Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
h i g h l i g h t s
The powders of the volcanic rocks tested present a very high pozzolanic activity.
Relationships between SAI index and chemical components were established.
Energy consumption for the production of volcanic powder cements was calculated.
Volcanic powders can be used up to 15% as a partial substitute for Portland cement.
Mortars with the volcanic powder withstand much better chemical attacks.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 June 2016
Received in revised form 22 October 2016
Accepted 20 December 2016
Keywords:
Volcanic powders
Cement
Pozzolanic activity
Compressive strengths
Durability
a b s t r a c t
This study is part of a sustainable development policy that is dictated by the growing needs of material
resources and the requirements of environmental protection. It addresses an investigation on the possibility of using volcanic powders as supplementary cementitious materials for environmental-friendly
durable concrete. For this purpose, an experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the
mechanical resistances and the durability of mortars containing an amount of volcanic powders.
Firstly, the work attempts to characterize several volcanic rocks (basalt, olivine andesite, amphibolebiotite andesite, amphibole andesite, hyodacite and scoria) from the mineral and chemical viewpoint
and evaluate their pozzolanic activity. Relationships between chemical components of volcanic rocks
and strength activity index were established. Secondly, it considers the mechanical strengths of the
Portland cement mortars containing a variable percentage of volcanic powders (10, 15, 20, 25, and
30%). Performance energy for the production of volcanic powder cements was evaluated. At the end,
the effects of aggressive chemical environments were investigated in terms of miscellaneous acidic
attacks (H2SO4, HCl, HNO3 and CH3COOH). Furthermore, a supplementary cementitious material, used
by many cement plants in Algeria, has been included in order to establish a comparative study.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
To lighten the economic and environmental impacts of cement
industry, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), including
limestone powder, fly ash, slag, silica fume, and natural pozzolans,
can be used as partial replacement of cement in concrete [14].
Apart from the immediate reduction consequence of the concrete
manufacturing costs, the partial replacement of cement will make
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: lyas6974@gmail.com (Y. Labbaci), abdelaziz970@yahoo.fr
(Y. Abdelaziz), Dr.ySr2016@gmail.com (A. Mekkaoui), rdmrdm80@yahoo.fr
(A. Alouani), labonum@yahoo.fr (B. Labbaci).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.088
0950-0618/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
469
Fig. 1. Volcanic massif of Boukas. (A) Geographic location, (B) Panoramic illustration of the oasis of Boukas, (C) 3D illustration of the volcanic massif of Boukas.
470
4. Experimentation
4.1. Methodology
In the first stage, several volcanic rocks were characterized from
the mineral and chemical viewpoint. In order to make the petrographic identification, a number of thin sections of volcanic rocks
were examined under a Nikon Polarized Light Microscope (Eclipse
LV100Pol). The XRD powder pattern was recorded on a Siemens D5000 X-ray diffractometer, with Ka cobalt anticathode
(k = 1.789 ), at a current of 40 mA and voltage of 40 kV. The scans
were performed in the 2h range from 0 to 70 with a scanning
speed of 2/min. The chemical compositions of raw materials were
determined by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) using a Philips PW 1404 X
spectrophotometer.
In the second stage, the evaluation of pozzolanic activity of various volcanic rocks by means of mechanical strength tests was
established. The preparation of the mortars was carried out according to the norm NFP 15-403 [22]. A control mixture was produced
with a constant binder/sand/water proportion of (1/3/0.5). In the
test mixtures, 20% of the mass of Portland cement used in the control mixture was substituted by the same mass of the test supplementary cementitious materials. The strength activity index with
471
Sample A
Sample B
Sample C
Sample D
Sample F
Sample E
Fig. 3. Tested samples.
Table 1
Visual description of tested samples.
Rock
Color
Special characteristics
A
B
Dark
Reddish
C
D
E
F
Gray
Gray
Greenish gray
Dark
Table 2
Mortar proportions of mortars of the experimentation.
CM
VP10
VP15
VP20
VP25
VP30
Water [ml]
450
405
382.5
360
337.5
315
45
67.5
90
112.5
135
1350
1350
1350
1350
1350
1350
225
225
225
225
225
225
472
A : Basalt
D : Rhyodacite
B : Olivine andesite
E : Amphibole andesite
F : Scoria
Fig. 4. Microscopic observations under polarized light.LPA.25x. Pl: plagioclase, Ol: olivine, Cpx: clinopyroxene, Opx: orthopyroxene, Op: opaque Amp: amphibole, Bio: biotite,
Qz: quartz.
reddish-brown color. In thin section, the sample shows a microlitic porphyritic texture. It contains mainly phenocrysts of fresh
augite, sericitized andesine and minor amounts of altered
olivine and orthopyroxene.
The sample C corresponds to an amphibole-biotite andesite
small crystals of feldspars. Under the microscope, it shows a
microlitic porphyritic texture porphyritic microstructure in
which sericitized andesine phenocrysts are zoned, together
with orthoclase, and including biotite, amphibole and apatite.
The sample D corresponds to a rhyodacite. It is light gray in
color. In thin section, the sample shows a hyalo-microlitic texture. It contains some porphyritic feldspar, quartz and mafic.
It is composed of calcium feldspar porphyritic compounds, ferromagnesian pyroxene, amphibole and biotite. Quartz is automorphe embedded in a matrix hyalo-microlitic. Feldspars are
partially or completely replaced by secondary minerals group
phyllosilicates (sericite and chlorite) and calcite. Ferromagnesian are partially replaced by oxides and chlorite.
The sample E represents an amphibole andesite with large crystals of plagioclase. It has a greenish gray color. Under the microscope this andesite shows microlitic porphyritic texture. It
473
474
475
476
Table 3
Mineralogical identification by X-ray diffraction of raw materials.
Sample
code
Rock name
Minerals
Basalt
B
C
Olivine andesite
Amphibole-biotite
andesite
Rhyodacite
D
E
F
Amphibole
andesite
Scoria
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Reference
28 days
91.90% and 84.15%, respectively). Among these samples, rhyodacite powder gives the most reactive pozzolan (91.90%).
In order to make the test results interpretation easier, relationships between strength activity index and chemical components
were evaluated. From the correlation graph it is clear that there
is a significant correlation between the chemical components and
the strength activity index (Fig. 12). Test results revealed that the
pozzolanic activities of volcanic rocks are directly proportional
with the increase of the sum of (SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3). It also
appears from the results that the pozzolanic activity increases with
the increase in silicon dioxide rate (SiO2). It can be noted that
Aluminium oxide (Al2O3), Iron (III) oxide (Fe2O3), LOI, and Magnesium oxide (MgO) decrease the pozzolanic activity.
From the chemical point of view, all the tested volcanic powders
(basalt, olivine andesite, amphibole-biotite andesite, amphibole
andesite, hyodacite and scoria) are suitable for use as supplementary cementitious materials.
Table 4
Chemical composition of raw materials.
SiO2 (%)
Al2O3 (%)
Fe2O3 (%)
MnO (%)
MgO (%)
CaO (%)
Na2O (%)
K2O (%)
SO3 (%)
TiO2 (%)
P2O5 (%)
LOI (%)
Cement
21.04
5.34
4.07
1.14
64.94
0.17
0.88
0.75
1.67
49.97
16.64
10.06
0.12
4.14
7.48
3.52
2.37
1.81
0.36
2.54
56.26
14.15
11.27
0.12
3.26
1.92
4.87
2.71
2.23
0.37
1.97
51.88
16.31
8.81
0.14
3.98
6.12
3.93
3.09
1.62
0.34
2.38
67.21
13.53
5.96
0.05
1.05
0.57
3.48
5.44
0.42
0.08
1.4
57.15
16.28
7.72
0.10
3.75
5.9
3.81
0.99
1.08
0.23
2.89
47.21
18.85
9.99
4.38
10.84
0.81
0.20
0.50
3.91
Table 5
Comparison between supplementary cementitious materials properties and ASTM C618-00 requirements.
Chemical composition
Requirement
Common NP (%)
Minimum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Minimum
70
5
3
10
34
76.67
4.14
2.54
42.49
81.68
3.26
1.97
54.34
77
3.98
2.38
45.76
82.13
2.06
1.4
61.49
81.15
3.75
2.89
51.25
76.05
4.38
0.50
3.91
36.37
477
120
100
80
10%
60
15%
20%
40
25%
20
0
30%
2 days
7 days
28 days
56 days
90 days
Fig. 12. Relationships between chemical components and strength activity index.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2 days
7 days
28 days
56 days
90 days
Age (days)
Age (days)
40
30
CM
20
Andesite
Scoria
10
0
1 day
-10
Fig. 17. Loss of mass of mortars at different ages of immersion in sulfuric acid (5%
H2SO4).
50
45
40
35
30
25
CM
20
Andesite
15
Scoria
10
5
0
1000
950
50
900
45
850
800
Volcanic Powder
750
Cement
700
650
10
20
30
40
40
50
478
35
30
25
CM
20
Andesite
15
Scoria
10
Fig. 15. Energy consumption for the production of one ton of mortar.
5
0
1 days 7 days 14 days 21 days 28 days
24
23
Fig. 19. Loss of mass of mortars at different ages of immersion in nitric acid (5%
HNO3).
22
21
20
19
Volcanic Powder
18
Cement
17
16
15
10
20
30
40
50
45
40
35
30
25
CM
20
Andesite
15
Scoria
10
5
0
E Cc Ec Cvp Evr
where: E is the energy consumption for the production of one ton of
mortar, Cc and Cvp are the proportions of cement and volcanic powder in the mortar, Ec is the energy consumption of the cement manufacturing process (950 kWh/t) and the finish grinding of the
cement (50 kWh/t), Evr is the energy consumption for the grinding
of the volcanic rocks (75 kWh/t).
The performance energy can be calculated by dividing the
required energy by the compressive strength of the mortar.
479
Fig. 21. State of the samples after 28 days of immersion in acidic solutions compared to sample kept in water.
480
100
5. Conclusion
90
80
64.58
70
54.38
60
50
40
30
10
0
19.9
19.68
20
0
hydrochloric
nitric acid
acec acid
acid
Fig. 22. Gain in mass of mortars containing andesite-based cement compared to
control mortar after 28 days of immersion in acidic solutions.
100
90
80
65.96
70
54.15
60
50
40
24.29
30
14.5
20
10
0
0
Control mortar sulfuric acid
hydrochloric
nitric acid
acec acid
acid
Fig. 23. Gain in mass of mortars containing scoria-based cement compared to
control mortar after 28 days of immersion in acidic solutions.
481
[21] ASTM Standard C 311-98, Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly
Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete, ASTM
International, West Conshohocken, 2007.
[22] NFP 15-403, Normal and Normal Mortar Sand, AFNOR, 2006.
[23] NF EN 196-1, Methods of Testing Cement. Determination of Strength, AFNOR,
2005.
[24] ASTM C 267-96, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Resistance of Mortars,
Grouts, and Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes, ASTM International,
West Conshohocken, 2001.
[25] ASTM Standard C618-00, Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined
Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete,
ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2000.
[26] ASTM C595-08, Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, ASTM
International, West Conshohocken, 1998.
[27] A. Shvarzman, K. Kovler, I. Schamban, Shter.G. Grader, Influence of chemical
and phase composition of mineral admixtures on their pozzolanic activity,
Adv. Cem. Res. 14 (2002) 3541.
[28] V. Papadakis, S. Tsimas, Supplementary materials in concrete. Part I: efficiency
and design, Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (2002) 10351041.
[29] A. avdar, S
. Yetgin, Availability of tuffs from northeast of Turkey as natural
pozzolan on cement, some chemical and mechanical relationships, Constr.
Build. Mater. 21 (2007) 20662071.
[30] M. Shannag, A. Yeginobali, Properties of pastes, mortars and concretes
containing natural pozzolan, Cem. Concr. Res. 25 (1995) 647657.
[31] S. Mindess, J.F. Young, D. Darwin, Concrete, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper
Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
[32] Y. Senhadji, G. Escadeillas, H. Khelafi, M. Mouli, A. Benosman, Evaluation of
natural pozzolan for use as supplementary cementitious material, Eur. J.
Environ. Civ. Eng. 16 (1) (2012) 7796.
[33] N. Madlool, R. Saidur, M. Hossain, N. Rahim, A critical review on energy use
and savings in the cement industries, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (4)
(2011) 20422060.
[34] I. Bribin, A. Capilla, A. Usn, Life cycle assessment of building materials:
comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of
the eco-efficiency improvement potential, Build. Environ. 46 (5) (2011) 1133
1140.
[35] C. Hosten, B. Fidan, An industrial comparative study of cement clinker grinding
systems regarding the specific energy consumption and cement properties,
Powder Technol. 221 (2012) 183188.
[36] H.T. Cao, I. Bucea, A. Ray, S. Yozghatlian, The effect of cement composition and
pH of environment on sulfate resistance of Portland cements and blended
cements, Cement Concr. Compos. 19 (2) (1997) 161171.
[37] E. Hewayde, M. Nehdi, E. Allouche, G. Nakhla, Using concrete admixture for
sulfuric acid resistance, ICE Proc. Constr. Mater. 160 (1) (2007) 2535.