Design of 2 MW Power Plant Using Renewable Energy For LUBELCO Lubang Islands Revised

Design of 2 MW Power Plant Using Renewable Energy for LUBELCO Lubang Island, Mindoro
By
Gaspar, Vandrix O.
A Design Project Submitted to Electrical Engineering Department
In Partial Fulfillment of the Required for the Course
Power System Analysis and Design (EEP533L1)
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

2016
Acknowledgement
The design project serves as a partial fulfilment for Power Plant Engineering and Design course for
electrical engineering student of the technological Institute of the Philippines. A research-oriented task
that aims to enhance a students knowledge and understanding of the actual design process weve
achieved; we wouldnt be able to accomplish this without those people who helped us for the entire
process.
To Engr. Gerard Francesco DG. Apolinario, our Professor, for he had always time for the consultation
time and all the ideas he had shared with us.
To our family who give us strength and support to finish the project.
And lastly, to our Almighty GOD for the grace, mercy, and compassion.
Table of Contents
Title Page .................................................................................................................................................. i

ii
Aknkowledgement..................................................................................................................................... ii
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... iii
List of Figures........................................................................................................................................... iii
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................v
Chapter 1 Project Background ................................................................................................................ 1
The Project .......................................................................................................................................... 1
Project Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 1
The Client ............................................................................................................................................ 1
Project Scope and Limitation......................................................................................................... 1
Significance of the Project ................................................................................................................... 1
Project Development ........................................................................................................................... 3
Chapter 2 Design Inputs (Technical Specifications) ................................................... 4
Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Scope of the Project ............................................................................................................................ 4
Chapter 3 Project Design ........................................................................................................................ 8
Chapter 4 Design Constraints, Trade-Off and Standards ...................................................................... 25
Design Constraints ............................................................................................................................ 25
Trade-Offs .......................................................................................................................................... 25
Chapter 5 Final Design .......................................................................................................................... 32
Chapter 6 Design Simulation.................................................................................................................. 39
Chapter 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 48
Reference .............................................................................................................................................. 49
Appendix A ............................................................................................................................................ 50
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Project Development ............................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2-1 Wave map of Lubang Island (from NREL) and Wave scale (from NREL) ................. 4
Figure 2-2 Distance of Looc Poblacion from the Lubang LPP................................................................. 5
Figure 2-3 Map of Lubang Island .........................................,,,................................................................ 6
Figure 2-4 Single Line Diagram .............................................................................................................. 7
Figure 3-1 Schematic Diagram of Additional Power Plant ...................................................................... 8
Figure 3-2 Single Line Diagram Biomass ............................................................................................. 12
Figure 3-3 Figure 3-3 Pelton Turbine..................................................................................................... 13
Figure 3-4 Figure 3-4 Kaplan Turbine........................................................................................ 18
Figure 3-5 Seagen Horizontal Axis Turbine........................................................................................... 22
Figure 3-6 Vertical Axis Turbine ......................................................................................... 23
Figure 4-1 Graphical Representaion for Efficiency ............................................................................... 27
Figure 4-2 Graphical Representation for Life Span .............................................................................. 28
Figure 4-3 Graphical Representation for Land Area ............................................................................ 29
Figure 4-4 Graphical Representation for Levelized Cost of Energy ......................................................30
Figure 5-1 Single Line Diagram with Additional Wind Power Plant ...................................................... 32
Figure 5-2 Pelton Turbine......................................................................................... 33
iii
Figure 6-1 Single Line diagram Simulation .....................................................................................39

Figure 6-2 Protective Device Coordination ........................................................................................... 47
List of Tables
Table 2-1 Load Forecasting .................................................................................................................... 5
Table 2-2 Forecast (Growth Rate %) ...................................................................................................... 6
Table 2-3 Power Capacity (2015) ........................................................................................................... 6
Table 2-4 Load Feeder (2015) ................................................................................................................ 6
Table 3.1 Power loss in transformer 10
Table 4-1 Efficiency. ............................................................................................................................. 26
Table 4-2 Life Span .............................................................................................................................. 27
Table 4-3 Land Area ............................................................................................................................. 28
Table 4-4 Levelized Cost of Energy ...................................................................................................... 29
Table 4-5 TRADE-OFFS RESULT ........................................................................................................ 30
Table 6-1 Current Loading Violations ................................................................................................... 40
Table 6-2 Bus Voltage Violations .......................................................................................................... 40
Table 6-3 Transformer Violations .......................................................................................................... 40
Table 6-4 Transformer & Line Voltage Regulator Data ......................................................................... 40
Table 6-5 Branch Current Flow Values ................................................................................................. 40
Table 6-6: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle .............................................................. 41
Table 6-7: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle ................................................................. 41
Table 6-8: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle ................................................................. 41
Table 6-9: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at Std Cycle .............................................................. 42
Table 6-10: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle ............................................................ 42
Table 6-11: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle .............................................................. .42
Table 6-12: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle ................................................................43
Table 6-13: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at Std Cycle ............................................................ 43
Table 6-14: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle ............................................................ 44
Table 6-15: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle ............................................................... 44
Table 6-16: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle ............................................................... 44
Table 6-17: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at Std Cycle ........................................................... 45
Table 6-18: Bus (A) LLG Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle .......................................................... 45
Table 6-19: Bus (A) LLG Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle ............................................................. 45
Table 6-20: Bus (A) LLG Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle ............................................................. 46
Table 6-21: Bus (A) LLG Fault- Classical Method at Std Cycle ......................................................... 46
iv
Chapter 1
Project Background
The Project
Electricity has develop and very useful and has changed everyone life since the day it has discovered.
Electricity plays a huge part in peoples everyday lives. Even though power generation existed many
years ago, there are still places in the country that lacks electricity. It is because these places are
beyond the reach of the main grid. Most of these places are islands, just like the Lubang Group of
Island which lies to the northwest of the northern end of Mindoro.
The Lubang Electric Power Cooperative Inc. (LUBELCO), which can ensure relations with Occidental
Mindoro Electric Cooperative (OMECO), distribution supply and achieves power to customers in the
Lubang Isle in Mindoro. The National Power Corporation over Small Power Utility Group, is assigned to
supply power to isolated isles and detached island barangays that stay not linked to certain of the core
grids. The NPC diesel distribution plants are located contradictory to the main office of LUBELCO in
Barangay Bagubag, Vigo, Lubang. NPC consumes 2 arrangements of diesel generator: 500 kW and
650 kW.
For the 2007 the full demand on the organization was nearby 370kW then this would currently be
significantly higher. The rate of electricity in 2009 was P5.89 per kilowatt-hour for housing and P6.2378
kWh for profitable users. The problem is through the increase in charge for diesel fuel, and growing
demand for electricity, different sources of imminent electricity generation are actuality measured.
Project Objectives
The project aims to design a 2 MW generating plant using renewable energy for Lubang Island.
Specifically it address the following:
To cover the insufficient supply of electrical energy in year 2021.
To provide a less expensive electricity to the people of Lubang.
And to utilize the renewable energy that are available in the island.
The Client
The client of the project is Lubang Electric Cooperative, Inc. (LUBELCO).
Project Scope and Limitation
The project covers the generation of electrical power by means of renewable energy, specifically wave.
In wave power plant, the designer only design the generator that will be used in the wave turbine.
Significance of the Project
The electrical power deficiency in Lubang Island can be solved by applying the design project. With the
proper utilization of renewable energy, the nature will benefit as well with the residents of the island. By
using the renewable energy for electricity generation, it will provide substantial benefits to the health
and economy of the residents of Lubang Island. It will also provide clean environment for the residents
and the nature of the island. Using renewable energy will provide less expensive electricity to the
consumers. This is due to the abundant supply of renewable energy, like wave. Wave is well suited to
1
an island because of the availability and infinity of the source. Producing energy from renewable
electricity are practically than relic oils proposals important community health benefits. The greenhouse
gas produced by diesel power plants is linked to inhalation problems, neurological damage, heart
attacks and cancer.
The designers will also be benefitted by the project. As an engineering student, it is a good experience
to solve a real life problem. This will provide the designers a practice to apply all the gathered
knowledge from the very beginning of the electrical engineering program. With this project, the
designers will also be aware to the problems and trends in the world of electricity not only in the country
but the whole world.
Project Development
Start
Identify the
Problem
Data gathering / Technical
Study
Formulation
Design
Wave
Does the design meet

the requirement?
NO
YES
Simulation
Final Design
End
Figure 1-1 Project Development
Chapter 2
Design Inputs (Technical Specifications)
Summary
Lubang, Island is a small group island located near at Occidental Mindoro due to its rich natural
resources and several tourist attractions which caused an imminent increase in demand for electricity.
The load growth is statistically forecasted that resulted to a substantial increase in the peak demand in
the province. The continuous increase of peak demand can provide power shortage in the years to
come. By designing of renewable power plant in the island are possibly the answer for the problem of
the island. If possible, this power plant can solve the problems and theres some benefits not only in
terms of money but in terms of health also.
Scope of the Project
The scope of the project is to design an additional 2 MW power plant, utilizing wind or biomass. To
obtain the approximate capacity of the additional power plant, the power losses from transmission line,
substation, generator feeder, and the generator. In each type of power plant, the designer will only
focus to the part of the power plant that will be used in the tradeoffs. And the winning design in the
tradeoffs will be used for the final design, where it will be simulated in paladin, and analyzed for
additional protection.
Figure 2-1 Wave map of Lubang Island (from NREL) and Wave scale (from NREL)
Figure 2-1 show behavior of wave within the whole Island of Lubang. It is obvious that the common
areas in the Province of Lubang Island experience same wave density.
Figure 2-2 Distance of Looc Poblacion from the Lubang LPP

Figure 2-2 shows the distance of Lubang power plant from the load. The distance is estimated as 40
kilometers.
Power Profile
Main Stakeholders Supplier
Electric Cooperative
-NPC
-Lubang Electric Cooperative, Inc. (LUBELCO)
Table 2-1 Load Forecasting

Year
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Forecasted load after 6 years.
Peak Load (MW)

2.304
2.4323
2.5678
2.7108
2.861
3.0212
3.189
Reserve Capacity (MW)

1.4
-1.415
Load Projection in 6 years

Where,
Pm=Peak demand in mth year Po=Peak
demand in the year 2015 g=0.0557
Pm= Po(1+g)m
P6= 2.304 MW*(1+0.0557)6
P6= 2.815 MW
Reserve Capacity in 10 years

P= 1.4 MW-2.815 MW
P6=-1.415 MW
Note: Negative sign indicates insufficient supply
Table 2-2 Forecast (Growth Rate %)
Name of Plant
Lubang Dpp
Peak Demand (KW)

809
Energy Sales (MWH)

3,218
Table 2-3 Power Capacity

(2015)
Name of Plant
Lubang Dpp
Dependable Capacity (MW)

809
Reserved Capacity
3,218
Table 2-4 Load Feeder (2015)

Name of Plant
Vigo
Sorville
Dependable Capacity
295.2
73.8
Reserve Capacity
1.4
1.4
The data inputs shown in the tables above correspond to the existing situation in the power system of
Lubang Island. In the year 2015, the reserve capacity is 1.4 MW. This capacity was calculated through
the dependable capacity and peak demand of the system. The producers dont function at their full
capability all the time; the outputs might differ according to circumstances at the power plant, fuel costs,
and/or as trained from the electric power grid operator.
Figure 2-3 Map of Lubang Island

Figure 2-3 shows the geographical map of Lubang Island.
Lubang DPP, Lubang Island 0.5 MW
24hr of operation - 0.5MW
6
From 12MN-12MN 0.704MW

Lubelco - 0.6MW
Lubang Land Area (in hectares) - 11,310
Figure 2-4 Single Line Diagram

Figure 2-4 shows detailed single line diagram of the whole province of Lubang Island. This was the
basis in studying the whole power system of Lubang Island.
Chapter 3
Project Design Methodology
Methodology
The design project provides solution to the power shortage of the franchise of LUBELCO by providing
additional Power Plant in the island. The researcher will gather data to create the load characteristics of
the system in order to formulate the needed power for the franchise.
Stage 3
Stage 2
Stage 1
Figure 3-1 Schematic Diagram of Additional Power Plant

Figure 3-1 shows the detailed schematic diagram of the additional power plant. The generation part is
connected to a transformer, then to the transmission line with a length of 2 km.
Stage 1: Transmission System

The line current at the secondary side of the transformer
To attain the line current that ill flow on the transmission line from substation to load, this formula will be
used:
P
IL =
3*Vr*pf
Where:
IL = line current (ampere) VR=
receiving voltage at the grid
pf = power factor
P = additional power needed in Lubang Island
2 MW
IL
NEC Section 240-3: General

Requirements for branch circuit,
feeder and other conductors
97.197 A
Conductors are selected such that their ampacities are at least 125% of the continuous current through
the conductor.
As per PEC Part 1, Table
3.10.1.16: Allowable ampacities of
1.25*IL=121.4963A
insulated conductor rated 0
through 2000V.
The impedance of each line
The approximate distance of the power plant to the substation is 2 km. The total impedance of each line
will vary according to the length of the line. See at Appendix C. Note: 2 km = 6561.6798 ft.
0.5218
R=
3.4239 XL
0.8983
0.1369
XC
Z=R+j(XL-XC)=3.4239+j(0.8983-108950.8)=108.95<-89.9982 k
Where:
R = resistance
XL = inductive reactance
XC = capacitive reactance
Z = impedance
Power loss in transmission line

The loss in transmission line is due to the
IEC 60287, Series for calculating

losses for electric cables
Plosses=3IL2RL=3(97.197)2(3.4239)=97.0394 kW
Where:
IL = line current (ampere)
RL = resistance per line (ohm)
Plosses = power loss in the transmission line (watt)
Stage 2: Substation System
Table 3.1 Power loss in transformer
3.12 MVA 690 V/13.2 kV Power Transformer (Y-)
Maximum permissible no load loss at rated
3.0 KW (Maximum)
voltage and rated frequency
Maximum permissible load loss at rated
17.0 KW (Maximum)
current,
According to E5-1-Power Transformer, the maximum power loss of the selected transformer will be 17
kW.
Efficiency of transformer
IEC 60076: Power transformer
measuring
technique
and
accuracy in loss measurement.
Pout
=
*100%
Pout+Plosses
2 MW+97.0394 kW
99.1959%
Line current at the primary side of the transformer

Since it is a step-up transformer, the current at the primary side is high. To obtain the current at the
primary side, turns ration will be used.
VP IS
=
10
VS IP
1.38 kV
3
97.197 A
3
=
As per PEC Part 1, Table

3.10.1.16: Allowable ampacities
of insulated conductor rated 0
through 2000V.
13.2 kV
IP
IP=929.71 A
Where:
V1 = voltage at primary side
V2 = voltage at secondary side
I1 = current at primary side
I2 = current at secondary side
Conductors are selected such that their ampacities are at least 125% of the continuous current through
the conductor.
As per PEC Part 1, Table 3.10:
Allowable ampacities of insulated
1.25*IP=1.1621 kA
conductor.
The impedance of each line
The approximate distance of the power plant to the substation is 30 m. The total impedance of each line
will vary according to the length of the line. See Appendix C Note: 30 m = 98.4252 ft.
0.0170
R=
0.1369
XL
XC
Z=R+j(XL-XC)=1.6732m+j(4.3799m-4.5822M)=4.5822<-90 M
Where:
R = resistance
XL = inductive reactance
XC = capacitive reactance
Z = impedance
Power loss in transmission line
The loss in transmission line is due to the
2
3 2
-3
Plosses=3IL RL=3(1.1621*10 ) (1.6732*10 )=6.7789 kW

11
Where:
IL = line current (ampere)
RL = resistance per line (ohm)
Plosses = power loss in the transmission line (watt)
The total losses from load up to the feeder
Total Losses=97.0394 kW+17 kW+6.7789 kW=120.8183 kW
Therefore the total capacity of the additional power plant must not
be less than 2 MW+120.8183 kW=2.1208 MW.

Stage 3: Generation System

Design : Wave Power Plant
Figure 3-2 Single Line Diagram

Figure 3-2 shows the detailed schematic diagram of the wind power plant. The generation part is
connected to a transformer, then to the transmission line with a length of 2 km.
12
Option 1: Point absorber
Figure 3-3 Pelton Turbine

Figure 3-3 shows the construction of the pelton turbine.
Pelton Turbine.
Calculation of turbine input power (Pi)
Pi = r * g * Cn2 *Hn * Qt
Where:
Pi = input power, in watts
r = density, in kg/m3 (r water =1025kg/m3)
g = gravitational constant, 9.81 m/s2
Cn = nozzle discharge coefficient, ~0.98
Hn = net head, in meters
Qt = water flow capacity of each nozzles, in m3/s
Hn = Hg- Htl
13
Where:
Hg = the gross head which is the vertical distance between water surface level at the intake and at the
turbine.
Htl = total head losses due to the open channel, trash rack, intake, penstock and gate or valve.These
losses approximately equal to 6% of gross head
Calculation:
Net head,
Hg=43m
Htl= 2.58m
Water flow capacity of each nozzles,

Ar= 0.03m2
Vr= 18.84m/s
IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance

tests to determine the hydraulic
performance of hydraulic
turbines, storage pumps and
pump-turbines.
Input power,
Calculation of Turbine speed (N)
Where:
14
N = turbine speed, in rpm

Ns = specific speed, in rpm
Nj = number of turbine nozzles (jet), as:
Where:
Qn = water flow rate, m3/s
IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

to determine the hydraulic
performance of hydraulic turbines,
storage pumps and pump-turbines.
specific speed, in rpm
N = turbine speed,
(
pm
number of turbine nozzles (jet),
For Water jet Velocity (Vj):
Where:
15
= Water jet velocity, in m/s

For water jet,
Calculation of nozzle dimensions

Water Flow rate through each nozzles (Qn)
,in m3/s
Where:
The nozzle area (Aj) can be computed as
, in m2
water flow rate :
The nozzle area:
Calculation of maximum turbine efficiency

The output power developed (Po) by the turbine can be computed as:
(
,in watts
16
Then the hydraulic efficiency (hth) can be computed as:

(
= 180

Where:
=bucket roughness coefficient, ~0.98
= deflection angle between bucket and jet, (160 - 170)
Output power,
= 180
=

17
Option 2: Overtopping/Terminator
Figure 3-4 Kaplan Turbine

Figure 3-4 shows the construction of the Kaplan Turbine
Kaplan Turbine
Pi = r
g H Qt
Where:
H = 25m
Input power,

18
Where:
Where:

N = turbine speed,
pm
19

Where:
For water jet,

,in

m3/s
Where:
The nozzle area (Aj) can be computed as:
, in m2
The nozzle area:
water flow rate :

(
,in watts
20

(
= 180
Where:
Output power,

= 180
=
21
Option 3: Seagen Horizontal Axis Turbine
Figure 3.5 Seagen Horizontal Axis Turbine

Power Input Formula:
1
Pin = a v3 p
2
Power Output Formula:
1
Pout = a v3 p b g in terms of watt electrical power)
2
IEC/TS 62600-200, Section

9.1.2 : Water Density of 1023
kg/m3
Efficiency of the Turbine

Pin Losses
Efficiency=
Pin
Total Efficiency of the System
eceiving Power
Turbine Losses Transmission line and transformer
eceiving Power
Where:
Pin - Power input of the turbine
Pa - Density of water (kg/m3)
A - Area of the wind passing through rotor diameter of the (m2)
v - Velocity of water (m/s)
Cp - Power coefficient (Betz Limit)
- Efficiency
IEC/TS 62600-200 ed 1: Power

performance measurements of
electricity
producing
tidal
turbines
`
Considering one turbine in computing for the efficiency of the system,
22
1
10 2
Pin = 1023 ) ( ) 0.34 3 0.55 = 8 8.43k
2
2
Efficiencygenerator = 0.84 0.97)x100 = 85.09
Efficiency at the generation part= 0.8509 0.92 100 = 78.28
Pout =0.7828 3.47
) 9.8k
2000 k
umber of tidal turbines=
= 2.94 3
679.8
Pin Losses
Efficiency=
Pin
78.28 =
868.43k Losses
868.43k
Losses=193.3k
Total Losses=Losses x no. of turbines
Total Losses=193.3k x 3
Total Losses=773.279k
Option 4: Vertical Axis Turbine
Figure 3.6 Vertical Axis Turbine

Power Input Formula:
1
Pin = 2 a v3 p
Power Output Formula:
IEC/TS 62600-200, Section

9.1.2 : Water Density of
1023 kg/m3
23
Pout =
1
2
v3
p b g
in terms of watt electrical power)

Pin Losses
Efficiency=
Pin
Total Efficiency of the System
eceiving Power
Turbine Losses Transmission line and transformer
eceiving Power
Where:
Pin = power input of the turbine
Pa = density of water (kg/m3)
A = area of the wind passing through rotor diameter of the (m2)
v = velocity of water (m/s)
Cp = power coefficient Betz Limit)
IEC/TS 62600-200 ed 1:
Power
performance
measurements of electricity
producing tidal turbines
Considering one turbine in computing for the efficiency of the system,

1
6 2
Pin = 2 1023
(2) 0.5 3 0.55 = 994.284 k
Efficiencygenerator = 0.84 0.97)x100 = 85.09
Efficiency at the generation part= 0.8509 0.92 100 = 78.28
Pout =0.7828 994.2846 k )= 8.32 k
2000 k
umber of tidal turbines=
= 2.56 3
778.326 k
Pin Losses
Efficiency=
Pin
78.28 =
994.2846 k Losses
994.2846 k
Losses=215.9586 k
24
Chapter 4
Design Constraints, Trade-offs and Standards
Design Constraints
The design constraints were acquired during the selection of design in order to land with the best
possible proposal without compromising other aspects.
Levelized Cost of Energy
Levelized cost of energy is the main metrics for the charge of energy developed by a generator. Since
generation was the main concern of the project, LCOE was prized meant for evaluation of numerous
generation selections. It is computed by auditing all of a structures estimated lifespan costs, which are
separated by the structures lifetime estimated generated power production (kWh). The investment
capability and demands of the client was took in consideration without having disadvantages to the
design so that in long term, the advantages of the best design will come into realization in terms of cost
saving and profit against initial investments.
Efficiency
The design should attain satisfying efficiency when commissioned as a whole system. The design
should incorporate the least possible losses that a system could possibly achieve. In comparison of
different generation options, the individual efficiency of the designs were taken into consideration so
that there can be a proper selection that can obtain the said objective without compromising much the
other factors considered.
Area
The design should be in suitable size which will compliment with respect to the target location of the
project. The area of the best design must be at the minimum with respect to other criterions.
Life Span
The design should provide a quality service by having acceptable power output. The design should also
be able to withstand long term operations and different environmental conditions with respect to the
area of installation. The degradation of the design must be at the minimum to maximize the usage to
the extent of the economic life of the converting technology.
Trade-Offs
The following table shows the trade-off for each type includes in the design project. Kirkwood and Sarin
quantitative method was used for the trade-off for final design of the project. The following equation will
be used in determining the criterion rank of each design based on the criteria. Equation 4.1 will be used
in determining the lowest importance while Equation 4.2 is for highest importance.
25
Reverse exponential Scoring

-(high-v)
1-e P
Ranking Scoring=
-(high-l0w)
1-e P
(4.1)
Exponential Scoring
-(low-v)
1-e P
Ranking Scoring=
(4.2)
-(low-high)
1-e
Where:
High: the high value
Low: the lowest value
v: the input value
P: the base value
Table 4-1 Efficiency.
Efficiency
Rank Score
Point
absorber
Overtopping/Terminator
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis Turbine
Vertical Axis
Turbine
98.3%
92.27%
78.28%
78.28%
0.6775
Tabulation of the efficiency and rank score of the efficiency of each design.
26
1.2
1
98.3
93.27
%
78.28
%
0.8
78.28
%
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Point Absorber
Terminator/Overtoppin
g
Vertical
Axis
Turbine
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis
Turbine
Figure 4-1 Graphical Representaion for Efficiency

The two methods of Kirkwood and Sarin were used to analyze the data above. The following formula
were:
-
Ranking Score =
-
- low-v
P
- low-high
P
This formula was used to analyze the Efficiency and the Life Span of all designs since the higher value
is being considered in the designs.
Table 4-2 Life Span
Life Span
Rank Score
Point
absorber
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis Turbine
Vertical Axis
Turbine
50yrs
50yrs
20yrs
15yrs
0.1223
Tabulation of the life span and rank score of the efficiency of each design.
27
60
50
1
50
50
04
30
20
20
15
10
0
Point Absorber
g
Vertical
Axis
Turbine
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis
Turbine
Figure 4-2 Graphical Representation for Life Span

were:
-
Ranking Score =
-
- low-v
P
- low-high
P
This formula was used to analyze the Efficiency and the Life Span of all designs since the higher value
is being considered in the designs.
Table 4-3 Land Area
Land Area
Rank Score
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis Turbine
Vertical Axis
Turbine
150m2
185m2
270m2
210m2
0.8194
0.646
Point
absorber
Tabulation of the land area and rank score of the efficiency of each design.
28
270m
300m
210m
250m
200m
185m
150m
150m
100m
50m
1
0m
1
Point Absorber
g
Vertical
Axis
Turbine
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis
Turbine
Figure 4-3 Graphical Representation for Land Area

were:
-
Ranking Score =
-
- high-v
P
- -high-low
P
This formula was used to analyze the levelized cost of energy and the land area of all designs since the
lowest value is being considered in the designs.
Table 4-4 Levelized Cost of Energy
Point
absorber
LCoE
Rank Score
7.23 wh
0.8804
2.2/Kwh
1
Seagen
Horizontal Axis
Turbine
Vertical Axis
Turbine
38.069 wh
11.486 wh
0.7745
Tabulation of levelized cost and rank score of the efficiency of each design
29
38.06
9
40/Kwh
11.04
6
20/Kwr
10/Kwh
8/Kwh
7.23
4/Kw
h
2.2
2/Kw
h
0
Point Absorber
g
Vertical
Axis
Turbine
Seagen
Horizontal
Axis
Turbine
Figure 4-4 Graphical Representation for Levelized Cost of Energy

were:
-
Ranking Score =
-
- high-v
P
- -high-low
P
This formula was used to analyze the levelized cost of energy and the land area of all designs since the
lowest value is being considered in the designs.
Table 4-5 TRADE-OFFS RESULT
Rank
Criterion
Efficiency
LCoE
Area
Life Span
Rank Score
5
3
2
1
Seagen
Horizontal Axis
Turbine
Vertical Axis
Turbine
1
0.8804
1
1
0.6775
1
0.8194
1
0
0
0
0.1223
0
0.7745
0.646
0
10.6412
9.0263
0.1223
3.6155
Point
absorber
30
Table 4.5 shows the ability to satisfy the criterion (Efficiency, LCOE, Area, Manufacturability and Life
Span) that has a scale from 0 to 1. Using the standard analysis of Kirkwood and Sarin, Therefore, the
Point Absorber Option 1) is the final design of the project.
31
Chapter 5
Final Design
Figure 5-1 Single Line Diagram with Additional Wave Power Plant
32
Point absorber
Figure 5-2 Pelton Turbine

Figure 3-3 shows the construction of the pelton turbine.
Pelton Turbine.
Pi = r * g * Cn2 *Hn * Qt
Where:
Cn = nozzle discharge coefficient, ~0.98
Hn = Hg- Htl
33
Where:
Hg = the gross head which is the vertical distance between water surface level at the intake and at the
turbine.
Htl = total head losses due to the open channel, trash rack, intake, penstock and gate or valve.These
losses approximately equal to 6% of gross head
Calculation:
Net head,
Hg=43m
Htl= 2.58m
Water flow capacity of each nozzles,

Ar= 0.03m2
Vr= 18.84m/s
IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance

tests to determine the hydraulic
performance of hydraulic
turbines, storage pumps and
pump-turbines.
Input power,
Where:
34

Where:

N = turbine speed,
(
pm
Where:
35

For water jet,

,in m3/s
Where:
The nozzle area (Aj) can be computed as
, in m2
water flow rate :
The nozzle area:


(
,in watts
36

(
= 180
Where:
Output power,
= 180

Short Circuit Analysis

VBase = 690 kV
SBase = 2.25 MVA
2.25MVA
XG=j72.4105 x
2.25MVA
XG=j72.4105 pu
2.25MVA
IEC Std 551-2006 , IEEE

Recommended Practice for
Calculating Short-Circuit Currents
in Industrial and Commercial
Power Systems
XT1=j18.1026 x
2MVA
37
XT1=j20.3654 pu
108.95<-89.9982 k
XTL=
13.2kV
2.25MVA
XTL=1.4069<-89.9982 pu
Short Circuit Current @ Each Generator
IEC Std 551-2006 , IEEE

Recommended Practice for
Calculating Short-Circuit Currents
in Industrial and Commercial
Power Systems
Xeq
2.25MVA
x
= 129.9994A
Isc j14.4821x3 x 690V
Use 0.13KAIC breaker
=
Short Circuit Current @ Step up Transformer, Primary Side

Xeq= j14.4821
1
2.25MVA
Isc= = = 129.9994A j14.4821 3 x 690V

Short Circuit Current @ Step up Transformer, Secondary Side
Xeq= j9.8421
1
2.25MVA
Isc= = = 9.9991A j9.8421
3 x 13.2kV

Short Circuit Current @ Transmission Line, Sending End
Xeq= j9.8421
1
2.25MVA
Isc= = = 9.9991A j9.8421
3 x 13.2kV

Short Circuit Current @ Transmission Line, Receiving End
Xeq= j9.8556
1
2.25MVA
Isc= = = 9.9854A j9.8556
3 x 13.2kV

Chapter 6
38
Design Simulation
Figure 6-1 Single Line diagram Simulation

Figure 6-1 shows the existing single line diagram of the LUBELCO and the additional power plant.
39
Load Flow
Table 6-1 Current Loading Violations
Branch
Name
Type
Over
Lim
(%)
Current Ampacity Loading

(kA)
(kA)
(%)
Under
Lim
Violation
(%)
No Current Violations Found!

Table 6-2 Bus Voltage Violations
Branch Name
Type
Bus
Voltage
Upper Lim
(kV)
(pu)
(%)
No Voltage Violations Found!
Lower Lim
(%)
Table 6-3 Transformer Violations

Library Code Capacity
Loading
Branch Name Library
Name
(MVA)
(MVA)
No Xfr Violations Found!
Over
(%)
Table 6-4 Transformer & Line Voltage Regulator Data

Branch
Library Code
Type
R (%)
Name
Name
18
2-W xfmr
1000-3-L
0.8000
29
2-W xfmr
1000-3-L
0.8000
38
2-W xfmr
1000-3-D
0.8000
Table 6-5 Branch Current Flow Values
Branch
Library
Type
Name
Code Name
19
Breaker
I4T - PH
22
Feeder
900
24
Breaker
MC 600A
30
Breaker
MC 600A
36
Breaker
MC 600A
39
Breaker
I4T - PH
41
Breaker
I4T - PH
HV Breaker
Breaker
MV I4TPH
from looc
Step up
Breaker
MV I4TPH
Trans
Violation
(%)
Under Viol.
(%)
X (%)
F Tap (pu)
T Tap (pu)
5.6900
5.6900
5.6900
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Current
(kA)
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.007
0.133
0.439
0.023
Angle (deg)
14.6
14.6
14.6
190.4
160.6
-16.8
13.3
Ampacity
(kA)
0.025
0.019
0.025
0.010
1.140
0.450
0.025
Loading
(%)
65
84
65
69
95
98
93
0.311
-15.4
0.320
97
0.311
-15.4
97
40
18
29
38
2-W xfmr
2-W xfmr
2-W xfmr
1000-3-L
1000-3-L
1000-3-D
0.311
0.007
0.023
-15.4
190.4
24.6
Table 6-6: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle
28
Pre-Flt
(V)
13200
Bus Bar
690
220762
19.17
84305 101199
131714
Generator to Poblacion
690
61218
26.91
22881
28792
36777
Looc
690
10059
6.047
4420
3718
5775
19.68
85523 103106
Bus Name
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
0.5C X/R
1014
5.315
NPC LUBANG D
690
224388
Power Plant
Table 6-7: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle
0.5C
Sym
456
0.5C
DC
357
Bus Name
28
Pre-Flt
( V )
13200
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
1014
1C
X/R
5.315
1C
Sym
456
Bus Bar
690
220762
19.17
84305
Looc
690
690
61218
10059
26.91
6.047
22881
4420
8589
9
2562
0
2211
85523
8789
6
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
224388
19.68
1C
DC
198
0.5C
Asym
579
133959
1C
Asym
497
120358
34350
4942
122637
Table 6-8: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle

Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
3C X/R
3C
Sym
3C DC
3C
Asym
28
13200
1014
5.315
456
19
456
Bus Bar
690
220762
19.17
84305
44590
95371
690
61218
26.91
22881
16060
27954
Looc
690
10059
6.047
4420
277
4428
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
224388
19.68
85523
46420
97309
41
Table 6-9: Bus (A) 3P Fault- Classical Method at StdCycle

Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
Std
X/R
Std
Sym
Std
DC
Std
Asym
28
13200
1014
5.315
381
381
Bus Bar
690
220762
19.17
83436
83436
690
61218
26.91
3866
3866
Looc
690
10059
6.047
4016
4016
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
224388
19.68
84655
84655
0.5C
Sym
395
0.5C
DC
309
0.5C
Asym
502
Table 6-10: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle

Pre-Flt
Inst "=""Bus Name
0.5C
Bus Name
( V )
"""
X/R
878
5.315
28
13200
Bus Bar
690
191186
19.17
73010
87641
114068
690
53016
26.91
19815
24935
31850
Looc
690
8712
6.047
3828
3220
5002
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
194326
19.68
74065
89292
116012
Table 6-11: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle

Pre-Flt
Inst "=""Bus Name
Bus Name
( V )
"""
878
28
13200
5.315
1C
Sym
395
1C X/R
171
1C
Asym
431
1C DC
Bus Bar
690
191186
19.17
73010
74391
104233
690
53016
26.91
19815
22187
29748
42
Looc
690
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
Table 6-12
8712
6.047
3828
1915
4280
194326
19.68
74065
76120
106207
LL Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle
Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
3C
X/R
3C
Sym
3C DC
3C
Asym
28
13200
878
5.315
395
16
395
Bus Bar
690
191186
19.17
73010
38616
82593
690
53016
26.91
19815
13908
24209
Looc
690
8712
6.047
3828
240
3835
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
194326
19.68
74065
40201
84272
Table 6-13: Bus (A) LL Fault- Classical Method at Std Cycle

Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
28
13200
Bus Bar
690
690
Looc
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
690
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
878
Std
X/R
Std
Sym
Std
DC
Std
Asym
5.315
359
359
191186
19.17
72632
72632
53016
26.91
5730
5730
8712
6.047
3644
3644
194326
19.68
73687
73687
43
Table 6-14: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at 0.5

Cycle
Pre-Flt Inst "=""Bus Name
Bus Name
( V )
"""
1008
28
13200
0.5C
0.5C Sym
X/R
5.315
454
355
0.5C
Asym
576
0.5C DC
Bus Bar
690
219123
19.17
83679
100448
130736
690
59351
26.91
22183
27914
35655
Looc
690
12102
6.047
5317
4473
6948
NPC LUBANG D
Power Plant
690
222747
19.68
84898
102352
132979
Table 6: Bus (A) -15 LG Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle

Pre-Flt
Inst "=""Bus Name
Bus Name
( V )
"""
1008
28
13200
1C
X/R
5.315
1C
Sym
454
1C
DC
197
1C
Asym
494
Bus Bar
690
219123
19.17
83679
85262
119464
690
59351
26.91
22183
24838
33302
Looc
690
12102
6.047
5317
2661
5946
NPC LUBANG D Power

222747
690
Plant
Table 6-16: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle
19.68
84898
87253
121740
Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
3C
X/R
3C
Sym
3C DC
3C
Asym
28
13200
1008
5.315
454
18
454
Bus Bar
690
219123
19.17
83679
44259
94663
690
59351
26.91
22183
15570
27102
Looc
690
12102
6.047
5317
333
5328
44
NPC LUBANG D Power

222747
690
Plant
Table 6-17: Bus (A) LG Fault- Classical Method at Std
Cycle
19.68
84898
46080
96597
Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
Std
X/R
Std
Sym
Std
DC
Std
Asym
28
13200
1008
5.315
426
426
Bus Bar
690
219123
19.17
83391
83391
690
59351
26.91
8570
8570
Looc
690
12102
6.047
5111
5111
NPC LUBANG D Power

222747
19.68
690
Plant
Table 6-18
LLG Fault- Classical Method at 0.5 Cycle
Pre-Flt
Inst "=""Bus Name
0.5C
Bus Name
( V )
"""
X/R
1057
5.315
28
13200
84611
84611
0.5C
Sym
476
0.5C
DC
373
0.5C
Asym
604
Bus Bar
690
220126
19.17
84062
100908
131334
690
60559
26.91
22634
28482
36381
Looc
690
11623
6.047
5107
4296
6673
NPC LUBANG D Power

Plant
690
223753
19.68
85281
102814
133580
Table 6-19: Bus (A) LLG Fault- Classical Method at 1 Cycle

Pre-Flt
Inst "=""Bus Name
Bus Name
( V )
"""
1057
28
13200
Bus Bar
690
690
1C
X/R
5.315
1C
Sym
476
206
1C
Asym
519
220126
19.17
84062
85652
120011
60559
26.91
22634
25344
33980
1C DC
45
Looc
690
NPC LUBANG D Power

Plant
690
11623
6.047
5107
2555
5710
223753
19.68
85281
87647
122290
Table 6-20: Bus (A) LLG Fault- Classical Method at 3 Cycle

Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
3C
X/R
3C
Sym
3C DC
3C
Asym
28
13200
1057
5.315
476
19
476
Bus Bar
690
220126
19.17
84062
44462
95096
690
60559
26.91
22634
15887
27653
Looc
690
11623
6.047
5107
320
5117
NPC LUBANG D Power

Plant
690
223753
19.68
85281
46288
97033
Table 6-21
LLG Fault- Classical Method at Std Cycle
Bus Name
Pre-Flt
( V )
Inst "=""Bus Name

"""
Std
X/R
Std
Sym
Std
DC
Std
Asym
28
13200
1057
5.315
420
420
Bus Bar
690
220126
19.17
83484
83484
690
60559
26.91
5351
5351
Looc
690
11623
6.047
4748
4748
NPC LUBANG D Power

Plant
690
223753
19.68
84704
84704
46
Figure 6-2 Protective Device Coordination

Figure 6-2 shows the protective device coordination (PDC) done in the system. Each device and equipment
was applied by the PDC so that the system will ensure its safety.
47
Chapter 7
Conclusion
After the formulation different designs in wave power plant, engineering constraint were used to
determine the best possible design that will sustain the deficit power in Lubang Island in the next
following years. The constraint are based upon the availability of the resources of renewable energy
and desired characteristics of the client.
After the step by step process, point absorber has won the tradeoff. Also, the project obejectives were
attained by winning the design. First, point absorber can compensate the insufficient supply of electrical
energy in year of 2021. Second, it can provide a less expensive to the people of Lubang Island. Lastly,
it will utilize the renewable energy that is available in the island which is the wind.
Using the paladin software, the system parameters were obtained by checking the full report after
conducting load flow analysis. With the power generation, the 2 MW deficit power in Lubang will be
covered. Satisfying and overcoming the all the problems that will be faced for the following years, this
design project is considered as a success.
Lastly, standards play a vital role in governing the system and processes, such as IEC, IEEE, ANSI, ISO,
etc., and must always incorporate into the design to ensure that the design is safe, efficient and reliable.
48
Reference
From Books:
Kiameh, Philip (2012). Power Generation Handbook. McGraw-Hill Companies, United States of
America Wayne, H. W. (2007). Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers. McGraw-Hill Incorporated,
United States of America.
Gasch, Robert. Wind Power Plants Fundamentals, Design, Construction and Operation Second Edition.
Gonen, Turan (2008). Electric Power Distribution System Engineering. Taylor and Francis Group LLC,
Florida
Online Sources:
Publications/freepublications/publication/essentials3.pdf
https://www.iea.org/
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/52688.pdf
AmandaCuellar_Thesis_June2012.pdf
https://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/
Energy Content in Common Energy Sources. (n.d.). Retrieved February 03, 2016, from
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/energy-content-d_868.html
Transformer rating, Losses, and Short-circuit Impedance Specifications. (2016, January). Retrieved from
http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/10-Mva-Amorphous-alloy
oilimmersed_60333898712.html?spm=a2700.7724838.30.1.0kEHfr&s=
49
Appendix A
Calculation of Trade-Offs
Efficiency
Point absorber
Terminator/Overtopping

Pin Losses
Efficiency=
Pin
78.28 =
868.43k Losses
868.43k
Losses=193.3k
Pin Losses
Efficiency=
Pin
78.28 =
994.2846 k Losses
994.2846 k
Losses=215.9586 k
50
LCOE
Point Absorber
Equipment
Generator
Tidal Turbine
Total
Price
125,213,400
361, 727,600
No. of Pieces
1
1
Total Price
361, 727,600
125,213,400
486,941,000
Operation and Maintenance = 0.3 x Investment Cost

Operation and Maintenance = 0.3 x 486,941,000
Operation and Maintenance = 146,082,300
Cost of Seagen horizontal Axis Turbine

Equipment
Price
Generator
173,752,447
Tidal Turbine
681,333,333
Total
No. of Pieces
3
3
Total Price
521,257,400
2,044,000,000
2,565,257,400

Operation and Maintenance = 0.3 x 2,565,257,400
51
Vertical Axis Turbine

Equipment
Generator
Tidal Turbine
Total
Price
62,000,000
196,000,000
No. of Pieces
3
3
Total Price
186,000,000
588,000,000
774,000,000

Equipment
Generator
Tidal Turbine
Total
Price
33,00,000
117,000,000
No. of Pieces
1
1
Total Price
33,00,000
117,000,000
150,000,000

52
Life Span
Design
Vertical Axis Turbine
Seagen horizontal Axis Turbine
Point Absorber
(Yrs)
15
20
50
50
Calculation of Rank Scores:

Ranking Score =
Formula if the high values are preferred.
Ranking Score =
Formula if the low values are preferred.
Efficiency
Formula used for setting the high and low values:
High=98.3%
Low=78.28%
P=preferred value of the client
Ranking Score =
Formula if the high values are preferred.
Point Absorber:
Ranking Score =
- 78.28-98.3
100
- 78.28-98.3
100
Ranking Score = 1
Terminator/Overtopping:
Ranking Score =
- 78.28-92.27
100
- 78.28-98.3
100
53
Ranking Score = 0.6775

Vertical Axis Turbine:
Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =0
- 78.28-78.28
100
- 78.28-98.3
100
Seagen Horizontal Axis Turbine:

Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =0
- 78.28-78.28
100
- 78.28-98.3
100
LCOE:
High=38.069
Low=2.2
Ranking Score =
Point Absorber:
Ranking Score =
- 38.069-7.23)
100
- 38.069-2.2
100
Ranking Score =0.8804

Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =1
- 38.069-2.2)
100
- 38.069-2.2
100

Ranking Score =
- 38.069-11.486)
100
- 38.069-2.2
100

54
Ranking Score =
- 38.069-38.069)
100
- 38.069-2.2
100
Ranking Score =0
Life Span
High=50
Low=15
Point Absorber:
Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =1
- 15-50
100
- 15-50
100
Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =1
- 15-50
100
- 15-50
100

Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =0
- 15-15
100
- 15-50
100

Ranking Score =
- 15-20
100
- 15-50
100
Area
Since there is huge discrepancy between the areas of each design, low and high values are
set.
High=270
low=150
55
Point Absorber:
Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =1
- 270-150
100
- 270-150
100
Ranking Score =
- 270-185
100
- 270-150
100
Ranking Score = 0.8194

Ranking Score =
- 150-210
100
- 270-150
100

Ranking Score =
Ranking Score =0
- 150-270
100
- 270-150
100
56

Design of 2 MW Power Plant Using Renewable Energy For LUBELCO Lubang Islands Revised

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Design of 2 MW Power Plant Using Renewable Energy For LUBELCO Lubang Islands Revised

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Design of 2 MW Power Plant Using Renewable Energy for LUBELCO Lubang Island, Mindoro

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

Title Page .................................................................................................................................................. i

Figure 6-1 Single Line diagram Simulation .....................................................................................39

Does the design meet

Figure 2-2 Distance of Looc Poblacion from the Lubang LPP

Table 2-1 Load Forecasting

Peak Load (MW)

Reserve Capacity (MW)

Load Projection in 6 years

Reserve Capacity in 10 years

Peak Demand (KW)

Energy Sales (MWH)

Table 2-3 Power Capacity

Dependable Capacity (MW)

Table 2-4 Load Feeder (2015)

Figure 2-3 Map of Lubang Island

From 12MN-12MN 0.704MW

Figure 2-4 Single Line Diagram

Figure 3-1 Schematic Diagram of Additional Power Plant

Stage 1: Transmission System

NEC Section 240-3: General

Power loss in transmission line

IEC 60287, Series for calculating

Line current at the primary side of the transformer

As per PEC Part 1, Table

IEC 60287, Series for calculating

IEC 60287, Series for calculating

Stage 3: Generation System

Figure 3-2 Single Line Diagram

Option 1: Point absorber

Figure 3-3 Pelton Turbine

Water flow capacity of each nozzles,

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance

Calculation of Turbine speed (N)

N = turbine speed, in rpm

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

specific speed, in rpm

For Water jet Velocity (Vj):

= Water jet velocity, in m/s

For water jet,

Calculation of nozzle dimensions

The nozzle area:

Calculation of maximum turbine efficiency

Then the hydraulic efficiency (hth) can be computed as:

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

Figure 3-4 Kaplan Turbine

Calculation of Turbine speed (N)

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

For Water jet Velocity (Vj):

For water jet,

Calculation of nozzle dimensions

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

water flow rate :

Calculation of maximum turbine efficiency

Then the hydraulic efficiency (hth) can be computed as:

IEC:41-1991 filed acceptance tests

Option 3: Seagen Horizontal Axis Turbine

Figure 3.5 Seagen Horizontal Axis Turbine

IEC/TS 62600-200, Section