1

BEFOREDESIGNATEDCOURTUNDERM.P.I.D.ACTAT
BOMBAYCITYCIVIL&SESSIONSCOURT,ATMUMBAI.
MISC.APPLICATIONNO.397OF2016.
IN
R.A.No.13OF2016.
MonishBhandarkar.
Age:31,Occupation:Businessman
ResidentofRunwalnagar,B5block4,
PanchPakadi,Thane400601.
V/s.
TheStateofMaharashtra.
ThroughEOW,UnitIII,Mumbai

...Applicant.
...Respondent.

AND
MISCAPPLICATIONNO.398OF2016.
IN
R.A.No.12OF2016.
HareshBhadra.
Age:30,Occupation:Businessman
ResidentofRoomNo.7,Porbandarwalachawl,
Chiragnagar,GhatkoparWest,Mumbai400607.
...Applicant.
V/s.
TheStateofMaharashtra.
ThroughEOW,UnitIII,Mumbai
...Respondent.

Appearance:
Adv.Jainfortheapplicants.
SPPAdvocateGharatfortheState.
CORAM:

SPECIALJUDGE,MPIDACT.
D.P.SURANA(C.R.No.36)

DATED:

17thNovember,2016.
ORDER:

By these applications accused who were granted bail by

commonorderdtd.23.06.2016inBANo.24of2016andBANo.25of

2016 by these applications under sec. 439(1) (b) of the Cr.P.C. are
seekingmodificationbywayofrelaxationofthebailorders.
HeardAdv.JainfortheapplicantsandSPPAdv.Gharatforthe
State.Perusedtheapplicationandthebailorder.Alsoperusedsayfiled
bytheSPPwherein,hecontendedthatregularsurety/iesasperregular
conditionmaybeaccepted.SPPopposedtheapplication.
ApplicantsweregrantedbailconditiontoexecutePBandSBof
Rs.5Lakhseach.ApplicantshaveexecutedPBofRs.5Lakhsandareon
provisional cash bail on deposit of Rs. 5 Lakhs each. Applicants
submittedthattheyarefacingdifficultyinorganizingsolventsurety/ies
forRs.5Lakhs.Adv.Jainrequestedtoacceptsolventsurety/iesinthe
formofFDRforthebailamountorderbythisCourt.
InHighcourtinspection,practiceofacceptingsurety/iesin
theformofFDRisdeprecated.Applicantshavealreadydepositedcash
bailamountofRs.5Lakhs.ItisdifficultinCitylikeMumbaiorThane
toarrangefor the solventsurety/ies for Rs.5Lakhs.The residential
address of applicants at Thane or Ghatkopar is not disputed by the
prosecution.Itis not allegedbySPPthattheyhavejumpedthebail
conditions.Acceptanceofsuretyistosecurethepresenceofaccused.As
such,Iamoftheviewthat,inadditiontothecashbailamountofRs.5
Lakhsalreadydepositedbyaccused/applicantstheycanbedirectedto
furnishonelocalsuretyofRs.15,000/,whichwillservedthepurpose
ofsecuringpresenceofapplicants.Assuch,Iproceedtopassfollowing
order.
ORDER
Therequestofapplicantstoacceptsurety/iesintheformof
FDRstandsrejected.
In addition to the cash bail amount of Rs.5 lakhs each
alreadydepositedbyapplicants,andinmodificationbyrelaxationof

thebailcondition,applicantsarepermittedtofurnishonelocalsurety
ofRs.15,000/each.
OntherequestofAdv.Jain10weekstimeisgrantedto
applicants to furnish surety/ies, as per modified order. Till then
applicantswillbeonsameprovisionalcashbailalreadydeposited.
WithabovedirectionsbothMAstandsdisposedoff.
Date:

17/11/2016

(D.P.Surana)
Spl.Judge,MPIDAct&
Addl.SessionsJudge,
CityCivil&SessionsCourt,Gr.Mumbai.
OrderDictatedon :17/11/2016
Transcribedon :17/11/2016
Signedon
:17/11/2016
IaffirmthatthecontentsofthePDFfileorderarethesame,wordtoword,
aspertheoriginalorder.
NameofStenowithpost

NameoftheJudge(withC.R.no.)
Dateofpronouncementoforder
OrdersignedbytheP.O.on

Orderuploadedon

:VarshaN.Rajgole.
(H.G.Stenographer)
:HHJShri.D.P.SURANA(CR36)
:17/11/2016
:17/11/2016
: