Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
changed?...2007
Source:
This document is based on secondary information accessed from
reliable databases and available literature.
Caveat: While all care has been taken to ensure that the data and information
provided in this Report is accurate, the Academy will not take any responsibility for
decisions that a company or an audit firm may take on the basis of this report.
1.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Top 25 firms How the fee per audit changed ------------------------------- 19
The Top 25 firms by number of audits. The Average fee charged per
audit, the fee per Rupee of Turnover. The Best fee and Lowest fee.
11. Ranking of firms 2007 and 2006 --------------------------------------------------- 20
Top 50 audit firms in 2007 ranked on the basis of three parameters. The
corresponding rank in 2006.
12. Industry wise share of the Top auditors ----------------------------------------- 22
What is the share of the Top 5 auditors (By fee charged) in each
Industry.
13. Industry wise Top Auditors (Based on fee charged per Audit) ---------- 25
The Trigger:
In 2007, India spent 0.01319% of its turnover on audit related fees. That is, for
every Rs 100,000 that it clocked as turnover it spent Rs 13.2 to confirm that its
financial processes were in order.
If you said, Hey, that isnt much, take a look at recent history. The corresponding
number for 2006 was Rs 13.0 and that for 2005 was Rs 14.1. Interestingly, in 2007
the total audit fees rose by 34% while India Incs turnover went up by 32%. Surely,
auditors shouldnt be complaining.
194 audit firms audited the 437 companies in our sample. This means that on an
average, each firm audited about 2 companies. And if you consider the fact that
149 firms audited one company apiece, you realize that while the audit space is
crowded, it is cornered by a handful of auditors.
In 2005, when we wrote the first-of-its-kind research report on Who are Indias Top
Auditors, we worked on a population of 1,394 companies. These were picked on
a what-were-available basis. To us that sample was fine since it also happened to
cover 80% of Indias 1,000 most valuable companies as named by the magazine
Business Today. Now, two years down the road, in 2007, our focus is a shade
different. Our research is now not focused primarily on who are Indias Top
Auditors. Instead our focus is on:
a. How much is the audit cost
b. What is the composition of this cost
c. How has this cost moved over time
d. Is this cost significant and
e. Is there a sort of racism in the profession in that do some firms get away
with a lot more fees than the others.
In the process we also track who are Indias top auditors!
The principal trigger for this report was a corporates query on whether increase in
audit fees was a rule or an exception. And we realized that there was no organized
data on it. Worse still, for the public there is no ready made information about the
composition of audit fees; for the companies there is no easy to find data on what
their auditors charge others; for the auditors there is no single point reference on
PRIME ACADEMY
what their peers charge their clients. So whichever way one turned, the gyan was
missing! We decided to step in to fill the gap.
We chose to look only at the companies that form the broad-based BSE 500 Index.
Of-course this would mean that we would have a small sample. But thats par on
course because by covering the BSE 500 we would actually be covering 91% of
the market capitalization and 73% of the Year 2007 turnover of the companies
listed on Indias bourses. All said, public interest lies only in these companies and
not in the scores of unlisted companies and partnership firms.
From the list of 500 we dropped banks because their presence would distort both
the turnover and the audit fees. Also since banks are audited by several auditors,
it would be nearly impossible for us to know who audited which branch. We also
dropped those companies for which full data in the manner required by us was not
available. In that way we had to do away with 84 companies. We then added 21
companies to make a few industry verticals representative. This took the total tally
to 437 companies, our final sample population. Of the 437 companies data for 424
companies (97% of the sample) was current in that they had their year ending any
day after March 31, 2006.
At 437, the sample may appear unimpressive but remember it accounts for a
market capitalization of Rs 51,839,409 million. Thats approximately 76% percent
of BSEs total market capitalization as on 6th Dec 07.
Rs. Million
Head
FY 2007*
Stat audit
1,333.58
59.5%
1,044.02
62.3%
27.7%
Taxation
178.00
7.9%
141.31
8.4%
26.0%
Certification
242.99
10.9%
163.94
9.8%
48.2%
Out of Pocket
131.40
5.9%
90.12
5.4%
45.8%
Others
353.37
15.8%
236.96
14.1%
49.1%
Total
Composition
FY 2006
Composition
% Growth
2,239.345
PRIME ACADEMY
The low and small turnover companies, representing the large underbelly of
Indias companies, accounted for 78 % of the sample size and only 17% of
the sample turnover. The high end companies, namely the high and superhigh, accounted for 13% of the sample size and 74% of the sample turnover.
Clearly Paretos law was at work!
The growth in total audit fees across these 5 categories hasnt been consistent.
While the low turnover companies saw their aggregate audit expenditure rise
by 37%, the small turnover companies had an increase of 23%. In contrast,
the medium turnover companies spent 45% extra. At the high end, the high
turnover companies had their audit fees rise by 41% while the super high
turnover companies paid their auditors more by 33%. Clearly, there is no
discernible pattern.
Whereas the audit fee to turnover percent at the macro level has been flat across
two years, (0.013% ie Rs 13 per Rs 1 Lakh of turnover) suggesting that there is some
relationship between fees and turnover, the interesting find is that this percent is
significantly higher in the case of the Low Turnover companies inidcating perhaps
that audit fees is more flat than variable. This is largely confirmed by the fact that
the correlation between audit fee and turnover is 0.38
Category
No of
Companies
<1000
Low
218
959,162
5.6%
49.9%
37.0%
0.051%
1000-2499
Small
121
1,992,149
11.7%
27.7%
23.3%
0.028%
2500-4999
Medium
40
1,413,502
8.3%
9.2%
44.7%
0.020%
5000-9999
High
27
1,902,027
11.2%
6.2%
41.4%
0.016%
Super high
31
10,715,993
63.1%
7.1%
32.8%
0.006%
437
16,982,832
100.0%
100.0%
33.5%
0.013%
> 10000
Grand Total
Turnover
Rs million
% of
Turnover
% of
Fee
Companies growth
Audit fee to
turnover CY
(Rs. Million)
FY 2007
Composition
FY 2006
Composition % Growth
Stat audit
305
61.8%
233
64.7%
30.7%
Taxation
40
8.1%
33
9.2%
20.9%
Certification
57
11.6%
37
10.3%
54.5%
OOP*
17
3.3%
13
3.6%
27.3%
Others
75
15.2%
44
12.2%
70.8%
Total
494
100.0%
360
100.0%
37.0%
320
57.3%
259
57.3%
23.4%
Taxation
44
7.8%
38
8.4%
14.9%
Certification
68
12.2%
54
12.0%
26.3%
OOP
32
5.7%
23
5.0%
40.3%
Others
94
16.9%
78
17.3%
20.2%
Total
558
100.0%
452
100.0%
23.3%
160
58.1%
127
66.3%
26.7%
Taxation
24
8.7%
17
9.1%
38.6%
Certification
26
9.5%
10
5.1%
171.1%
OOP
12
4.2%
10
5.2%
15.9%
Others
54
19.5%
27
14.3%
97.5%
Total
276
100.0%
191
100.0%
44.7%
Stat audit
154
51.5%
125
58.9%
23.4%
Taxation
36
12.1%
25
11.9%
43.9%
Certification
15
5.0%
11
5.2%
36.6%
OOP
35
11.8%
12
5.6%
199.5%
Others
59
19.6%
39
18.4%
50.7%
Total
299
100.0%
211
100.0%
41.4%
395
64.4%
301
65.1%
31.4%
Taxation
34
5.6%
28
6.0%
22.9%
Certification
76
12.4%
52
11.3%
46.0%
OOP
36
5.9%
33
7.1%
10.8%
Others
72
11.7%
49
10.5%
47.8%
Total
613
100.0%
462
100.0%
32.8%
GRAND TOTAL
2,239
1,676
33.6%
PRIME ACADEMY
10
Total Fees
2007
Total Fees
2006
Growth %
Consumer Discretionary
70
236
190
24%
Consumer Staples
28
154
124
24%
Energy
19
172
146
18%
Financials
26
137
77
78%
Health Care
35
139
125
11%
Industrials
100
442
313
41%
Information Technology
54
297
209
42%
Materials
83
383
313
22%
Telecommunication Services
193
104
86%
Utilities
15
87
75
16%
Total
437
2,239
1,676
34%
Industry
For sure, there has been an across the board growth with each sector registering
double digit growth.
The principal gainers were the auditors of the Telecommunication Services where
the hike was a whopping 86%. The Financials vertical elected to increase the
cost of audit by 78%. Both Industrials (41%) and Information Technology (42%),
too chose to increase fees handsomely. Incidentally no vertical saw a fall in fee.
Health Care (11%), Utilities (16%) and Energy (18%) clocked the lowest growth
rates.
The growth across industry verticals has however been skewed given that the
standard deviation of growth for the population was large at 15%.
PRIME ACADEMY
11
Year
Others
Total
Consumer
Discretionary
FY 2007
64%
9%
10%
3%
14%
100%
FY 2006
63%
8%
12%
4%
13%
100%
Consumer Staples
FY 2007
54%
15%
3%
6%
23%
100%
FY 2006
57%
17%
3%
8%
15%
100%
FY 2007
58%
2%
25%
9%
5%
100%
FY 2006
55%
3%
31%
8%
4%
100%
FY 2007
63%
6%
13%
3%
16%
100%
FY 2006
76%
6%
5%
3%
10%
100%
FY 2007
63%
8%
10%
6%
13%
100%
FY 2006
61%
9%
11%
7%
12%
100%
FY 2007
57%
9%
9%
10%
15%
100%
FY 2006
65%
10%
9%
5%
12%
100%
Information
Technology
FY 2007
66%
6%
12%
4%
12%
100%
FY 2006
72%
7%
6%
4%
11%
100%
Materials
FY 2007
53%
10%
10%
7%
21%
100%
FY 2006
52%
10%
10%
7%
22%
100%
Telecommunication FY 2007
Services
FY 2006
65%
3%
13%
2%
18%
100%
75%
3%
4%
1%
18%
100%
Utilities
FY 2007
57%
11%
2%
5%
25%
100%
FY 2006
59%
9%
1%
4%
27%
100%
FY 2007
60%
8%
11%
6%
16%
100%
FY 2006
62%
9%
10%
5%
14%
100%
Energy
Financials
Health Care
Industrials
AVERAGE
Best Fee
12
OOP
Lowest Fee
AUDITOR
Price Waterhouse
Chaturvedi & Shah
BSR & Co
Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Chaturvedi & Shah
FEES
103
88
61
42
40
In respect of each of the 10 Industries, the Best, the Worst, the Average and the
Median fees are laid out.
In eight out of the 10 industries, the top grosser was one amongst the audit Big
4. Chaturvedi and Shah (Reliance Industries; Energy) as also N M Raiji & Co
(Indian Hotels; Consumer Discretionary) were the exceptions.
The best average fees ( Rs 27.6 M) was in the Telecom sector. Energy, the
second best was by contrast, streets behind at Rs 9.1 M. At Rs 3.4 M, Consumer
Discretionary had the lowest average fees.
The best median fees lies in the Telecom sector and the worst is in the Utilities
sector.
Based on audit fee as a % of turnover, the Financials, Telecom, Healthcare, and
Information Technology sectors are great paymasters while Energy at 0.003%
is way behind the pan India mark of 0.013%.
Industry
Auditor
Rs M
Utilities
29.70
Telecom Services
Price Waterhouse
102.53
Materials
28.59
TCS Ltd
Information Technology
S B Billimoria & Co
18.30
Industrials
41.93
Health Care
Price Waterhouse
13.70
Financials
S B Billimoria & Co
26.75
Energy
87.70
Consumer Staples
37.80
Consumer Discretionary
N M Raiji & Co
16.20
PRIME ACADEMY
13
INDUSTRY
AUDITOR
Rs M
Utilities
T N Shah & Co
0.13
Telecom Services
0.67
Materials
B Bhushan & Co
0.12
Information Technology
0.10
Industrials
S R Batliboi & Co
0.02
Sun Pharmaceuticals
Health Care
0.11
BSEL Ltd
Financials
0.11
Energy
0.15
Consumer Staples
0.09
Donear Ltd
Consumer Discretionary
0.04
Percent to
turnover CY*
Percent to
turnover PY*
Utilities
5.77
1.71
0.011%
0.011%
Telecommunication Services
27.62
5.30
0.037%
0.044%
Materials
4.61
2.82
0.014%
0.015%
Information Technology
5.49
3.72
0.029%
0.027%
Industrials
4.42
1.78
0.017%
0.017%
Health Care
3.96
2.90
0.030%
0.036%
Financials
5.29
3.26
0.042%
0.040%
Energy
9.07
2.72
0.003%
0.003%
Consumer Staples
5.50
3.18
0.023%
0.023%
Consumer Discretionary
3.37
2.41
0.017%
0.019%
5.12
2.72
0.013%
0.013%
ALL INDIA
*CY is 2007 & PY is 2006
14
Year
Stat audit
Taxation
Certification
OOP
Others
Total
Consumer
2007
152
21
24
32
236
Discretionary 2006
120
15
22
25
190
26%
40%
9%
(16%)
29%
24%
2007
83
23
35
154
2006
71
21
10
18
124
Growth
16%
10%
8%
(10%)
92%
24%
2007
101
44
15
172
2006
80
45
11
146
25%
(11%)
(3%)
36%
68%
18%
2007
86
18
22
138
2006
59
78
46%
70%
338%
100%
173%
77%
2007
87
11
14
18
139
2006
76
11
14
15
125
Growth
14%
3%
(3%)
0%
23%
11%
2007
252
40
41
45
64
443
2006
202
32
27
16
36
313
Growth
25%
25%
51%
181%
78%
41%
2007
197
18
34
12
36
297
2006
150
14
13
24
209
Growth
31%
26%
164%
50%
51%
42%
2007
201
37
37
26
81
383
2006
163
30
30
23
68
313
Growth
24%
24%
25%
13%
20%
22%
2007
125
25
34
193
2006
78
18
104
61%
120%
528%
200%
86%
86%
2007
50
10
22
87
2006
44
20
74
Growth
13%
49%
103%
33%
9%
17%
Total
2007
1,334
178
243
133
353
2,241
Total
2006
1,044
141
164
90
237
1,676
Growth
28%
26%
48%
48%
49%
34%
Growth
Consumer
Staples
Energy
Growth
Financials
Growth
Health Care
Industrials
Information
Technology
Materials
Telecom
Services
Growth
Utilities
PRIME ACADEMY
15
equipment
enga
includes
dict
including
services
Com
he
inani pand
Th
rises%
anies
ed
ution
e ! re!and
asp
B f% roducts
companies%
other
1
apcoa
-ne inpand
g0ct
ol
q
oce
ran
re
ed%
other
related
ing
/s in%
consumableufu
The%
service
R coerie
The11
producers
16
ro
quipment.
s.-re
Vera
M re
. emar
! f - eting
ice so
ict!
i roincludes
utor
Ddq 0 ma
- B!companies
V a ement
no.
M cr
MM
durable
are
es
household
goods
and
ersona
consumer
rans
- ma
services
! 1 suctod)
ct
! re
.P- and
f
- ! M
roviderortationM
he
Ths
ne
g
inan
i i Sector
s resSector
Sectos rmanufacturers
in
uct
re.
tr
gract
retailing
companiespasp
el pasph
Id nduct
sSector
erpmar
etspand
su
Distri consumer
ors
erpcenters.
ood,
roducts
Material Sector
Covers commodity-related manufacturing industries and includes companies that
manufacture chemicals, construction materials, glass, paper, forest products and
related packaging products, metals, minerals and mining companies, including
producers of steel.
Utilites Sector
Covers those companies which are into electric, gas or water utilities, or companies
that operate as independent producers and/or distributors of power.
PRIME ACADEMY
17
Number of firms
149
20
7
0
4
3
3
1
1
6
194
Companies
149
40
21
0
20
18
21
8
9
151
437
The composition of audit firms clearly indicates that the audit space is crowded.
Notice that 194 firms audited the 437 companies in the sample. Thats about 2
companies per firm. The data also conclusively proves that the audit space is
dominated by a select few. Notice that just 6 of the 194 firms have a client base of
more than 9 in the sample. They take up 151 of the 437 audits indicating that just
6 3% of the firms audit 34.6% of the population.
Between them, the Big Four namely Deloitte Haskins & Sells, including A F
Ferguson (57), Price Waterhouse (25), S R Batliboi & Co (25) and BSR & Co (17)
audit 124 companies. Very interestingly, 149 firms audit 1 company apiece. That
is, 76% of the firms audit 34.5% of the population. The message: the big players
have a huge share of the cake.
18
Table 10: Top 25 (By no. of Audits) How the fee per audit changed
Audit firm
Rs Million
Percent
Fee/Audit Fee/Audit Fee/Turn Fee/Turn
Audits
CY
PY
CY
PY
Rs Million
Max
Min
fees
fees
47
6.63
5.09
0.025%
0.025%
41.93
0.11
Price Waterhouse
40
8.64
6.40
0.044%
0.043%
102.53
0.34
S R Batliboi & Co
25
7.44
5.99
0.031%
0.036%
24.90
0.02
BSR & Co
17
9.51
4.85
0.023%
0.024%
61.40
1.55
12
7.33
5.31
0.027%
0.027%
22.60
1.85
A F Ferguson & Co
10
8.44
7.99
0.018%
0.021%
23.60
2.80
S B Billimoria & Co
11.18
8.98
0.021%
0.025%
26.75
0.86
19.19
12.37
0.009%
0.009%
87.70
0.15
9.00
8.68
0.027%
0.029%
37.80
1.69
N M Raiji & Co
5.97
4.42
0.004%
0.004%
16.20
0.31
3.30
1.86
0.023%
0.024%
7.44
0.39
B K Khare & Co
3.10
2.45
0.032%
0.032%
4.60
1.37
3.72
3.32
0.033%
0.033%
5.60
0.19
Lodha & Co
1.85
1.79
0.015%
0.020%
3.80
0.73
C C Chokshi & Co
1.98
1.73
0.015%
0.010%
4.96
0.63
Haribhakti & Co
2.14
1.66
0.028%
0.029%
3.11
0.96
MGB & Co
3.60
3.51
0.032%
0.039%
7.80
1.51
5.73
4.43
0.010%
0.010%
13.80
0.13
2.64
1.32
0.074%
0.039%
4.95
1.00
6.13
3.20
0.022%
0.018%
14.20
1.06
RSM & Co
3.20
1.81
0.043%
0.035%
6.40
1.24
Sorab S Engineer
4.30
3.06
0.043%
0.032%
9.70
1.21
2.31
1.99
0.007%
0.007%
2.53
2.00
1.55
1.50
0.000%
0.001%
2.72
0.66
10.93
5.93
0.035%
0.027%
18.86
3.83
PRIME ACADEMY
19
20
Rank 2007
Rank 2006
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
6
9
10
11
17
12
16
14
13
15
18
24
21
20
22
25
19
23
turnover audits and 25% weight for rank based on number of audits. The weighted
ranks were then aggregated and the firm with the best aggregate rank was named
first. Similar ranking was done for 2006 in order to arrive at comparatives.
A study of the ranking pattern clearly indicate the huge presence of what the Audit
World knows as the Big 4.
Seven of the top 10 belong to the Big 4. Three of them belong to the Deloitte
brand namely Deloitte Haskins & Sells (Rank #1), S B Billimoria & Co (#6) and A F
Ferguson & Co (#8); and two belong to the PwC staple namely Price Waterhouse
(#2) and Lovelock & Lewis (#10). Also making its presence felt is BSR & Co (#5),
the Indian arm of audit major KPMG. Completing the roll call is S R Batliboi & Co
(#4), the Indian representative of Ernst & Young.
RANKING SUMMARY
Haribhakti & Co
Sundaram & Srinivasan
G P Kapadia & Co
J C Bhalla & Company
Sorab S Engineer
Mehra Goel & Co
Price Waterhouse Coopers
Kadam & Co
M S Krishnaswami & Rajan
Ray & Ray
Goel Garg & Co
RSM & Co
S V Ghatalia & Associates
Shah & Co
Price Waterhouse LLP
Sharma Goel & Co
G Basu & Co
Dhawan & Co
S S Kothari Mehta & Co
P D Kunte & Co
K S Aiyar & Co
Karnavat & Co
S N Dhawan And Co
K K Mankeshwar & Co
K M Agarwal & Co
Rank 2007
Rank 2006
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
27
26
35
28
30
29
31
32
34
33
64
44
41
38
46
40
43
36
47
42
48
37
39
45
58
21
Table 12: Industry-wise share of the Top 5 auditors on the total fees
Industry
Utilities
Telecommunication Services
Materials
Information Technology
Industrials
Health Care
Financials
Energy
Consumer Staples
Consumer Discretionary
TOTAL
TOP 5 auditors
% share
92%
99%
51%
78%
57%
78%
78%
90%
79%
48%
69%
Others %
Share
8%
1%
49%
22%
43%
22%
22%
10%
21%
52%
31%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Take Industrial for instance. While this vertical consists of 100 companies, just 5
audit firms take up 57% of the audit fee. Similarly in Material of the 83 companies,
the top 5 take home 51% of the audit cost. Another example is Information
Technology. The top 5 from a population of 54 encash 78% of the cake. Except for
two verticals in the case of the rest more than 50% of the fee goes to the biggies.
The moral: It pays to be big.
22
WAY AHEAD
There are clear signs of the winds of change.
Audit fees are beginning to rise as public accounting firms begin to pay higher to
retain talent. Gone are the days when audit could be done for a small price. The
risks in audit engagements are on the rise. The regulating authorities no longer
treat the audit firms with kid gloves. The profession is now a business. And
Corporates have to pay for value.
The sunrise sectors like telecom, Information Technology, Health Care and Energy
have all been captured by a handful of players. Almost everywhere more than
50% of the sector is captured by a select few. Any boom here would lead to a
boom for these few audit firms. Audit engagements are rapidly changing hands
as brand has become increasingly important. A consolidation of sorts among the
audit fraternity is for sure. Survival will be that of the fittest.
PRIME ACADEMY
23
Auditor
Utilities
0.06
19.17
Price Waterhosue
9.35
3.03
12.38
2.40
3.40
5.80
2.10
1.50
3.60
TOP 5 AUDITORS
54.76
25.19
79.95
4.60
2.02
6.61
TOTAL
59.36
27.20
86.56
Price Waterhouse
67.00
35.53
102.53
BSR & Co
43.30
18.10
61.40
S B Billimoria & Co
13.00
4.20
17.20
1.90
3.40
5.30
Dhawan & Co
4.36
0.93
5.29
129.56
62.16
191.72
1.52
0.08
1.60
131.08
62.24
193.33
S R Batliboi & Co
41.68
25.15
66.83
33.03
15.10
48.12
11.16
17.13
28.29
Price Waterhouse
18.99
8.95
27.94
9.50
14.80
24.30
TOP 5 AUDITORS
114.35
81.13
195.47
OTHERS
123.89
63.14
187.03
TOTAL
238.24
144.27
382.50
Price Waterhouse
69.52
29.14
98.66
BSR & Co
49.07
3.68
52.75
22.69
23.27
45.97
S B Billimoria & Co
17.30
5.94
23.24
7.24
4.24
11.48
165.83
66.27
232.10
48.88
15.62
64.50
214.71
81.89
296.60
OTHERS
TOTAL
S N Guha & Co
Information Technology
24
Total
2007
39.00
19.11
TOP 5 AUDITORS
Materials
All Others
2007
17.20
T R Chadha & Co
OTHERS
Telecommunication Services
Stat + Tax
Audit 2007
21.80
Stat + Tax
Audit 2006
16.50
All Others
2006
11.55
Total
2006
28.05
Fee/Audit
2007
19.50
20.09
0.03
20.12
0.005%
0.007%
9.59
5.45
2.00
7.45
0.019%
0.019%
6.19
1.70
6.50
8.20
0.023%
0.0132%
5.80
2.10
1.20
3.30
0.002%
0.002%
3.60
45.84
21.28
67.12
0.011%
0.012%
9.99
4.80
2.81
7.62
0.012%
0.010%
0.94
50.64
24.09
74.74
15
0.011%
0.011%
5.77
63.30
18.66
81.96
0.056%
0.070%
102.53
0.20
0.20
0.036%
NA
61.40
9.80
2.60
12.40
0.020%
0.027%
17.20
1.90
1.50
3.40
0.038%
0.031%
5.30
4.27
0.68
4.95
0.009%
0.009%
5.29
79.47
23.44
102.91
0.038%
0.045%
38.34
1.05
0.13
1.18
0.017%
0.021%
0.80
80.52
23.57
104.09
0.037%
0.044%
27.62
36.96
24.15
61.11
0.026%
0.031%
9.55
29.52
14.57
44.09
0.010%
0.013%
8.02
8.16
5.70
13.85
0.031%
0.026%
9.43
12.69
8.30
20.99
0.039%
0.034%
4.66
7.90
14.50
22.40
0.007%
0.008%
24.30
95.22
67.21
162.44
23
0.016%
0.017%
8.50
97.44
53.46
150.89
60
0.012%
0.014%
3.12
192.66
120.67
313.33
83
0.014%
0.015%
4.61
52.08
20.89
72.96
10
0.042%
0.032%
9.87
39.81
3.90
43.71
0.015%
0.018%
8.79
18.75
2.47
21.22
0.048%
0.032%
6.57
16.60
4.00
20.60
0.012%
0.015%
11.62
5.90
2.01
7.91
0.046%
0.080%
5.74
133.14
33.27
166.41
27
0.026%
0.024%
8.60
30.81
11.72
42.53
27
0.056%
0.049%
2.39
163.95
44.99
208.94
54
0.029%
0.027%
5.49
PRIME ACADEMY
25
SECTOR
Auditor
Industrials
S R Batliboi & Co
Health Care
Energy
10.32
69.97
16.80
23.00
39.80
33.90
4.67
38.57
Price Waterhouse
18.24
15.61
33.85
TOP 5 AUDITORS
169.70
83.35
253.05
OTHERS
122.81
66.39
189.20
TOTAL
292.51
149.73
442.25
Price Waterhouse
25.99
9.99
35.98
19.40
11.18
30.58
BSR & Co
11.47
4.55
16.02
S R Batliboi & Co
12.19
3.27
15.46
7.59
2.51
10.10
TOP 5 AUDITORS
76.65
31.50
108.14
OTHERS
21.49
8.93
30.42
TOTAL
98.14
40.43
138.56
S B Billimoria & Co
38.25
8.17
46.42
16.19
4.39
20.58
5.74
13.13
18.86
4.50
6.59
11.09
9.82
0.67
10.49
TOP 5 AUDITORS
74.49
32.95
107.44
OTHERS
19.57
10.43
30.00
TOTAL
94.06
43.38
137.44
65.55
33.90
99.45
6.37
15.32
21.69
11.93
3.79
15.72
6.60
5.00
11.60
3.81
1.98
5.79
94.26
59.99
154.25
9.98
8.07
18.05
104.24
68.06
172.30
TOP 5 AUDITORS
OTHERS
TOTAL
AUDIT FEE ANALYSIS 2007
Total
2007
70.86
59.64
K K Soni & Co
26
All Others
2007
29.74
Financials
Stat + Tax
Audit 2007
41.12
Stat + Tax
Audit 2006
36.76
All Others
2006
11.28
Total
2006
48.04
Fee/Audit
2007
10.12
44.96
11.17
56.12
0.017%
0.018%
10.00
4.30
1.40
5.70
0.056%
0.010%
39.80
28.39
4.05
32.44
0.057%
0.063%
9.64
15.18
5.73
20.91
0.036%
0.046%
4.84
129.58
33.63
163.21
26
0.029%
0.028%
9.73
104.59
45.45
150.04
74
0.011%
0.012%
2.56
234.18
79.08
313.25
100
0.017%
0.017%
4.42
21.95
6.99
28.95
0.065%
0.069%
9.00
15.06
11.70
26.76
0.042%
0.047%
4.37
12.41
4.54
16.95
0.021%
0.051%
5.34
10.82
5.00
15.82
0.025%
0.034%
3.09
7.67
2.78
10.45
0.017%
0.020%
10.10
67.90
31.01
98.92
20
0.033%
0.043%
5.41
19.49
6.14
25.63
15
0.022%
0.023%
2.03
87.40
37.15
124.54
35
0.030%
0.036%
3.96
29.97
5.10
35.08
0.037%
0.040%
11.60
11.67
3.41
15.08
0.060%
0.088%
4.12
4.00
1.62
5.62
0.072%
0.049%
18.86
4.15
4.15
0.077%
0.051%
11.09
3.83
0.48
4.31
0.032%
0.045%
10.49
53.63
10.62
64.24
12
0.046%
0.048%
8.95
10.16
2.70
12.86
14
0.033%
0.023%
2.14
63.79
13.32
77.10
26
0.042%
0.040%
5.29
48.55
33.80
82.35
0.008%
0.009%
33.15
5.95
11.94
17.89
0.003%
0.003%
21.69
14.83
6.13
20.95
0.070%
0.139%
5.24
5.20
3.80
9.00
0.001%
0.001%
11.60
3.31
1.63
4.94
0.020%
0.018%
2.90
77.84
57.30
135.14
10
0.004%
0.004%
15.42
6.49
4.55
11.05
0.001%
0.001%
2.01
84.33
61.85
146.18
19
0.003%
0.003%
9.07
PRIME ACADEMY
27
SECTOR
Auditor
Consumer Staples
Total
2007
49.34
22.19
6.41
28.60
Price Waterhouse
7.74
9.56
17.30
5.80
7.69
13.49
11.88
0.54
12.42
TOP 5 AUDITORS
85.50
35.66
121.16
OTHERS
20.28
12.60
32.89
105.79
48.26
154.05
A F Ferguson & Co
22.90
10.93
33.83
16.97
6.84
23.81
N M Raiji & Co
15.10
6.38
21.48
12.24
4.61
16.84
S R Batliboi & Co
10.74
5.82
16.56
TOP 5 AUDITORS
77.94
34.58
112.52
OTHERS
95.52
27.72
123.24
173.46
62.30
235.76
TOTAL
28
All Others
2007
11.45
A F Ferguson & Co
TOTAL
Consumer Discretionary
Stat + Tax
Audit 2007
37.89
Stat + Tax
Audit 2006
36.81
All Others
2006
10.00
Total
2006
46.81
Fee/Audit
2007
16.45
20.12
7.67
27.79
0.018%
0.022%
14.30
6.23
2.33
8.56
0.038%
0.023%
5.77
4.40
2.91
7.31
0.806%
0.404%
13.49
8.28
0.22
8.50
0.102%
0.083%
6.21
75.83
23.13
98.97
11
0.030%
0.029%
11.01
16.46
8.82
25.28
17
0.013%
0.012%
1.93
92.29
31.96
124.25
28
0.023%
0.023%
5.50
18.85
11.43
30.28
0.013%
0.016%
8.46
9.52
5.52
15.04
0.031%
0.028%
3.40
12.52
2.92
15.43
0.044%
0.041%
5.37
11.49
4.27
15.75
0.011%
0.013%
5.61
7.88
5.69
13.57
0.068%
0.069%
5.52
60.24
29.83
90.07
21
0.020%
0.021%
5.36
75.33
24.52
99.85
49
0.015%
0.018%
2.52
135.58
54.34
189.92
70
0.017%
0.019%
3.37
PRIME ACADEMY
29
S No AUDIT FIRMS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
30
RANK
2006
6
180
134
80
153
151
166
161
111
168
115
138
159
71
97
21
110
76
95
5
127
19
164
3
59
105
9
1
158
62
36
113
103
96
43
169
84
35
183
77
74
82
64
193
133
190
27
100
73
S No AUDIT FIRMS
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
RANK
2007
29
94
163
114
110
88
97
173
193
96
49
15
50
58
46
175
33
16
129
134
47
53
84
19
75
168
21
10
194
63
181
127
155
60
34
104
115
31
159
22
128
65
174
7
177
148
80
62
64
RANK
2006
28
93
174
107
108
112
89
143
194
86
45
14
58
53
48
173
32
13
121
119
37
49
118
24
83
179
20
10
192
63
181
126
172
50
34
116
124
29
163
22
125
72
155
7
176
150
79
61
65
S No AUDIT FIRMS
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
Nishinihon
NM RAIJI & CO
O P Bagla & Co
P Raj & Co
P B Vijayaraghavan & Co
P C Bindal & Co
P Chandrasekar
P D Kunte & Co
P G Bhagwat
P K Lilha & Co
P K Rungta & Co
P L Tandon & Co
P Murli & Co
P S Subramania Lyer & Co
P V R K Nageswara Rao & Co
P.N. Raghavendra Rao & Co.
Patankar & Associates
Patwari & Co
Picardo & Co
Prakash Chandra Jain & Co
Price Waterhouse
Price Waterhouse Coopers
Price Waterhouse LLP
R Chadha & Associate
R Nagpal Associates
R G N Price & Co
R Laddha
R M Ajgaonkar & Co
R R Patel & Co
R S Agarwala & Co
R S Bharucha & Co
Raju And Prasad
Raman S Shah & Co
Ramanlal G Shah & Co
Ramasamy Koteswara Rao & Co
Rao & Swami
Rathi & Co
Ray & Ray
Rohira Mehta & Associates
RSM & Co
S Janardhan & Associates
S Tandon & Associates
S B Billimoria & Co
S Gopala Krishna Murthy
S J Thaly & Co
S Janardhan & Associates
S K Patodia & Associates
S Kumar Gupta & Associates
RANK
2007
98
147
86
112
83
165
187
45
55
119
106
123
151
51
101
142
105
143
176
100
2
32
40
136
160
190
158
113
131
135
59
192
172
162
179
77
118
35
109
37
81
120
6
126
74
144
191
169
RANK
2006
87
135
85
141
78
157
184
42
54
91
104
101
170
57
106
132
98
142
165
92
2
31
46
123
154
189
171
94
120
139
51
188
167
160
177
81
148
33
109
44
128
102
8
136
68
156
191
162
S No AUDIT FIRMS
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
S N Dhawan And Co
S N Guha & Co
S R Batliboi & Associates
S R Batliboi & Co
S R Dinodia & Co
S S Khandelwal & Co
S S Kothari Mehta & Co
S V Ghatalia & Associates
S V R & Associates
S V Rangan
Sanghavi & Company
Shah & Co
Shantilal Mehta & Co
Sharma Goel & Co
Sharp & Tannan
Shashikant Paril & Associates
Shyam Snder Mangala & Co
Singhi & Co
Singrodia Goyal & Co
SNB Associates
Sorab S Engineer
SRB & Associates
Srikanth & Shanthi Associates
Sriramamurthy & Co
Sundaram & Srinivasan
Suresh C Mathur & Co
Suresh Chandra & Associates
Suri & Co
T N Shah & Co
T R Chadha & Co
Talati & Talati
Thacker Butala Desai
Thakur, Vaidyanath Aiyar & Co
Thar & Co
V D Joshi & Co
V K Dhingra & Co
V P Bansal & Co
V Parekh & Associates
V Sankar Aiyar & Co
V Shivkumar & Associates
Varma & Varma
Vatsaraj & Co
Venkat & Sujatha Associates
Vijay Prakash Gupta & Associat
Vijay Sehgal & Co
Vipin Aggarwal & Associates
Vishnu Ram & Co
Walker Chandiok & Co
RANK
2007
48
17
12
4
138
137
44
38
170
188
85
39
182
41
11
149
52
23
121
69
30
57
166
161
27
72
18
78
183
13
146
133
66
70
140
157
92
139
25
185
56
71
108
141
67
186
90
14
RANK
2006
39
15
17
4
187
130
47
41
152
185
99
38
178
40
11
146
70
25
117
60
30
56
175
144
26
69
18
67
145
12
131
147
66
140
137
129
88
122
23
182
52
55
114
149
75
186
90
16
PRIME ACADEMY
31
Participating Companies
32
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
3i Infotech Ltd
Information Technology
41
Consumer Discretionary
Energy
42
Consumer Discretionary
ABB Ltd
Industrials
43
Materials
Abbot Ltd
Health Care
44
Industrials
Industrials
45
Consumer Staples
ACC Ltd
Materials
46
Consumer Staples
Adalbs Ltd
Consumer Discretionary
47
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
48
Materials
Materials
49
Materials
10
Industrials
50
Industrials
11
Advanta Ltd
Consumer Staples
51
Industrials
12
Aftek Ltd
Information Technology
52
Industrials
13
Industrials
53
Consumer Discretionary
14
Financials
54
Industrials
15
Alembic Ltd
Health Care
55
Industrials
16
Industrials
56
Telecom Services
17
Consumer Discretionary
57
Materials
18
Industrials
58
Materials
19
Industrials
59
Biocon Ltd
Health Care
20
Materials
60
Bluestar Ltd
Industrials
21
Consumer Discretionary
61
Materials
22
Materials
62
Consumer Discretionary
23
Financials
63
BPCL
Energy
24
Consumer Discretionary
64
Brittania Ltd
Consumer Staples
25
Aptech Ltd
Consumer Discretionary
65
BSEL Ltd
Financials
26
Areva Ltd
Utilities
66
Health Care
27
Consumer Discretionary
67
Energy
28
Consumer Discretionary
68
Information Technology
29
Ashapura Ltd
Materials
69
Industrials
30
Industrials
70
Castrol Ltd
Materials
31
Industrials
71
CEAT Ltd
Consumer Discretionary
32
Consumer Discretionary
72
Industrials
33
Materials
73
CESC Ltd
Utilities
34
Information Technology
74
Materials
35
Industrials
75
Industrials
36
Health Care
76
Energy
37
Information Technology
77
Cipla Ltd
Health Care
38
Health Care
78
Materials
39
Consumer Discretionary
79
CMC Ltd
Information Technology
40
Consumer Staples
80
Consumer Staples
PRIME
34
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Utilities
Materials
Information Technology
Information Technology
Industrials
Information Technology
Information Technology
Industrials
Information Technology
Consumer Discretionary
Financials
Health Care
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Information Technology
Consumer Staples
Information Technology
Materials
Financials
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Materials
Information Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Energy
Health Care
Consumer Staples
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Industrials
Industrials
Materials
Information Technology
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Financials
Materials
Financials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Materials
Materials
Financials
Industrials
Information Technology
Industrials
Financials
Materials
Financials
Materials
Information Technology
Industrials
Materials
Industrials
Information Technology
Industrials
Financials
Materials
Industrials
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
Information Technology
Industrials
277 MTNL
Telecom Services
Industrials
Materials
Financials
Industrials
Information Technology
Materials
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Materials
Industrials
Industrials
Industrials
Industrials
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Health Care
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Utilities
Materials
Materials
Materials
Health Care
Financials
Information Technology
Information Technology
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Financials
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Industrials
Materials
Materials
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Utilities
Consumer Discretionary
Information Technology
Information Technology
Health Care
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Telecom Services
Industrials
Financials
Health Care
Industrials
Information Technology
Information Technology
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Energy
Materials
Health Care
Information Technology
Financials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Financials
301 ONGC
Energy
Health Care
Financials
Health Care
Materials
Health Care
Consumer Discretionary
PRIME ACADEMY
35
36
Health Care
Materials
Information Technology
Health Care
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Energy
Materials
Information Technology
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Staples
Materials
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Financials
Industrials
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Industrials
Energy
Information Technology
Materials
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Health Care
Industrials
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Information Technology
Materials
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Information Technology
Information Technology
Industrials
Consumer Staples
Financials
Consumer Discretionary
Telecom Services
Information Technology
Utilities
Materials
Energy
Materials
Information Technology
Energy
Health Care
Information Technology
Information Technology
Consumer Staples
Consumer Discretionary
Health Care
Industrials
Health Care
349 SAIL
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Information Technology
Information Technology
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
S No COMPANY
SECTOR
Materials
Materials
Information Technology
Health Care
Industrials
Financials
Utilities
Consumer Staples
Materials
Materials
Consumer Staples
Consumer Staples
Materials
Information Technology
Consumer Discretionary
Information Technology
Information Technology
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Health Care
Telecom Services
Utilities
Materials
Consumer Discretionary
Information Technology
Consumer Staples
Health Care
Consumer Discretionary
Health Care
Telecom Services
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Discretionary
Materials
Materials
Information Technology
PRIME ACADEMY
37