Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PFMEA Number:
Process Name:
Process Responsibility:
Prepared By:
Affected Product(s):
PFMEA Key Date:
PFMEA Origination Date:
PFMEA Revision Date:
Core Team Members:
Process / Product
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(FMEA)
Process or Product
Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible:
Communication No direct
from Cust Service communication
to Supporting
Dept
Representative
Outdated employee
information in current
profile
Delayed transfer of
customer case
No incentive for
Manager to comply
completely with
requirement
No formal liaison
9
R
P
N
Recommended
Action(s)
126
288
Action Results
S
O
Actions Taken E
C
V
C
Customer complaints
4
Responsibility
and Completion
Date
D
E
T
R
P
N
Procedure changed
to include
delinquency report
7/15/00
30
Procedure
changed, Dept
liaisons identified
8/31/00
72
D
E
T
Current
Process
Controls
Potential Cause(s)/ O
Mechanism(s) of
C
Failure
C
Manager
completion of
change form
S
E
V
Potential Effects
of Failure
Potential Failure
Mode
Process
Function
FMEA Master
Process / Product
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(FMEA)
Process or
Product Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible:
Page 3
Recommended
Action(s)
What are the actions for
reducing the occurrence, or
improving detection, or for
identifying the root cause if it is
unknown? Should have
actions only on high RPN's or
easy fixes.
Responsibility
and
Completion
Date
Who is
responsible for
the
recommended
action?
Action Results
Actions Taken
List the completed actions
that are included in the
recalculated RPN.
Include the implementation
date for any changes.
S
E
V
O
C
C
D
E
T
R
P
N
Recomkpute RPN after
actions are complete.
R
P
N
D
E
T
Current
Process
Controls
O
C
C
Potential Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s) of Failure
S
E
V
Potential Effects
of Failure
Process
Function
Extreme
High
Moderate
Low
None
Severity of Effect
Rating
10
Likelihood of Occurrence
Very
High
Moderate
High
1 in 2
Failure is almost inevitable
Re- Very
Low
mote Low
Failure
Rate
1 in 3
1 in 8
1 in 20
1 in 80
Process is in statistical control but with isolated failures.
Previous processes have experienced occasional
failures or out-of-control conditions.
1 in 400
1 in 2000
1 in 15k
1 in 150k
1 in 1.5M
Rating
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Very
Low
DPPM
100,000
50,000
Moderate
High
10,000
Very
High
Low
5,000
2,000
1,000
500
200
100
Probability Rating
1 in 10
10
1 in 20
1 in 50
1 in 100
1 in 200
1 in 500
1 in 1,000
1 in 2,000
1 in 5,000
1 in 10,000
Measurement
Technique
%R&R or P/T
Ratio
Upper
Spec
Limit
Target
Lower
Spec
Limit
Variable
Sheet
Cp
Cpk
Sample
Size
Date
Actions
Date:
Revision:
Product:
Process:
Process Step
Employee
Status
Change Form
What's
Controlled?
Status
Change
indicator
Measurement
Method
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
List Select
New Dept
List Select
New Grade
List Select
New Salary
Grade Guidelines
Mgr Review
New Mgr
Org Chart
Mgr Review
Change Effect
Date
None
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
Sample Size
Frequency
Who/What
Measures
Where
Recorded
Decision Rule/
Corrective Action
100%
As Needed
Mgr, HR
Clerk
HR Checklist
100%
As Needed
HR Checklist
100%
As Needed
HR Checklist
100%
As Needed
Mgr
100%
As Needed
Mgr
100%
As Needed
Mgr, HR
Clerk
HR Checklist
Mgr, HR
Clerk
Mgr, HR
Clerk
Approved by:
Approved by:
Approved by:
SOP's
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012