Search ...

Search
Toggle navigation

Menu

Production
Post Production
Reviews
News
Tips
Experts
Search ...

Search
Toggle navigation

Menu

Latest
Topics
Webinars
Channels
Advertise

Uncategorised
CAMERAS: Rough Guide to Color Grading with the new DSC Labs OneShot

CAMERAS: Rough Guide to Color Grading with the new DSC Labs OneShot
The best way to reproduce color accurately is to have a color reference in the shot with known colors on it. This chart does just
that.
by Art Adams September 19, 2012 Uncategorised

In the old days we shot an 18% gray card to tell a lm dailies timer where we wanted our exposure placed and what color we wanted dailies to be. Now that lm is
being replaced by HD a simple gray card is no longer enough, because while lm colors are xed by emulsion video colors are not. A gray card in video doesnt
communicate anything about accurate color. Thats why I designed the DSC Labs OneShot dailies reference chart.

The author holding his technological baby.

Note: Purchasing information for this product is given at the end of the article, on page two.
The DSC Labs OneShot is intended to give a colorist the most information possible without taking up a lot of time on set. The chart contains white and black chips for
white and black balancing (yes, black has a color, and if its not right your entire image will suer); an 18% gray chip for exposure; four common esh tone references;
and the Rec 709 primary and secondary colors, at 50% saturation.
This chart is only truly usable for Rec 709 colorimetry, which is HD colorimetry. Were working on a digital cinema version of this chart, but for now this
will do as dailies are almost always viewed in Rec 709.
The Rec 709 primaries and secondaries are printed at 50% saturation because it is impossible to print them at full saturation: their colors, as seen
properly on a monitor, are more saturated than modern printing technology can reproduce, so they fall outside the CMYK color gamut. Printing them at
half their saturation means that using 2x magnication on a vectorscope puts them into their targets.

The primaries and secondaries are perhaps the most important references on the chart. It is certainly possible to neutralize the image using only white and black
references but this doesnt necessarily mean that color will be accurate after doing so: the cameras matrix generally doesnt aect neutral tones (white, black and
gray) but it ALWAYS aects colors. White balance means that neutral tones will appear white, but says very little about how red, green, blue, cyan, yellow and magenta
are rendered.
Im going to use Apples Color for this demonstration:

These are the controls in the Primary In room, where overall color corrections are rst applied to an image. They are fairly similar to what youll see in most color
correction programs. The three main controls are lift, gamma and gain, shown here as shadows, mid tones and highlights. If youre using a mouse or trackball, as
I am, its handy to note that the color wheels match exactly the color layout of the vectorscope. For example, if I push the highlights dot toward red Ill see every
color on the vectorscope move toward red.
Heres our sample image, shown in Color:

Thats a DSC Labs OneShot chart (designed by yours truly) alongside a esh-colored dog toy and two glass pumpkins on a beige rugreally just a standard test setup.
(Right?)
As you can see the image has a very strong blue cast. I shot this in indirect skylight with a Nikon D7000 whose white balance was set at 4000K.
The rst thing Im going to do is zoom in to the chart so it lls the entire frame. As the waveform and vectorscope in Color only sample what is within this frame,
zooming in isolates the chart so I can see exactly what Im doing.

Its not important to frame the chart perfectly as the waveform and vectorscope dont care. As long as I have some of each chip in the frame I should have plenty of
information to work with.
The rst thing Im going to look at is overall color balance, and I can see that by looking for the white, black and gray chips on the waveform monitor. If they are all in
a line then Im good to go. As you can see, though

they arent. Theres a strong blue cast to the image. To make this right Ill have to reduce the amount of blue in the image while boosting red and green.
Im going to attempt to neutralize this cast by making the following corrections:
(1) Im going to use the highlights color control to make the white chips peak line up in the red, green and blue channels. If the peaks are the same
height then the white chip is neutral. Im not going to worry about how bright white is at the moment. As long as its brighter than 18% gray Im happy.
Im also going to use the luma slider (the slider on the far right of the highlights circle) to change the overall exposure so that the gray chips fall at
around 40 IRE on the waveform monitor. If the gray chips dont line up together then Im going to place the gray chip in the green channel at 40 IRE and
worry about the others in a moment. (Green is an important color in HD as its the channel from which most of the luma information in the shot is
derived. It seems like a good idea to give it preferential treatment.)
(2) Next Ill manipulate the shadows control to line up the black chip in each channel. This is a little more dicult as theres so little red in the image that
the black chip appears smeared in the red channel. By pushing the shadows toward red Im adding gain to the red channel, and that smear you see is
noisebecause gain amplies everything in the signal, including noise. (As so little red was captured in the image due to a poor white balance we have to
really amp up whatever small amount of red is left.)
Im not overly concerned with making black touch 0 IRE yet. Im happy as long as its close to 0 IRE without being crushed. Moving the black level around
later will change saturationpushing it down, for example, increases overall saturationbut we can also reduce saturation overall later, once we tweak
the individual colors.
(3) Lastly, Ill manipulate the gamma (mid-tones) control to make the gray chip line up at 40 IRE in all three color channels.
(4) Ill need to repeat all the above steps (align the white chip in the highlights, shadows and mid-tones) until the white, black and gray chips line up in
the color channels. Changing any one of these parameters aects the others so itll take several passes to get them all aligned.
I always manipulate the highlights rst, because often the blacks and mid tones will fall into place if the white balance is close to accurate. If the shot is severely out of
balance then Ill manipulate the blacks second, as bringing the highlights and shadows into alignment often brings the mid tones into alignment. Ill play with gamma
last, simply because it generally requires the least amount of work. (Also, most camera paint boxes/camera control units will not allow you to adjust the color of the
gammaI assume there must be a reason for that, so I always leave color adjustments to gamma until last.)
Its also helpful to watch the vectorscope while doing all of this. The center of the scope is where white, black and gray should fall. The vectorscope can be somewhat
helpful when white balancing if you can identify the dot that represents highlights and push it into the center of the scope, neutralizing it. The problem is that white,
gray and black all show up as dots, they all belong in the center of the scope, and if they are out of alignment it can be dicult to determine which of the three
dierent dots is which. I nd that if I can get the chips on the waveform close to alignment I can then see which dot is closest to the center on the vectorscope and
nudge it directly into the center. When all three are aligned the chips on the waveform should be aligned horizontally across all the color channels and there should
be only one dot in the exact center of the vectorscope.
For example, if the gray chip isnt lining up because the red channel is low, look and see if theres a white dot on the vectorscope is leaning away from red. If it is, push
the gamma (mid-tones) control toward red and see if that moves the dot toward the center of the vectorscope.
Heres what it looks like when white, black and gray are aligned and balanced:

The most important value here is 18% gray. The vectorscope doesnt show any information other than color accuracy and saturation, but color saturation will appear
to change if the image is made brighter or darker. Putting middle gray at 40% ensures a consistent starting point for color saturation.
Heres what the controls look like:

Not a subtle correction, as you can see.

The Rec 709 spec denes the brightness levels where the white and black chips should fall on a waveform monitor, but Rec 709 was only ever designed to hold six
stops of dynamic range. In theory the white chip (90% reectance) should be placed at 100 IRE, but as that chip is only 2.5 stops brighter than 18% gray youll end up
throwing away most of your overexposure headroom if youre using any modern camera. If your camera has 4.5 stops of overexposure headroom, for example,
putting that white chip at 100 IRE potentially throws away 2-2.5 stops of highlight detail!
The black chip is similar. Most HD cameras can see ve or six stops of shadow detail easily but the Rec 709 spec only calls for about three stops of underexposure
detail before hitting black. My preference is to use middle gray to set overall exposure, as our eyes are most sensitive to mid-tone contrast anyway, and the highlights
and shadows can be set by eye later. The chart is technically correct, but nearly every modern camera exceeds the Rec 709 contrast specication.
Heres what the vectorscope looks like:

Not good. Ive zoomed in on the vectorscope by 2x (or 25% in Colors terminology) and the color chips are way too saturated and not terribly accurate. The image isnt
perfectly color balanced as something is drifting a little toward cyan, as evidenced by the cyan dot just below the center of the scope. Overall, though, white balance is
fairly close to perfect so Im going to move on to secondary corrections now and try to put the colors in their boxes.
The chart looks like this:

Close, but not close enough.

Weve done the broad strokes, but theres still more to do. Turn the page for the ne strokes
Now that weve made the neutral tones fairly neutral its time to look at our primary and secondary colors. The vectorscope shows us where they should fall, so if we
put their respective dots in the boxes we should see accurate color reproduction.
There are two things to note here:
Some cameras have a hard time saturating colors enough to go into their boxes. Thats not always a bad thing as that kind of detail gives cameras their look. Its
more important to ensure the colors fall on the correct vectors, which are lines drawn from the center of the vectorscope through each color box. If the colors fall
on the proper vectors they are at least accurate, even if they arent fully saturated.

For example, if the green chip falls on the green vector then the color is accurate, even if it isnt saturated enough to reach its box.
Cyan and green always seem to be the hardest colors to put in the boxes. I dont know why this is, although I have a couple of theories that I wont bother you with
right now. What I will show you in a bit is why it may not be a good idea to fully saturate those colors to the Rec 709 spec.
For this part of the grade Im going to go into the secondaries room and activate two secondary corrections. In the old days of lm grading the primary grade
(primaries) controlled the coarse adjustments of the telecine: highlights, shadows, mid tones and their hues. Primary controls are the broad strokes. Secondaries
are the ne strokes that take place not in the telecine but in the color grading software itself: this is where we add vignettes, selectively desaturate colors, etc. on top
of the primary grade.
Primary controls manipulate the image overall, while secondaries manipulate part of the image.
Were going to start out looking only at the hue adjustment, as this is where we can put the colors on their vectors. Selecting a color on this line and pushing it up or
down rotates that color around the center of the vectorscope without aecting the others overly much. If a color is landing o to one side of its vector this
adjustment will move it around until it lands in the right place.
This shows the corrections I had to make to put each color onto its vector:

As you can see I really had to tweak every color. Green and red seem closest to their vectors. Blue and cyan needed some help, as did esh tone. Now all the colors
are technically accurate: the colors on the chart are being accurately reproduced in the video signal.

This is what the vectorscope looks like after the hue curve adjustment. (I had to zoom out from 2x for this view as several of the colors were way too saturated and
were shooting o the scope!) All the colors are now on their lines, or vectors, that run from the center of the scope through their color target box. The esh tones are
falling along the I-line of the scope, between the red and yellow boxes, which is exactly where they should be. (The darkest esh tone should fall directly on the I-line,
while the others can fall a little to the side.)
Next I use an additional secondary control to adjust saturation. By saturating or desaturating a color I can move it toward the center of the vectorscope (less
saturated) or away from the center (more saturated). In this case I want to put each of the dots into their boxes by putting a point on the adjustment line for each
color that is improperly saturated and push it up or down until it hits its box. All of these adjustments interact so I may have to do this a couple of times per point.
Heres what the saturation curve looks like:

As you can see I had to reduce saturation overall except for a slight adjustment upward in magenta and a massive adjustment upward to cyan. (Remember I
mentioned that cyan was always strangely undersaturated? Now you can see what I mean.)
Heres what the vectorscope looks like, now back to 2x magnication:

Every color is near perfect. Yellow is a little short, but Im going to say thats close enough for this demo.
Theres one very important thing to note here: see how green, cyan and magenta are elongated? Thats due to noise from pushing the color matrix too far. In this
article I talk about how matrices aect the image, and talk a bit about how to use the user matrix to manipulate colors and create looks. The user matrix is a table
that usually looks like this:
R-B
R-G
G-R
G-B
B-R
B-G
Each of those pairs aects the image in a fundamental way. Without getting into the math (because I dont understand matrices mathematically anyway):
When aecting a color pair, like R-G, red will change in saturation and green will change in saturation AND hue. That means green will move not just
toward or away from the center of the vectorscope, but toward or away from redmaking it a touch yellow or cyan, depending on which way your
adjustments push it.
The problem is that excessive matrix manipulation can create noise, and color noise looks like a smear or a streak. The hue and saturation controls in Color are
matrix adjustments, and Ive pushed cyan so hard to make it properly saturated that were adding a lot of noise to the green channel. The streaks fall roughly in the
direction that each color will travel if I aect them in the matrix: green smears in the direction that it would move if I adjusted R-G, as does cyan because it is
composed of equal parts green and blue. I dont know why magenta is smeared, but its interesting to notice that its tail extends opposite that of green. (I played
around with the saturation controls and couldnt nd a setting where magenta didnt smear!)
If I back o on the cyan saturation I end up with this:

The green channel is a lot cleaner now. If you tried to manipulate this in camera you probably wouldnt have access to a matrix function that aected just cyan (some
cameras do oer this control, but most dont) so youd probably have to back o on the green saturation (G-R and G-B) to make green less noisy. This is normal, and
its how most cameras function out of the box. If you put green into the box using the in-camera matrix youll probably end up with a smeared dot on the vectorscope
and a lot of extra noise.
It is possible to get perfect Rec 709 colors out of a camera, but there may be a price. Thats why I said earlier that getting the colors on their vectorsmaking them
accurateis often more important than making them perfectly saturated, because perfect saturation is sometimes too much for a camera to reproduce and can result
in a lot of noise.
Just for fun Im going to remove the correction I just made to cyan and put all the colors back in their boxes. Heres what the image looks like:

Last, but not least, I need to set contrast by making white and black look right to my eye. As you can see in the waveform image above, black is fairly black but white is
a little dim at 70 IRE and I want a little more contrast than that.
Ill make white brighter in the Primary Out room, because I can control the gain and the blacks without changing their color.
If I change brightness in Colors Primary In room, where Ive added all my overall color corrections, increasing brightness will also add warmth because Ive added
red to the highlight control to eliminate the blue cast. For example, if I use the highlight slider to make the highlights brighter I also add more red, because Ive added
a lot of red to the highlights control and that is amplied. Color cant separate brightness changes from color changes within the same room.
Changes made in the Primary Out room sit on top of everything Ive done so far, as its the last step in the grading chain, so boosting brightness here doesnt add
any color to the highlights.
By raising the highlights slider a little in the Primary Out room I increased the white chip to 85 IRE as thats where it looks right to my eye.

This kind of luma correction is easy to do in Blackmagic Resolve simply by increasing the brightness of the highlights, as Resolve uses a YRGB model that
separates luma (brightness, or Y) from the red, green and blue channels. Changing Y [luma] in the highlights doesnt aect the color at all, in any mode.
Heres what we started with:

Heres the nal grade:

Some of what Ive done might horrify a real colorist. Ill admit that Im an amateur at this stu and I only do it so that I can learn what colorists can and cant do. It also
helps me communicate my wishes to a colorist using terminology they understand. Amateur or not, though, understanding how all of this works helps me
troubleshoot camera setups and know when a camera error can be repaired using a post x or if a reshoot is required.
What Ive shown is that if I put a chart in the shot with known values on it, and then grade for those values, I can easily neutralize an image that contains a very strong
color cast. If this was a log or raw image I could very quickly create a color accurate and neutral rendition of what the camera saw on the set. I can then use this
reference as the basis for further color corrections to create a specic look, or leave it as is so that the DPs intended look comes through exactly as she/he shot it.
This chart really isnt a guide for nal color correction as thats more of an artistic process than a technical one. This chart is about dailies: getting the image right, or
right enough, that all concerned can get a sense of what looks a DP is creating on set. This not only helps the DP maintain their chosen look throughout the post
process but also reassures the director and producers that they are getting what they want and expect.
The FrontBox OneShot(tm) is available now from DSC Labs for US$287. Quantity discounts are available. Order by phone at (866) DSC LABS or +1 905
673 0929, or by email.
There is a smaller Pocket version that is available only through SMPTE for US$94.50. Please contact them here.
Note: I have worked as a paid consultant for DSC Labs, and I designed this chart.
Art Adams | Director of Photography | 09/18/2012 | www.artadamsdp.com
Tags: DeliveryEducation & InspirationSystems
Share:
PREVIOUS POST

Secondary Storyline Workows

NEXT POST

Photokina Wrap Up Part 2 Lenses & Accessories

Art Adams - Director of Photography

Cinematographer Art Adams shoots spots, visual eects, web/interactive/mobile and high-end marketing projects. His website is at http://www.artadamsdp.com.
Art has been published in HD Video Pro, American Cinematographer, Australian Cinematographer and Camera Operator Magazine He is a current member of the
International Cinematographers Guild, a past member of the Society of Camera Operators (SOC), and an industry consultant and educator. He lives in the San
Francisco Bay Area.

You Might Also Like

Final Cut Pro X Workow: The Book Read about FCPXs rst Hollywood Feature Film Edit
- on March 03, 2015

Day 22 #28daysofquicktips Add a Specic Track Number in your Avid Media Composer Timeline
- on February 22, 2015

Day 21 #28daysofquicktips Use EDL Comments to View Notes in Avid Media Composer Timeline
- on February 21, 2015

SOCIAL
twitter
facebook
linkedin
google plus
vimeo
rss

Popular
A Short History of Headroom, and How to Use It

by Art AdamsMay 1, 2016

The essential gear you may not be using on set

by Damian AllenMay 3, 2016

Improving image quality by changing channels

by Chris ZwarMay 4, 2016

Panasonic Shows O Varicam LT To PVC: NAB 2016

by Brian HallettMay 3, 2016

ART OF THE CUT with the editor of The Jungle Book, Mark Livolsi, ACE

by Steve HullshApril 30, 2016

A Short History of Headroom, and How to Use It

by Art AdamsMay 1, 2016

The essential gear you may not be using on set

by Damian AllenMay 3, 2016

Improving image quality by changing channels

by Chris ZwarMay 4, 2016

Panasonic Shows O Varicam LT To PVC: NAB 2016

by Brian HallettMay 3, 2016

ART OF THE CUT with the editor of The Jungle Book, Mark Livolsi, ACE

by Steve HullshApril 30, 2016

ABOUT
ProVideo Coalition brings together the lm industrys best writers, bloggers and video experts under one URL. Each writer / lmmaker / contributor writes based on
their personal knowledge and experience. PVC has become the leading resource for video professionals working in major studios and post houses, independent
lmmakers, educators, students and storytelling enthusiasts as the place to go for news, information, reviews and training.
This award-winning site provides comprehensive information on both production and post-production in multi-distribution lm, online, mobile, and broadcast
environments. PVC is owned by Moviola, headquartered in the heart of Hollywood and dedicated to the lm industry since 1919. We rent, educate and sell product
through our sister companies: Moviola Digital, moviola.com, Moviola Education Center, and Filmtools.com.
To learn more about Advertising and Sponsorship Opportunities send an email to info@provideocoalition.com

POPULAR TAGS

3D Stereoscopic 4K After Eects After Eects Tutorials Audio Avid Media Composer Blackmagic blackmagic design camera cameras canon

Commercial creative cloud Delivery dslr Editing Education & Inspiration FCP X FCPX Film Final
Cut Pro Final Cut Pro X Freelancer Insights macbreak martin motion graphics nab NAB 2015 nab 2016 nab show NAB Show 2015 news NLE Online PodCast post
cinematography

production premiere pro cc Production Radio Reviews sony

Systems TV Video

Newsletter
Sign up for the ProVideo Coalition weekly e-newsletter and get the most popular articles, blogs, and reviews right to your inbox.
Email

SUBSCRIBE

Copyright 2016 ProVideo Coalition, a Moviola Company. All Rights Reserved.