Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 Slip resistance
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 3
slip resistance
Slip resistance
How do we define anti-slip? Put simply it is
a material with the appropriate performance
characteristics to overcome the problem of
people falling over in specific environments.
It has been calculated that the annual cost of slip and trip injuries
to society could be over 750 million (more than 360 million directly
agents which cause floor tiles to have less adherence than if they
Wherever floor tiles are used, the onus falls on the specifier to choose
where function has to take precedence over form and safety issues
override cost.
5.2
5.2
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 4
slip resistance
Current UK legislation
At present, there are no official UK requirements covering the slip
surface using the inclined plane system, in conditions which are rather
subjective.
The test method therefore reproduces the conditions under the heel
at the critical moment when it first contacts the floor, and is usually
carried out using both a leather element in dry conditions and a
Pendulum Test
The scale of co-efficient of friction values is as follows:
DIN 51130 and 51097: the German test methods
ASTM 1028 American test
This method of measurement establishes the Static Co-efficient of
Friction, and involves pulling a weighted block of wood with a rubber
Dangerously slippery
Excessively slippery
Satisfactory friction
0 to 0.5
Slippery product
0.5 to 0.6
to skidding.
> 0.6
Excellent friction
fall from a certain angle so that it rubs against the surface that is
being tested. A Four S rubber cap is fitted on its end, and it is allowed
to fall in a pendular arc; depending on the height reached after rubbing
against the tested surface, a value is obtained that will be used to
classify it.
dangerous than one with the coefficient of 0.61? Finally, there are no
guidelines as to what level is required in specific areas.
Slip resistance
0 to 24
Dangerous
25 to 34
Marginal
35 to 64
Satisfactory
65 and above
Excellent
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 5
slip resistance
Surface roughness
This test is also the one often preferred by UK scientists/consultants
However over the last decade there have been two camps firmly
entrenched against each other, one siding with the Tortus and one with
the Pendulum. The Health and Safety Executive refuses to accept that
the Tortus is accurate in wet conditions and rely on the Pendulum test
instead.
a slip resistance value (SRV) greater than 20. The top table
relates potential for slip to pendulum values and surface
roughness. A surface contaminated with water requires a
surface roughness value of 10 micrometres to provide
reasonable slip resistance.
Also, the Pendulum Test can give misleading results on tiles with
profiled surfaces. Measurements can be disrupted by the size of the
raised profile area, the ratio of high to low areas (distance apart), and
the shape of the profiles themselves (round or square edges).
The Pendulum Test does appears in several British Standards, but none
various viscosities.
Four S pendulum value, surface roughness values and potential for slip
Pendulum
value
Potential
for slip
<25
High
Less than 10
25 to 35
Moderate
10 to 20
35 to 65
Low
21 to 30
>65
Extremely low
Greater than 30
Typical
contaminant
to 1
Clean water
20
1 to 5
Milk
45
5 to 30
Stock
60
30 to 50
Olive Oil
70
50
Margarine
70
5.2
5.2
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 6
slip resistance
The DIN 51097 standard is used to assess the slip resistance of floor
tiles under wet barefoot conditions. DIN 51097 is the only standard
which classifies tiles for areas where people walk barefoot, e.g. around
the test area is steadily increased until the person begins to slip.
The angle at which the person slips is recorded and averaged out
specific applications.
3 to 10
R10
10 to 19
R11
19 to 27
R12
27 to 35
R13
>35
Classification
Typical applications
Critical angle
Class A
12
Class B
18
Class C
24
The higher the rating, the more a tile may be considered anti-slip.
The opposite table shows work areas and environments with slippery
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 7
slip resistance
R9
R9
R10
R9
R12
R11
R11
R11
R12
R12
R13
R12
R12
R12
R12
Processing of vegetables
Vegetable tinning
Sterilising rooms
Rooms in which vegetables
are prepared for processing
R13
R11
R12
R11
R12
R11
R12
R12
R12
R12
16 Paint shops
Wet grinding areas
17 Ceramics industry
Wet grinding mills (processing
of ceramic raw materials)
Mixers: handling of materials like tar,
pitch, graphite and synthetic resins
Presses (shaping); handling of materials
Moulding and glazing areas
18 Glass and stone processing
Stone cutting, stone grinding
Glass shaping,etching and
acid polishing facilities for glass
R12
R11
R11
R11
R11
R10
R12
R12
R11
R9
R10
R11
R10
R11
R10
R10
R9
R9
R9
R9
R9
R9
R11
R9
R11
R11
R13
R13
R13
R12
R11
R12
R11
20 Storage areas
Storage areas for oils and fats
R12
R12
R12
R11
R11
R12
R11
R11
R12
R12
R12
R12
R12
R12
R12
27 Financial institutions
Counter areas
R9
28 Garages
Garages, car-parks
R10
R9
R9
R9
R10
R10
R10
R10
R11
1
Outdoor areas
Entrance areas and stairs
R11 or R10
Traffic routes
R11 or R10
Loading platforms, covered
R11 or R10
Loading platforms, not covered
R12
Sloping ramps
(e.g. for wheel-chairs, loading platforms) R12
Parking areas
Open air parking areas
R11
R11
R12
R11
R11
R11 or R10
R9
5.2
5.2
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 8
slip resistance
Porcelanosa utilise the Ramp test and the TRRL Pendulum test for
tile ranges whose final use must comply with the requirements of
Test results are given in the table opposite. Ramp test R values
are also shown on product data pages (in Sections 2, 3 and 4).
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 9
slip resistance
re
fe
re
nc
e
Pr
od
uc
ts
he
et
y
Dr
tu
sT
es
t
Ra
m
p
Silver
R9
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.2
Durango
R10
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.3
Durango Antislip
R12
49
60
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.3
Piacentina
R10
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.4
Piacentina Antislip
R11
40
56
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.4
Shanghai
R9
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.5
Kenya
R9
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.6
Kenya Antislip
R10
53
63
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.6
To
r
Ti
le
ra
ng
e
te
st
(R
va
lu
e)
to
DI
N
De
51
te
33
ba rmi
0
n
re a
fe tio
et n
on of
we slip
t a re
re si
a st
to an
TR
DI ce
RL
N
51 with
Pe
09
nd
7
ul
um
Te
st
W
et
TR
RL
Pe
nd
ul
um
Te
st
Dr
y
To
rtu
sT
es
t
W
et
Test certificates are available for each tile range from Porcelanosa on request.
Osaka
R9
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.7
Osaka Antislip
R10
46
57
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.7
Ulldecona
R9
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.8
Ulldecona Antislip
R10
52
63
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.8
Mino
R9
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.9
Mino Antislip
R10
45
58
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.9
Alpina
R10
23
49
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.10
Assur
R9
22
47
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.11
Carpatia
R10
28
51
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.12
Carpatia Antislip
R12
49
61
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.12
Caucaso
R9
23
49
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.14
Caucaso Antislip
R12
49
60
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.14
Pedralbes
R9
22
47
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.16
Via Emilia
R10
29
52
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
2.1.17
R12
51
59
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.17
Yuste
R10
30
52
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.18
Yuste Antislip
R12
48
60
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.18
Altamira
R10
28
51
Satisfactory
Excellent
2.1.19
Altamira Antislip
R12
50
61
Excellent
Excellent
2.1.19
5.2
5.2
15/4/05
11:48 am
Page 2
slip resistance