Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).8665 OF 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.
RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
The
appellant
is
the
High
Court
of
Patna.
The
first
under appeal, the High Court opined that the compulsory retirement
order impugned before it was not sustainable.
first
respondent,
therefore,
the
continuation
of
the
judiciary.
In
the
context
of
the
submissions
made
by
the
appellant, this Court by the above mentioned orders called upon the
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by OM
PARKASH SHARMA
Date: 2017.01.14
12:54:36 IST
Reason:
the bar.
LatestLaws.com
2
the
appellant
is
always
at
liberty
to
If that is the
take
appropriate
is
questionable
warranting
his
removal
or
compulsory
is
to
be
retired
on
the
that
his
conduct
is
liberty
of
the
The
appellant
to
initiate
disciplinary
action
Though it is
......................J.
(J. CHELAMESWAR)
......................J.
(ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE)
NEW DELHI
JANUARY 12, 2017
LatestLaws.com
3
ITEM NO.2
COURT NO.3
SECTION XVI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s).
I N D I A
8665/2015
Appellant(s)
VERSUS
AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.
Respondent(s)
For Respondent(s)
[O.P. SHARMA]
AR-CUM-PS
(Signed order is placed on the file)
[SUMAN JAIN]
COURT MASTER