Sie sind auf Seite 1von 26

Turn autoplay off

Jump to content [s]

Jump to comments [c]

Jump to site navigation [0]

Jump to search [4]

Terms and conditions [8]

Edition: UK

US

Sign in Mobile

About us

About us

Contact us

Press office

Guardian Print Centre

Guardian readers' editor

Observer readers' editor

Terms of service

Privacy policy

Advertising guide

Digital archive

Digital edition

Guardian Weekly

Buy Guardian and Observer photos

Today's paper

The Guardian

G2 features

Comment and debate

Editorials, letters and corrections

Obituaries

Other lives

Sport

Film & music

Subscribe

Subscribe

Subscribe to the Guardian

iPhone app

iPad edition

Kindle

Extra

Guardian Weekly

Digital edition

All our services


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our
use of cookies. Find out more hereHide

New s

Search

News
Paralympics
Sport
Comment
Culture
Business
Money
Life & style
Travel
Environment
Video
Dating
Jobs
News
Datablog

Next
Previous
Blog home

World's top 100 universities 2012: their reputations ranked by Times Higher
Education
The top 100 list of world universities shows Harvard at number one again, UK's
leading universities have dropped several places since last year and China's
universities have improved. Find out what else this list reveals
Get the data
Get the 2011 and 2010 THE ratings

Share 485

Email

Harvard University tops The Times higher education reputation list, as it did in 2011.
Photograph: Chris Ison/PA
Harvard University is number one in the top 100 list of most reputable Universities as
it did last year, according to data put together by The Times Higher Education and
Thomson Reuters.
The country with the most reputable universities in the world is the US according to
the global reputation ranking out today.
But what's interesting are the subtle changes from last year's list.
As the Guardian's Jessica Shepherd observes:
Some of the UK's leading universities have dropped several places since last year,
while China's universities have improved their performance. China is expanding its
higher education system faster than most other countries in the world.
These trends have not yet changed the overall results of the countries producing the
most reputable universities. Taking the top 50 universities from the list we can see that
America still has the largest number of higher quality universities, followed by the
UK.
Click through to see the full size version of this chart.
According to the Times Higher Education website the list is made by 17,554 leading
academics from 149 countries who have rated campuses across the world according to
how good they thought their research and teaching were.
With university tuition fees rocketing and more applicants fighting for places,
university reputation is set to be an even bigger focus for prospective students.
Here's all the data for you to explore. Let us know what you can do with it.
Data summary
Time's higher education university reputation rankings
Click heading to sort
2012 reputation
2011 reputation
University
Country
rank
rank
Source: TIMES HIGHER EDUCATION, THOMSON REUTERS
1
Harvard University
United States 1

Time's higher education university reputation rankings


Click heading to sort
2012 reputation
2011 reputation
University
Country
rank
rank
Massachusetts Institute of
2
United States 2
Technology
United
3
University of Cambridge
3
Kingdom
4
Stanford University
United States 5
5
University of California, Berkeley United States 4
United
6
University of Oxford
6
Kingdom
7
Princeton University
United States 7
8
University of Tokyo
Japan
8
University of California, Los
9
United States 12
Angeles
10
Yale University
United States 9
11
California Institute of Technology United States 10
12
University of Michigan
United States 13
United
13
Imperial College London
11
Kingdom
14
University of Chicago
United States 15
15
Columbia University
United States 23
16
Cornell University
United States 16
16
University of Toronto
Canada
17
18
Johns Hopkins University
United States 14
19
University of Pennsylvania
United States 22
20
Kyoto University
Japan
18
United
21
University College London
19
Kingdom
Swiss Federal Institute of
22
Switzerland
24
Technology Zrich
University of Illinois at Urbana
23
United States 21
Champaign
23
National University of Singapore Singapore
27
25
University of British Columbia
Canada
31
25
McGill University
Canada
29
27
University of Wisconsin-Madison United States 25
28
University of Washington
United States 26
London School of Economics and United
29
37
Political Science
Kingdom
30
Tsinghua University
China
35
University of California, San
31
United States 34
Francisco
32
University of Texas at Austin
United States 31
33
Duke University
United States 36
34
New York University
United States 51-60
35
Northwestern University
United States 40
36
University of California, San Diego United States 30
37
Carnegie Mellon University
United States 28

Time's higher education university reputation rankings


Click heading to sort
2012 reputation
2011 reputation
University
Country
rank
rank
38
Peking University
China
43
39
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
42
39
University of Massachusetts
United States 19
41
Georgia Institute of Technology
United States 39
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt
42
Germany
48
Mnchen
43
University of Melbourne
Australia
45
44
Australian National University
Australia
51-60
44
University of California, Davis
United States 38
University of North Carolina at
46
United States 41
Chapel Hill
47
University of Minnesota
United States 43
47
Purdue University
United States 47
United
49
University of Edinburgh
45
Kingdom
50
The University of Sydney
Australia
51-60
51-60
Delft University of Technology
Netherlands 49
51-60
Karolinska Institute
Sweden
51-60
United
51-60
University of Manchester
61-70
Kingdom
51-60
The Ohio State University
United States 51-60
51-60
Osaka University
Japan
50
51-60
Pennsylvania State University
United States 61-70
University of California, Santa
51-60
United States 51-60
Barbara
Korea,
51-60
Seoul National University
51-60
Republic of
51-60
Tohoku University
Japan
51-60
51-60
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Japan
51-60
cole Polytechnique Fdrale de
61-70
Switzerland
71-80
Lausanne
61-70
Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel
#N/A
The Hong Kong University of
61-70
Hong Kong
91-100
Science and Technology
61-70
Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin
Germany
71-80
United
61-70
King's College London
61-70
Kingdom
61-70
Technische Universitt Mnchen Germany
61-70
61-70
University of Pittsburgh
United States 51-60
61-70
University of So Paulo
Brazil
#N/A
61-70
University of Southern California United States 71-80
61-70
National Taiwan University
Taiwan
81-90
71-80
University of Amsterdam
Netherlands 81-90
71-80
Universitt Heidelberg
Germany
81-90
71-80
Michigan State University
United States 71-80
71-80
Universit Paris-Sorbonne
France
#N/A

Time's higher education university reputation rankings


Click heading to sort
2012 reputation
2011 reputation
University
Country
rank
rank
The University of Queensland
71-80
Australia
81-90
Australia
71-80
Texas A&M University
United States 81-90
71-80
Uppsala University
Sweden
61-70
71-80
Utrecht University
Netherlands 71-80
71-80
Washington University in St Louis United States 71-80
71-80
University of Zrich
Switzerland
61-70
81-90
Brown University
United States #N/A
The Chinese University of Hong
81-90
Hong Kong
#N/A
Kong
81-90
University of Florida
United States 61-70
81-90
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Belgium
81-90
Korea Advanced Institute of
Korea,
81-90
91-100
Science and Technology
Republic of
United
81-90
University of Leeds
81-90
Kingdom
81-90
Leiden University
Netherlands 81-90
81-90
Lund University
Sweden
71-80
81-90
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
91-100
81-90
Tel Aviv University
Israel
#N/A
91-100
University of Arizona
United States 71-80
91-100
Boston University
United States 61-70
United
91-100
University of Bristol
81-90
Kingdom
91-100
cole Polytechnique
France
61-70
91-100
Indiana University
United States 81-90
91-100
Middle East Technical University Turkey
#N/A
91-100
Universit Paris-Sud
France
#N/A
91-100
Universit Pierre et Marie Curie
France
#N/A
Rutgers, The State University of
91-100
United States 71-80
New Jersey
Wageningen University and
91-100
Netherlands #N/A
Research Center
Download the data
DATA: download the full spreadsheet
More data
Data journalism and data visualisations from the Guardian
World government data
Search the world's government data with our gateway
Development and aid data
Search the world's global development data with our gateway
Can you do something with this data?
Flickr Please post your visualisations and mash-ups on our Flickr group
Contact us at data@guardian.co.uk

Get the A-Z of data


More at the Datastore directory
Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Posted by
Ami Sedghi and Lisa Evans
Thursday 15 March 2012 09.30 GMT guardian.co.uk

Jump to comments (22)

Article history
Education
Higher education
International education news
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
Harvard University
University funding
Tuition fees
UK news
Politics
Education policy
More from Datablog on
Education
Higher education
International education news
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
Harvard University
University funding
Tuition fees
Politics
Education policy
More blogposts
More data
More on this story

Asian universities challenge US-UK domination of rankings

Survey puts Harvard in top spot, while all the leading Asian universities gain
higher rankings than in 2011
Buy Facts are Sacred - the Power of Data ebook

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Buy for Kindle (UK) - 2.99


Buy for Kindle (US) - $4.61
Buy for iPhone, iPad or iPod touch (UK) - 2.99
Buy for iPhone, iPad or iPod touch (US) - $3.99
Learn more about Guardian Shorts

Next
Previous
Blog home

Share

Email
Ads by Google
Trading Platform
Plus500 Online Trading Platform. Free Demo Account, 200 Bonus!
www.Plus500.gr
Bachelor Degree
At New York College Educating Tomorrow's Leaders !
www.nyc.gr
University in Australia
If you want to study for a Uni Degree in Australia -explore here!
www.StudiesInAustralia.com
Comments
22 comments, displaying
Sort comments

http://w w w .guar

by

first
Oldest

Staff

Contributor
Comments on this page are now closed.
Comments on this page are now closed.

eyJ0aW1lc3RhbX

smotala1
15 March 2012 10:38AM
Once again, completely inconsistent to what other tables say. Once again the
top of the list stays the same. How ridiculous! To not even have universities
like Warwick, Durham or St Andrews in the top 100 is ridiculous. More
ridiculous is the fact that these universities are above so many of the other
universities in the table (like Kings) domestically but in the world rankings
they are not.
You just cannot rank universities full stop, and while it is laughable that
people try to do it on a smaller scale (domestically), when they attempt to
compare universities from around the world, with entirely different cultures
and entirely different methods of doing things, it is just beyond funny.

o
15164713

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (19)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

Loredan
15 March 2012 10:39AM
Clearly, the way to have a great reputation is to be in a place called
'Cambridge'. The top three universities in the world all are.

o
15164750

o
o
o
o
o

False

Recommend (17)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

Pick comment

sereinfalls
15 March 2012 10:57AM
Once again I am shocked that the University of Salford is not in this list!

o
15165162

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (13)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

RenaissanceFace
15 March 2012 11:39AM
Exactly, smotala. The University of Bath, for Instance, was 5th on the Times's
own most recent domestic rankings - but appears nowhere on this list

o
15166359

o
o
o
o
o

False

Recommend (0)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

mestizo
15 March 2012 12:09PM
I guess Derby is 101 this year?

Pick comment

15167096

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (10)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

smotala1
15 March 2012 12:22PM
I guess there is nothing wrong with these tables if the Guardian do not take
them too seriously. However, the fact that in another article, they say that,
universities will have to adapt to the tables, governmental policy could be
influenced, and that these are indicative of how good an institution is. These
show that the Guardian do take these way to seriously, and that is probably
quite damaging.

o
15167431

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (1)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

timeandtruth
15 March 2012 12:29PM
Without giving a breakdown of the 17,554 leading academics and the
countries they come from this type of report has little meaning.
A number of things will lead to bias, the specialist subjects of the academics,
the country they come from and the University they teach in.
Unless the breakdown of academics is 50% humanities and 50% sciences it is
impossible to achieve anything like a meaningful table. Also if the number of
questioned academics has increased from Asian it is logical that a change in
position and representation will occur.

This article should clearly give us this data.

o
15167605

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (8)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

AdamY952
15 March 2012 12:54PM
10 british universities in the world top 100
I can't help noticing that this table rates King's 8th in the UK
guardian rates them 30th
complete university guide rates them 13th
there is so little consistency between various tables for the non Oxbridge
universities there is little point looking at them individually
also this is made by academics rating the universities they do not take into
account bigger issues like student satisfaction, support for students, value for
money it seems a bit narrow minded to me

o
15168207

o
o
o
o
o

Recommend (10)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

False

tristanmax
15 March 2012 1:43PM

Pick comment

I wonder where the University of Bedfordshire is now, but I suppose Les


Ebdon couldn't care less, now that he is the head of OFFA, and on 145,000 for
A 3 day week

o
15169390

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (1)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

pereubu2000
15 March 2012 2:21PM
We're #9, we're #9 ... Bruins rampage through the streets of Westwood...

o
15170336

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (0)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

Loredan
15 March 2012 3:05PM
You can't expect consistency between these league tables, the guys behind
them need them to be just a little bit different from each other, and to have a
small amount of volatility each year. Otherwise no one would care.
So, a global league table that contrived not to have Harvard in the top 5 would
not get picked up on as people would assume it was silly. In the UK the early
university league table compilers were open that they had to gather data and
then make sure Oxford and Cambridge were at the top.

Normally most of the indicators are effectively measures of reputation, so this


one just cuts to the chase.

o
15171327

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (4)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

CarmenT
15 March 2012 5:48PM
both my children graduated from San Francisco high school and completed
their university studies in Canada, for less money than I paid for their high
school. Univ of British Columbia and McGill are 25th in the world (in the top
15 in North America). great to see these public Canadian schools with such
high rankings.

o
15175074

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (5)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

999Jasper
15 March 2012 10:54PM
Pitt, Ohio State and Purdue come out ahead of Brown? Really? Really? This
list seems pretty meaningless once you get beyond the top 20.

15179558

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (1)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

cwm269
17 March 2012 1:37AM
There are more academics in Scotland, a country with only seven or eight
'established' universities, than were asked in this survey. It's a miniscule
sample, which wouldn't be so bad if it didn't suffer from the same problems
that every peer review of this kind suffers from.
1) It's always biased towards science- they won't say for sure, but other peer
reviews don't bother to ask historians or literature specialists- STJU doesn't at
all, so I'd guess 90%+ would be in those fields, probably medical sciences.
Economics and business is about as far away from Science and Engineering as
they get. In my small sample size, I certainly don't know anyone that's been
asked in humanities, or know of anyone that knows of anyone that was asked
to review. And two of my three institutions have just placed in the top 10. In
my humble opinion, Yale trumps Harvard for a great deal of the arts and
humanities areas that I know of and work in. However, it has no reputation to
really speak of in things like Engineering.
2) There's a vicious cycle now where academics have even admitted using
league tables to work out where they think the best places are. So yes, they're
actually using the Times to tell the Times where is best. Terrific.
3) There's always a capital city bias for places that are less known. 'Well, I
don't know much about Finland, but we'll say Helsinki'... Humboldt in Berlin
tends to do better here than it does in German peer reviews.
4) Academics do a good bit of back-slapping for their friends and colleaguesso expect the biggest labs and departments to crop up. Leeds, with nearly
40,000 students in the top 100- there probably isn't that much to pick between
there and another very similar institution like Southampton or something,
except it's half the size.
5) Usual problem with rankings. We try to say a place with three dozen
departments is better than another with three dozen departments, despite the
reality that one probably edges some and the other edges some. If we believe
this table, Imperial has a better reputation than LSE. Except that they compete
in exactly zero areas, save that they're both universities.
6) They try, god bless them, to normalise for non-English speaking universities
because they don't get many responses, but since English is just about the
universal language of publication and research, it just skews it too far the other

way. I'm not really sure Seoul University is having quite the impact on
research in the English medium compared to plenty of universities that I can
think of that aren't on that list. Not saying it's not a terrific institution, but 99%
of us probably don't know, and you can't just multiply what the two Korean
speakers think by fifty to get an answer.
7) It doesn't help to be broad- if you're good at two things and only do two
things (like a specialised technical university) you'll be rewarded. Being good
at 10 things but having 30 departments means you'll rank lower.
In sum, I'm really not sure why we continue to put up with these things- it's
not what universities are for, and just turns them more into the consumer
market that we've been trying to avoid for years. People WILL, mark my
words, look at this, and decide to spend a ton of money going to UCL or
wherever even though it's not the well aligned with their interests, just because
they think it will help them get a job. We're potentially cheating people out of
a great experience and a lot of happiness because we continue to publish this
rubbish.

o
15200676

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (8)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

profevil
31 March 2012 8:36AM
Unless you are an academic this table matters little. All that matters is that you
get a good job and are happy. Whether attending Cambridge will make you
happy remains to be seen!

o
15428901

o
o
o
o
o

Recommend (2)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close

False

Pick comment

Link to this comment:


Share
http://w w w .gu

Alumnireviews
24 April 2012 4:29PM
With rankings being quite subjective, and the methodology used is of the
ranking company, should it not be on a rating system? Some universities lower
down the table may have aspects of their university/programs to be much
better than many above them. The overall average reduces their chances. at
www.alumnireviews.com the alumni are the ones who rate various aspects of
their university and course (out of 7 stars). Surely rates are the way forward.

o
15799015

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (0)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

12bens
16 May 2012 3:46AM
University of Massachusetts 39th? And was 19th last year? You've GOT to be
joking!! UMass doesn't even rank 39th in Boston you turkeys! This list is
absolutely meaningless!!!

o
16148150

o
o
o
o
o

False

Recommend (2)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:

Pick comment

Share
http://w w w .gu

Magpiesview
16 May 2012 12:55PM
It seems that the 'best' Universities are not genuinely interested in Education.
After all there is this attempt to cherry-pick those who have either the abilities
or resources to succeed and then piggy-back their achievements to acquire
Kudos for the University, and then providing that Kudos to those who can
afford to buy it by studying at the institution.
After all Yale one of the USA and World's best Universities graduated George
W Bush, whilst Oxford graduated George Osbourne, and Cambridge Louse
Mensch - none of whom could reasonably be mistaken for highly intelligent
individuals

o
16153765

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (1)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

mkolkey
22 May 2012 7:47PM
This ranking system may not mean much but it does give me the right to brag
that UCLA # 9 is far superior to USC # 68 'loud gasp' it's official!!! Take that
Trojans!!!

o
16253771

o
o
o
o
o

False

Recommend (0)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:

Pick comment

Share
http://w w w .gu

Shashank Tripathi
31 May 2012 7:16PM
These rankings haven't changed much over the last 10 years, which is not
reflective of worldly realities. Universities such as Todai (Univ of Tokyo) or
Cornell are not truly in the global running. That is a US-centric perspective.
As though the methodology were not already suspect based on that, the
Einsteins behind this have managed to put Beijing (Peking) Univ much further
down the list than "Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zrich", which is so
close to "University of Massachusetts".
Get off that bong, researchers. This is a joke. Universum or QS have much
more credible rankings.

o
16400959

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (2)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

boonery
18 June 2012 3:10PM
Isn't it a bit odd that the Guardian, which spends so much time elsewhere
denouncing league tables for schools (and pointing out, quite accurately, how
flawed is their methodology, how destructive their impact) should get
enthusiastic about the same thing for universities? If it is difficult to compare
schools in the same country teaching in the same language and using the same
curriculum and exams, what possible meaning can there be to any attempt to
compare universities which have very little in common at all? What weighting
is given to the cadre admitted as students? how much depends on teaching and
on research output? How do you assess and compare the quality of any
course? What balance is there between arts, sciences and social sciences? How
do you compare the results for graduates between an enormous developing
economy like China and a small mature one like Switzerland? Tweak any of
your inputs and you get whatever output you want. It is, in fact, all pretty
meaningless....


o
16681401

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (0)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

lodestar2usa
20 June 2012 7:18AM
I must concur with:
"999Jasper
15 March 2012 10:54PM
Pitt, Ohio State and Purdue come out ahead of Brown? Really? Really? This
list seems pretty meaningless once you get beyond the top 20."
I had the good fortune, and perhaps grace from above, to get into the 1st, 2nd
(twice), 4th, and 25th. I went instead to the 80th, Brown University, and have
been happy my whole adult life for making what was an unusually wise
decision for a wet-behind-the-ears kid. Uncles and a grandfather taught at
everyone of the three schools 999Jasper mentions. They're fine universities but
don't light a candle next to Brown. I could write ten paragraphs specifically
why, knowing all these schools, but suffice it to say, this seems a very arbitrary
list that favors big schools with older reputations.

o
16709954

o
o
o
o
o

False

Pick comment

Recommend (0)
Responses (0)
Report
Share
Close
Link to this comment:
Share
http://w w w .gu

Comments on this page are now closed.


Learn about Data Visualisation with the Guardian

27 October Learn how to present data with Guardian Masterclasses. This


class is ideal for those who present for a living or work with data and want to
make something visually compelling. Find out more and book your place
The Guardian guide to clearing

This clear, concise ebook can help you navigate through the clearing process
and explain all the options available to you. Find out more or buy on Kindle
for 1.99

Teacher Network Blog

Closures, free schools and teacher protests: why


we're fighting for our jobs
School closures left Anne Dempsey and her colleagues without jobs. She looks
back on her career and explains why, along with the Pals of St George's, she's
fighting for her rights
1 comment

Higher Education Network

Impact factor: researchers should define the metrics


that matter to them
The impact factor assumes that the most cited articles are the most influential,
but influence is only one aspect of importance, say Victor Henning and
William Gunn
10 comments

More from Guardian Professional

Latest from the data blogosphere

o
o
o

7 Sep 2012
RGB Colorspace Atlas shows every shade in a cubic book
From FlowingData

o
o
o

7 Sep 2012
BIG THREE
From very small array

6 Sep 2012
o Mortality (1960-2010)
o
From Chart Porn
More from the data blogosphere
On News
Most viewed
Zeitgeist
Latest
Last 24 hours
o

1.

1. Barack Obama's speech to the Democratic national

convention live
2. 2. France shooting: girl left for eight hours in car with murdered family
3. 3. French Alps shootings: experts hope bullet casings will lead to killer
4. 4. Barack Obama pleads with voters to let him finish the job
5. 5. Kabul attack on female actors leaves survivors facing more 'punishment'
6. More most viewed
Last 24 hours
1. French Alps shootings: experts hope bullet casings will lead to killer
2. France shooting: girl left for eight hours in car with murdered family
3. The separatist map of Africa: interactive
4. Barack Obama pleads with voters to let him finish the job
5. French Alps shooting interactive map
6. More zeitgeist
Last 24 hours

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

1. Your views on the news - planning law, airline seats


and disabled benefits
2. Picture desk live: the best news pictures of the day
3. Paralympics 2012: full list of every medal winner - and how they break
down
4. 24 hours in pictures
5. Cameron's cabinet reshuffle: the full list of government ministers
All today's stories

Top topics on this site


Wikileaks war logs, Afghanistan & Iraq
Coalition government
Factfile UK
Government data
MPs expenses
Afghanistan
Public spending
Population
Defence
Health
Sites we like
Flowing Data
Infostethics
Everyblock
Visual Complexity
Many eyes
Dabble DB
Newsmap
Flickrtime
Google visualisations
Debategraph
Datablog weekly archives
Mar 2012
M
T
W
T
F
27
28
29
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
26
27
28
29
30
EducationGuardian on Twitter
Get the latest news from our education team on Twitter

S
3
10
17
24
31

S
4
11
18
25
1

alicewoolley1: MPs to investigate GCSE dispute. BBC http://t.co/NAJEOgx2


#education
about 1 day, 17 hours ago

GuardianTeach: Was published in Jan, but still a must-read #backToSchool


blog from TeacherToolkit: 'New term resolutions' http://t.co/aJugso0x
#education

about 3 days, 20 hours ago

JudyFriedberg: It's a gallery of joy to brighten your grey BH Monday: 'What


freshers should take to uni' http://t.co/XioxnIqB #education
about 1 week, 3 days ago
Read more tweets from our education team
Follow our education team on a Twitter list
This week's bestsellers

1.

1. Jerusalem
by Yotam Ottolenghi 16.00
2. 2. I am the Secret Footballer
7.99
3. 3. Unapologetic
by Francis Spufford 10.39
4. 4. History of the World in Twelve Maps
by Jerry Brotton 19.00
5. 5. Spell it Out
by David Crystal 10.39
Search the Guardian bookshop
Search
Section classified
Sponsored feature

Sending money overseas?


Using a currency specialist rather than your high street bank could save you time and
money. Discover how to cut costs on all your international money transfers while
keeping your money safe. Plus: all the latest trends in money management for Brits
who live abroad or own overseas properties, and your chance to win a 25 M&S
voucher. In association with HiFX

License/buy our content

Send

Close

|
Privacy policy
|
Terms & conditions
|
Advertising guide
|
Accessibility
|
A-Z index
|
Inside the Guardian blog
|
About us
|
Work for us
|
Join our dating site today
2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All
rights reserved.
485 Share

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen