Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bryan Hatch
CHEM101L
Excelsior College
Oleg Maksimov
Hatch 1
Hatch 2
Abstract
Hatch 3
Oil
Spray bottle
Adjustable voltage supply
2 metal plates
o One with a small orifice drilled through the center
Hatch 4
Hatch 5
To conduct the experiment the CRT was set to an intensity of 1nA and
kinetic energy of 100eV. Leaving the adjustable voltage supply set at 0V,
spray oil into the container and observe the droplets on the display. Adjust
the focus of the camera as required to see both the oil droplets and vertical
1mm line clearly. Once the focus is set spray the oil again this time picking
one drop and timing its decent for a minimum of 2 line increments (.250mm).
Record the time found in the time column of Table 1 and energize the
adjustable voltage supply. Slowly increase the voltage until the drop no
longer falls within the container. This adjustment will take time and as the
voltage approaches the value equal to the gravitational force applied to the
drop raise the voltage in smaller increments. If the drop falls outside the
camera view, spray the oil again and perform the timing and voltage steps
again. Record the value of the voltage applied to the plates once the drop no
longer moves within the container in the voltage column of Table 1. Repeat
this process for a minimum of 3 separate drops.
Now we must calculate the terminal velocity of the drop. Terminal
velocity is when the force from friction of the air equals the force of gravity
acting on the oil drop. The formula for terminal velocity is vt=d/t where d is
distance (in meters) the drop fell along the 1mm line and t is the time (in
seconds) it took the drop to fall that distance (Woodfield et al., 2014). Using
the equation vt=d/t calculate terminal velocity for each drop taking care to
remember 1m=1000mm. Record the terminal velocity in the terminal
velocity column Table 2.
Hatch 6
Next we must calculate the radius of the drop. The radius can be found
using the terminal velocity inserted into the equation r=(9.0407x10-5)(vt )
(Woodfield et al., 2014). Insert terminal velocity into the equation for vt and
calculate radius in meters. Record the drops radius in the radius column of
Table 2.
The next calculation is the drops mass. We use the radius (r) to
calculate the mass of the drop given the density of the oil (Woodfield et al.,
2014). For this oil the density is 3439.0 kg/m3. The equation for mass is
(3439.0 kg/m3)(r3). Insert the radius for r and calculate the drops mass.
Record this value in the mass column of Table 2.
Finally we must calculate the total electric charge of the drop (Qtot) and
then the charge of a single electron (C). We calculate the Qtot using the
equation Qtot=9.810x10-2 (m/V) where m is the mass of the drop and V is the
voltage applied to the plates for that drop (Woodfield et al., 2014). Insert
the mass and voltage for the respective drops and calculate the total charge.
Record this value in the total charge column of Table 2. The fundamental
electric charge of an electron (e) is 1.6x10-19C (coulombs). Divide your total
charge by e and round your answer to the nearest whole number (Woodfield
et al., 2014). This will give the total number of electrons on that drop. Divide
the total charge by the number of electrons to get the experimental value for
an electrons charge. Record this value in the electron charge column of
Table 2.
Hatch 7
Average the results for electron charge and calculate the percent error.
Take the average of the electron charge column of Table 2 and subtract
1.6x10-19. Next divide by 1.6x10-19 and multiply by 100 to calculate the
percent error.
kg difference but drop 2 was calculated to have 250 electrons while drop 3
only had 50. Drop 3 is more than double the size of drop 1 but drop 1 is
calculated to have 52 electrons compared to drop 3s 50 electrons. This
shows that size has minimal impact as to the quantity of electrons per drop.
To ensure my tracking of the drops distance of travel I chose drops,
which were close to or directly on the 1mm scaled line. Doing this made it
easy to track the drop as well as more accurately start and stop the
stopwatch during the drops travel. I then adjusted the voltage to the plates
by tens until the drop began to rise. I then lowered it by ones until the drop
began to fall. Finally I fine-tuned the voltage by 1/10 adjustments to the
voltage until the drop was suspended. After the data for a drop was record I
Hatch 8
would remove myself from the area and come back after a short break to
ensure I gave each run of the experiment unbiased or undistorted
observations.
My final average electron charge was 1.598x10-19 C, which is only 4x1022
C below Millikans findings. My average was found with only a 0.2% margin
Conclusion
In conclusion I was able to re-create Millikans experiment. My results
show that the electrical charge of an electron is quantifiable. My final value
for electric charge differed from the value of 1.602x10-19 most likely due to
human error when operating the stopwatch. This is the human error that
cannot be removed from any experiment.
Hatch 9
Tables
Table 1
Drop
1
2
3
Voltage (V)
Time (t)
Distance (d)
Table 2
Drop
Terminal
Radius (r)
Mass (m)
Total
Charge of
Velocity
Charge
one
(vt)
(Qtot)
electron
(C)
1
2
3
Table 3
Dro
Voltag
e (V)
17.3V
1
2
3
93.2V
37.8V
Tim
e
(t)
Distance
(d)
Terminal
Velocity
(vt)
Radius
(r)
3.61
0.250m
6.916x10-5
7.518x1
m/s
0-7 m
1.9s
0.250m
1.316x10-4
1.037x1
2.21
m
0.250m
m/s
1.131x10-4
0-6 m
9.615x1
m/s
0-7 m
Mass (m)
1.461x1015
kg
3.835x1015
kg
3.057x1015
kg
Total
Charge of
Charge
one
(Qtot)
electron (C)
8.285x10-18
1.593x10-19
4.037x10-17
1.615x10-19
C
7.934x10-18
C
1.587x10-19
Hatch 10
References