Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In this case, the site for the retaining wall is susceptible to failure
and excessive settlement will occur when superstructure is constructed
over it. Therefore, the best type of ground improvement methods decided
to be used for this case are stone column, stabilization by admixture
which is cement stabilization and field compaction.
3
Field compaction also will be done to improve the soil condition.
Soil compaction is defined as the method of mechanically increasing the
density of soil. If field compaction performed improperly, settlement of the
soil could occur and result in unnecessary maintenance costs or structure
failure. Almost all types of building sites and construction projects utilize
mechanical compaction techniques. Soil compaction is depending on the
soil type, soil moisture content and compaction effort required.
4
into the soil. Reinforcing the soil creating a stiff composite soil mass. In
addition, stone columns may sometimes provide the soil with an increased
drainage path to help reduce excess pore water pressure that can lead to
liquefaction, so the columns can reduce the consequences of liquefaction
when this occurs.
Stone columns will transmit some load to the soil by shear stresses
(along the column-soil interface) and end bearing (at the column base),
the predominant load transfer mechanism (unless the column is very
short) is lateral bulging into the surrounding soil. The passive resistance of
the surrounding soil dictates the column performance under load.
Generally the column bulging will be greatest close to the top of the
column where the overburden pressures are lowest. Therefore, this
method will increase the load-bearing capacity of shallow foundations on
the soil. It also tend to reduce the settlement of foundations at allowable
loads.
5
2.2.3 Field Compaction
Compaction is one kind of densification that is realized by
rearrangement of soil particles without outflow of water. Soil is compacted
by removing air and water from its pore space. It is the most obvious and
simple way of increasing the stability and supporting capacity of soil
(improving the physical properties of soil). This process of increases the
unit weight of soil by forcing solids into a tighter state and reducing air.
This is accomplished by applying static or dynamic loads to the soil. There
exists a certain amount of moisture that a soil can have where a
maximum unit weight is obtained. It does not involve fluid flow, but with
moisture changing. Field compaction will improve the soil condition as it:
a) Increases load-bearing capacity
b) Prevents soil settlement and frost damage
c) Provides stability
d) Reduces water seepage, swelling and contraction
e) Reduces settling of soil
The principal reason for compacting soil is to reduce subsequent
settlement under working loads and to increases the shear strength of the
soil. Other than that, compaction reduces the voids ratio making it more
difficult for water to flow through soil. This is important if the soil is being
used to retain water such as would be required for an earth dam.
Compaction can also prevent the build-up of large water pressures that
cause soil to liquefy during earthquakes
6
The soil condition for the given case is as shown in the Table 1. Deep
boring at the site result shows that the top layer of the soil is sandy silt
about 7.5 meters. The number of blows for depth of 3 meters is 2 to 8
blows, therefore the top soil of depth 3 meters is classified as soft to
medium based on Table 2. Moreover, 3m to 9m of the soil have 8-15 blows
which classified as stiff based on Table 2. 9m to 10.5 m depth soil is
classified as very stiff based on Table 2. The main criteria when
considering the ground improvement method are the type of soil,
moisture content, type of structure to be built, and the cost.
Table 1 : Summary of Deep Boring Result with SPT Plot for Borehole 3.
7
Since the top soils are soft to medium and they are sandy silt soil, it
is found that Stone column will be suitable as a ground improvement
method. Stone Columns are designed to improve the load bearing
capacity of insitu soils and fills and to reduce differential settlements of
non-homogeneous and compressible soils, allowing the use of shallow
footings and thinner base slabs. This technology is well suited for the
improvement of soft soils such as silty sand, and silts.
8
The cement helps decrease the liquid limit and increase the
plasticity index and workability of clayey soils. Cement stabilization is
effective for clayey soils when the liquid limit is less than 45 to 50 and the
plasticity index is less than about 25.
The cement helps increase the strength of soils, and strength increases
with
curing time.For field compaction, the proper amount of cement can be
mixed with soil eitherat the site or at a mixing plant. If the latter approach
is adopted, the mixture can then be carried to the site. The soil is
compacted to the required.
9
2.4 The method of the selected ground improvement technique.
10
2.4.1 Stone Columns Method
There are two methods to produce stone columns and they differ
mainly in the system that is used to release the stones into the ground:
11
2.4.2 Field Compaction
2. Mix-in-place method.
12
Mix-in-place method:
The BFS system controls the length and the diameter of the stone column,
better than the Top feed system. In addition, there is no risk of soil
collapse while the stone is released, because the Vibrolance is not
withdrawn from the ground until the stone column is finished. Thus, the
13
BFS system allows the contractor to have a continuous production process
that results in higher productivity and time savings.
Disadvantages
installation of stone columns by bottom feeding does not generate
spoil, however,that by top feeding generates spoil,which is not
environmentally friendly.
Disadvantages of sheepsfoot
The loose top-lift material can act as a sponge when it rains and slow
the compaction process.
14
The loose material also slows hauling units that deposit fill material, so
haul cycle times are increased.
1. It is widely available.
3. It is highly durable.
5. Granular soils with sufficient fines are ideally suited for cement
stabilization as it requires least amount of cement.
15
3.0 REFERENCE
[1] Bulbul Ahmed, Md. Abdul Alim, Md. Abu Sayeed. Improvement of
Soil Strength Using Cement and Lime Admixtures. Earth Science.
Vol. 2, No. 6, 2013, pp. 139-144. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20130206.14
[2] Liu, C. & Evett, B.J. 1998. Soils and Foundations, 4th edition,
Prentice-Hall, Inc, United States of America.
[3] Manis, K.M. (2002). Identification and Stabilization Methods for
Problematic Silt Soils (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/19000/19700/19752/PB2003100182.pdf
16