Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Choices
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Financial
Performance
Partnership
Financial
Reactive Condition
Proactive Reduced Expense
Annual Expenditure
Net Savings
Quick Paybacks
Financing
Equity Contributions
Multiple Funding Streams
ROI
Priorities
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Fiscal Year
Partnership
Performance
Dependence / Independence
Training
Risk Allocation
Measurement & Verification
Reporting
Utility Expenses
O&M Expenses
Energy Usage & Demand
Occupant Comfort
Complaint Reduction
Carbon Emissions
P e rc e n t C h a n g e
Year
2004
5 8 .9 6
2005
7 0 .3 7
2006
7 8 .4 1
2007
9 2 .8 9
4 7 .0 9
4 7 .1
4 6 .2 3
8 5 .9 5
c
D ie s e l ($ /g a l)
1 .8 1
2 .4 1
2 .8 1
2 .7 8
E le c tr ic
5 .8 7
5 .8 1
5 .9 7
6 .0 2
b
G a s o lin e ($ /g a l)
1 .8 5
2 .2 7
2 .6 5
2 .6 6
C o a l A n th r a c ite
C o a l B itu m in o u s
d
H e a tin g O il ($ /g a l)
1 .5 4
2 .0 4
2 .4 2
d
N a tu r a l G a s ($ /m c f)
1 0 .7 5
1 2 .8 2
1 3 .8 8
1 3 .3 9
P ro p a n e
6 0 .1 1
7 3 .5 1
9 2 .1 2
1 0 1 .8 7
4 1 .4 4
5 6 .4 9
6 9 .7 5
7 0 .3 8
a
W T I C r u d e ($ /b a rre l)
a
W e s t T e x a s In te rm e d ia te .
O n -h ig h w a y re ta il.
2 .4 6
W e ig h tin g
Annual
17%
33%
Increase
1
9
.3
5
%
1 1 .4 3 %
19.2%
0 .0 2 %
-1 .8 5 %
27.5%
1 6 .5
36.5%3 3
-1
.0
2
%
2 .7 5 %
0.9%
2 2 .7
17
22.3%
3 2 .5
1 8 .5
37.0%
1 9 .3
8 .3
14.9%
2 2 .2 9 %
2 5 .3 2 %
23.2%
3 6 .3
2 3 .5
23.3%
50%
E
1 8 .4 7 %
8 5 .9 2 %
-1
0 .8 4 %
0 .3
1 .8
-3 .5
1 0 .5 8 %
0 .9
A v e ra g e re g u la r p u m p p ric e .
R e s id e n tia l a v e ra g e .
Turnaround
Transformation Definition
Trans`for`ma`tion n. The process of motivating
organizational members to alter their patterns of
behavior in alignment with shifting demands of the
external environment.
Transformation Formula
Tr = f(D, M, P)
Tr = Transformation
D = Dissatisfaction
M = Model of future state
P = Process
Inventory
What do I have?
How old is it?
What is its condition?
How long was it expected to last?
How is it operating?
Is it wasting energy?
Is it causing complaints?
Is it costing $$ to maintain?
Will it cause an emergency upon failure?
Better Question:
How well can you
communicate your
situation?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Financial Measures
$ energy / $ Earnings
Btu / $ Earnings
Btu / sq ft
$ energy / sq ft
or
Productivity Measures
1.
2.
3.
4.
Annual Use
Increase
Annual Cost
Escalation
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
18.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
8.2%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
215,000
140,000
16,000
8,500
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
221,880
166,180
16,176
9,197
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
228,980
197,256
16,354
9,951
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
236,308
234,142
16,534
10,767
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
243,869
277,927
16,716
11,650
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
251,673
329,899
16,900
12,605
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
259,727
391,591
17,085
13,639
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
0.0%
$
$
$
85,100
-
$
$
$
91,483
-
$
$
$
98,344
-
$
$
$
105,719
-
$
$
$
113,648
-
$
$
$
122,172
-
$
$
$
131,335
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.6%
0.0%
$
$
$
3,800
-
$
$
$
4,583
-
$
$
$
5,527
-
$
$
$
6,665
-
$
$
$
8,038
-
$
$
$
9,694
-
$
$
$
11,691
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
3.0%
0.0%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Energy Budget
Maintenance Budget
Facility & Vehicle Budget
Total Budget
Millage Value
Facility & Vehicles
% of Budget
Millage Required
2008
Cost
Typical Escalation
4.6%
2.0%
2009
383,300
85,100
468,400
2010
418,016
91,483
509,498
2011
2012
2013
2014
458,068
504,416
558,201
620,772
693,733
98,344
105,719
113,648
122,172
131,335
556,411
610,136
671,849
742,944
825,068
$ 5,634,962
$ 2,997,310
$ 5,894,170
$ 3,057,256
$ 6,165,302
$ 3,118,401
$ 6,448,906
$ 3,180,769
$ 6,745,556
$ 3,244,385
$ 7,055,851
$ 3,309,272
$ 7,380,420
$ 3,375,458
8.3%
0.16
8.6%
0.17
9.0%
0.18
9.5%
0.19
10.0%
0.21
10.5%
0.22
11.2%
0.24
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Load Profiles
Interval Data
Sub-metered Data
Energy Allocation by Cost Center
Energy Use by Process
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
Jan
Annual Load
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Consecutive Mondays
900
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
800
Demand KW
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
Time of Day
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Billing errors
Rate structure and applicable riders
Rate assignment
Deregulated supply of energy commodity
Reliability and quality of energy supply
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
80%
Amount of Time
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
60%
40%
20%
800 KW has a 3.5% probability of occuring.
That is equivalent to 306 hours per year.
0%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Demand KW
Facility walkthroughs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Contrast to Benchmarks
Electric { $0.06 to $0.10 per kWh }
Natural Gas { $9.00 to $12.00 per MCF}
Fuel Oil (non-highway) { $3.50 per gal }
Coal { $120 per ton }
Gasoline { $3.50 per gal }
Diesel (highway) { $4.50 per gal }
Average Fuel Economy Auto { 20 to 25 mpg }
Average Fuel Economy Sm Truck { 15 to 20 mpg }
Do your costs compare?
Per Account
Per Building
Per Vehicle class
1.
2.
3.
4.
EUI by Activity
Energy Intensity for
Sum of Major Fuels
(thousand Btu/
square foot)
Northeast
Principal Building Activity
Education ........................................
Food Sales ......................................
Food Service ...................................
Health Care .....................................
Inpatient ........................................
Outpatient .....................................
Lodging ...........................................
Retail (Other Than Mall)...................
Office ..............................................
Public Assembly ..............................
Public Order and Safety ..................
Religious Worship ...........................
Service ............................................
Warehouse and Storage .................
101.6
248.1
272.8
212.2
275.3
84.7
92.3
65.0
101.2
89.2
132.5
52.1
79.8
41.6
Midwest
86.3
219.1
218.8
205.6
272.2
124.4
109.0
102.7
108.8
101.7
105.9
52.8
85.0
74.7
South
75.5
187.7
283.4
169.8
226.7
60.9
96.9
68.7
87.0
93.2
113.1
38.3
66.3
26.7
West
77.6
Q
243.8
179.6
246.8
115.3
103.7
63.2
72.1
91.2
Q
27.6
80.0
39.0
2.
Building envelope
Boiler and steam distribution
HVAC equipment
Electrical supply system
Lights, windows and reflective surfaces
Hot water distribution
Air compressors and air distribution
Motors
Manufacturing processes
1.
2.
3.
Commissioning
Retro-Commissioning
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Efficiency of Equipment
Efficiency of Equipment
Maintenance Procedures
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
Corrective Maintenance
2.
Must be timely
Must be done correctly the first time
Preventative Maintenance
Efficiency of Equipment
Efficiency of Equipment
Control Systems
System Upgrades
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Lighting
Over-sized Equipment
Motors (Fans and Pumps) & VFDs
Advanced controls
Steam trap replacements
Condensing boilers
Insulation
System redesign
Efficiency of Equipment
Efficiency of Equipment
1.
Alternate Fuels
2.
2.
3.
Organizational Integration
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Supply
Use
Equipment
Organizational
Integration
Programs
Projects
Accessible
0%
Load Profiles
0%
Monthly Bills
0%
Interval Data
0%
0%
Reporting
0%
Error Resolution
Sub-Metering
0%
0%
Supplier Choice
0%
0%
Rate Optimize
0%
0%
Risk Management
0%
Account Management
0%
Walk Through
0%
Diagnostic Audit
0%
0%
Operating Procedures
0%
DE Audit
0%
Commissioning
0%
On-going Monitoring
0%
System Upgrades
0%
Corrective Maint
0%
Preventive Maint
0%
Systems Control
0%
Lighting Upgrades
0%
Standards
0%
Alternate Fuels
0%
New Technology
0%
System M&V
0%
Project Approval
0%
0%
Energy Planning
0%
0%
0%
Results Auditing
0%
Resource Mgmt
0%
0%
Budget Preperation
0%
Accountability
0%
Data
Data
M onthly Bills
Monthly
Benchm ark & KPI
Benchmark
Reporting
100%
0%
100%
0%
Load Profiles
Profiles
Load
Interval Data
Projects
Projects
100%
0%
100%
0%
Sub-M etering
Sub-Metering
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
Optim ize
Rate Optimize
100%
0%
100%
0%
M anagem ent
Account Management
100%
0%
W alk Through
Through
Walk
100%
0%
100%
0%
Error Resolution
Resolution
Error
Supply
Supply
Program s
Programs
Supplier Choice
Choice
Supplier
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
Diagnostic Audit
Audit
Diagnostic
Operating Procedures
100%
0%
100%
0%
Com m issioning
Commissioning
100%
0%
100%
0%
M onitoring
On-going Monitoring
100%
0%
DE Audit
Audit
DE
Use
Corrective Maint
M aint
Corrective
100%
0%
Preventive Maint
M aint
Preventive
100%
0%
System Upgrades
Upgrades
System
100%
0%
Equipm ent
Equipment
System s Control
Systems
100%
0%
Lighting Upgrades
100%
0%
Standards
100%
0%
Alternate Fuels
100%
0%
New Technology
100%
0%
M &V
System M&V
100%
0%
Project Approval
100%
0%
Organizational
Integration
Integration
100%
0%
Energy Planning
100%
0%
M anager Role
Defined Energy Manager
100%
0%
100%
0%
Results Auditing
100%
0%
Resource Mgmt
M gm t
100%
0%
Financial Impact
Im pact & Incentives
100%
0%
Budget Preperation
0%
100%
Accountability
0%
100%
10
Overview
Process Flowchart
Time
Money
Expertise
Cause
1
Effect
Cause
3
Cause
2
Cause
4
Cause
5
11
Total
Electric
Other Fuels
28.2%
2.8%
25.4%
19.8%
18.4%
1.4%
12.1%
2.1%
10.0%
8.6%
7.9%
0.7%
4.6%
4.3%
0.3%
4.3%
0.4%
3.9%
4.0%
3.7%
0.3%
3.1%
2.9%
0.2%
2.4%
2.2%
0.2%
12.8%
4.3%
8.5%
100.0%
49.0%
51.0%
Total $ Spent
Total kBTU
$ per Sq Ft
Energy Use Index kBTU / Sq Ft
Total $ Spent
Total Departmental $ Spent
Total Consumption (Gallons or Miles)
$ per Mile or $ per Hour
Efficiency of Use MPG or Hours/gal
Total Maintenance $
12
in
in
in
in
energy savings?
maintenance savings?
improved quality of service?
improved comfort levels?
Funding Improvements
Piecemeal approach
Cross over two fiscal periods to double the impact
Bond Issue
Construction Options
Design-Bid-Build
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Identify
Need
Budget
Build
Performance Contracting
Classic
Reduce Scope Procurement
Cycle
Appropriate
Design
Bid
Review
Costs
13
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Identify
Need
Identify
Need
Budget
Classic
Procurement
Cycle
Budget
Classic
Procurement
Cycle
Appropriate
Appropriate
Design
Reduction in scope from funding shortfalls
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Identify
Need
Identify
Need
Budget
Classic
Procurement
Cycle
Appropriate
Design
Bid
Budget
Classic
Reduce Scope Procurement
Cycle
Appropriate
Design
Bid
Review
Costs
Review
Costs
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Traditional Design-Bid-Build
Identify
Need
Identify
Need
Budget
Build
Classic
Reduce Scope Procurement
Cycle
Appropriate
Design
Bid
Budget
Build
Classic
Reduce Scope Procurement
Cycle
Appropriate
Design
Bid
Review
Costs
Review
Costs
14
Performance Contracting
Performance Metrics
Performance Contracting
Identify
Need
Identify
Need
Budget
Budget
Commissioning
The
PC
Cycle
The
PC
Cycle
Appropriate
Change
Course
Campus Audit
Design /
Build
Appropriate
Change
Course
Campus Audit
Performance Contracting
Performance Contracting
Identify
Need
Identify
Need
Budget
The
PC
Cycle
Budget
The
PC
Cycle
Appropriate
Change
Course
Campus Audit
Design /
Performance Contracting
Performance Contracting
Identify
Need
Performance Metrics
Identify
Need
Budget
The
PC
Cycle
Change
Course
Campus Audit
Design /
Build
Commissioning
Appropriate
Budget
Commissioning
Appropriate
Change
Course
Campus Audit
Design /
Build
Commissioning and verification
of project performance after construction
The
PC
Cycle
Appropriate
Change
Course
Campus Audit
Design /
Build
The ESCO is your partner for the long term:
15 year performance guarantee
15
Performance Contract
Minimum Project Scope to Accomplish Results, no
Waste
Maximize use of Construction Dollars = Lower Total
Project Cost
Guaranteed Operational Performance
Low Cost to Install, Operate and Maintain
Single Source of Responsibility, no Finger Pointing,
Issues Resolved
Project Cost Control
Driven by Best Value, Savings must Justify Cost
Identify opportunities
Collect data to quantify the impact of change
Improve conditions through implemented changes
Control the environment and evaluate the outcome
Identify the effectiveness of the change
Correct false assumptions
Make adjustments in behaviors and equipment
16