Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Real-Time Data Analysis While Drilling Provides Risk Management for Both Geological
and Geometric Uncertainties in the Sotong K2.0 Reservoir
Md Zin Che Lah, Lancelot Sering, Azlee Abu Bakar,Petronas Carigali; Eva Sundal and Jan Daudey, Schlumberger
Abstract
Modern communication systems can transmit data from the
wellsite to shore in real time, allowing full utilization of
advanced drilling technology, 3D seismic and geological earth
modeling. While drilling, real-time data can then be analyzed
by all available experts to refine well plans and geological
models for optimized well placement.
GULF OF
THAILAND
GULF OF
THAILAND
D
AN
AIL
THAND
AIL
TH
PENINSULAR
MALAYSIA
PENINSULAR
MALAYSIA
PM 10
PM 10
ANGSI
ANGSI
BESAR
BESAR
DUYONG
DUYONG
SOTONG
SOTONG
SOUTH CHINA
SEAH CHINA
SOUT
SEA
DUYONG BARAT
DUYONG BARAT
PM 12
PM 12
In 1978,
included the
awarded to
PETRONAS
MD ZIN CHE LAH, LANCELOT SERING, AZLEE, EVA SUNDAL, JAN DAUDEY
SPE 64477
SOTONG-B3
SOTONG-B3
SOTONG-B
STG-03-PILOT-SVY
STG-03-PILOT-SVY
STG-03-PILOT-SVY
SOTONG_02
SOTONG_02
SOTONG_02
SOTONG-01
SOTONG-01
SOTONG-01
STG-04-PILOT-SVY
STG-04-PILOT-SVY
STG-04-PILOT-SVY
m
0 m
0
m
0
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
Markers
GR
GR
GR
Resistivity
Markers
Resistivity
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
Markers
GR (gAPI)
m
0 . 0 GR (gAPI)
180.0
0 . 0 GR (gAPI)
180.0
0.0
180.0
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
0.2
0.45NPHI
20.0
0.45
Markers
GR
GR
GR
Resistivity
Markers
(m3/m3)
-0.15
Resistivity
Resistivity
Markers
GR (gAPI)
AHTRT (ohm.m)
0 . 0 GR (gAPI)
180.0
0 . 0 GR (gAPI)
180.0
0.0
180.0
0.2
0.2
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
Markers
Resistivity
Markers
2.95
Resistivity
Resistivity
Markers
AHT90 (ohm.m)
20.0GR (gAPI)
180.0
20.0GR (gAPI)
180.0
20.0
180.0
( o h20.0
m . m1
) . 9RHOZ
(g/cm3)
5
2.95
20.0 1 . 9 5
GR
GR
GR
GR (gAPI)
RHOZ (g/cm3)
A H T R T ( o h20.0
m . m1) . 9 RHOZ
(g/cm3)
5
2.95
0.2 A H T R T
0.2
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
RHOZ (g/cm3)
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
(g/cm3)
1 . 9 RHOZ
5
2.95
RHOZ (g/cm3)
2.95
1.95
2.95
0.2 A H T 9 0
0.2
0.45
Markers
Resistivity
Markers
(m3/m3)
-0.15
Resistivity
Resistivity
Markers
AHT90 (ohm.m)
20.0 GR (gAPI)
180.0
20.0GR (gAPI)
180.0
20.0
180.0
( o h20.0
m0.45
. m ) NPHI (m3/m3)
-0.15
0.45NPHI
20.0
GR
GR
GR
GR (gAPI)
1 . 9(m3/m3)
5
A H T 9 0 ( o h20.0
m . m ) NPHI
0.2
-0.15
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
NPHI (m3/m3)
0.45NPHI (m3/m3)
-0.15
0.45NPHI (m3/m3)
-0.15
A H T 9 0 ( o h20.0
m . m ) RHOZ (g/cm3)
0.2
0.2 A H T 9 0
0.2
0.45
( o h20.0
m1. m
(g/cm3)
. 9) RHOZ
5
2.95
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
Markers
GR
GR
GR
RESISTIVITY
Markers
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
RESISTIVITY
RESISTIVITY
Markers
ATR (ohm.m)
GR_CDR (gAPI)
m
m
m
DEPTH
DEPTH
Markers
GR
GR
GR
Resistivity
Markers
Resistivity
RHOB_NPHI
RHOB_NPHI
Markers
GR (gAPI)
RHOB (g/cm3)
20.0GR (gAPI)
180.0
20.0GR (gAPI)
180.0
20.0
180.0
(g/cm3)
5
2.95
0.2 ATR (ohm.m)
20.0 1 . 9 RHOB
(g/cm3)
5
2.95
0.2 ATR (ohm.m)
20.0 1 . 9RHOB
2.95
0.2
20.0 1 . 9 5
(gAPI)
20.0GR_CDR 180.0
20.0GR_CDR 180.0
(gAPI)
20.0
180.0
-0.15
(g/cm3)
1 . 9RHOZ
5
2.95
20.0
1.95
-0.15
0.2
0.2
2.95
1 . 9RHOB
5
20.0
1.95
K SHALE
SOTONG-B1
SOTONG-B1
SOTONG-B1
100020003000
100020003000
1 0 0 02 0 0 0 D3E0P0T0H
m
m
m
(g/cm3)
2.95
2.95
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
-2050
-2050
-2050
-2050
-2050
-2050
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
K SHALE
-2075
-2075
-2075
-2075
-2075
-2075
-2100
-2100
-2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
K-1
K-1
K-1
2100
2100
2100
2100
-2100
-2100
-2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
K-1
K-1
K-1
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
-2125
-2125
-2125
K1.2 top
K-1
K-1
K-1
K-1
K-1
K-1
K-1
K-1
K-1
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K-1
K-1
K-1
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
-2125
-2125
-2125
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K1.2 top
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
-2150
-2150
-2150
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
K-2
Shale stringer
Shale stringer
Shale stringer
-2175
-2175
-2175
2.0
K
-2175
-2175
-2175
BASE
2.0
K
BASE
2.0
BASE
2.0
BASE
2.0
K
BASE
2.0
BASE
2.0
K
2.0
BASE
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
BASE
BASE
BASE
K
BASE
BASE
K
K
K
-2200
-2200
-2200
-2150
-2150
-2150
K-2
K-2
K-2
2.0
2.0
BASE
BASE
2.0
BASE
2.0
K
BASE
2.0
BASE
2.0
K-3
K-3
K-3
-2200
-2200
-2200
BASE
SPE 64477
REAL-TIME DATA ANALYSIS WHILE DRILLING PROVIDES RISK MANAGEMENT FOR BOTH
GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES IN THE SOTONG K2.0 RESERVOIR
Pilot Hole
Both the GOC and the OWC have an amount of
uncertainty; with small targets, it is critical to minimize these
uncertainties. A 12-in. pilot hole was drilled to reduce the
uncertainty in the TVD associated with the fluid contacts. The
pilot hole was subsequently also used to verify the structure
and the TVD location of the target sand itself, in addition to
the GOC and the OWC.
Sotong 04 Objectives
Development with conventional vertical wells had
consistently exhibited marginal economics. Also, there was a
limitation on the number of slots available on the platform to
be used for this project. To maximize cost efficiency, five
multilateral horizontal wells were planned to optimally drain
the Sotong K2.0 reservoir. The Sotong 04 trilateral in
particular was designed to drain the southeastern part of the
reservoir.
Fig. 6: Pilot Hole LWD Data With Squared Logs
GOC
12 m
2 m TVD
OWC
Fig. 5: Schematic of Sotong 4 Objectives
The LWD data acquired in the pilot hole (Fig. 6) provided the
following information:
14 m
MD ZIN CHE LAH, LANCELOT SERING, AZLEE, EVA SUNDAL, JAN DAUDEY
SPE 64477
Operational Challenges
SPE 64477
REAL-TIME DATA ANALYSIS WHILE DRILLING PROVIDES RISK MANAGEMENT FOR BOTH
GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES IN THE SOTONG K2.0 RESERVOIR
2165
2170
y = -0 .6 7 9 5 x + 2 1 8 3 .6
2175
Resistivity Modeling
Geometric control of the TVD was not sufficient to
maintain the horizontal wellbore at only 2 m above the OWC.
G O C = 2165m
O W C = 2179m
2180
2185
0
10
15
Rt
20
25
30
MD ZIN CHE LAH, LANCELOT SERING, AZLEE, EVA SUNDAL, JAN DAUDEY
SPE 64477
REAL-TIME DATA ANALYSIS WHILE DRILLING PROVIDES RISK MANAGEMENT FOR BOTH
GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES IN THE SOTONG K2.0 RESERVOIR
SPE 64477
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
-700
-700
H o r iz o n ta l E n tr y P o in t
-800
-800
<<< SOUTH
S ta r t o f P e r f s 3 0 1 8 m M D
Proposal
-900
Ho
Survey
ld
-900
Az
im
u th
12
2 .1
3
E n d o f P e rf s 3 3 2 0 m M D
-1000
PLAN VIEW
-1000
Scale (1 cm = 50 meters)
TD at 344 0m M D
-1100
-1100
P la n n e d T a rg e t T D
1100
1200
1500
1600
1700
1800
74 .46
2200
25 25 M D
H o r iz o n ta l E n tr y P o in t
S ta r t o f P e r f s 3 0 1 8 m M D
E n d o f P e rf s 3 3 2 0 m M D
9 5 / 8 in C a s in g P t
TD at 344 0m M D
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
Drilling Lateral 1
Fig. 8: Main Bore Wellplan (Blue) and Final Surveys (Red)
MD ZIN CHE LAH, LANCELOT SERING, AZLEE, EVA SUNDAL, JAN DAUDEY
1 000
1 200
1 400
1 600
1 800
2 000
-40 0
-40 0
En d of Perfs 3575m M D
Low er C asing W ind ow
TD at 3635m M D
H orizontal Entry Po int
P roposed TD
-60 0
t
en
40
0m
d is
p la
ce
-60 0
9 5/8in C asing Pt
-80 0
-80 0
Start of P erfs 3018m M D
P roposal
S urvey, Lat #1
Lateral Main
En d of Perfs 3320m M D
-10 00
PLAN VIEW
-10 00
TD at 3440m M D
1 000
1 200
1 400
1 600
1 800
2 000
EAST >>>
2 100
SPE 64477
En d of Perfs 3575m M D
2 200
P roposed TD
355 8 MD
8 00
9 00
1 000
1 100
1 200
1 300
1 400
1 500
1 600
1 700
1 800
TD at 3635m M D
1 900
100 0
120 0
140 0
180 0
200 0
-4 00
Up p e r W in d o w
TD a t 3 6 3 5 m M D
En d o f Sp e rry R u n
-6 00
-6 00
H o r iz o n ta l E nt ry P o in t
-8 00
Sta rt of P e rfs 3 0 1 8 m M D
.
sp
400m LW
En d o f Pe rfs 3 3 2 0 m M D
di
40
172 .86
-1 000
100m from HE P )
-1 000
0m
uth
Hold Azim
<<< SOUTH
-8 00
160 0
-4 00
TD a t 3 4 4 0 m M D
En d o f p e rfs
-1 200
-1 200
TD a t 3 1 4 6 m M D
Proposal
-1 400
3 6 0 m from s ta rt o f pe rfs
Survey
-1 400
3325m M D
PLAN VIEW
-1 600
-1 600
800
100 0
120 0
140 0
160 0
180 0
200 0
EAST >>>
Fig. 10: New Lateral 2 Plan: Original Plan (Blue) Inside 400-m
Separation Circle (Black); New Plan (Green) Outside Circle
REAL-TIME DATA ANALYSIS WHILE DRILLING PROVIDES RISK MANAGEMENT FOR BOTH
GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES IN THE SOTONG K2.0 RESERVOIR
SPE 64477
8 00
1 00 0
1 20 0
1 40 0
1 60 0
1 80 0
2 00 0
U pp er W in dow
T D a t 36 3 5m M D
L ate ral
9 5/8in Ca s ing P t
HEP
-6 00
E nd of P e rfs 3 5 75 m M D
S tart of P erfs 3 27 5 m M D
-6 00
HEP
m
en
HEP
p la
D is
0m
te
ra
l1
40
La
L a te ra
<<< SOUTH
S tart of P erfs 3 01 8 m M D
400m Displacement
2 71 1 m
E nd of P e rfs 3 3 20 m M D
l3
-1 00 0
-8 00
ce
S tart of P erfs
-8 00
-1 00 0
T D a t 34 4 0m M D
E nd of P e rfs
Lateral M ain
3 0 36 m
Lateral #1
T D @ 3 09 6
-1 20 0
Proposa l
-1 20 0
P ropo se d TD
PLAN VIEW
Survey, Lat #2
8 00
1 00 0
1 20 0
1 40 0
1 60 0
1 80 0
2 00 0
EAST >>>
U pp er W in dow
2 10 0
T D @ 3 09 6 m M D
HEP
2 20 0
E nd of P e rfs 3 03 6 m M D
S tart of P erfs 2 71 1 m
7 00
8 00
9 00
1 00 0
1 10 0
1 20 0
1 30 0
1 40 0
10
MD ZIN CHE LAH, LANCELOT SERING, AZLEE, EVA SUNDAL, JAN DAUDEY
SPE 64477
quality sand. This lateral did not shale out like the main
bore and was close to the expected geological model.
The 70-m interval of dolomitic sand was not perforated,
and the LWD logs were used to identify this zone. The 300 m
of production zone was achieved at the right spacing from the
main bore, well within the required 0.5-m TVD window.
Lateral 2 Results
Lateral 1 Results
For the first lateral, the geological cross section predicted a
slightly upward dipping formation (dips in the order of 0 to
1) in the beginning, and then downdips of 0.6 toward the last
part of the well.
SPE 64477
REAL-TIME DATA ANALYSIS WHILE DRILLING PROVIDES RISK MANAGEMENT FOR BOTH
GEOLOGICAL AND GEOMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES IN THE SOTONG K2.0 RESERVOIR
Conclusions
Geosteering of horizontal wells within tight vertical
tolerances is possible, even in complex reservoirs.
Multidisciplinary teams are necessary to evaluate complex
geology to make qualified steering decisions. Real-time
availability of the data, and the constant monitoring of it,
ensure events are interpreted as they occur.
To evaluate the geology, full triple-combo real-time data
are often necessary. In nonhomogeneous sands, resistivity and
gamma ray measurements alone may not suffice to geosteer or
to identify the producible intervals.
Extensive preplanning ensures that all relevant decision
trees are in place and that all parties understand their
individual roles within them.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank PETRONAS and Petronas Carigali Sdn.
Bhd. and partners for permission to publish this paper.
Nomenclature
2 - Statistical confidence limit (95%)
BHA - Bottomhole assembly
ECD Equivalent circulating density
GOC - Gas-oil contact
LWD - Logging while drilling
m MD - meters measured depth
MASA - Malong, Sotong, Anding fields
MHz - Megahertz
MWD - Measurement while drilling
OWC - Oil-water contact
ROP - Rate of penetration
SS - Subsea
TBT - True bed thickness
TD - Total depth
TVD - True vertical depth
TVD RKB - True vertical depth drillfloor
TVD SS - True vertical depth subsea
WOB Weight on bit
11