Fron: The Town Planning Review 21/1: 3-17
The Urban Revolution
V. GORDON CHILDE
‘The concept of “city” is notoriously bard to define,
‘The aim of the presear essay is to present the city
Listorically—or rather prehistorically—as the re-
sultant and symbol ofa “revolution” that initiated a
‘ew economic stage inthe evolution of society. The
word “revolution” must aot of course be taken as
denoting a sudden violent catastrophe: it is here used
for the culmination of a progressive change in the
economic structure and social organization of com-
‘unites that caused. or was accompanied by, a
samati increase in the population affected —an ine
crease that would appear as am obvious bend in the
Population graph were vital statistics avaiable. Just
such bead is observable at the time of the Industrial
Revolution in England. Though aot demonstrable
statistically, comparable changes of direction must
‘have occurred at two earlier point in che demographic
history of Britain and other regions. Though perhaps
less sharp and les durable, these too should indicate
‘equaly revolutionary changes in economy. They may
then be regarded likewise as marking transitions
Dbeeween stages in economic and social development.
Sociologists and ethnographers last century clas-
sified existing preindustrial societies in a hierarchy of
three evolutionary sages, denominated respectively
“savagery,” “barbarism” and “civilization.” If they be
defined by suitably selected criteria, the logical hie-
rarchy of stages can be transformed into a temporal
Sequence of ages, proved archaeologicaly to follow
‘one another in the same order wherever they occur.
‘Savagery and barbarism are conveniently recognized
‘and appropriately defined by the methods adopted for
‘rocuring Food. Savages ive exclusively on wild food
obtained by collecting, hunting or fishing. Barbarians
Reprise, with permision hot Tow Planing Reem Vo. 21, No
repeal Uae Pre
(2950)
on the contrary at lest supplement these natucal
resources by cultivating eile plants and—in the Old
World north ofthe Tropies~also by breeding aniraals
for food.
Throughout the Plistocene Pericd—the Palaeo-
Uthic Age of archacobgias—all Known human 30.
cleties Were savage in ‘he foregoing sease, and a few
savage tribes have survived ia out ofthe way parts to
the present day. In the archaeological record bar
barism began ess chan‘ea thousand yearsago with the
Neolithic Age of archeologists. Tc thus represents 3
later, a8 weil as a sigher stage. chan savagery,
Civilization cannot be deiced in quite such simple
terms. Etymologically the word is connected with
“city,” and sure enough lif in cities begins with this
stage, But “sity” is ise ambiguous so archaeologists
like to use “ariting” sa criterion of civilization: it
should be easily recopniable and proves to be a
‘eliable index to more profound characters. Note,
however, that, because people suid to be civilized oF
literate it does not follow that ll its members. can read
and write, aor thatthe allived in ities. Now there is
fo recorded instance of a community of savages
hilizing themseives, adopting urban if or inventing
4 script. Wherever cites have been but, villages of |
Drelterate farmers exited previonsly (save perhaps
where an already civiized people have colonized
Uniohabited tracts). So cinlization, wherever and
Whenever it arose, sucreded barbarism,
We bave seen that 2 revolution as bere defined
should be reflected inthe population statics. [a the
‘case of the Urban Revolution the increase was mainly
‘accounted for by the multiplication ofthe numbers of
Persons living together, ie, ia a single built-up area.
Pp. 317. Lispool Unbety Pr, Copyright 1950 by the‘THE URBAN REVOLUTION
“The ist cities represented settlement units of hitherto
unprecedented size, Ofcourse, it was not just thei size
that constituted thet distinctive character. We shall
find that by modern standards they appeared
ridiculously small and we might meet agglomerations
bf population today to which the name city would have
to be refused. Yet a certain size of settlement, and
density of population, is an essential feature of civili-
zation.
"Now the density of population is determined by the
food supply which in tum is limited by natural
resources, the techniques for their exploitation and the
means of transport and food-preservation available.
‘The last factors have proved to be variables in the
course of human history, and the technique of obtain-
ing food has already been used to distinguish the
consecutive stages termed savagery and barbarism.
Under the gathering economy of savagery population
‘was always exceedingly sparse, In aboriginal America
the carrying capacity of normal unimproved land
seems t0 have bees from .05 to .10 per square mle
Only under exceptionally favourable conditions did
‘the fshing tribes ofthe Northwest Pacific coast attain
‘densities of over one human tothe square mile. As far
fs we can guess [rom the extant remains, population
ensities in palacolithic and pre-neolthic Europe were
less than the normal American. Moreover such hun-
ters and collectors usualy live in small roving bands.
[At best several bands may come together for quite
brief periods on ceremonial occasions such as the
‘Australian coroborrees. Only ia exceptionally fax
voured regions can fishing tribes establish anything
like villages. Some setlements on the Pacific coasts
‘comprited thirty oF so substantial and durable houses,
‘accommodating groups of several hundred persons.
But even these villages were only occupied during the
winter; for the rest of the year their inhabitants