Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.1
Introduction
are provided in the book. Most of the model examples are based on a worldwide
selection of real design projects, such as the Millennium Bridge and Burj Kalifa, helping readers to find an effective way to model these types of structures.
In addition, the algorithms and theories that underpin the analysis, such as the
finite element method (FEM) and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method,
are also introduced. Along with the introduction of modelling techniques, relevant
design principles and design guidance are also covered. Thus this book can also serve
as a handbook for structural engineers. A feature of this work is that it introduces
advanced and complicated theory in a more understandable and practical way.
In real design practice, we analyse the structure with an advanced program to gain
a level of confidence, such as a ball-park figure for the size of the structural members,
but when we start the design we will still follow a code of practice, even though some
are quite conservative. Advanced modelling is particularly complementary to current
design guidance in those areas where it is still not clear. Therefore, this book will help
readers understand the balance between analysis and design.
1.2
Introduction
This chapter also covers a special topic on Tensegrity domes, which have a different
structural form to conventional long-span space structures.
Regarding bridge structures, different structure types such as the beam bridge,
cantilever bridge, suspension bridge and cable-stayed bridge are introduced in
Chapter 9. One of the main design issues for bridges is designing the structure under
moving load from vehicles, and the corresponding design guidance is introduced.
Modelling examples of two famous bridges, Millau Viaduct and the Forth Bridge, are
also given.
Foot-induced vibration is a critical issue for the design of foot bridges and hospitals.
This is because foot bridges are prone to vibration problems, and hospital buildings
have strict requirements for vibration prevention. The vibration problem and corresponding modelling examples are covered in Chapter 10.
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
Introduction
x
d
y
F
d
F
FA
MAB
EI
A
MBA
FB
B
VA
SAB
A
SBA
uA
B
uB
Fig. 1.4 Frame element.
Drawn in AutoCAD.
VB
can be ignored; therefore the beam element is accurate enough to model this
type of structural element. For columns, as they withstand high axial loads and
are also subject to bending and shear, frame elements are ideal for the simulation
of this type of structural element.
(c) The plate element is used to model flat structures whose deformation can be
assumed to be predominantly flexural. Plate elements only consider out-of-plane
forces; this means in-plane stress, such as the membrane effect, is not considered.
Typical plate elements are shown in Figure 1.5.
(d) The shell element is used to model both in-plane and out-of-plane forces. It consists of two types of conventional shell elements: 2D shell elements and 3D continuum shell elements.
The nodes of a conventional 2D shell element, however, do not define the shell
thickness; the thickness is defined through section properties.
3D continuum shell elements resemble 3D solid elements (this will be introduced later) in that they discretise an entire 3D body yet are formulated such
that their kinematic and constitutive behaviour is similar to conventional shell
elements.
Although 3D continuum shell elements are more accurate in terms of modelling,
in most engineering problems conventional 2D shell elements provide sufficient
accuracy. In structural analysis, in most cases, 2D shell is effective for analysing
structural members such as floor slabs or concrete shell roofs.
Figure 1.6 illustrates some typical shell elements. Figure 1.7 shows an example
of a typical floor modelled with 2D shell elements.
(e) The 3D continuum element (solid element), as shown in Figure 1.8, can be used to
model fully 3D structures such as dams and steel connections. Solid elements are
the most accurate way to represent a real structure, however their computational
cost is very high. Depending on the dimension of the structure and the engineering problems you want investigate, solid elements are not suitable for modelling
a space structure or multi-storey building due to the high computational cost, it
is better to model the full behaviours of a structural element, such as a composite connection (as shown in Figure 1.9). There are some structures for which 3D
stress analysis is critical, one example is dams. As thermal stress, shrinkage and
Introduction
Tetrahedral elements
Fig. 1.8 Typical 3D solid elements.
Drawn in AutoCAD.
Hexahedral elements
creep are critical in the design of a dam, only 3D stress analysis can accurately
represent its 3D behaviour.
There are enormous numbers of 3D solid element types in analysis packages, for
example Abaqus has over 100 types of 3D elements such as C3D10 and C3D20;
one of the main differences among them are the integration node numbers for
each element. An element with the same shape can have different integration
nodes. Figure 1.8 shows some typical 3D solid elements.
1.4
Conclusion
In this chapter, we have discussed typical engineering design problems for different
types of structures. We have also introduced the finite element method and its application in structural analysis.
References
Clough R.W, 1960. The finite element method in plane stress analysis, Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers, 2nd Conference on Electronic Computations, Vol. 23, American
Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 345378.
Courant R., 1943. Variational methods for the solution of the problems of equilibrium and
vibrations, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 49: 123.
Turner M.J., Clough R.W., Martin H.C., and Topp L.C. 1956. Stiffness and deflection analysis
of complex structures, Journal of Aeronautical Science, 23: 805823, 854.