Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
GLEN S. STOCKMAL
Natural Resources Canada
Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary)
3303 - 33rd Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2L 2A7
gstockma@nrcan.gc.ca
ABSTRACT
Recent mapping in the Blairmore East-Half map area indicates a pop-up structure transected by the Crowsnest River,
near the leading edge of Eastern Cordilleran deformation. At scenic Lundbreck Falls, the sub-horizontal attitude of the
Santonian Virgelle Formation (Milk River Group) is anomalous in comparison to fault-bounded slices to both the east and
west, where strata display steep to moderate dips more typical of Foothills structures. The relatively broad (750 m across
strike), flat-lying structure exposed at Lundbreck Falls is bounded downstream to the east by a foreland-directed thrust
placing Virgelle Formation on Campanian Lundbreck Formation (Belly River Group). To the west, this sub-horizontal
structure is overridden by a steeply west-dipping, foreland-directed thrust carrying Milk River and Belly River strata in its
hanging wall. Stratigraphic offset across this thrust fault is apparently small to negligible at the Crowsnest River, but
increases at higher elevations to the north and south. On either side of this thrust fault, north of the Crowsnest River, two
anticlines involving the Virgelle Formation face each other. These atypical relationships suggest that, at the river and
adjacent low elevations, the sub-horizontal structure may be bounded to the west by a cryptic, west-directed backthrust that
is overridden up-slope by the foreland-directed fault just described. These features are inferred to comprise a pop-up
structure, similar to those interpreted elsewhere within the triangle zone in the subsurface, but never before described in
outcrop in the Foothills of Alberta. Although they appear to be very rare in the Foothills, the inferred backthrust is not alone
in this immediate area. Two kilometres downstream, the hinge of an upright anticline, involving a well-exposed section of
Milk River Group strata at the classic Lundbreck transition outcrop, is removed to the north by another west-directed
backthrust. This backthrust could also be associated with a pop-up structure, as suggested by its configuration in restored
cross-sections. An association between the pop-up structures and the triangle zone is implied by their proximity, but
relative timing relationships are unclear. The recognition of these structures, using a refined stratigraphy in an area mapped
previously, suggests that pop-up structures associated with the triangle zone may be more common than published studies
indicate, and therefore may be more important features of the Outer Foothills belt than is widely appreciated.
RSUM
Une cartographie rcente de la moiti-est de la carte de la rgion de Blairmore indique une structure dun coin extrusif
transect par la rivire Crownest, prs de la limite de la dformation de la cordilire-est . Au niveau des chutes pittoresques
de Lundbreck, lattitude sous-horizontale de la formation Virgelle du Santonien (groupe Milk River) est irrgulire
compare aux tranches limites par des failles situes lest et louest, l o les couches prsentent des pendages prononcs modrs, plus typiques des structures des Foothills. La structure relativement large (750 m dun bout lautre), et plate,
expose sur les chutes de Lundbreck, est limite en aval lest par un chevauchement davant-chane qui superpose
la formation Virgelle sur la formation Lundbreck du Campanien (groupe Belly River). A louest, cette structure soushorizontale est surmonte par un chevauchement davant-chane pendage prononc vers louest, transportant des couches
de Milk River et Belly River dans son compartiment suprieur. La sparation stratigraphique des affleurements travers
cette faille de chevauchement est apparemment de petite ngligeable au niveau de la rivire Crownest, mais elle augmente
au nord et au sud des altitudes plus hautes. Au nord de la rivire Crownest deux anticlinaux contenant la formation
Virgelle se font face. Ces agencements de structures de chaque ct de cette faille de chevauchement suggrent quau
niveau du fleuve et des basses altitudes adjacentes, la structure sous-horizontale puisse tre limite louest par un
rtrochevauchement cryptique orient vers louest, domin en amont de pente par la faille davant-chane tel que dcrit plus
139
140
G.S. STOCKMAL
haut. Ces structures sont infres comme faisant partie dune structure de coin extrusif, similaire celles qui sont interprtes
ailleurs lintrieur de la zone triangle sous-terraine, mais qui nont jamais t dcrites auparavant dans laffleurement des
Foothills de lAlberta. Bien quils apparaissent comme tant trs rares dans les Foothills, les rtrochevauchements infrs ne sont
pas uniques dans cette zone immdiate. A deux kilomtres en aval, la charnire dun anticlinal vertical, comprenant une section
bien expose de couches du groupe Milk River, laffleurement classique de la transition de Lundbreck, est supprime au nord
par un autre rtrochevauchement orient vers louest. Ce rtrochevauchement peut galement tre associ une structure dun coin
extrusif, comme le suggre sa configuration dans des coupes restaures. Une association entre les structures de coins extrusifs et
la zone triangle est sous-entendue du fait de leur proximit, mais les liens relatifs de leur rpartition dans le temps demeurent
incertains. La reconnaissance de ces structures, par lutilisation dune stratigraphie affine dans une rgion cartographie
prcdemment, suggre que les structures de coins extrusifs associes avec la zone triangle puissent tre plus courantes que
ne le rapportent les tudes publies ce sujet, et par consquent elles peuvent se rvler comme tant des caractristiques plus
importantes de la ceinture externe des Foothills quen gnral on lui attribue.
Traduit par Gabrielle Drivet
INTRODUCTION
141
Fig. 3. Definition and possible deformation paths of a pop-up structure. (a) Schematic of a pop-up structure. (b) Three possible options for
deformation and evolution of a pop-up structure. (c) Possible configuration resulting from Option 3, shown in (b). Circle and arrow indicate
sense of rotation of the structure as it moves up the ramp and onto the
flat. Dashed-double dotted line indicates possible out-of-sequence fault
branching off the top of the thrust ramp. (d) Possible configuration following offset on the out-of-sequence thrust imbricate. (e) Possible final
configuration of the pop-up structure in (d) following subsequent backrotation as indicated by large circle and arrow, due to general insequence footwall imbrication. Position of oppositely facing anticlines,
juxtaposed across the out-of-sequence imbricate, is indicated. See text
for discussion.
142
G.S. STOCKMAL
STRATIGRAPHY
A generalized stratigraphic column for the southern Alberta
Foothills is shown in Figure 4. The Foothills structural belt
(Bally et al., 1966) is informally divided into the Outer
Foothills and the Inner Foothills based on stratigraphic level of
exposure (Fig. 4) (Dahlstrom, 1970). The Inner Foothills belt
includes a number of structural culminations exposing units as
old as the Mississippian Banff Formation (e.g., Moose
Mountain, Plateau Mountain, Livingstone Range). Units older
than Mississippian age do not crop out at the surface within the
Foothills, but are known to be involved in subsurface structures
(e.g., Bally et al., 1966; Fermor, 1999).
In general, the level of structural detail mappable in any
given area is strongly dependent upon the attainable degree of
stratigraphic subdivision. In the Foothills, for example, the previous generation of bedrock maps utilized a relatively coarse
stratigraphy where the dominantly non-marine section between
the Wapiabi Formation and Bearpaw Formation marine shales
was assigned to a single mappable unit: the Belly River
Formation (e.g., Douglas, 1950; Wall and Rosene, 1977)
(Fig. 5). At the base of the Belly River Formation, in the
Foothills south of the Bow River, Stott (1963) recognized the
Chungo and Nomad members, which he interpreted as equivalent respectively to the Milk River and Pakowki formations in
the Plains to the east. Working along and south of the Bow
River, Rosenthal and Walker (1987) recognized the same members as far south as the Maycroft map area (Fig. 1), but placed
them at the top of the Wapiabi Formation, consistent with
Stotts interpretations north of Bow River. Rosenthal and
Walker (1987) also subdivided the Chungo Member into three
units: a lower marine unit transitional with the underlying
Thistle Member of the Wapiabi Formation, a middle marine
shoreface unit, and an upper non-marine unit (Fig. 5).
Jerzykiewicz and Norris (1994) used a six-fold subdivision
of the former Belly River Formation (Fig. 5) to map structures
near Lundbreck Falls. Their stratigraphic subdivisions and
nomenclature were used in the early stages of the GSCs
A key element in importing Plains stratigraphy and terminology into the Foothills was the recognition and position of
the Pakowki Formation, considered equivalent to the Nomad
Member (Stott, 1963; Rosenthal and Walker, 1987), which
overlies the Milk River Group. The Pakowki Formation is very
well exposed on the Oldman River in the Maycroft map area
(Stockmal, 1995, 1996), located immediately north of the
Blairmore map area (Fig. 1). Figure 6 illustrates the degree of
exposure and some of the key features of this outcrop, which
was measured by Stott (1963), Rosenthal (1984), and Stockmal
(1995). In particular, note: (1) the leaf and other plant debris
imprints in the non-marine Deadhorse Coulee Formation interval (Fig. 6, lower right); (2) the sharp contact of the Pakowki
Formation marine shales on the uppermost sandstone of the
Deadhorse Coulee (Fig. 6, upper right); (3) the quality of exposure of the marine Pakowki Formation (Fig. 6, lower left),
which includes excellent hummocky cross-stratified sandstone
beds; and (4) the sharp base of the basal Belly River sandstone overlying the Pakowki Formation (Fig. 6, upper left). A
critical aid to recognition of the Pakowki Formation in isolated
or poor exposures is a basal, matrix-supported, chert-pebble
conglomerate. At the Oldman River locality, the pebbles range
in size from 1 to 6 cm (Fig. 6, small photos at top, middle) and
are concentrated in the lower 20 cm of the Pakowki interval,
though they occur up to 3 m from the contact. Similar chert
pebbles are known from the Plains at the base of the Pakowki
Formation (Meijer Drees and Mhyr, 1981).
On the Crowsnest River, in the map area discussed here,
Rosenthal and Walker (1987) did not recognize a clear equivalent to the Nomad Member, although the lower two units of the
Chungo Member were delineated. The lower portion of this
particular outcrop was also described in detail by Lerand and
Oliver (1975), and has become well known to local sedimentologists as the Lundbreck transition outcrop (a reference to
the adjacent town of Lundbreck and the facies transition from
the marine Wapiabi Formation to the non-marine Belly River
Formation). In the often-reproduced section of Lerand and
Oliver (1975; their figure 3), the Telegraph Creek Formation
comprises their units 1 through 9, and the Virgelle Formation
comprises their units 10 through 13.
Figure 7 is an overview of the section examined by Lerand
and Oliver (1975; west half of Fig. 7) and Rosenthal and
Walker (1987), viewed looking south, whereas Figure 8 is an
overview of the upper portion of the section measured by
Rosenthal and Walker (1987), viewed looking north. The
prominent, thick sandstones of the Virgelle Formation (~40 m
thick) and the basal Belly River Group (basal Connelly Creek
Formation) sandstone (~15 m thick) are clear, as are thick,
composite sandstone units within the Deadhorse Coulee
Formation (Figs. 6, 7, 8). The Pakowki Formation crops out on
the north side of Crowsnest River, in the poorly exposed and
relatively thin (~8 m) interval indicated in Figure 8. Chert pebbles up to 1.5 cm in diameter were dug out of the outcrop at this
locality, confirming this interpretation. Similar to the situation
on the Oldman River to the north (Fig. 6, upper left), the basal
Belly River sandstone on the Crowsnest River (Figs. 7, 8)
143
abruptly overlies the Pakowki interval, possibly with an unconformable relationship. An unconformity could account for the
relative thinness of the Pakowki at Crowsnest River, and the
absence of clearly marine sandstones in this interval. For a
detailed perspective of the shoreline-related basal Belly River
sandstones in the Plains, see Hamblin and Abrahamson
(1996).
The three formations of the Belly River Group, originally
described by Jerzykiewicz and Norris (1994), can generally be
distinguished in river exposures though their identification in
the surrounding countryside can be problematic to impossible
(Stockmal, 1995). The most characteristic difference between
the Connelly Creek and Lundbreck Formations (which make up
the bulk of the total thickness of the group) is the colour of the
recessive shaly beds: the Lundbreck Formation contains bright
greyish-green to yellowish-green mudstones (Jerzykiewicz and
Norris, 1994, p. 384) in contrast to the drab, olive green mudstones more typical of the Connelly Creek Formation.
Jerzykiewicz and Norris (1994) also suggested that the appearance of whitish limestone concretions in the Lundbreck
Formation aids identification, though Stockmal (1995) indicated that these occur throughout most of the Belly River
Group. The thin, uppermost unit of the Belly River Group, the
Drywood Creek Formation, is extremely recessive and is known
only from major river exposures.
Due to problems with identification of formations within
the Belly River Group away from major river exposures
(Stockmal, 1995), the new series of GSC Open File maps
from the Crowsnest River north do not show individual formations except along and immediately adjacent to the rivers
144
G.S. STOCKMAL
145
Fig. 7. Overview, looking south, of Milk River Group and Pakowki Formation exposure on Crowsnest River, at the classic Lundbreck transition outcrop. Viewpoint location: 702925E, 5496780N, UTM Zone 11, NAD 27.
Fig.8. Overview, looking north, of upper Milk River Group, Pakowki Formation, and lower Belly River Group (Connelly Creek Formation)
exposure on Crowsnest River, at the classic Lundbreck transition outcrop (703053E, 5496485N, UTM Zone 11, NAD 27). In the distance to the
northeast are exposures of the Lundbreck Formation farther downstream on Crowsnest River (see Fig. 9). Note the nature of the exposure in
the hills to the north-northwest; these hillside outcrops of Virgelle, Deadhorse Coulee, and basal Connelly Creek formations are those seen in the
aerial photograph in Figure 10, lower left.
Fig. 6. (facing page) Field photographs of Milk River Group, Pakowki Formation, and basal Belly River Group exposure on the Oldman River
(outcrop location: 697650E, 5526100N, UTM Zone 11, NAD27). Centre: Overview of exposure from the upper Virgelle Formation to the basal
Belly River sandstone (base of Connelly Creek Formation see inset stratigraphic column). Lower right: Leaf and plant debris impressions in
the non-marine Deadhorse Coulee Formation. Upper right: Sharp contact of Pakowki Formation on Deadhorse Coulee Formation; distinctive
chert pebbles indicated by white circle, and shown in smaller inset photos. Lower left: Overview of Pakowki Formation interval, looking upsection to basal Belly River sandstone. Upper left: Sharp basal contact of basal Belly River sandstone on top of Pakowki Formation.
146
G.S. STOCKMAL
Fig. 9. Geological map, after Stockmal and Lebel (2003) (see Fig. 1 for location of figure within the larger map area). The locations of
the Lundbreck transition outcrop (Figs. 7, 8), panoramic viewpoints (Figs. 11, 12), and structural cross-sections (Fig. 13) are indicated, as is the
outline of Figure 10. Foreland-directed thrust faults (TF1, TF2 and TF3) and hinterland-directed backthrusts (BT1 and BT2) discussed in the text
are labelled.
147
Fig. 11. Panoramic view from station SQB2002-019 (location shown in Fig. 9). DHC: Deadhorse Coulee Formation; TC: Telegraph Creek
Formation. See text for discussion. Viewpoint location: 701451E, 5495506N, UTM Zone 11, NAD 27.
148
G.S. STOCKMAL
Fig. 12. Panoramic views from stations SQB2002-042 (top) and SQB2002-108 (bottom). DHC: Deadhorse Coulee Formation; Wp:
Wapiabi Formation. See text for discussion. Viewpoint locations: Station 042 703117E, 5493869N; Station 108 700979E, 5497756N; both
UTM Zone 11, NAD 27.
149
Fig. 10. Examples of aerial photographic expression of stratigraphic units and structures. Top: Area encompassing the inferred pop-up structure, outlined in Figure 9 for a direct comparison with map interpretation. LT o/c and LF indicate locations of the Lundbreck transition outcrop and
Lundbreck Falls, respectively. Note the anomalous, apparent, cross-structural strike orientation of resistant units within the pop-up structure, both
north and south of the Crowsnest River. White-outlined boxes are areas enlarged at bottom of figure. Lower left: Enlargement of aerial photograph at top showing expression of the Virgelle, Deadhorse Coulee, and basal Connelly Creek formations. Compare with view in Figure 8, and
interpretation in Figure 9. In particular, note the position of a backthrust (BT1) cutting out these units progressively to the north. Lower right:
Enlargement of aerial photograph at top showing a second example of the expression of these same units. Note the prominent fold (west-facing
anticline) in the upper right corner (compare with Fig. 9). This fold lies in the footwall of a thrust fault (TF2), and in the hanging wall of an inferred
backthrust (BT2).
150
G.S. STOCKMAL
that labelled South applies to all map areas from Beaver north and south away from the river where the fault is seen to cut
Mines to the international border (Fig. 1). These differences up-section in its hanging wall at higher elevations (Fig. 9).
primarily reflect the level of stratigraphic understanding during
In the hanging wall of thrust fault TF1, along and adjacent to
mapping (as noted above), as well as the quality of exposure. the Crowsnest River, the sub-horizontal Virgelle Formation is
almost continuously exposed for a cross-strike distance of
approximately 750 m (Fig. 9). Figure 11 is an annotated
STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
panorama, as viewed from the western edge of the inferred popup structure (viewpoint shown in Fig. 9). To the east-northeast,
GEOLOGICAL MAP
the Virgelle Formation can be seen in the railroad cut which lies
Previous mapping in the study area, using different strati- in the immediate hanging wall of thrust TF1. Lundbreck Falls is
graphic subdivisions, is limited to Hage (1945) and located approximately 150 m due east of the railroad cut (indiJerzykiewicz and Norris (1994). Figure 9 is a portion of the cated in Fig. 11). South of the railroad and immediately overlyrecent map by Stockmal and Lebel (2003) that encompasses ing the Virgelle Formation exposed in the railroad cut is the
the interpreted pop-up structure. The area along and adjacent Deadhorse Coulee Formation (Figs. 9, 11). The first thick, comto the Crowsnest River, where the individual formations of the posite package of sandstones within this interval is seen in
Belly River Group are mappable, is indicated. Note that the Figure 11, south and upslope of the river. The stratigraphic posithree formations of the Milk River Group are mappable every- tion of this sandstone ledge is equivalent to the thick sandstones
where; this subdivision accounts for most of the improvement seen above the Virgelle Formation in Figure 8 and the promiof the new mapping in comparison with Hage (1945).
nent rib of outcrop above the Virgelle Formation in Figure 10
The location of the Lundbreck transition outcrop (Figs. 7, (lower left). In the distance beyond the railroad cut to the east8) is indicated near the centre of the map. This location lies on northeast the resistant sandstones of the Virgelle Formation can
the east limb of an upright anticline (the Tower Anticline of be seen in both limbs of the Tower Anticline (the Lundbreck
Jerzykiewicz and Norris, 1994) that is cut out to the north by transition outcrop is indicated in Fig. 11).
a backthrust (labelled BT1). The existence and position of this
At the Figure 11 viewpoint, and adjacent to Highway 3A, the
backthrust is clear from exposures along the Crowsnest River Virgelle Formation dips shallowly to the southeast, flattens
and from aerial photographs (Fig. 10). Westward from the toward the river, and then dips very shallowly to the northwest at
east-dipping Lundbreck transition outcrop there is a contin- the railroad cut (Figs. 9, 11). Overall, this geometry is somewhat
uous section down through the Virgelle Formation, the spoon-shaped with the long axis of the trough of the flexure
Telegraph Creek Formation, and into the Wapiabi Formation. nearly coincident with the course of the Crowsnest River.
The core of the Tower Anticline, occupied by the Wapiabi
To the north (Fig. 11), shallowly east-dipping Virgelle
Formation along the river, is completely exposed showing Formation crops out in a prominent rib that is structurally conlocally intense brittle, disharmonic, accommodation structures tinuous with the outcrops along the Crowsnest River, but physat centimetre to multi-metre scales, with both foreland- ically separated from it by erosion (Fig. 9). At the western end
directed and hinterland-directed minor faults. Farther of this rib is a west-facing anticline (Figs. 9, 11). This relatively
upstream (west), the next outcrops encountered are west- modest fold is dramatically expressed in aerial photographs due
dipping Virgelle Formation on the west limb of the anticline. to its shallow southward plunge and position on a slightly
The proximity of the Virgelle Formation with respect to the steeper southward topographic slope (Fig. 10, lower right).
hinge of the anticline indicates that the entire Telegraph Creek
Immediately west of the Figure 11 viewpoint is a gully and a
Formation and the base of the Virgelle Formation are missing. narrow (~50 m) zone of no exposure. The next outcrop to the
Within the context of contractional Foothills structures, this west is also Virgelle Formation, but its moderately west-dipping
relationship indicates a backthrust.
attitude is markedly different from exposures contiguous with
The backthrust interpretation is clearly supported by aerial those at Lundbreck Falls (Figs. 9, 11). Although there is very
photographs (Fig. 10, lower left) that show the Virgelle little stratigraphic offset, the presence of a foreland-directed
Formation in the west limb of the anticline being cut out pro- thrust fault between these outcrops becomes clear in the context
gressively to the north (c.f. Figs. 9, 10). This backthrust dies of structures mapped upslope to both the north and the south
out to the south, where the Virgelle Formation is folded with- (Fig. 9). In both these directions, this thrust (labelled TF2 in
out interruption across the Tower Anticline (Figs. 9, 10, top Figs. 9, 11) cuts up-section in its footwall. To the north, a large
continuous hinge indicated). Neither Hage (1945) nor upright to slightly east-facing anticline develops in the hanging
Jerzykiewicz and Norris (1994) recognized backthrust BT1.
wall that involves all formations of the Milk River Group
West of backthrust BT1 is a continuous west-dipping section (Figs. 9, 11). Hage (1945) did not recognize fault TF2, although
of Belly River strata, mappable along the Crowsnest River as it was mapped by Jerzykiewicz and Norris (1994).
Connelly Creek and Lundbreck formations (Fig. 9). In river
The juxtaposition of these two oppositely facing anticlines
exposures the moderately dipping Lundbreck Formation is over- involving the Virgelle Formation, across foreland-directed
ridden by a foreland-directed thrust fault (labelled TF1 in Fig. 9) thrust TF2 (Figs. 9, 11), is an unusual structural situation. As
carrying sub-horizontal Virgelle Formation. This thrust, which discussed below, this juxtaposition, coupled with the atypical
places a hanging wall ramp on a footwall flat, is easily followed flat-lying geometry of the structure through Lundbreck Falls, is
151
152
G.S. STOCKMAL
Fig. 13. Structural cross-sections and palinspastic restorations. Lines of section indicated in Figure 9. Tadpoles indicate projected
structural dip measurements. Enlargement of folds in north section shown in inset. Belly River Group is shown as undivided, although
formation contacts are shown as dotted lines in south section (cc: Connelly Creek; lb: Lundbreck; dw: Drywood Creek). See text for discussion.
153
154
G.S. STOCKMAL
Fig. 14. Schematic triangle zone configurations and possible relationships to pop-up structures. (a) Idealized configuration showing the three
sides (numbered, see text for explanation) bounding the triangle zone (shaded). Short-dashed lines indicate nascent thrusts with relatively low
frontal ramp angles bounding horses labelled A and B. (b) Similar to configuration in (a) except relatively steep frontal ramps of nascent horses A
and B coincide with foreland-directed thrusts bounding pop-up structures (thick-dashed lines). Note possible correspondence to mapped faults
BT1, BT2, TF1, and TF3. (c) Possible configuration of (b) following triangle zone advance and incorporation of horses A, B, and others. Compare
geometries of labelled faults with those in Figure 13. Thick, solid, black lines are faults bounding the pop-up structures; thin, solid, black lines are
detachments corresponding to thin, long-dashed, black lines in (b). See text for discussion.
CONCLUSION
Detailed mapping along and adjacent to the Crowsnest
River, facilitated by a refined stratigraphic subdivision of the
former Belly River Formation, indicates an atypical, flatlying, fault-bounded structure near Lundbreck Falls. This
structure is best interpreted as a pop-up exposed near the apex
of the triangle zone. The backthrust to the pop-up structure,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank GSC colleagues Margot McMechan and
Daniel Lebel for feedback involving the structural geology and
mappable stratigraphy, Kirk Osadetz for an internal review, and
Art Sweet and Tony Hamblin for discussions and joint field
investigations involving detailed aspects of Upper Cretaceous
stratigraphy. I also wish to thank Bulletin referees Phil de
Gruyter and Michael L. Morrison for thorough and very useful
reviews. GSC Contribution Number 2003139.
REFERENCES
Anderson, E.M. 1905. The dynamics of faulting. Edinburgh Geological
Society, Transactions, v. 8, p. 387-402.
Bally, A.W., Gordy, P.L. and Stewart, G.A. 1966. Structure, seismic data, and
orogenic evolution of southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of
Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 14, p. 337- 381.
Bgin, N.J., Lawton, D.C. and Spratt, D.A. 1996. Seismic interpretation of the
Rocky Mountain thrust front near the Crowsnest deflection, southern
Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 44, p. 1-13.
Dahlstrom, C.D.A. 1969. Balanced cross sections. Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences, v. 6, p. 743-757.
______ 1970. Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky
Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 18, p. 332-406.
Davis, G.H. and Reynolds, S.J. 1996. Structural Geology of Rocks and Regions
(2nd edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 776p.
Douglas, R.J.W. 1950. Callum Creek, Langford Creek and Gap map-areas.
Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 255, 124p.
Fermor, P. 1999. Aspects of the three-dimensional structure of the Alberta
Foothills and Front Ranges. Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 111,
p. 317-346.
Gordy., P.L., Frey, F.R. and Norris, D.K. 1977. Geological guide for the
C.S.P.G. 1977 Waterton - Glacier Park Field Conference. - Canadian
Society of Petroleum Geologists, Calgary, 93p.
Hage, C.O. 1945. Cowley, West of Fifth Meridian, Alberta. Geological Survey
of Canada, Map 816A, scale 1:63, 360.
Hamblin, A.P. and Abrahamson, B.W. 1996. Stratigraphic architecture of
Basal Belly River cycles, Foremost Formation, Belly River Group, subsurface of southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan. Bulletin of
Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 44, p. 654-673.
Hiebert, S.N. and Spratt, D.A. 1996. Geometry of the thrust front near Pincher
Creek, Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 44, p. 195-201.
Jerzykiewicz, T. and Norris, D.K. 1994. Stratigraphy, structure and syntectonic
sedimentation of the Campanian Belly River clastic wedge in the southern Canadian Cordillera. Cretaceous Research, v 15, p.367-399.
Jones, P.B. 1982. Oil and gas beneath east-dipping underthrust faults in the
Alberta Foothills, Canada. In: Geologic Studies of the Cordilleran Thrust
Belt: Volume 1. R.B. Powers (ed.). Rocky Mountain Association of
Geologists, Denver, p. 61-74.
Lawton, D.C., Sukaramongkol, C. and Spratt, D.A., 1996. Seismic characterization of a compound tectonic wedge beneath the Rocky Mountain foreland basin, Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 44,
p. 258-268.
Lebel, D. and Williams, E.P. 1994. Geology, Cardston, Alberta. Geological
Survey of Canada, Open File 2854, scale 1:50,000.
______, Douglas, R. J. W. and Norris, D. K. 1994. Waterton Lakes (82H/4),
Alberta Geology (preliminary). Geological Survey of Canada, Open File
2855, scale 1:50,000.
______, Stockmal, G. S. and McMechan, M. E. 1997. Towards a three-dimensional atlas of the Southern Alberta Foothills: a progress report of the
155