes on hard bearing force measuring balancing machine. In order to take unbalance measurements, the sub-assembly is rotated on a balancing machine bearings to a pre-selected speed.
The magnitude and angular position of the unbalance is indicated on vectormeters. The correction is carried out by addition or removal
of masses at each plane. Another test run is
conducted to check the residual unbalance.
For disc-shaped components, the use of
one correction plane is sufficient. The unbalance
Khan et al.)
953
12
11
.J
1.
VAC. PORT
2. CASNO
3.
s.
g. OSCILLATORS
TOP DAMPER
4. MOI.!:CIAAR PUMP
11 INTERFACE
5. ROTOR
12. COMPUTER
6.
ELECTRIC 't.()TOR
13. PRINTER
7.
BOTTOM
14. M. F. INVERTER
DAMPER
954
(a) Translatory
rigid mode
(b)
Conical rigid
mode
Khan eta!.)
_1
_ _2
_ _3
_3
-~
lf,J
~b
-5
-90-
955
lished by fixing a trial weight in the correction plane and determining the rotor-bearing system response. On the basis of this
response the exact amount and phase of
the correction weight is determined.
( 4) The correction weight for first flexural
mode is added in central correction plane 3.
A test run with this V-mode correction
weight is made at exactly the same speed
as the previous run, during which the initial
deflection amplitude was measured, for
determining the expected improvement in
rotor response at V-mode. Also the effects
of the correction weight on rigid modes
are checked. Usually, rigid modes are affected very little whereas for obtaining a
better balance quality at flexural speed subsequent runs are carried out.
This above mentioned procedure, i.e. (N)
plane method of balancing flexible rotors
is a useful method and our experience
shows that it is valid for almost 80% of the
rotors. It gives quite satisfactory results.
Rest of the 20% rotors exhibit large deflections either at translatory rigid mode or at
conical rigid mode. Usually, translatory
rigid mode is more violent than the conical
rigid mode. The (N + 2) plane balancing technique is adopted for balancing these rotors
and is sequentially described below.
(5) The rotor is accelerated under vacuum
until significant deflections due to translatory rigid mode begin to appear but before
the deflections are too big to strike the
surrounding casing the rotor is quickly
decelerated to a lower speed. At this speed
the rotor truely runs as a rigid rotor without
being influenced from any suspension
criticals. The amount of deflection and
phase angle is obtained from the measuring
points I and 5 at this speed. Then the rotor
is brought to rest and correction weights
are applied in the correction planes I and
5 according to the measured vibration signals
from the top and the bottom points.
(6) With these correction weights, the rotor is
accelerated to exactly the same speed of
previous run, and improvements in deflections at top and bottom are checked. Any
956
1000
E
~
a.
800
600
{\,
200
1/1
...__
--
1610
I-'
3220
ol"' ~
80 so
""'
I?-
-<J:200
r-( )
6"0
Speed (rpm)
r--
4830
~ 40oi
f.
lm
'\60ol .,
(I)
I
l\
400
80
1610
~ '::,_/
r"<
"\.....
+
Speed(rpm) _ ___
3220
4830
(II)
61J.O
805
3220
4830
i440
8050
1610
3220
4830
6440
Speed (rpm) _ _. -
1000
BOO
600
_//
lur
a.
E 200
-<l:
If!)
/_ l..,
\
n\..-"---
.......
.r
i'.._ 1---(11)
1/f
1610
3220
4830
+6440
805
t~tlllBtJ I
0
1610
3220
4830
6440
8050
Fig.
S(a)~(c)
Rotor response at top (1), central (3) and bottom (5), measuring plane
in vicinity of first flexural critical speed <+ ), (I) before and (II) after
modal balancing
-92-
8050
Khan
ffi.
eta/.)
957
EXAMPLE OF BALANCING
V"
14500
43500
29000
58000
725 00
~
<l:
p
Seed
(r pm : - -
800
6nr
I
21Y" liLA
0
,._!--14500
29000
Speed (rpm)
43500
58000
725 00
2i000
43500
58000
72500
Speed (rpm.) _ _. -
ll..
14500
29000
43500
Speed (rpm) _ _. -
000
~,
ci.
<(
600
wo I.
200
0
11
14500
29000
Speed (rpm)
43500
58000
725 00
58000
725 00
3ti 0
OJ'
14500
2~ JUO
Speed
(rpm) _usoo
__.__
Fig.
6(a)~(c)
58000
72500
958
~
E
Translatory rigid I. 35
mode
Conical rigid mode 0.55
Flexural V -moue 2. 006
<l:
14500
58000
43500
29000
c:i.
<l:
29000
Sp~:~:d
43500
58000
0.50
2nt
4 00
---+
,I
/\I
v~
_l
Speed (rpm)
14500
0.30
7250
~:~~ 1111111 H
0
"""E1:
1.240
400
Zero to peak
displacement
after modal
balancing(MM)
--------
::
200
Zero to peak
displacement
before modal
balancing(MM)
Modes
1000
14500
29J~
Spud (rpm)
270
58000
72500
180
"'0
VI
..c
I"
43500
58000
17500
90
a..
72500
14500
20000
~ (fpmj
__._
1000
lltr
(,
400
_!
200
bf "\1
<l:
0
~.
"SOD
r
29000
43500
58000
7250
Speed (rpm)
360
270
180
90
0
vv
14500
29000
43500
Speed (rpm)----.
58000
72500
43500
I
J1\.
I
I
Ul
(rpm) _ __._
c:i.
Rotor response at top (1 ), central (3) and bottom (5), measuring plane
at operating speed (N + 2 method)
-94-
IV. SUMMARY
(I) The individual balancing of components
has proved effective in minimizing the
initial unbalance of a complete rotor.
About 20 to 30% of the rotors require
no correction at the first critical speed.
The time to balance the rotor in a high speed
balancing facility is reduced.
(2) The modal balancing technique for balancing a centrifuge rotor in its own bearings
is quite practicable and useful. It also requires less number of balancing runs as
compared with the influence coefficient
method.
959
-REFERENCES( 1) TESSARZIK, J. M., BADGLEY, R. H., ANDERSON, W. J.: Flexible rotor balancing by the exact
point speed influence co-efficient method, Trans.
ASME, J. Eng. Ind., 94, 148-158 (1972).
( 2) BISHOP, R. E. D., GLAD WELL, G. M. L.: The
vibration and balancing of an unbalanced flexible
rotor, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 1 [ 1], (1959).
( 3) DARLOW, M. S., SMALLEY, A. 1., PARKINSON,
A. G.: A unified approach to flexible rotor balancing outline and experimental verification, Paper
No. c-340/80, IME-1980, Proc. 2nd Int. Con[.
on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, p. 43 7444 (1980).
(4) ZORZI, S. E., Von PRAGENAU, G. L.: Modern
rotor balancing emerging technologies, Mech
Eng., 25- 32 (Dec., 1985).
( 5) KELLENBERGER, W.: Should a flexible rotor be
balanced in (N) or (N + 2) plane, J. Eng. Ind.,
Trans. ASME, 94, Paper No. 71-Viv-55, p. 548560 (1972).
(6) BISHOP, R. E. D., PARKINSON, A. G.: On the
use of balancing machines for flexible rotors, ibid.,
94, 561-575 (1972).
( 7) idem: On the isolation of modes in the balancing
of flexible shaft, Pro c. In st. Mech. Engineer,
177(16], 407-423 (1963).
- 95-