Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PRELIMINARIES
In this section, we give the basic definitions and results fuzzy set theory [24], intuitionistic fuzzy set
theory [1], fuzzy multi set theory [15], intuitionistic fuzzy multi set theory [13,14], bipolar fuzzy set
theory [2,9], bipolar fuzzy multiset [20],
^ P
is defined by
x / x: x U `
x U , the value P X
^ x , P
U
X.
x , P B x : x U `
is a set of ordered
sequences
^x / P
where, P i U o > 0 , 1 @ , i
x , P 2 x , ..., P i x , ..., P k x : x U `
1, 2 , ..., k .
is a set of
^x / P
where,
Pi
x :U
1
x , P 1 x , P 2 x , P 2 x , ..., P i x , P i x , ..., P k x , P k x : x U `
> 0 ,1@ , P i x : U
> 1, 0 @ ,
1, 2 , ..., k ,
every
Pi
follows:
I
1122 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
x, P I
x ,Q I x
: xU
can be defined as
where, P I x : U
> 0 , 1 @ and Q I x : U
0 d PI
x Q I x
d1
for any x U .
in
denoted by
TA
x,
x and
IA
FA
u , T A x , I A x , F A x : x E , T A x , I A x , F A x > 0 ,1 @
TA
x,
x and
IA
FA
x , so
0 d TA
x
IA
x
FA
d 3
ANM
x, TA
:x X
where
1
TA
>0 ,1@
such that
0 d TA
x
Here,
P
FA
IA
x
FA
x d 3 for
1, 2 , 3, ..., P
T x , T x , ...., T x ,
1
for any
x X
I x , I x , ...., I x
and
F x , F x , ... ,
1
x , T ( x ), I ( x ), F ( x ), T
x, I x, F
(x) : x X
`,
where T , I , F : X o > 1, 0 @ and T , I , F : X o > 1, 0 @ .
T ( x ), I ( x ), F ( x )
corresponding to a bipolar
neutrosophic set A and the negative membership degree T ( x ), I ( x ), F ( x ) denotes the truth
membership, indeterminate membership and false membership of an element x X to some implicit
counter-property corresponding to a BN-set A .
1123 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
x , T A ( x ), I A ( x ), F A ( x ), T A
x , I A x , FA
(x) : x X
x , T B ( x ), I B ( x ), F B ( x ), T B
x , I B x , FB
(x) : x X
and
B BN
Then,
1. A B N B B N if and only if
x d
TA
x t
IA
x t
FA
2. A B N
TA
IA
FA
IB
FB
TB
IB
IA
x,
FA
FB
x,
TB
x,
IB
x d
FB
x for all
x X.
if and only if
TA
x,
x t
x d
x,
TA
x,
B BN
x,
TB
IA
FA
x,
TB
x,
IB
x,
FB
x for any
x X.
3. A B N C if and only if
ABN
x , F A ( x ),1 I A ( x ), T A ( x ), F A ( x ),1 I A ( x ), T A ( x ) : x X
4. A B N B B N if and only if
ABN B BN
x , T A ( x ) T B ( x ), I A ( x ) I B ( x ), F A ( x ) F B ( x ), T A ( x ) T B ( x ), I A ( x ) I B ( x ),
FA ( x ) FB ( x ) : x X
5. A B N B B N if and only if
ABN B BN
x , T A ( x ) T B ( x ), I A ( x ) I B ( x ), F A ( x ) F B ( x ), T A ( x ) T B ( x ), I A ( x ) I B ( x ),
FA ( x ) FB ( x ) : x X
1124 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
^ x, T
x , T A x , ...., T A x , T A x , T A x , ...., T A x ,
1
2
P
I x , I x , ...., I
1
2
P
F x , F x , ...., F
1
2
P
x , I A x , I A x , ...., I A x ,
1
2
1
2
P
x , F A x , F A x , ...., F A x
P
1
2
P
:x X
where,
x , T A x , ...., T A x , T A x , T A x , ...., T A x : E
1
2
TA
P
1
2
P
x , I A x , ...., I A x , I A x , I A x , ...., I A x : E
1
2
IA
P
1
2
P
> 0 ,1@ ,
> 0 ,1@ ,
and
1
FA
x , F A x , ...., F A x , F A x , F A x , ....,
2
P
1
2
1, 2 , 3 , ..., P
P
FA
x: E
x d
TA
> 0 ,1@
such that
0 d TA
x
IA
x
T x , T x , ...., T
1
2
x d
FA
P
and
1
TA
2
P
d ... d T A
x for any
x E.
x , T A x , T A x , ...., T A x ,
1
2
P
I x , I x , ...., I x , I x , I x , ...., I x ,
1
2
P
1
2
P
F x , F x , ...., F
1
2
P
A
x , F A x , F A x , ...., F A x
1
2
P
is the truth membership sequence, indeterminacy membership sequence and falsity membership sequence
of the element x , respectively. Also, P is called the dimension of BNR-set
A.
A, B BN RS
E . Then,
d TB
i
t TB
TA
TA
i
x,IA x
t IB
i
x,IA x
d IB
i
i
i
x,
t FB
i
x , FA x
d FB
i
FA
i
i
i
FA
i
FB
x,
i
TA
i
TB
x,IA x
i
x,
x .
B
i
IB
if
i
TA
x , FA x
i
i
TB
i
FB
x,IA x
x .
x, FA
1
1125 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
x , F A x , ...., F A x , F A x , F A x , ...., F A x
2
P
1
2
P
i
i
IB
x,
1 I x ,1 I x , ....,1 I
1
2
P
T x , T x , ...., T
1
2
A, B BN RS
P
A
^ x, T
1
C
x ,1
1
IA
2
IA
x , ....,1
x , T A x , T A x , ...., T A x
1
2
P
:x X
P
IA
E . Then,
x ,1
A B
and is defined by
x , T C x , ...., T C x , T C x , T C x , ...., T C x ,
2
P
I x , I x , ...., I
1
2
P
F x , F x , ...., F
1
2
1
2
P
x , I C x , I C x , ...., I C x ,
1
P
C
2
P
x , F C x , F C x , ...., F C x
1
2
P
: x E`
where
1
TC
1
IC
1
FC
m a x ^T A
m in ^ I A
1
1
x , F B x ` ,
m in ^ F A
1
and i
1
IC
1
^ x, T
1
D
m ax ^ I A
1
x , I B x ` ,
1
1
m ax ^ FA
1
FC
x , T B x ` ,
1
1
x , F B x `
1
1, 2 , 3 , ..., P .
m in ^ T A
1
TC
x , I B x ` ,
1
x E
x , T B x ` ,
1
A B
and is defined by
x , T D x , ...., T D x , T D x , T D x , ...., T D x ,
2
P
I x , I x , ...., I
1
2
P
F x , F x , ...., F
1
2
1
2
P
x , I D x , I D x , ...., I D x ,
1
P
D
2
P
x , F D x , F D x , ...., F D x
1
2
P
where
1
TD
1
ID
1
FD
m in ^ T A
x , T B x ` ,
TD
m ax ^ I A
x , I B x ` ,
ID
1
1
x E
1
m ax ^ FA
1
and i
A B
2.
x , F B x ` ,
A, B ,C BN RS
B A
and
1
A B
1
1
m in ^ I A
1
FD
m a x ^T A
1
x , I B x ` ,
1
x , T B x ` ,
1
m in ^ F A
1
x , F B x `
1
B C
E . Then
B A
and
1126 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
1
1, 2 , 3 , ..., P .
1
B C
: x E`
x ,
1. A
2. A
Proof:
A
A
A, B BN RS
A, B BN RS
Definition 3.6. Let E is a real Euclidean space E n . Then, a BNR-set A is convex if and only if
a x 1 a y t T x T y ,
TA
a x 1 a y d
IA
i
i
TA
i
i
IA
for every x , y E ,
a I
i
IA
a x 1 a y t
i
FA
i
i
FA
and i
y,
i
IA
i
FA
y,
a x 1 a y d T x T y ,
i
i
i
a x 1 a y t
IA
i
a x 1 a y t
FA
FA
i
i
y,
i
IA
i
FA
y .
1, 2 , 3, ..., P
Definition 3.7. Let E is a real Euclidean space E n . Then, a BNR-set A is strongly convex if and
only if
a x 1 a y ! T x T y ,
TA
a x 1 a y
IA
i
i
TA
i
i
IA
i
FA
a x 1 a y
for every x , y E ,
a I
i
IA
i
IA
i
FA
and i
i
i
y,
i
i
a x 1 a y !
i
FA
i
IA
a x 1 a y !
i
FA
i
IA
y,
i
FA
y .
1, 2 , 3, ..., P
A, B BN RS
y,
FA
a x 1 a y T x T y ,
i
E . Then,
A B
d HD
A, B
d HD
E . Then,
A , B between
and B , defined by
j
A
xi TB xi
IA
xi TB xi
IA
j
j
xi
IB
xi
IB
j
xi
FA
xi
FA
j
xi
FB
xi
FB
j
xi
j 1 i 1
j
TA
1127 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
j
d NHD
j
j
A , B between
j
j
and B , defined by
xi
d NHD
A, B
6nP
j
xi TB xi
IA
j
xi TB xi
IA
j
3. Euclidean distance
d ED
j
A , B between
T x T x
T x T x
j
d ED
A, B
6nP
xi
IB
j
xi
FA
j
xi
FB
j
xi
FA
j
xi
FB
FA
j
xi
FB
j
xi
FB
j
xi
xi
IB
A , B between
j 1 i 1
j
j
T x T x
T x T x
j
j
j
j
xi
and B , defined by
IA
d NED
IB
j
A, B
j
xi
j
d NED
IB
IA
j
j
j 1 i 1
xi
j 1 i 1
TA
j
j
xi
j
xi
xi
IB
IA
xi
IB
j
xi
j
xi
and B , defined by
IA
j
FA
j
j
xi
j
xi
FA
FA
j
xi
j
xi
j
xi
FB
j
xi
FB
Disease} be a set of diseases and S={Temperature, Cough, Throat Pain, Headache, Body Pain} be a set
of symptoms. Then, we have relation among Symptoms and Diseases as;
Tuberculosis
Temperature
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6
0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .7 , 0 .9
Cough
0 .4 , 0 .2 , 0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .9
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .9 , 0 .8 , 0 .7
Throat Pain
0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .8
0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .6
Headache
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .4 , 0 .2
0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5
Body Pain
0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .3 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .2
1128 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
Typhoid
Throat Disease
Temperature
0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .3 , 0 .1, 0 .2 , 0 .3
Cough
0 .6 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .4
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3
Throat Pain
0 .3 , 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .9 , 0 .9 , 0 .7 , 0 .8
Headache
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .5 , 0 .4
0 .8 , 0 .9 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .7 , 0 .5
Body Pain
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .7
The results obtained different time intervals such as: 8:00 am 12:00 am and 4:00 pm in a day as
Table-II;
P1
P2
P3
P4
Temperature
Cough
Throat Pain
0 .8 , 0 .9 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .7 , 0 .5
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .9 , 0 .9 , 0 .7 , 0 .8
0 .3 , 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .4 , 0 .2
0 .4 , 0 .2 , 0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .9
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .9 , 0 .8 , 0 .7
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .2
0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5
0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .8
0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .6
0 .3 , 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3
0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .3 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .9 , 0 .8 , 0 .7
0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .7 , 0 .9
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .2
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .7
0 .4 , 0 .2 , 0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .9
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .5 , 0 .4
0 .8 , 0 .9 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .7 , 0 .5
0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .8
0 .3 , 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .4 , 0 .2
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .7
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .9 , 0 .9 , 0 .7 , 0 .8
0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .3 , 0 .1, 0 .2 , 0 .3
0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .3 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .7 , 0 .9
0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .9 , 0 .8 , 0 .7
1129 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
P1
P2
P3
P4
Throat Pain
Headache
0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .7 , 0 .9
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .4 , 0 .2 , 0 .6 , 0 .2 , 0 .4 , 0 .9
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .2
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6
0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .9 , 0 .8 , 0 .7
0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .7
0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .3 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .3 , 0 .1, 0 .2 , 0 .3
0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .4 , 0 .6
0 .3 , 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .9 , 0 .9 , 0 .7 , 0 .8
0 .2 , 0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .5 , 0 .4 , 0 .7
0 .1, 0 .8 , 0 .3 , 0 .1, 0 .2 , 0 .3
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .9 , 0 .9 , 0 .7 , 0 .8
0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .7 , 0 .2 , 0 .1, 0 .4
0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .5 , 0 .6
0 .5 , 0 .8 , 0 .4 , 0 .5 , 0 .6 , 0 .3
0 .8 , 0 .7 , 0 .6 , 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .2
0 .3 , 0 .8 , 0 .1, 0 .3 , 0 .2 , 0 .1
Tuberculosis
Typhoid
Throat Disease
P1
0, 251
0, 300
0, 260
0, 253
P2
0, 224
0, 262
0, 213
0, 291
P3
0, 232
0, 299
0, 239
0, 310
P4
0, 254
0, 263
0, 268
0, 290
The lowest distance from the Table-III gives the proper medical diagnosis. Patient P1 suffers from
Viral Fever, Patient P2 suffers from Typhoid, Patient P3 suffers from Viral Fever and Patient P4 suffers
from Viral Fever.
5
CONCLUSION
In this paper, we introduced definition of bipolar neutrosophic refined sets and investigated some of
their basic properties which is generalize the fuzzy set, fuzzy multiset, bipolar fuzzy set, bipolar fuzzy
multiset, intuitionistic fuzzy multiset, neutrosophic multisets and bipolar neutrosophic set. The theory can
be applied to problems that contain uncertainty such as problems in economic systems, algebraic
structure, topological structure, pattern recognition, game theory and so on.
1130 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
REFERENCES
[1]
K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20 (1986) 8796.
[2]
P. Bosc, O. Pivert, On a Fuzzy Bipolar Relational Algebra, Information Sciences, 219 (2013) 1
16.
[3]
S. Broumi and . Deli, Correlation measure for neutrosophic Refined sets and its Application n
Medical Diagnosis, Palestine Journal of Mathematics, 5(1) (2016), 135143.
[4]
[5]
I. Deli, M. Ali and F. Smarandache, Bipolar Neutrosophic Sets and Their Application Based on
Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems, Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on
Advanced Mechatronic Systems, 22-24 August, 2015, Beijing, China,
[6]
I. Deli and S. Broumi, Neutrosophic Soft Relations and Some Properties, Annals of fuzzy
mathematics and informatics, 9(1) (2015) 169182.
[7]
I. Deli, S. Broumi and F. Smarandache, On Neutrosophic Refined Sets and Their Applications
in Medical Diagnosis, Journal of New Theory, 6 (2015) 8898.
[8]
M. K. Kang and J. G. Kang, Bipolar fuzzy set theory applied to sub-semigroups with operators
in semigroups. J. Korean Soc. Math. Educ. Ser. B Pure Appl. Math., 19(1) (2012) 2335.
[9]
K. M. Lee, Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their operations. Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent
Technologies, Bangkok, Thailand (2000) 307312.
[10] K. J. Lee, Bipolar fuzzy subalgebras and bipolar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras, Bull.
Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 32(3) (2009) 361373.
[11] S.K. Majumder, Bipolar Valued Fuzzy Sets in -Semigroups, Mathematica Aeterna, 2(3) (2012)
203213.
[12] S.V. Manemaran B. Chellappa, Structures on Bipolar Fuzzy Groups and Bipolar Fuzzy D-Ideals
under (T,S) Norms, International Journal of Computer Applications, 9(12) (2010) 710.
[13] P. Rajarajeswari and N. Uma, On Distance and Similarity Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy
Multi Set, IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 5(4) (2013) 1923.
[14] P. Rajarajeswari and N. Uma, A Study of Normalized Geometric and Normalized Hamming
Distance Measures in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi Sets, International Journal of Science and
Research, Engineering and Technology, 2(11) (2013) 7680.
[15] S. Sebastian and T.V. Ramakrishnan, Multi-fuzzy sets: An extension of fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Inf
Eng 1 (2011) 3543.
[16] F. Smarandache, n-Valued Refined Neutrosophic Logic and Its Applications in Physics,
Progress in Physics, 4 (2013) 143146.
1131 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com
[17] F. Smarandache, A Unifying Field in Logics. Neutrosophy : Neutrosophic Probability, Set and
Logic, Rehoboth: American Research Press, 1999.
[18] H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y.Q. Zhang and R. Sunderraman, Single valued neutrosophic sets,
Multispace and Multistructure, 4 (2010) 10413.
[20] Y. Yang, X. Peng, H.Chen and L. Zeng, A Decision making approach based on bipolar multifuzzy soft set theory, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 27 (2014) 18611872.
[21] S. Ye, J. Fu, and J. Ye, Medical Diagnosis Using Distance-Based Similarity Measures of Single
Valued Neutrosophic Multisets, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 7 (2015) 4752.
[22] J. Ye, Similarity Measures Between Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Their Multi-Criteria
Decision-Making Method, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, DOI: 10.3233/IFS-120724.
[23] S. Ye, J. Ye, Dice Similarity Measure Between Single Valued Neutrosophic Multisets and Its
Application in Medical Diagnosis, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 6 (2014) 4852.
1132 | P a g e
www.icnase16.com