Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Performance
Indicator
Abstract:
Environmental
issues
call
for
a
more
optimized
management
of
the
fossil
fuel
global
consumption
and
in
effect
more
efficient
power
utilization.
In
recent
years,
the
shipping
industry
and
the
involved
international
organizations
(IMO)
have
been
promoting
the
reduction
of
marine
fuel
consumption,
aiming
for
lesser
CO2,
NOx,
SOx
gases
emitted
to
the
environment.
An
effective
monitoring
is
proposed,
utilizing
a
comprehensive
performance
indicator
of
vessel's
systems
that
depends
on
readily
available,
easy
to
obtain
by
the
crew
propulsion
parameters.
Keywords
and
phrases:
Environment,
pollution,
emissions,
green
house
effect,
energy
performance
monitoring,
fuel
consumption,
hull
resistance,
propulsion
1.
Introduction:
Merchant
shipping
remains
the
largest
carrier
of
freight
throughout
recorded
history
due
to
the
economic
advantages
involved.
Optimum
management
of
the
global
propulsion
power
may
result
in
large
cut
down
of
marine
fuel
grades,
which
will
in
turn
benefit
environment
and
the
economics
of
the
shipping
community.
The
most
important
OPEX
cost
factor
is
the
marine
fuel
(J.M.J
Journee
and
J.H.C.
Maijers
[5]),
the
price
of
which
affects
world
trading
patterns
and
modes
and
frequently
is
the
fora
main
topic.
Although,
water
transport
is
still
the
most
efficient
mode
(small
ratio
of
CO2
per
cargo
ton
per
mile)
the
aim
is
for
vessel's
further
energy
efficiency
optimization,
bunker
minimization
and
in
turn
reduction
of
CO2,
NOx,
SOx.
An
energy
efficiency
management
scheme
cannot
be
sustained
unless
a
meaningful
and
practical
mode
of
monitoring
is
applied.
Along
these
lines,
R-J
Kariranta
[9]
presents
the
Onboard-NAPA
computer
software/hardware
for
on-line
collection
of
data,
assessment
of
the
hydrodynamic
situation
and
the
provision
of
recommendations
to
crew
and
the
office.
From
the
scientific
standpoint,
vessels
sailing
is
a
complex
hydrodynamic
motion
through
liquid
(sea
water)
and
atmospheric
air
medium,
affected
by
the
complex
wave
formation
at
the
boundaries
of
the
hull
with
specific
characteristics
imposing
difficulties
in
accurately
simulating
the
phenomenon
of
turbulence
and
assessing
its
effect
on
main
engine
power
requirements.
J.M.J
Journee
and
J.H.C.
Maijers
[5],
recognizing
the
importance
of
accurately
predicting
the
power
and
speed
of
the
vessel
for
a
given
set
of
meteorological
forecast,
worked
on
a
computer
software
to
simulate
the
effect
of
added
resistance
due
to
rough
sea
and
resulted
steering
as
well
as
the
effect
on
the
vertical
motion
resistance
due
to
slamming.
R.L.
Townsin
and
Y.J.
Kwon
[7]
provide
approximate
relationships
for
the
practical
estimation
of
the
percentage
of
speed
loss
as
a
function
of
the
Beaufort
number.
Henk
van
den
Boom
et
al.
[3]
focus
on
the
importance
of
accurate
and
transparent
speed
trial
methodology
and
determine
the
boundary
conditions
and
the
correction
methods
for
deviated
parameters
to
be
applied.
Means
of
obtaining
robust
benchmarking
level,
facilitates
future
practical
reference
and
monitoring
of
vessels
performance.
Ship
Performance
Indicator,
by
Dr.
Panos
Deligiannis
1
John
E.
Kokarakis
et
al.
[6],
involving
financial
aspects
of
shipping,
suggest
an
expression
for
the
daily
Time
Charter
Equivalent
(TCE)
as
a
function
of
the
effective
power
and
the
vessel's
speed,
which
is
given
as:
TCE =
FRv
cR pb * f ( PE , VS ) ,
d
where
FRv
is
the
freight
rate,
d
the
voyage
distance,
cR
the
daily
operating
expenses
and
pb
the
price
of
bunkers.
As
individual
vessel
speed
trial
determines
the
power
versus
speed
function
(Henk
van
den
Boom
et
al.
[3]),
they
showed
that
the
abovementioned
relationship
can
provide
an
optimum
speed
for
given
financial
and
environmental
restrains.
From
a
different
viewpoint,
Jack
Devanney
[4]
brought
out
the
uneconomic
charter
party
speed
clause,
which
todays
VLCC
market
is
required
to
maintain
a
value
in
the
range
of
13
to
13.5
knots.
The
implication
of
such
a
requirement
has
an
indirect
but
significant
impact
on
CO2
emissions.
As
super
slow
steaming
of
about
8
Knots
is
the
point
of
equilibrium
on
todays
freight
rate
versus
trading
speed
plane,
only
bilateral
(charterer
Owner)
understanding
can
result
in
environmental
benefits.
International
bodies
have
attempted
to
control
the
matter
of
energy
efficiency
by
passing
relevant
regulation
(IMO,
MEPC.1
/Circ.683)
and
guidelines
(INTERTANKO
[8])
to
the
international
shipping
community,
recommending
that
appropriate
procedure
is
in
place
for
the
monitoring
of
the
fuel
consumption
and
the
harmful
emissions
across
the
entire
fleet,
appropriately
recorded,
aiming
for
the
mitigation
of
environmental
pollution.
The
present
study
proposes
a
key
performance
indicator
that
without
involving
complicated
algorithm,
it
provides
the
reciprocating
interaction
between
the
"Vessel"
and
the
Office
(onboard
measurements
ashore
assessment
-
onboard
control
-
ashore
management).
2.
Theory
A
key
performance
indicator
(KPI)
is
devised,
that
compares
the
chemical
energy
of
the
consumed
fuel
with
the
produced
propulsion
effect.
On
the
basis
of
the
hydrodynamic
fundamentals,
a
group
of
parameters,
extracted
from
a
daily
"sailing"
report,
is
utilized
to
provide
a
unique
value,
which
satisfies
below
common
practice
constrains.
2.1
The
KPI
requirements:
1. Dimensionless
number
2. Unique
value
for
an
individual
vessel
3. Target
value
easy
and
accurately
to
determine,
utilizing
common
speed
trial
data
4. Inclusive
of
the
hull
resistance
effects
(wave,
wind,
swell,
current)
5. Statistically
constant
between
characteristic
periods
of
time
(dry-docking,
major
main
engine
overhauling,
hull
&
propeller
cleaning)
6. Capable
of
providing
diagnosis
on
the
a. efficient
operation
of
the
main
engine
(inferior
quality
bunkers,
poor
combustibility)
and
b. power
transmission
system
(shafting-bearing
arrangement)
7. Specific
for
crew
to
grasp
8. Measurable,
achievable,
realistic
and
timely
available
2
Ship
Performance
Indicator,
by
Dr.
Panos
Deligiannis
Propeller
throughput
water
flow
is
responsible
for
the
applied
thrust
on
the
shaft
and
in
turn
on
the
vessel
(MAN
Diesel
&
Turbo
[1]),
producing
a
variable
degree
of
wake
yielding.
This
flow
strain
is
due
to
hull
resistance
(J.M.J.
Journee
and
J.H.C.
Maijers
[5])
as
well
as
the
energy
loss
into
dissipated
turbulence
and
its
value
is
reflected
on
the
slip
ratio
S
(figure
1):
V
S = G
N*p
The
slip
ratio
is
based
on
the
actual
vessel
transporting
speed
(VG),
with
which
vessel
moves
from
one
position
to
the
other
(GPS
speed).
Vessel
navigating
speed
may
be
different
from
its
transporting
one,
since
water
current
tends
to
alter
vessel's
position.
Thus,
S
recapitulates
the
required
load
on
the
propeller
in
order
for
the
vessel
to
maintain
constant
speed
(VG).
Figure
1
Propeller
water
interaction
* DP2 * *VM2
.
(3)
4
and
in
effect
the
thrust
power
transmitted
to
the
accelerated
water
is
given
as:
!"#!"#(!!!)
= !
!
!!! ! ! !!! !!
............................................... (6)
Hence,
for
an
individual
vessel,
the
dimensionless
number
can
be
simplified
to
foc * NCV * (1 S )
..............................................
(7)
PDno =
N 2 *VS
The
bunker
quality
is
built
in
the
PDno
via
the
net
calorific
value
(NCV)
and
counts
for
possible
increase
in
consumption
due
to
quality
of
bunkers
in
use.
Other
combustibility
effects,
which
are
related
to
engine
performance
and
are
not
accounted
for,
can
be
diagnosed
through
the
resulted
effect
on
the
fuel
consumption
and
in
turn,
the
drifting
of
the
value
of
the
PDno
off
its
target.
3.
The
application
A
large
number
of
data
was
extracted
from
the
Neda
Maritime
Agency
fleet
(25
tanker
and
bulk
carrier
vessels)
daily
"noon"
archives,
covering
a
time
period
extending
since
2005.
The
set
of
data
that
is
included
in
the
analysis,
corresponds
to
different
type
and
size
vessels
under
varying
external
conditions
(weather,
current,
wave
formation),
loading
and
trim
state
(laden,
ballast,
even
keel,
trim
by
bow
or
stern).
The
raw
data
underwent
a
coarse
filtering
processing
in
order
for
the
outliers
due
to
erroneous
readings,
incomplete
or
short
voyages
to
be
excluded.
This
way,
the
bias
of
the
mean
value
is
minimized,
allowing
a
more
accurate
representation.
Table
1
summarizes
the
specific
information
on
the
vessels
that
took
part
in
the
analysis.
There
are
four
types
of
vessel
with
respect
to
cargo
handling
and
size,
namely
VLCC
(309-320K
DWT),
AFRAMAX
(105-115K
DWT),
CAPESIZE
(180K
DWT)
and
SUPRAMAX
(57K
DWT).
Table
1
Vessel
characteristic
information
Vessel#
DWT
LxWxD
Engine
Power
N
at
MCR
PDno
1
319,180
332.99x60x30.4
39,900
76
1.33
2
319,319
333x60x30.5
38,706
75.3
1.27
3
319,330
333x60x30.5
38,706
75.3
1.26
4
309,287
333.28x58x31.3
34,650
79
1.11
5
309,020
333.28x58x31.3
36,960
76
1.23
6
115,319
249.99x43.96x21
19,380
105
0.34
7
114,829
249.9x44x21
19,500
89
0.46
4
Ship
Performance
Indicator,
by
Dr.
Panos
Deligiannis
8
9
10
11
105,328
105,328
180,000
57,400
248x43x21
248x43x21
292x45x24.7
190x32.26x18.5
19,100
19,100
25,370
12,900
91
91
91
127
0.45
0.44
0.58
0.15
Over
10,000
records
were
processed
in
order
to
allow
an
accurate
estimation
of
the
mean
PDno
value
for
the
individual
vessel
(table
1).
Figure
1
shows
the
regression
analysis
resulted
linear
relationship
between
PDno
and
Peng/N2 with
correlation
coefficient
close
to
unit.
This
suggests
that
PDno
is
mainly
affected
by
the
size
of
the
engine
and
indirectly,
the
size
of
the
propeller,
as
these
"
%
P
are
two
interrelated
quantities
$ N 3 eng 5 ' (MAN
Diesel
&
Turbo
[1]).
Dp &
#
Figure
1:
PDno
dependency
on
Peng/N2
1.40
1.20
PDno
1.00
R
=
0.99699
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0
Peng/N2
4. The analysis
A
twofold
analysis
is
attempted,
firstly
to
show
that
PDno
fulfills
KPI
requirements
(paragraph
2.1)
and
secondly
to
demonstrate
the
ability
of
the
PDno
to
accurately
predict
fuel
oil
consumption
as
part
of
a
global
performance
monitoring
tool.
Figure
2
shows
a
typical
representation
of
the
historical
values
of
PDno
(vessels#4,5).
These
are
based
on
the
reported
daily
"measured"
fuel
oil
consumption.
The
graph
includes
data
from
the
whole
range
of
power
and
resistance
that
corresponds
to
a
large
variety
of
encountered
weather,
current,
wave
heights,
as
well
as,
draught,
interchanging
between
the
two
extreme
values.
These
values
correspond
to
ballast
and
laden
condition,
which
affect
the
hull
form
drag
force
by
almost
100
percent.
Nevertheless,
a
3-monthly
moving
average
trend-line
indicates
the
tendency
of
the
PDno
to
maintain
constant
value.
Expected
deterioration
of
vessel's
performance
is
depicted
in
the
form
of
oscillation
of
the
trend-
line
between
successive
milestones
due
to
the
drifting
over
time
of
the
PDno
value.
This
is
attributed
to
a
major
alteration
of
the
hydrodynamic
state
of
the
hull-propeller
system
and/or
a
significant
main
engine
performance
variation.
Ship
Performance
Indicator,
by
Dr.
Panos
Deligiannis
5
The
increase
of
the
roughness
of
the
propeller
and
the
hull,
is
part
of
the
unavoidable
evolution
during
normal
vessel's
operation
and
sailing,
and
reflects
on
the
boundary
layer
energy
dissipation
and
in
turn,
the
value
of
PDno.
In
figure
2,
a
prolonged
storage
period
(idle)
of
the
#4
vessel
in
2009
permanently
deteriorated
hull
roughness,
which
required
frequent
in-water
hull
and
propeller
cleaning,
giving
oscillating
character
to
the
trend-line.
On
the
other
hand,
in
figure
2B,
silicone
paint
provides
a
low
roughness
height
coating
that
reduces
the
drag
force
and
therefore,
the
effective
power.
Energy
de-rating,
modification
and
major
overhauling
equally
alter
the
value
of
PDno
through
fuel
consumption
(foc).
Figure
2B
indicates
the
point
where
main
engine
major
modification
in
the
form
of
turbocharger
cut
out
(isolation
of
one
unit)
optimized
the
slow
steaming
performance.
Figure
2:
PDno
historical
data
(vessel
#4)
1.30$
1.25$
1.20$
1.15$
1.10$
1.05$
1.00$
0.95$
0.90$
09/05$ 07/06$ 04/07$ 02/08$ 12/08$ 10/09$ 08/10$ 06/11$ 04/12$ 01/13$ 11/13$
(vessel#5)
1.50$
hull&propeller)
cleaning)
1.45$
1.40$
1.35$
main)engine)
turbocharger)
cut)out)
1.30$
1.25$
1.20$
1.15$
drydocking2)
silicone)
applica4on)
1.10$
09/11$ 12/11$ 04/12$ 07/12$ 10/12$ 01/13$ 05/13$ 08/13$
The
mean
value
of
PDno,
for
each
vessel
of
table
1,
is
used
for
the
calculation
of
the
daily
fuel
oil
consumption,
which
is
then
compared
with
the
corresponding
"measured"
one.
Figure
3
displays
the
data
set
of
vessel
#4
as
a
representative
case
for
the
fleet.
The
main
bulk
of
the
data
points
lies
within
a
narrow
space
surrounding
y=x
line.
The
spread
is
almost
zero
at
the
low
end,
linearly
increasing
towards
the
extreme
consumptions.
This
suggests
constant
percentage
of
error
in
6
Ship
Performance
Indicator,
by
Dr.
Panos
Deligiannis
estimating
foc.
Improving
data
measuring
techniques,
instrumentation,
as
well
as,
crew
awareness
can
minimize
this
error.
Figure
3:
fuel
oil
comparison
120"
calculated"
100"
10%"
80"
60"
40"
20"
0"
0"
20"
40"
60"
measured"
80"
100"
120"
Q-Q
plot
(figure
4)
is
employed
to
provide
a
qualitative
verification
of
the
null
hypothesis
suggesting
that
the
error
in
estimating
fuel
oil
consumption
follows
a
normal
distribution
around
a
mean
value.
This
is
the
case
when
ranked
(ascending)
arrangement
of
the
"measured"
and
"calculated"
values
occupies
the
loci
of
the
y=x
line
(figure
4,
red
line).
It
can
be
seen
that
the
linear
trend-line
passing
through
these
values
shows
perfect
fit
with
a
correlation
coefficient
of
almost
a
unity
and
a
slope
of
the
corresponding
relationship
very
close
to
tan
45o.
Figure
4:
Q-Q
plot:
foc
120"
y"="1.0283x"+"2.0304"
R"="0.9975"
calculated"
100"
80"
60"
40"
20"
0"
0"
20"
40"
60"
80"
100"
120"
measured"
The
corresponding
PDno
probability
density
function
distribution
is
constructed
from
the
data
set
of
figure
4
and
is
shown
in
figure
5.
On
the
right
of
the
mean
lie
the
data
points
for
which
the
foc
is
underestimated
and
on
the
left
the
overestimated
ones.
The
distribution
follows
normal
mode
as
is
also
suggested
by
the
Q-Q
plot,
signifying
the
uniqueness
of
PDno
for
individual
hull-engine
combinations.
Any
other
value
is
symmetrically
located
to
the
left
or
right
of
the
mean
with
frequency
of
occurrence
indicating
a
mostly
unbiased,
random
effect.
Ship
Performance
Indicator,
by
Dr.
Panos
Deligiannis
7
Table
5:
PDno
probability
density
function
10.00#
pdf#
8.00#
6.00#
4.00#
2.00#
0.00#
0.90# 0.95# 1.00# 1.05# 1.10# 1.15# 1.20# 1.25# 1.30#
PDno#
Figures
6
display
three
different
sets
of
data
coming
from
three
individual
vessels
(table
1,
#
1,5,10).
These
graphs
demonstrate
the
negligible
dependency
of
PDno
on
the
main
navigational
parameters
of
the
slip,
fuel
oil
consumption
and
main
engine
power,
even
at
extreme
values.
Figures
6
PDno#independent#of#foc#
2.00#
1.50#
1.00#
0.50#
0.00#
0.00#
20.00#
40.00#
60.00#
PDno#independent#of#Power#
0.80#
0.60#
0.40#
0.20#
0.00#
0.00#
5000.00#
PDno#independent#of#%S#
1.50#
1.00#
0.50#
0.00#
&30.00# &20.00# &10.00# 0.00#
10.00#
20.00#
30.00#
5. Conclusion:
40.00#
Nomenclature:
foc:
Fuel
oil
consumption
rate,
Kg
per
day
NCV:
Net
calorific
value,
MJ/kg
:
Seawater
density,
kg/m3
Dp:
VS:
VM:
VG:
N:
p:
S:
T:
PT:
PC:
PE:
Peng:
L:
B:
D:
Propeller
diameter,
m
Vessel
speed
through
water,
nautical
miles
per
hour
Mean
flow
velocity
through
propeller
disk,
nautical
miles
per
hour
Vessel
transporting
speed
measured
by
the
GPS,
nautical
miles
per
hour
Main
engine
revolution
rate,
s-1
Propeller
pitch,
m
Slip,
vessel's
actual
speed
to
propeller
advance
speed
ratio
Propeller
thrust
force,
N
Thrust
power,
KW
Fuel
oil
input
power,
KW
Effective
towing
power,
KW
Main
engine
maximum
continuous
power,
KW
Vessel
overall
length,
m
Vessel
breath,
m
Vessel
depth,
m
Notation:
MCR:
DWT:
IMO:
"Sailing"
report:
VLCC:
AFRAMAX:
CAPESIZE:
References:
1. Basic
Principles
of
Ship
Propulsion,
MAN
Diesel
&
Turbo
2. Sv.
Aa.
Harvald,
Prediction
of
Power
of
Ships,
Royal
Technical
University
of
Denmark,
Department
of
Ocean
Engineering,
2800
Lyngby,
Denmark
3. Henk
van
den
Boom,
Ivo
van
der
Hout,
Maarteen
Flikkema,
Speed-Power
Performance
of
Ships
during
Trials
and
in
Service,
MARIN,
The
Netherlands,
H.v.d.Boom@MARIN.nl
4. Jack
Devanney,
The
Impact
of
Charter
Party
Speeds
on
CO2
Emissions,
Center
for
Tankship
Excellence,
USA,
djw1@c4tx.org
5. J.M.J
Journee
and
J.H.C.
Maijers,
Ship
Routing
for
Optimum
Performance,
Delft
University
of
Technology,
Ship
Hydromechanics
Laboratory,
Mekelweg
2,
2628
CD
Delft,
The
Netherlands
6. John
E.
Kokarakis,
Vaya
Hatziyanni,
Cpt.
George
Dienis,
Cpt.
George
Vasilakis,
Michael
Adamis,
Contribution
Towards
Determination
of
the
Optimal
Ship
Speed
7. R.L.
Townsin
and
Y.J.
Kwon,
Approximate
Formulae
for
the
Speed
Loss
Due
to
Added
Resistance
in
Wind
and
Waves,
The
Royal
Institution
of
Naval
Architects,
1982
8. INTERTANKO,
Guide
for
a
Tanker
Energy
Efficiency
Management
Plan,
1st
Edition,
December
2009
9. R-J
Kariranta,
Implementation
of
a
Tanker
Energy
Efficiency
Management
Plan
for
a
VLCC,
The
Royal
Institute
of
Naval
Architects,
Design
and
Operation
of
Tankers,
8-9
June
2011,
Athens,
Greece.