,iIL1&sl!

::,$

Laittrre,\

Fuiiq\.mt-

\: t t-* *tu

- es.

iq3 - ilt0

,,Ai'i i"
{.-i.S.

YffiLf

i I01r

*istri*t 0ourt

f;astern CIistriet of

fu,,|*

LETTER OF ROGATORY

This writing will be submitted in the style of a letter of Rogatory after consultation advisement
and approval Chief Nanya Shabu el of the At-sik-hata nation of yamassee Moors We as

members of the Any-yu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors Declare the following United states code
2g usc 13 60 and who land include {but not limited to) Georgia North Carolina South Carolina
Alabama Florida Tennessee We are the lndigenous peoples of the aforementioned land with
geographic coordinates: 33degrees 36feet 36inches N. tatitude; -E4degrees LTfeet lTinches W.

longitude
1715 yamassee uprising and The trail of Tears which include Missouri is a historical event,
(HJ3
which has been acknowledge by the U.S. congress passing the following resolutions HJR- 3
IH) HJR 1g4 S con Resolution 26 in which the u.s. federal government under the command of

our peoples be they: yamassee, Hichiti, Choctow,

Cherokee, Moor olmac,Seminole, Yuchi,Washitaw and force them to walk west to Oklahoma
away from their traditional land which are illegally and unlawfully usurped by the United States
U.S. president Andrew Jackson rounded up

prior to the passing of the aforementioned U.S. congressional bills and the united nations
declarations on the right of lndigenous peoples our people's have had the most resistance from
the United States of America in exercising our right to self determination this despite the fact
that United states of American have pass presidential executive orders t3LA7 lmplementation
Human Right treaties and presidential proctamation 7500 guaranteeing our right to exercise our

tribal sovereignty and self determination

The lB57 U.S. supreme court decision Sanford vs Scott known as the Dred scott decision, which
has never been over turn has made it clear that no descents of Africans can be a Citizens of
united states of American this current state of affairs teads those descent of African/Moors who
are unfamiliar with international law united nations 2nd decade of the world's lndigenous

people and the fact that they can now self identify themselves as indigenous or tribal unable to
have a nationality or the ability to identify and clam their lndigenous inheritance in cord with
HJR 194

The legal limbo created by the Dred scott decision of 1857 coupled with the Jim crow laws and
the Christian Black codes of 1794 and the South Carolina negro act which are still use to this day
has put the descent of Africans living in American in a state less position this is cause these
judgment and
decent of Africans to rely on united states courts which have a history of biased
decision against not only Africans but native American as well.

All over American many African people claim not only their African heritage but lndian ancestry
as well. Many as called African American famities have lndian roots in any one of the various

tribes in American such as; Cherokee Choctaw, yamassee, yuchi, Seminole,

Yash itaw. Lumbee,Creeks etc.

Hjr 194 110 congress Lst session on February 27 2OO7 congress acknowledges that African
Americans were stripped on their names and in heritage

I2003 president George W Bush acknowledge in a trip to Goree lsland, Senegalthat

slavery "was one of the greatest crime of histoq/'.
July

The northwest ordinance enacted by congress in L787, which begins with the phrase "the

utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the lndians"

United States of American have consistently fault and resists, to this day also African Americans
claiming are lndigenous Status we have consult with chief Nanya shaabu from the At-sik-hata
nation of yamassee Moors in cord with the international law have declared proclaim our
indigenous rights our documentation has been legal recognize acknowledge certified
authenticated and confirmed as correct yet we still face persecution apartheid genocide rape
and kidnapping for manifesting our lndigenous rights as we are in title to by Law it is well know

that Africans in American who claim their indigenous status as native Arnerican/lndian are
subjected to persecution ridicule discrimination genocide abuse and scorn as if that is not
possible that they could be native American/lndian yet modern history is now unearthing and
uncovering facts to prove the assumption by American to be contrary archaeological evidence
Definition of the Unites states of America : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC Non profit
Delaware Corporation lncorporation Date 4//79189 File No 2L93946 UNITED STATES Of
AMERICA INC Non-profit Delaware Corporation lncorporation Date 4/t9189 File No. 2193946

Entity Name UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC Entity Kind CORPORATION Entity Type RELIGIOUS
NONPROFIT Residency DOMESTIC State DE Status VOID TAX INFORMATION Last Annual report
Filed : L99L

htt: / /www.state.de.us/corp/directweb.shtml

We have declared our selves Indigenous in tribaland claim our indigenous rights as we are in

title to in cord with

resolutionl94 and HJ resolution 3 we still face an up held battle by the

Corporation United States of America. We who have declared and claim our indigenous rights
face skepticism ridicule and scorn for daring to declare ourselves as lndigenous although the
congressional records been apologies from the U.5. congress allow us to do so, since in
American's legal system we are look upon as not having a legalor lawfully status/citizenship.
We as lndigenous Cherokee Moors are not Citizens of the United States of American (Religious
Corporation) And as such we are entitled to protection accord with the constitutional rights andthe lnternational rights as well. Our Statutory Declaration of our indigenous rights put us in
HJ

conflict mostly and consistently with U.S courts U.S Government and the localSTATE and U.S
Government agencies We are All native American and White we all have a valid treaty with the

____I

governor who is the Chief Magistrate of the State of Missouri via Statutory Declaration. UNILoS
Article 19 right of safe passage we are seeking clarity and thi: validity of actions taking by STATE
agents which have violated the various treaty UNDRIP civil political economic social culture
rights.

Jurat

E..""*tq

united Nations Declaration on the rigtrt of Indigenous PeoplesUnited Nations Convention on

socdev/
Ritttts, UnitedNations Charter; Article 55 &.56, Presidential
So"iuf g
""lt*ul
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S- Con' Res' 26 S' 1200, HJR-3

Affrmed to and subscribed before me this \

a"y of January
By:
Affiant UCC

Public

Produce

Identifrcation

TyPe and #

/f*
1-;-".444
f
Notary

rD

/\6,,

iudice

lrint /i*no

d{

-,

/4,s

My Commission ExPires

Nolary p_ubtic _ wotary Seat

or urssotiRt--'
h?tfr'; tJ, : f l?f il;f iX ii B %,Jt,J

.STATE
I

uommtssion #,i 58g.164g

Slztftt<tLl

1.

Do Judge Theresa Count Burke Michael Kellan Mullen Bryan L. Hettenbach Dale Glass

prosecutor Jeniffer M Joyce have a valid oath of office an lndemnity bond an Employee
ldentification number to be produced as evidence for the record with times places dates

of lnception?

2.

Do any of the Judges or prosecutor in question number

have the following (a)

knowledge of lnternational Law (b) knowledge or access to congressional records (c)

knowledge of or access to executive order (13107) presidential proclamation (7500) (d)
knowledge of HJR 194 (e) oaths to protect human rights to be produced as evidence for
the record human rights to be produced as evidence for the record?

3.

What are if any the consequences of the above agents for not being able to produce any
of the requested information as proof for the record?

4.

ls

5.

ls it true that a charter is permission for a corporation to do business or a document

the city of Saint Louis Corporation with a charter established in 1914 and is listed on
Dun Bradstreet? Can evidence be produced?

creating a corporation? Can proof be provided on the record?

6.

the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri the Saint Louis Metropolitan police
Department Medium Security Institution Corporations doing business with or within the
corporate city of Saint Louis? They are still listed on Dun & Bradstreet as well proof in
favor of or against is requested for the record?

7.

Do the city of Saint Louis and corporations doing business have members, citizens,

ls

residents, subjects or clients? ls this participation mandatory or by agreement?

8.

What are the stipulations for participation with the City of Saint Louis and other
corporation? Are you required to give up any rights? proof of these conditions are
requested for the record

9.

Do the City of Saint Louis and its affiliate corporations promote and respect the right

to

self-determination as is the mandate in lnternational Law via Executive Order (13107)

lnternational Convent on Civiland political rights and United Nations Declaration on the
Right of lndigenous Peoples? Proof is requested for the record?

10. How does codes ordinance rules regulations and statutes of the city of saint Louis apply
to peopte who are not Citizens residents subjects clients or members? Are these people
forced to comply? Forcefulty assimilated or are exceptions made? Proof is requested for

the record.

11. Do the City of Saint Louis its agents or agencies have any authority to promote or
practice slavery which has been prohibited internationally domestically and locally?
Proof is requested for the record?

it located? What is or was the date

of purchase and who was the previous owner? Proof is requested for the record

12- Do the city of Saint Louis own land and if so where is

land? Proof is
13. Can a corporation such the city of Saint Louis own or purchase lndigenous

requested for the record?

L4. Do contacts exist for the corporate city of Saint Louis and the corporate state of
Missourito do business together? When did this contact come into existence and when
does it expire? Who were the sighing agents or parties? What services do they offer and
goods are offered to purchase or sell? Proof is requested for the record
15. Can people contact with corporations? Are the contracts implied or expressed? Do the
contracts have to be bilateralor can a unilateral contract exist and be valid or
enforceable in a court of law? PrOof is request for the record
16. Can the city of Saint Louis or the state of Missouri which are corporation enforce
obligations on people who are not citizens' residents or member?
pg
17. Did Michael Kellan Mullen fotlow the mandate from the congressional records
ASZZZO May 11 1955 when he issued the warrant document lD number 16-STFTA-165?

1g. Does Dale Gtass have the authority to keep Michael Fullilove in prison on a invalid

warrant?
19. Can a warrant that is issued which violate RSMO 542.030 be valid?
20. Does any Judge have authority to make void a valid Treaty?

21. Do judges have obligations to report other judges who abuse their authority or violate

their Oath of Office?

22.The faulty or invalid warrant is the bases for a criminal charge should the chargers be
dismiss?

23. Are any of the Judges administering over a Cestui Que Vie Trust in this matter via
probate jurisdiction grant to them though article 5 of the Missouri Constitution?
24. lf the warrant by Judge Theresa Count Burke (3646 tllinois) is issued with a rubber stamp
is

the warrant valid and can this case be dismiss for its invalidity?

25. Can the prosecutor attorney or the judge in this matter produce the cusip number and

bid bond for the record? 1422-CR00351-01

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous Peoples&ttp://www.un.org./esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRlP8jn.Ulf) United Nations Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Charter; Article 55 & 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res. 26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Affirmed to and subscribed before me this

Produceldentification

lL

0", of January

rype and # rD

TIMOTHY

J.

1! I !

I,iUWrtY

Notai'y Public - l',:Dtary

Se al

STATE OF MlSSotiftl

Commissioned for St. Louis CountY

My Commission Expires: lipril 8, 2019
Commission # 15634648

5/716ooLr